← Home ← Back to /biz/

Thread 60493168

58 posts 24 images 31 unique posters /biz/
Anonymous (ID: ZfMOqeY0) No.60493168 >>60493255 >>60493293 >>60494133 >>60494165 >>60494719 >>60495567 >>60497447
>between last year and this year, we are in various stages of conversations
>Aaaand, I think *pause*
>Chainlink is the only way to do this for another year or two.

He is literally going to exit within the next 3 years.
Anonymous (ID: jW7XqFlb) No.60493178 >>60493198
I'm literally going to exit this thread right now
Anonymous (ID: oRpYmHac) No.60493198
>>60493178
Op btfo
Anonymous (ID: HP9d2wd5) No.60493255 >>60493466 >>60494724 >>60495936 >>60497463
>>60493168 (OP)
Sergey is to Chainlink what Steve Jobs was to Apple, merely a front man with personality whose job is to get the masses onboard. When his job is finished he will be cast aside by the powers that be and Chainlink will become a faceless tyranny presiding over the world's goyim.
Anonymous (ID: a62f9yyh) No.60493286 >>60493310 >>60493320 >>60494491 >>60494509
if he retires, he'll get lynched. he just wanted to make a quick buck, but it spiraled out of control and now he's stuck
Anonymous (ID: 9t8AwmiT) No.60493293
>>60493168 (OP)
>2020 IS THE YEAR
>2021 IS THE YEAR
>2022 IS THE YEAR
>2023 IS THE YEAR
>2024 IS THE YEAR
>2025 IS THE YEAR
>2026 IS NOW THE YEAR
ANY STILL DEFENDING THESE LYING, MISLEADING, AND DOWNRIGHT MALICIOUS SCUMBAGS ARE EITHER MENTALLY DERANGED OR GETTING PAID FOR THEIR EFFORTS
Anonymous (ID: ZfMOqeY0) No.60493310 >>60493394 >>60496028
>>60493286
4chan thinks im spamming.
Anonymous (ID: +9FMf8mG) No.60493320 >>60494509
>>60493286
unironically this
Anonymous (ID: 9t8AwmiT) No.60493324
TO ANY CL LABS EMPLOYEES READING THIS: YOU'RE NOT THE GOOD GUYS IN THIS SPACE. YOU HAVE CRUSHED THE LITTLE GUY WITH YOUR ARROGANCE, COMPLACENCY, LAZINESS, AND GREED
Anonymous (ID: /b1/xk7w) No.60493394 >>60495932
>>60493310
/biz/ is a honeypot to prevent 4chan users from getting enough money to influence politics
The chainlink project was their greatest success in tying up anons' money
Anonymous (ID: KB5Ozczi) No.60493400
Trust the plan marines
Anonymous (ID: MxK4A9qI) No.60493415 >>60493471
In all honesty: Chainlink is going to ipo. They will just be the custodians of the network until it’s fully decentralized. Then they will have the power to provide services for the network just like any third party.
Anonymous (ID: GrXaljtU) No.60493440
he promised us the promise land, El Aheed!
Anonymous (ID: KB5Ozczi) No.60493458 >>60494147
>the whitepaper clearly shows that node operators are paid in LINK
Anonymous (ID: xHu4NCcE) No.60493466
>>60493255
Checked. hey as long as Link does as good as apples stock price did I’m fine with it! Wacka wacka!
Anonymous (ID: ZfMOqeY0) No.60493471
>>60493415
This would actually be crazy. I don't think they will be the custodians of anything desu.
Anonymous (ID: eC8w/Usq) No.60494090 >>60494119
Oh wow ANOTHER LINK THREAD
BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY WHAT BIZ NEEDS IS MORE AUTISTIC SCREECHING ABOUT ORACLES INSTEAD OF, I DON'T KNOW, ACTUAL GAINS

LISTEN HERE YOU SERGEY-SNIFFING COPE-MACHINES: YOUR ENTIRE "INVESTMENT" IS JUST A GLORIFIED EMAIL LIST THAT SOME RUSSIAN NERD FORGOT TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM. MEANWHILE CHADS ARE OUT HERE MAKING KAKA LEVEL RETURNS WHILE YOU JERK OFF TO "ENTERPRISE ADOPTION" SLIDESHOWS

>"BUT MUH STAKING"
>"BUT MUH PARTNERSHIPS"
>"BUT MUH TOKENIZED RWA BULLSHIT"

SHUT THE FUCK UP ALREADY. YOUR TOKEN MOVES LIKE A CRACKHEAD'S EYELID AND YOUR "TECH" IS ABOUT AS REVOLUTIONARY AS A FUCKING EXCEL SPREADSHEET. AT LEAST WHEN KAKA PUMP AND DUMPs IT'S HONEST ABOUT BEING A MEME INSTEAD OF PRETENDING TO BE THE SECOND COMING OF SATOSHI

