that most of you can't stomach

I think you forgot the first 60 posts

don't be too hard on yourselves tho

>>60494891
good call

ITS ABOUT TIME MORE PEOPLE ARE WAKING UP TO THE CL LABS HUSTLE.
UNIRONICALLY ID FEEL BETTER ABOUT THE PROJECT IF IT WAS STEVE, SERGEY, AND THOMAS WORKING OUT OF A NAIL SALON

chainlink knew exactly how to market to the losers here

you play on their intellectual superiority complex, tell them they're in on a secret

in retrospect it was hilarious, and most have woken up
but even funnier is seeing the remaining cult attempted to mimic the feigned arrogance of the original shills
but they're so dumb they can't even put into their own words what they're shilling

Yawn...

We've arrived at the point of FUD that they concede that link is probably one the most important protocols in the space but that it will NEVER relate to a price increase in link even if it is implicitly mentioned in the whitepaper and documentation as collateral and transaction mode

I repeat, Links price according to fudders WILL NEVER benefit from CLLs success

>>60494899
Lmao what a fucking loser

>>60494954
>>60494930

truth hurts doesnt it

>>60494944
>FUD

you mean reality?

>whitepaper

hahahahahahahah look at this kid

you still leave teeth out for the fairy

>>60494964
So youre doing this because youre worried about me? You want me to sell?

it's been great this year to see the awareness spread on this scam

those posts only used to get a few hundred views, not they're all hitting thousands, many 5 figures and only growing

>>60494988
what is "this"? you mean discussing crypto on a crypto board


>You want me to sell?
i dont know who you are, do what you feel buddy. you're paltry holdings dont matter

>>60494882 (OP)
NOT SELLING

>>60494958
Cope and dilate my Linkys stay super stinky

>>60494988
checked
personally I'd like you to shut the fuck up until LINK hits at least $100 (doubt), then you can spam and gloat as much as you want

>>60494988
No
We want you to remember this day when Chainlink Labs has dumped their final token and announces an IPO as well as ways to stake alternate tokens on the Chainlink network
We will show you this thread and laugh at you

>>60494882 (OP)
Imagine buying Amazon or Apple merch and thinking you're a literal investor on them.

Retarded, no? When you buy LINK you're doing the same.

>>60494882 (OP)
The real truth. ETH, LINK, SUI, SOL, BASE, and most of all the projects follow BTC.
>BTC every time
>BTC

>>60494882 (OP)
Kek baggies. Just so you know, I won't read any follow up to this post but you will regret holding LINK in the years to come as you slowly lose all faith, I hope you remember this post, you are going to continue to be dumped on and you will miss the real opportunities to make life changing, generational wealth, you could sell now and position yourself in the most obvious plays and secure your future, but you won't and I'm happy you won't, because fuck you all that's why LMAO. Sorry, everything personal faggot STINKies, this is what you deserve for being the most insufferable bunch of nigger brained retards in the crypto space by far for the last 7 years+. Eat shit.

>>60494944
>I repeat, Links price according to fudders WILL NEVER benefit from CLLs success
correct
you were conned
smart conned, if you will

GOD I LOVED SEEING THAT IMBECILE FISHY GET PUT IN HIS PLACE. HE'S THE MOST INSUFFERABLE OF ALL THE PAID SHILLS

My god, the fud quality really arrived in the gutter

>>60495005
>what is "this"? you mean discussing crypto on a crypto board
nigger you've been making daily twitter screencap dump threads where half the posts are yours the entire year

>>60496067
>The real truth. ETH, LINK, SUI, SOL, BASE, and most of all the projects follow BTC

Link is down against all of these massively

when btc goes up, link gets dragged up just a little bit but not much

just like it's holders, the link coin is so weak and limp, even going up a couple % is a monumental effort

THE Cuckolds of crypto

>>60496177
so you're saying i have like 20 different x accounts, all of which gets tens of thousands of views

>>60496184
it's impossible to make a post on crypto twitter without getting thousands of views and subsequently dozens of replies from bot accounts talking about a great opportunity, so congrats on your views I guess

All this over 7% inflation rate.

Isn't it strange that so many tokens are getting swallowed by the market so easily. It's still in the top 15.

Amazing really when number of wallets holding <1000 LINK is decreasing.

