Thread 60483713

How does this affect fuddies?
Do they think a public audit of smart contracts is gonna entail "Rewards" for Sergey? What's the latest spin?

>>60483713 (OP)
all I see is:
>please dont unstake
>here's another date please dont sell
>have an "insider" LARP with real, meaningless info

chainlink labs doesn't want you to sell

>>60483721
by that logic Visa doesn't want you to sell your link

Just sell and fuck off. There's absolutely no need for you to spin these kinds of scenarios in your demented brain all day long.

>>60483721
whats the insider larp you're claiming to be BUSTING this time?

>>60483721
This

>>60483713 (OP)
Kek baggies

>>60483721
If they doubled the pool it would be filled in a day.

I'm just in the peanut gallery I don't even hold crypto cause I don't believe in it I'm a stocks guy but I do lurk and I will say chainlink gets a surprising amount of hate compared to everything else crypto. It's like the punching bag of the crypto world, kind of like GME baggies in my world. Maybe it's coordination by bad actors who want to suppress the price like the link holders insinuate, but I will say that in GMEs case it really is just that retarded to hold it.

>>60483713 (OP)
>Americlaps who don't know how to use a VPN CAN'T CLAIM
>i-it will all be SHITCOINS
>$200k prize money, PAID FOR BY BAGHOLDERS
Typed it out for them so they don't have to.

>>60484251
thank you for your service, but it's really all their world revolves around. They'll type the same retarded non argument shit cause that's what it's come to.

>>60483721
kek fuddies

>>60484281
It's the only dopamine hits they get to enjoy, however small they might be.

>>60484251
you do realize the issue is not "how" to use a vpn right?

go back the last few weeks and read through some threads


>>60483731
why isn't anyone in the know buying up link token before the alleged big run up if it's so valuable?

by now you have all of these huge entities involved so obviously lots of people with a lot of money are aware of link

>>60484827
>why isn't anyone in the know buying up link token
What, like publicly?

>>60484840
no, like tangibly

>>60484840
public or private, i'm open to any evidence that suggests someone is...typically this would be reflected in the chart

i know trump's sons bought a few mil earlier this year but then it got moved onto an exchange

>>60484847
let the man respond for himself

>>60484861
he did respond, what's your response?

>>60484860
>i know trump's sons bought a few mil earlier this year
Not Trump's sons, a crypto co-founded by Trump himself (and his sons).
And what moved the price was the speculative momentum this generated, not the buy itself.

>>60484873
I'm sorry to interrupt your scripted RP with the resident fudder, but why isn't anyone buying LINK?
thanks

>>60484884
Because you hold it

>>60484892
thankfully I'm not

>>60484873
yeah eric and don jr run the fund hence my comment "trump's sons" lol

your response didn't answer my question. please tell me that wasn't the only arrow in the quiver

>>60484892
yeah I also vote that this >>60484884 specific individual sell all of xim's LINK

>>60484906
lmao whatever you say babe

>>60484909
>your response didn't answer my question
Of course it did. You're just too dumb to understand.

Let me spell it out for you: the crypto project cofounded by Donald J. Trump (and sons) bought millions worth of Link, but what pumped the price was not really the buy, but rather the speculative impact on the wider market.

>>60484935
thanks love

>>60484935
>Of course it did. You're just too dumb to understand.

what the fuck hahaha what an insane response
i am the one who brought up trump buying. there was nothing "smart" or "dumb" about that, it's literally just something that happened

that last sentence was especially out of left field and it looks like it was copy pasted from ai


but lets put the paltry trump purchase aside and try to ask the question in a different way... at this juncture in 2025, chainlink is well known all over the world, including huge corps like visa and some of the world's largest banks. they also have millions of followers online and are connected to dtcc and swift

so...think about the wide net of people who know about link, many of whom must have a lot of money. if link is such a guaranteed 50-100x, why aren't they buying it?

>>60484935
also interested in your thoughts on trump's other purchases in the world liberty wallet

were you aware they had a few million more in tron coin than link? should we assume they value tron higher than link?

if not, why?