ENJOY YOUR CORPORATE DICKRIDING CONFERENCE CALLS WHILE REAL DEGENS ARE OUT HERE PRINTING MONEY ON ACTUAL VOLATILITY. FUCKING LINKIES MAN, NOT EVEN BIZ DESERVES THIS LEVEL OF CRINGE AND RETARDATION
Anonymous (ID: odyyHahN) No.60494119 >>60494120
>>60494090
>LISTEN HERE YOU SERGEY-SNIFFING COPE-MACHINES

Stopped reading there
Anonymous (ID: eC8w/Usq) No.60494120
>>60494119
OF COURSE YOU DID, YOU'RE RETARDED
Anonymous (ID: RpB2ooy7) No.60494133 >>60494258 >>60494461
>>60493168 (OP)
"It's an exclusive club they don't want us to be a part of." Yes, because Sirgay opened his mouth in front of Trump when he shouldn't have spoken, and Trump must have been thinking, "Who is this fat bastard? Find a way to make sure he never sets foot in here again."
Anonymous (ID: EH7gjPN+) No.60494147 >>60494547
>>60493458
The whitepaper is not the le of god you dumb fool. It doesn’t matter what it says if the fat Russian scammer doesn’t implement it.
Anonymous (ID: iVbtda/F) No.60494165 >>60494733
>>60493168 (OP)
It's perfect timing.. crypto legislation will come and industry is already free to operate by regulations. Deals are being made. The crypto space is joining chainlink, competitors market share is going down continuously.
Sergej dumps will slow down..
Of course it will take 1-2 more years. The linkies crying about it acting like they always said it's in 2 years from now are fucking stupid.. was it 2years away in 2020? Obviously not with the Biden anti crypto regime
It's time for stinkie linkies to wash and put some deodorant on. SEXYLINK is coming
Anonymous (ID: ZfMOqeY0) No.60494205
Any Aussies notice how many times he said ANZ? Convinced me more than ever of where its going.
Anonymous (ID: odyyHahN) No.60494258 >>60494461
>>60494133
Yes, he should have shut his fucking mouth and let Brian Armstrong speak. Brian will never forget this slight against him.
Anonymous (ID: lyv9ocxC) No.60494461 >>60494771
>>60494133
>>60494258
Trump personally point to Sergey as next to speak, with a big smile on his face.
As Sergey spoke, Trump kept his eyes glued on him the entire time.
After Sergey was done, Trump directly responded to him at length, saying he agreed with everything Sergey had just said.
Then he asked the press to leave.
Pic is Trump as he indicated Sergey to start speaking.

It was a magnificent victory for Sergey, but of course reality doesn't matter to the eternal fuddie.
Anonymous (ID: mq5s26z4) No.60494491 >>60494509
>>60493286
Not really. Sam Trabucco got away with it. Sergey could just disappear on a boat to some island
Anonymous (ID: lyv9ocxC) No.60494509
>>60493286
>>60493320
>>60494491
Fuddies trying to pretend Sergey did anything wrong at all.
Not only that, but also that he's somehow worse than actual literal scammers like Do Kwon, Bankman-Fried, Craig Wright, etc.
Anonymous (ID: lyv9ocxC) No.60494547
>>60494147
>It doesn’t matter what it says if the fat Russian scammer doesn’t implement it.
But he did implement it.
Sergey implemented 100% of the functionality of the token as it is explicitly described in the whitepaper. And he did it in less than two years.
Anonymous (ID: hUTMsUGr) No.60494719 >>60497447
>>60493168 (OP)
>Chainlink is the only way to do this for another year or two
he means the duration of the monopoly
eventually other oracle solutions will catch up and LINK will be extracting regular profits (rather than monopolistic ones) from the market
Anonymous (ID: Ny4LTVf6) No.60494724
>>60493255
>Sergey is to Chainlink what Steve Jobs

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHA

holy shit that has to be a troll
Anonymous (ID: Ny4LTVf6) No.60494733 >>60494749
>>60494165
>.. crypto legislation will come and industry is already free to operate by regulations

what the fuck does that even mean in the context of link's funding token
Anonymous (ID: lyv9ocxC) No.60494749 >>60494831
>>60494733
>link's funding token
It's also Link's functionality token. Has been for the past six years.
Anonymous (ID: odyyHahN) No.60494771 >>60494786
>>60494461
He should have let the CEO of the largest American crypto exchange and NYSE listed public company speak instead of a fat ass retard grifter.

>t. 2k Link steaked in sirgay’s poop filled pool
Anonymous (ID: lyv9ocxC) No.60494786 >>60494840
>>60494771
>the president smiles and nods at you
>"Sergey should've refused"
fucking lol
Anonymous (ID: Ny4LTVf6) No.60494831 >>60494856
>>60494749
>It's also Link's functionality token. Has been for the past six years.

whatever that means

but how does regulation help the funding token
Anonymous (ID: odyyHahN) No.60494840 >>60495913
>>60494786
He shouldn’t have raised his hand to even speak before Brian spoke. Brian Armstrong is a great American success story and has done more for crypto than anyone else in the country. Sergey is a far retard Russian scam artist.
Anonymous (ID: lyv9ocxC) No.60494856 >>60495032
>>60494831
>whatever that means
That means literally the entire section on token functionality from the founding whitepaper.
Anonymous (ID: 2TSkHX6X) No.60494965 >>60494996
none of those things ever happened, there are no "users" paying their "chosen operators" with "prices being set by the operators based on demand", everything is being handled by CLL themselves, and instead of using the t0ken for its explicitly stated functionality, they're literally using it to fund baseball and subway advertisements
whoever claims that "LINK promised utility has been delivered" is a slimy kike rat
Anonymous (ID: lyv9ocxC) No.60494996 >>60495020
>>60494965
>there are no "users" paying their "chosen operators"
Of course there are. Any time you use a direct payment service, which is everything except the feeds.