>>60496209
>Amazing really when number of wallets holding <1000 LINK is decreasing.
this is retail coming to its senses

>>60496209
>Amazing really when number of wallets holding <1000 LINK is decreasing.
interesting

fuddie chuddie kiddos are going all out today, good job fellas

>>60496284
look
at
the
price
bitch
we win every day by default

look man I"m not selling OK????????

>>60494882 (OP)
>>60494887
>>60494893
>>60494899
>>60494921
Adem bro you're 34 where are your wife and kids lmao

>>60496184
>i'm an eceleb bro
cool, that might just get you a wife and kids right? kek

>>60494882 (OP)
Lol okay.
I know something no one else knows about "the team" and their funding situation which makes me laugh every time I see this bullshit.
>>60494887
Would be completely verifiable on the blockchain.
The number of times i've seen this "Sergey dumping 700k tokens" joke, with no etherscan receipts to back it up, fucking hilarious.
>>60494899
>weaponised dilution tool
Sounds like somebody lost their money being a retard.
Anyway, i hope he gets sued for slander.

>>60496112
>smartcontract.com
>ICO tokens distributed manually

It was obvious from the start

>>60496292
>win
no one wins in your case, not even you
the based chuddie kiddos on the otherhand...

>>60496364
What do you know?
Is the tribe pulling the strings?

>>60496268
Then who is buying, if not retail?

>>60496397
WHEN THE SHILLS SPENT MONTHS YAMMERING ON ABOUT HOW THE 700K WEEKLY DUMPS TO BINANCE WERE THROUGH AN AUTOMATED SMART CONTRACT
UNITL ONE DAY
>70K TO BINANCE
LOOKY THERE, LOOKS LIKE BIG SERG GOT A LITTLE TOO EXCITED
10 MINUTES LATER
>630K TO BINANCE
MANUALLY DUMPING ON BAGHOLDERS ALL ALONG

>>60496364
Got any cool tidbits to drop?

>>60496364
>The number of times i've seen this "Sergey dumping 700k tokens" joke, with no etherscan receipts to back it up, fucking hilarious.
GO BACK, YOU LITERAL TOPBUYING BAGHOLDER. YOU WOULD THINK THEY WOULD EDUCATE THE SHILLS ON BASIC CL HISTORY. AT LEAST MAKE YOUR LARP BELIEVABLE.

>>60496364
>The number of times i've seen this "Sergey dumping 700k tokens" joke, with no etherscan receipts to back it up, fucking hilarious.

go away nulinkie

>>60494882 (OP)
1 LINK = 1 tokenized human lol

>>60497207
>>60496695
>No receipt faggots

>>60496437
>>60496684
I will not say explicitly but I will tell you that this "wahhh muh 700k linkies dumping! SERGEY IS DUMPING!" is utter bullshit (as if you needed someone to point out that these people are clearly unhinged if they are even really people at the rate which they post this kind of FUD). All you need to know is, they have never had a need to "dump tokens" to generate money for their expenses. This is from a very reliable source, this information is pre-ICO. I'll post it one day, because it's a funny story. This is not a LARP, I don't know what will happen with the price, but I am confident market makers want to put people off acquiring it just like they did with bitcoin.

>>60498537
SHUT THE FUCK UP, NERD. WHAT A LYING SACK OF SHIT

>>60496437
>Is the tribe pulling the strings?
I doubt it, but you never know. It along with "you're buying mark of the beast technology" is just another form of FUD. Greedy people don't want you to have money or the ability to compete with them.
Just use your head, dyor and don't rely upon crypto to stay afloat.

most linkies arent aware link came very close to ath this cycle

they were looking at the price chart instead of the mcap chart

they missed their 2nd chance to sell ath and will wait another 4 years+ to get another

>>60494921
oh he even points this out, kek

>>60498537

Sorry shills, but I'm in too deep.
Maybe you're right, but I rather see my bag go to zero than selling it and letting moon away

>>60498685
MANY SUCH CASES
MARRIED TO THEIR BAGS NO MATTER HOW POORLY THE BAG TREATS THEM. BATTERED BAGHOLDER SYNDROME 101

>>60494882 (OP)
stomached it a long time ago. that's more reason I sold it for supra.