>>60484987
>why aren't they buying it?
People don't tend to broadcast private buys, do they?

The only reason to disclose such buys publicly is if they're buying in an official capacity, which is extremely rare for all cryptos except the ETF ones.

Blah blah blah...Price....? Chart????

>>60484827
Wait.. you really think they aren't? Maybe check the whale stats on a metric website, but I'll help you out with more >>60484847 evidence

>>60485426
And there's more where that came from. You guys really think that /biz/-fudding works on the big boys? lmao cute

>>60484987
maybe cause these people are still buying. thankfully for them, their "millions of tech-illiterate followers" haven't caught up to them in terms of understanding what each digital shitcoin does. Mine is being used by those big corpos. And someone is quietly buying each of Sergey's dumps. Someone is absorbing, there's a floor or two. A combination of factors is keeping the price low and someone is eating that shit up. Do you think the average bizraeli is still DCA'ing into CL?
I'm sure you've been a victim of the FUD and I'm sorry, maybe grab a suicide stack of like 100, it might be pricier than a rope and chair but you'll be thankful if the dudes in my screenshot are smarter than you are right now.

>>60485426
>>60485437
>>60485489
are you 12? almost none of the txs you're showing are people buying and accumulating, it's literally internal exchange transfers from hot wallet to hot wallet you absolute imbecile
if anything, a couple of txs are from binance/coinbase deposit accounts to hot wallets, meaning those are most likely sells
what a fucking retard

>>60485426
What website is that, anon?

>>60485642
I like the token

>>60485642
I'm literally giving you wallet addresses and you somehow still fumble it. Are you sure you aren't a retard?
>are you 12?
And what kind of insult is this lol. Sounds like you aren't old enough to post here lil zoomie, you have to go back.

>>60485689
literally all of the identifiable addresses are sending LINK TO hot wallets you drooling mongoloid
>>60485653
>retard can't into blockchain explorers
what the FUCK happened to this board, are all the smart posters gone for good?

>>60485701
I just like the look and layout of that one in particular. If you're not going to help, shut the fuck up and mind your own business.

>>60485701
Child, calm your tits. You are wrong. Take a deep fucking breath and try to coordinate your squinty porn-filled eyes for 10 seconds, actually just try, it might take longer for a brainlet like you. Just fucking TRY to track the BIG NUMBERS and where they GO (cold, hot, private) and then trace back which address is doing the trades. You can do it. I believe in your infantile brain.
Dad and Mom will be proud if you accomplish this, I mean it.

>>60485653
Arkham

>>60485729
>Arkham
Thank you, anon.

>>60485426
who's wallet is this?

>>60485437
>You guys really think that /biz/-fudding works on the big boys?

uhh what? i don't recall saying that
obviously posts here don't move the market

>>60485489
>maybe cause these people are still buying

yeah that's one theory but i've heard that for years now and doesn't seem likely
it's not like these are the kind of people that need another paycheck to buy something

> And someone is quietly buying each of Sergey's dumps

how do you know that's not one of the original founders buying to keep price propped up? they all have to be worth hundreds of millions

>you'll be thankful if the dudes in my screenshot are smarter than you are right now.

they probably are smarter but doesn't mean they're making good moves. that james wynn dude just blew like 80m on futures bets lol

also, given that world liberty owns more tron than link, are we conceding tron is a more valuable coin?

if you're using the trumps to substantiate the conviction in link, then i think you'd have to make this concession

>>60485018
>People don't tend to broadcast private buys, do they?

they aren't required to but people sure as hell do they in crypto all the time. very easy way to pump something you own when you have a following

there must have been a thousand posts when the trumps bought link trying to pump the price

>>60486043
>who's wallet is this?
that's the point isn't it? it's not like it's PAXG, we don't count those guys with 1M Linkies in their wallet

>yeah that's one theory but i've heard that for years now and doesn't seem likely
>it's not like these are the kind of people that need another paycheck to buy something
sorry what? Are you aware of how markets work? Do you think you can just input how many tokens you need and multiply by current price? I don't understand the question

>how do you know that's not one of the original founders buying to keep price propped up? they all have to be worth hundreds of millions
Maybe? I guess that could be the case? The original founders are not secret entities my dude and the CL Labs wallets are known, so I don't know where you are getting at. The team is selling tokens to themselves? Is that something you want me to explain?

