Thread 23561785

How will robot wives impact society?

>>23561785 (OP)
Improve it drastically. We need to destroy women as an idea, kill them all. All we need are their eggs.

>>23561785 (OP)
I am pretty convinced at this point that good things are simply impossible in this reality so i refuse to believe it will happen and if it does it will be twisted and corrupted

Men will achieve reproduction without women by 2035, using stem cell-derived eggs from male cells, fertilized by male sperm, and gestated in artificial wombs. At this point, low-cost female android companions will also be available, causing bio-female value to plummet.

Thus ends the age of the roastie.

>>23561786
Based.

>>23561788
>2035,
There's no artificial womb prototype that's 10 years away from being rolled out.
Expect at least 30 more years.

>>23561788
> 2035
This all already possible today.
Humans are already being cloned.

>>23561790
Except there are. It's just illegal to use them for humans.

>>23561785 (OP)
>How will robot wives impact society?
This is far bigger than that.
If you could just print off infinite 200IQ citizenbots at will, why would you keep importing infinite 60IQ niggers?
Imagine being able to mass produce intelligent, productive, taxable, law abiding populations. Need a territory populated? Print a million. Need workers for your new industrial heartland? Print a million. Need to repopulate conquered territory? Print a million. Need troops to invade somewhere? Print a million.
Humans are going to become a minority.

>>23561793
What would be the point of the people anymore?

The elites will always value themselves, but inferior people are going to have to die off, or else we're all going to die.

>>23561788
Too complex. Better just to have corporate womb rentals. Women are paid by the corporation to have babies and all you need to do is send your sample in via the post.

>>23561792
I'm old. That was 20 years ago and it went nowhere.

>>23561795
>That was 20 years ago and it went nowhere.
Officially

>>23561785 (OP)
The one in the middle is the only sexy one, u artists.

>>23561794
>What would be the point of the people anymore?
That's like saying "what's the point of Poland anymore" when Polish people are outnumbered by everyone else.
Wouldn't American citizenbots be patriotic flag-waving Americans too? Fucking gookbots are taking our circuits!

>>23561785 (OP)
I dunno

>>23561785 (OP)
A robot sophisticated enough to perform human labor by definition becomes a substitute for labor. Due to competition for that labor (demand for such robots), prices will rise relative to wages until a robot wife costs 30+ years of labor for whatever skill level person she replaces.

>>23561785 (OP)
Every man will have a silicon slave in his home that will cook his meals, do his laundry and shit ice cream into his mouth. Men will explore every deviant kink and fetish they can imagine in the privacy of their own home with their sex bot.

The bot will record all of this in 4k and transmit it to the factory. Bootleg robo-porn will explode in popularity, not for it's arousing nature but for it's comedy potential.

>>23561785 (OP)
Artificial wombs will lead to even more feminism because you’ve removed the entire need for them to bear children. It will be an extinction level event for incels. You don’t know how much worse it can get still

>>23561791
Weve had human clones since the 60s and human passing robots since the 80s.

>>23561785 (OP)
>(Your life occurs in this segment)
Fuck you, FUCK YOU, F U C K Y O U

>>23561799
Put the 41-44 in the bag and nobody gets hurt.

>>23561807
That's ok too
>>23561799
NOTICE that while the creator of that webcomic is ultra-liberal, NOT ONE of the Nandroids is a nigger.

>>23561785 (OP)
my grandparents were really hoping for a robot house maid. They wanted someone that would help them do chores and do small talk without all the other bullshit. They hated the people that would show up to check in on them when my parents were busy.

/pol/ is saved

>>23561785 (OP)
We will die before robot wives even become a thing. But if we follow this path of reasoning, there is already a much simpler way to ensure the fullness of reproductive instincts of both genders - creating perfect "spouses" with CRISPR (genetic modifications). Although the idea may seem frightening, in my view, it's not very different from creating robots to be quite honest, humans are just biological robots after all. Whether we like it or not, this technology is probably already being used to create super soldiers in some secret Chinese facility right now.