>>60498537
>All you need to know is, they have never had a need to "dump tokens" to generate money for their expenses.


0x959815462eec5fff387a2e8a6871d94323d371de

Here are some Chainlink Team wallet transactions dated from 2023.

>>60494893
Hard capped token limit, so no there is no venezuela style inflation going on
Token emissions are quite normal for a crypto project
But correct that there isnt direct buy pressure from the network, hence we speculate if you wait for that it'll be far too late

In any case i like how the fud moved from link very bad doesnt work pyth better to link great protocol but token emissions

>>60494882 (OP)
>>60494887
>>60494893
>>60494899
>>60494921
> You’re not getting access to Chainlink’s business by holding LINK… You’re just buying a fee token, a voucher

LINK is not equity. It’s a utility token, not a stock. It’s used to pay for oracle services, secure the network through staking, and align economic incentives. That’s how most decentralized protocols work — it’s not supposed to act like a dividend-yielding asset. This is by design, not deception.

You don’t get shares of Amazon by holding AWS credits either. Utility ≠ equity, and Chainlink has been clear about this from the start.

> No burn. No buybacks. No scarcity. Nothing that rewards holders

This is either dishonest or ignorant. Chainlink has implemented staking, which:
• Reduces circulating supply,
• Adds yield (rewards),
• Introduces slashing (risk) to incentivize honest behavior,
• Paves the way for fee-sharing models in the future.

Also, scarcity isn’t just about hard caps. It’s about economic demand. LINK’s growing utility across banks, governments, and DeFi increases demand — that’s how real value accrues.

> They dilute the supply monthly to fund operations and pump hype

Yes, tokens are released — transparently, according to a multi-year unlock schedule. No rug pulls. Chainlink’s team is building real global infrastructure. That requires funding.

The real question: Would you rather the team not fund operations and stop building?

And those “dilutions”?
• LINK still has one of the lowest inflation rates among top utility tokens.
• A portion of those tokens are staked, locked, or held long-term.

>>60494882 (OP)
buy BTC, simple as.

>>60499627
> They time announcements, long LINK, and dump on retail

This is pure conspiracy theory — no evidence, only correlation ≠ causation.
Markets react to news. Volatility is normal in crypto. If you’re over-leveraged, that’s a trader problem, not a Chainlink problem.

Also: Chainlink has released major updates during bear markets, including CCIP, staking v0.1/v0.2, and partnerships with Swift, ANZ, DTCC, etc. That’s not hype-pumping — it’s long-term delivery.

> The price didn’t rise because the supply exploded. It’s a liquidity extraction machine.

The price didn’t rise yet because of:
• Market-wide consolidation.
• LINK’s role as infrastructure (slow adoption, then sudden).
• Smart money accumulating while retail panics.

This isn’t a liquidity extraction machine — it’s a long-term rails play. Just like HTTP or TCP/IP didn’t make millionaires overnight. Chainlink is foundational infrastructure being embedded in banks, markets, and smart contract systems now.

> Chainlink is legit tech but LINK is a scam

This is contradictory. If Chainlink is critical infrastructure, then its native token — used for securing, operating, and paying for that system — can’t be a scam.
• LINK enables trust-minimized data feeds.
• LINK will be the only way to interact with Chainlink’s secure oracle layer.
• LINK staking underpins the reputation and economic security of the protocol.

>>60499640
OPs posts reads like someone who traded emotionally, lost money, and is now bitter. That’s understandable — but it’s not Chainlink’s fault. It’s a reflection of poor strategy, not poor fundamentals.

Chainlink’s vision is decade-long. The people who win aren’t the ones chasing daily pumps — they’re the ones who understand the tech, and the roadmap

If you were looking for a short-term meme coin pump, LINK was never for you. But if you understand the value of decentralized data, financial infrastructure, and secure middleware for the global economy — you’ll understand why LINK is designed the way it is.

And here’s what the FUDders don’t get: we’re not early-stage anymore — we’re in the rollout phase. Chainlink’s tech is already integrated with Swift, DTCC, ANZ, Euroclear, Vodafone, major banks, and tokenized asset pilots across the globe. CCIP is live. Staking is live. The foundation is laid. We are watching the global financial plumbing shift in real time — and Chainlink is positioning itself as the default interoperability layer for all of it. While short-term thinkers whine about tokenomics, long-term builders and institutions are locking in the infrastructure of the next financial era. If you walk away now, you’re not exiting a scam — you’re exiting just before the actual utility phase begins.