Also james wynn would be the opposite of what we are talking about, as he is doing all this, very publicly, very loudly, and he is being an overall retard, probably for the clout or because he already has other('s) accounts doing the profit making out of his circus show.

>>60485642
>>60485701
if nobodys buying chainlink why are any exchange wallets moving link around for any reason

>>60485437
>You guys really think that /biz/-fudding works on the big boys
i really dont understand why they bother still and in this intensity
/biz/ aint moving no market anymore, /biz/ is dead and not reaching any new people anymore who are too poor anyways to matter
what is the point of all of this, someone clearly thinks its worth money to keep at it

>>60484216
i make fun of deluded linkies from time to time. it's funny

>>60486499
True, combine it with the fact that /biz/ was the place where Chainlink was shilled at the ICO level and SOME, I REPEAT, SOME of the anons here, who didn't have enough money for the offering floor amount, pooled their ETH together to grab a bag.
Also a big part of the LINK community has been stemming from /biz/. You can look it up yourself. Most CL news at the time were circulating HERE first, then a community discord was funded and was GIVEN to a Chainlink Dev later and then it started popping up on reddit, where it was meant with crazy FUDing by the marines that wanted to accumulate. The timeline is really easy for me to follow, since I've been here from the start, but enough spoon-feeding.

>>60486232
exchanges frequently change seed phrases for security

>>60483713 (OP)
americans, canadians cant redeem without breaking ToS. lol lmao

Here, Linkies
Your eternal reward from Sergey

>>60487024
- its strictly prohibited, they can block you from accessing the interface if use VPN. stay safe linkbros

>>60486755
missing the point i know all of that, but this was the past and i do think most of us bough our bags in 2018-19 not at the ico but i digress
back then the deranged fudding would have made sense to stop biz from creating the meme potential in the first place, however that didnt happen as we all know the meming won

what i am wondering is why do they keep it up right now in this year, well anything past 2022 at least
right now biz is dead so why bother fudding a dead place that isnt attracting new people anymore, doesnt move a market and isnt creating viral meming

>>60487034
What does tf2 have to do with chainlink?

>>60487127
pressure ogs to sell. simple as

>>60487127
This >>60487267 but
>why?
Because this shit wasn't ready to handle TradFi in 2022. All those PILOTS AND POC'S need to happen, whether some fag memes it or not.
Chainlink wasn't ready and the price is being kept low. Regulation is coming, banks are finalizing their PILOTS after doing POCs.
Mystery solved

>>60487267
OGS WILL NEVER SELL. THEY'D RATHER HOLD TO 0 THAN POTENTIALLY SELL TOO EARLY AND MISS THE ROCKET SHIP

>>60483713 (OP)
>>60483731
wow, that's cool. really cool.
but, oh, chart? oh, and, price?

>>60485642
>>60485701
Did you figure it out yet son?

>>60487363
>Because this shit wasn't ready to handle TradFi in 2022. All those PILOTS AND POC'S need to happen, whether some fag memes it or not.
>Chainlink wasn't ready and the price is being kept low. Regulation is coming, banks are finalizing their PILOTS after doing POCs.
>Mystery solved
so then sergey lied when he said staking and CCIP was ready to ship. i literally bag held that cycle because of this and i will continue to shit on that fat ass for making my life hell

>>60489562
>sergey lied when he said staking and CCIP was ready to ship
He shipped both years ago, what the fuck are you talking about.

>>60489567
>He shipped both years ago, what the fuck are you talking about.
no he didnt you stupid nu fag. Where hte fuck do you think "sergey lied people died" meme came from

>>60489577
>Where hte fuck do you think "sergey lied people died" meme came from
From you.
You're literally the only person on earth pushing this narrative.