>>23561953
Not that I necessarily believe this should happen, I'm just saying that based on op's point of view o algo

by putting a psychological swiss army knife for feds and advertising interests in place of what should be the most fulfilling parts of life

>>23561953
>Whether we like it or not, this technology is probably already being used to create super soldiers in some secret Chinese facility right now.
i dunno man
reminds me of cold war psychology, where everyone has to have some new world-ending doomsday weapon as fast as possible, as soon as it's thought of, in case other countries are already doing the same

but yeah that's kind of interesting, and genetically engineered spouses might be more benign than CIA nigger robots

>>23561953
Intelligent robots would just become legal persons and then you couldn't own them.

>>23561977
that do be the wet dream of some technocrats probably
human beings paying dead machines

"i stuck a realistic enough visage on this steam engine, now you have to pay it a $100,000 (which just goes to me, the engineer) per year wage for the energy it generates"

>>23561975
>in case other countries are already doing the same
I have absolutely no doubt that a dictatorship that created a virus that caused a global pandemic isn't researching one of humanity's most powerful weapons, it's just how things are, I guess. But yeah, the idea of creating spouses is at least an interesting hypothesis
>>23561977
It probably would be programmed from the factory to love you, so even if a robot like that had free will, it probably wouldn't be a problem.

>>23561988
>It probably would be programmed from the factory to love you, so even if a robot like that had free will, it probably wouldn't be a problem.
That could work but it depends on what kinds of laws get passed.

>>23561785 (OP)
Is this implying that women should act like robots?

>>23561988
>I have absolutely no doubt that a dictatorship that created a virus that caused a global pandemic isn't researching one of humanity's most powerful weapons, it's just how things are, I guess.
anon, there's no way to know for sure
maybe they don't have the resources or are pursuing some other horrible project
but on the basis of "they MUST be creating this weapon i thought of", you've now put a bunch of resources and time to bring it into the world sooner
you see what i mean?

it's just an interesting philosophical problem, but it doesn't really matter to these posts, and i don't mean to bog you down in it

>>23562002
no
its implying women should get out of the way and let robots take over their role instead

>>23561785 (OP)
Reality is often disappointing.

You guys do realized that these robots will be really expensive to buy and maintain? Most of you fuckers don't even have jobs.

>>23562191
On top of that they also wanna have babies with them lol. I really can’t see the average /pol/ chud going out and working two full time jobs like a 1960s dad to support their 1960s robowife and family. Going to be a lot of starving and malnourished kids in this future. That’s not even mentioning how fucked up thses kids will be growing up with a robot maid/sexbot for a mom and a deadbeat /pol/ chud for a father.

>>23562191
That's like saying cars will be forever unobtainable because the first ones.. or pcs were expensive. A forever butler is 100% worth 60k or something equivilant you're nuts. Even the cheap shitty version we have now is pretty affordable, but to be fair were training it

>>23562234
They worked their butts off but two jobs makes no sense lol, smaller towns means you didnt have to play musical chairs

>>23562242
Learn economics >>23561800

>>23562303
i don't think it would go that way, because what about all the money spent on buying robots as labor substitutes?
that money doesn't just go to the companies and disappear, it's still part of the economy
i don't know what the implications of that would be, but yeah

>>23562301
Yes my grandpa in the 50s and 60s worked two jobs to afford a house payment and support a family of six kids.
Do you have any idea how expensive raising a kid is? The average cost to raise a child in the U.S. is around $29,000 to $30,000 per year, with estimates suggesting it could cost over $300,000 in total from birth to age 18. This figure varies significantly by location, family income, and other factors, and is driven primarily by housing, food, and childcare costs. While yes, raising a child with your robowife in your chudcel gooncave located in your mom’s basement is a frugal lifestyle for a single man it’s not a conducive environment to raising a child. Like be honest to yourself: how different would your life be if you grew up in your dad’s gooncave living with your robosexslave mom in your grandparents basement?

>>23562307
>i don't think it would go that way, because what about all the money spent on buying robots as labor substitutes?
That's because you don't understand scarcity and how economies reach equilibria. Increasing returns to scale only happens over a limited scope. After that you have rivalry for the use of resources. If robots are cheaper than human labor, more robots get made until it's they're at equal benefit:cost relative to their substitutes (human labor).
Pic related illustrates the case for two substitutes.

>>23562361
Women can't raise kids. Single motherhood is a strong indicator for bad outcomes, but single fatherhood isn't.