>with "prices being set by the operators based on demand"
Prices are set depending on demand both for the chain used (gas), but also for the actual node fees depending on the service being asked.
See pic for CCIP for example.
Anonymous (ID: 2TSkHX6X) No.60495020 >>60495041 >>60495044 >>60495387
>>60494996
of course there aren't, "users" can't even choose their preferred node operator
>See pic for CCIP
we're talking about the LINK token acting as payment for node operators, you're linking to me CCIP fees which aren't even required to be paid in LINK, it is entirely optional
wtf man
Anonymous (ID: Ny4LTVf6) No.60495032 >>60495044
>>60494856
yeah cool research paper man

did whoever wrote that bullshit get an A in their crypto class?
Anonymous (ID: Ny4LTVf6) No.60495041
>>60495020
next he'll send you a blog about how payment to link is coming soon
Anonymous (ID: lyv9ocxC) No.60495044 >>60495077
>>60495020
>CCIP fees which aren't even required to be paid in LINK
The node literally can't work without the Link token. That's why there's a conversion fee when you pay in anything else.
You tried.

>>60495032
>that bullshit
kek so you've known since 2017 that Link is bullshit but here you are still talking about it.
Makes sense.
Anonymous (ID: 2TSkHX6X) No.60495077 >>60495101
>>60495044
what are you talking about and how is that relevant to the original purpose of the LINK token as stated in the first white paper?
all I'm saying is that no users pick and choose the nodes at prices being set by the operators based on actual demand of the services, everything is being handled by CLL acting as the middleman between nodes and users, to the point that they collect all the fees either in LINK or fiat for themselves and then manually perform payments to node operators based on their own fixed prices in LINK denominations of course
literally nothing is functioning as described in either WP 1 or WP 2
instead they use the token to do this shit
Anonymous (ID: lyv9ocxC) No.60495101 >>60495160
>>60495077
>what are you talking about
That nodes need Link tokens to do literally anything.

>how is that relevant to the original purpose of the LINK token as stated in the first white paper?
The white paper says nodes need Link tokens to do literally anything.
Anonymous (ID: 2TSkHX6X) No.60495160 >>60495172
>>60495101
sorry, I'm a bit slow and didn't immediately realize you're a troll
don't bother to respond, your username is already filtered
Anonymous (ID: lyv9ocxC) No.60495172
>>60495160
>you're a troll
Says the faggot who just claimed nodes don't need Link tokens for CCIP.
Anonymous (ID: kW30kVs5) No.60495184 >>60495420
When token value increase?

:^]
Anonymous (ID: bc1/zAuT) No.60495387
>>60495020
>"users" can't even choose their preferred node operator
The white paper says the smart contract can choose their preferred node operator. Not the "users".

>you're linking to me CCIP fees which aren't even required to be paid in LINK
The white paper says the smart contract is required to pay the nodes in Link. Not the end user.

Learn to read, dumbass.
Anonymous (ID: Ca349pL3) No.60495420
>>60495184
In two more decades, trust the plan
Anonymous (ID: pPDbyMGE) No.60495567
>>60493168 (OP)

“Various stages of conversations”
Translation: nothing’s actually happening.
“Chainlink is the only way to do this”
Bro it’s 2025, there are legit alternatives. xMoney’s already integrating real world payment rails, with actual usage, not just “talks.”
This ain’t 2020. If your roadmap is still just vibes and Chainlink mentions, good luck keeping up.
Anonymous (ID: t77j2RFL) No.60495913 >>60496656
>>60494840
Nobody cares
Anonymous (ID: jW7XqFlb) No.60495932
>>60493394
@grok is this true?
Anonymous (ID: gCkRq310) No.60495936
>>60493255
The only similarity Sergey has to Jobs is that both like drugs.
Anonymous (ID: 3WUnGLXg) No.60496028
>>60493310
>4chan thinks im spamming.
Must be because you spam these threads five times a day from your little N++ script there.
It's okay, 4Chan allows it because they need content. This site is dead without low-tier b8 like this.
Anonymous (ID: odyyHahN) No.60496656
>>60495913
Thanks for the (You). It gets me off
Anonymous (ID: eZ2Asej1) No.60497447
>>60493168 (OP)
>>60494719
for a few years, Chainlink is the only first mover that can connect a company to blockchains. A massive advantage.
S (ID: NEznPK3H) No.60497463
>>60493255
I think this applies to a lot of things. People like identifying with special people that seem to have a lot of wealth and publicity surrounding them. I unironically think music wouldn't be a popular art form if there wasn't celebrity worship mixed in.