>>60489617
I saved this image on the 8th of December 2017

This is not a new narrative. Remember his blockchain mail app he bailed on?

>>60489643
We were talking about the "Sergey lied in his January 1, 2022 address".

>>60489562
>>60489577
What are you on about? Do you just wanna blame someone for the previous market cycle decisions you made?
That's alright, I guess. But you have nothing of value to add to this thread, so let's agree that you're a butthurt kiddo.
I made the thread to speculate on what this audit might be about, but that fell right off, so it became a spoon-feeding thread. Now you are just admitting you just wanna vent.
Ok. Let it all out.

>eats link, linkies and Sergey fat ass too

Sorry linktards. Your coin never meant to make it and you got scammed by Sergey.

https://x.com/minima_global/status/1932424092075888797?s=46&t=P0x4bIVYfSYUs5qgGSODiw

>>60489753
I don't think financial institutions care about your albanian solution man

>>60489567
staking is by no means "shipped", I suggest you read the WP 2.0, specifically the part about super linear staking

>>60487267
this, imagine you get an og to sell 1k or even 10k link. Every links future value if it really does go to 500 or even 1k is well worth any indian fud wage

>>60489858
kek well it didn't launch fully developed. Nothing ever does, especially software.
Are you retarded? Legit question.

>>60489846
VolvoSiemens and Zeekr do. Linkies really are the worst baggies of all crypto space
Minima solved link oracle problem in, what, 6 months?

>>60489974
>not banks
How did you verify they solved it?

>>60489867
you're brown and poor because you invested into a globohomo shitcoin

>>60489546
yes, I figured out that you're a paid shill full of shit unironically
all of the BIG NUMBERS end up on exchange wallets, like I said

>>60487267
NEVER HAPPENING.
>>60487752
CORRECT. I would just buy more if the price ever went to $1 again

>>60486142
>Are you aware of how markets work?

are you? price stays low when there's less demand
also the team has hundreds of millions of coins to sell


> The original founders are not secret entities my dude and the CL Labs wallets are known

come on dude don't be obtuse
obviously they could have other wallets

>Also james wynn would be the opposite of what we are talking about, as he is doing all this, very publicly, very loudly, and he is being an overall retard

agree w that but the only reason i brought him up was to show that a "whale" doesn't mean someone is making good moves or has some secret knowledge
aka that wallet you showed above could just be some degen

>>60486499
>>60487127

posts on this board don't move the market
you lose credibility when you insinuate as such

>>60487363
>Chainlink wasn't ready and the price is being kept low.

explain to me how this makes sense
what is the advantage of the link token price being held down? aren't link services priced in USD, aka if they facilitate a $1m transaction, their fee is x% of it?

>>60489867
AGAIN, I REPEAT. OGS ARE NEVER SELLING. THEY'LL RIDE THIS THING DOWN TO 0, STILL BELIEVING IN THE PROJECT. FUDSTERS WHO ARE FUDDING IN ATTEMPTS TO GET OGS TO SELL ARE WASTING THEIR TIME. ITS A FOOLS ERRAND

>>60489888
>kek well it didn't launch fully developed. Nothing ever does, especially software

a little disingenuous there using "fully developed", more like barely developed and a shell of the ideas laid out on their blog
and sure in software the initial version is not the final, but it should still be a good working product

when amazon launched, you could go to the website and buy books
when uber app launched, you could download the app and get a ride

when chainlink launches something, it typically means it's doing another test with select partners, and/or one small limited aspect of it is available, but the rest of it doesn't really exist yet
take svr for example, which was "launched" in march but has done $9k in revenue
the products are perpetually in idea stage

also is no one going to answer the tron question? >>60486094

>>60490152
>more like barely developed
Link staking is technically exactly as developed as Solana staking for instance. And Solana's staking is more than five years old.
And it was always more technically developed than ETH's 3-year staking lockup debacle.

You're actually clinically retarded.

