Anonymous
10/29/2025, 11:12:41 PM
No.23532172
[Report]
>>23532173
>>23532175
>>23532176
>>23532178
>>23532179
>>23532180
>>23532181
>>23532183
>>23532185
>>23532186
>>23532508
>>23532519
MUH TRADITIONAL MAN
So, I'm all for getting women back onto the "right", but this idea that women should be stay-at-home moms exclusively is abso-fucking-lutely retarded.
Except for a brief, 20-30 year window after World War 2, women both before and after that, largely worked. And I'm not saying they folded laundry, or cooked meals, I mean they had fucking JOBS.
This laughable dream of the right, that women sat at home humming with a baby on one knee and a knitted sweater in the other, is a mythical creation of those on the right who hold the fallacy of the traditional man.
Women were bakers, cooks, maids, nannies, wet mothers, seamstresses, tanners, worked merchant stalls, textiles, mills, brewed, were cooks/chefs (One of the first American cookbooks was written by a woman, Amelia Simmons, American Cookery (1796)), and a whole plethora of other niche jobs and roles within the community as a whole.
Men largely did the hard physical labor, yes, but women were mostly right beside them, also working. The idea of the stay-at-home pampered princess who did nothing but care and cook for the home is an invention of the 20th century for a specific pocket of time. For 99% of human history, it was relegated mostly to the elites, upper class, and upper-middle class who were able to allow this life style, and they constituted less than 10% of the population of their communities.
Except for a brief, 20-30 year window after World War 2, women both before and after that, largely worked. And I'm not saying they folded laundry, or cooked meals, I mean they had fucking JOBS.
This laughable dream of the right, that women sat at home humming with a baby on one knee and a knitted sweater in the other, is a mythical creation of those on the right who hold the fallacy of the traditional man.
Women were bakers, cooks, maids, nannies, wet mothers, seamstresses, tanners, worked merchant stalls, textiles, mills, brewed, were cooks/chefs (One of the first American cookbooks was written by a woman, Amelia Simmons, American Cookery (1796)), and a whole plethora of other niche jobs and roles within the community as a whole.
Men largely did the hard physical labor, yes, but women were mostly right beside them, also working. The idea of the stay-at-home pampered princess who did nothing but care and cook for the home is an invention of the 20th century for a specific pocket of time. For 99% of human history, it was relegated mostly to the elites, upper class, and upper-middle class who were able to allow this life style, and they constituted less than 10% of the population of their communities.