>>60490172
imagine defending staking v.000002 in 2017+8
42 is rolling on his grave now

>>60490179
There isn't a coin with a higher market value that has more technically accomplished staking than Link.
The only exception is ETH, which started its staking journey with nearly 3 years of complete lockdown after half a dozen delays.

All the rest either has similarly developed staking (Solana), or no staking at all.

>>60490192
that doesn't make LINK's staking less of a vaporware

>>60489986
Don’t throw at me rhetorical bullshit Jordan Peterson style. Check for your self, read and dig, fucking nerd.

>>60490213
By that logic every single instance of crypto staking is vaporware.

>>60490217
So you made it up. You have no idea if they actually solved it (most likely didnt, considering their pajeet team of nobodies)

>>60490220
glad we could agree that Chainlink's staking is actual vaporware

>>60490244
>Chainlink bad because crypto bad
kek

Sergey shipped Link staking, and from the very start it was 10x more advanced, functional, and transparent than ETH's staking launch.

>>60483713 (OP)
You can tell this guy is a bottom and running from real problems in his life. Spends all day every day for literal years searching for link articles to post on /biz. The ones who engage with him are no better.

>>60490257
no, chainlink bad because it is quite literally vaporware

>>60490287
>chainlink bad because it is quite literally vaporware
By your logic.
The same logic that makes all of crypto vaporware.

>>60490295
great, that is irrelevant to the fact that Chainlink itself is vaporware

>>60490302
>the entirety of crypto is irrelevant
fucking lol

>>60490317
I accept your concession

>>60490192
>started its staking journey with nearly 3 years of complete lockdown after half a dozen delays
remember when CLL tried to pull this when they announced staking and then immediately backtracked when they realized linkies are ever so slightly less retarded than mETHheads?

pepperidge farm remembers

>>60490340
Even then it was 2 years at the most. ETH's was nearly 3 years, and ETH's lockdown marathon was the result of a list of delays.

>>60490257
WHO CARES? ETH MINTED MILLIONAIRES WITHIN 3 YEARS. ITS GOING ON 8 YEARS NOW AND CHAINLINK BAGHOLDERS ARE LIVING IN THE SUBWAYS THEY'RE SO POOR. WHY DO YOU THINK CHAINLINK IS ADVERTISING IN TRANSIT SYSTEMS AFTER ALL?

>>60483713 (OP)
latest spin is linkies unironically jumping around with joy as link avoids dumping down to $12 for another day. just bought another 1k of snibbu today btw, how much link are you holding?

>>60491671
>Link can't pump because staking bad
>also ETH pumped even when it didn't even have staking

So you're saying staking doesn't matter for price action, got it.

>>60493214
kek
the latest cope is that ETH doesn't have staking therefore LINK should pump
the absolute state of baggie mental gymnastics

>>60493664
No, the fud is that Link can't pump because Link staking bad.

>>60490179
42 was an annoying newfag

>>60490328
It is your only remaining FUD point, that a 2T market is vapourware? GJ fudsissies kek

>>60490179
>on
In English we say "rolling in his grave"

>>60493672
that's not fud, that's true

>>60493746
It's a complete and utter lie.
Bitcoin, ETH, XRP, Solana, BNB, Doge, Tron, ADA, ... pumped into the top 10 even though their staking is either nonexistent or exactly the same as Link's.

>>60493755
yes, but Chainlink's staking is vaporware, regardless of poompa
that's not fud, that's entirely factual

>>60494378
You said Link can't pump because of its staking system.

>>60484827
>you do realize the issue is not "how" to use a vpn right?
>
>go back the last few weeks and read through some threads

Where I live when I first bought Chainlink, Coinbase was barred from selling crypto to me. Anyone is who too scared of Uncle Sam to go click on a button to claim some shitcoins is ngmi I'm afraid.

>>60494407
>ngmi

says the guy who's down 10x against bitcoin since last cycle
no need to rehash the convo about the vpn, like i said just go back like 2 weeks on read through

also wanted to bump... why is no one responding to this >>60490160
>0