>>60499603
>there isnt direct buy pressure from the network
Which is also quite normal for a crypto project.

Bitcoin, Solana, XRP, ... basically run for free because of the inflationary miner subsidies. Same with ETH before PoS.

>>60499640
you aren't being honest about the situation.

what chainlink labs currently offers is "cool tech"
this cool tech works. awesome. the tech is open source code and running it isn't particularly resource intensive

you could spin up a node and start delivering data. no one would subscribe. no one would pay. worse, no one would use it for free. There would be no incentive for a node not in Chainlink™'s whitelist to report correct data vs the reward of gaming any protocol relying on that data.

The value of the Chainlink™ network is currently captured by the friction of "just trust me bro". You have to be on a list to run a node. You have to be vetted and known. Chainlink wouldn't work to deliver truth if anyone could spin up a node

The promise of chainlink from the beginning has been that truth can be delivered without the friction of that social trust. The original proposal to deliver this involved cryptoeconomic incentives.

Exploring this unknown and untested frontier is the reason linkies hold
just six more years

>>60499640
>>60499676
thanks for the reassurance chatgpt, very bullish

>>60498537
Well i couldnt say about the early days but anyone with a brain know cll is self funding since 2021 due to their direct deals
All of the you are paying the hr roastie posts were always bullshit, as outlined the tokens are used to subsidize the network
I had hoped it would move to money making already but it is what it is, all premines would be dumped eventually anyway so a steady known emission is probably best

>>60499696
Of course never implied it was
Dont get started on the scam that is solana
Its quite funny that the twitter retard called cll the worst tokenomics in the space when meme coins exist or even looking at supposed legit projects like solana its a burning vc thrash pile
Cll has one of the most solid tokenomics due to the hard cap as it actually stands
Many other projects have innate terra luna style blow up potential, not link tho

good morning

>>60499752
>The value of the Chainlink™ network is currently captured by the friction of "just trust me bro"
There are already many systems in place that go way beyond lol
Not just the nodes themselves cancelling out and ignoring outliers, but also a separate layer of nodes called the risk management network. Not to mention staker reporting.

You're a paid fuddie.
As confirmed by >>60496397

It's funny cos i'm still fully staked and never selling since v0.1. plus i have 9 wallets.
plus i have sxt claimed and stakes on the Buid
>but you must sell
kek, no. lol. just bought more

chainlink labs

the $9B 4chan-shitposting company
never seen it mentioned outside this shithole

>>60499950
>never seen it mentioned outside this shithole
Really? Because it's mentioned in detail on the websites and in the documentation of Swift, DTCC, JP Morgan, Visa, ...

>>60499952
really? all I see is paid blogspots about experiments with zero technical details whatsoever, especially regarding the LINK token
get fucked fishy

>>60500241
>get fucked fishy
THIS PAID SHILL IS A BOTTOM OF THE TANK TYPE OF PERSON. THINK HE'S SO SMART BECAUSE HE GOT A DECENT ENTRY IN LINK YEARS AGO. AND HIS ENTIRE LIFE NOW REVOLVES AROUND TRYING TO "OWN" XRPERS ON TWITTER. DUDE LITERALLY SPENDS HOURS EVERY DAY WRITING DISSERTATIONS ABOUT XRP. EASILY THE CROWN AS THE MOST PATHETIC PERSON IVE SEEN IN THE SPACE. SAD!

>>60499768
Ari Juels recently said he was hoping sergey would put his office in that google skybridge in new york when chainlink buys it in 3 or 4 years. I figure i can give it atleast that long, taking weight in what ari juels says, over some random faggot on /biz/

>>60499752
>spends a good chunk of his life collecting little pictures/memes and trying to convince others they shouldn't spend so much time trying to make it on one particular token
>spends large chunks of time dreaming up Link fud. writes it all out in neat little paragraphs.
yeh, i'm convinced kek

>>60500284
do you know what paragraphs are?
where the fuck are you people coming from, because you're OBVIOUSLY not from here
>calls reddit spacing "paragraphs"
>can't recognize an old 2018 LINK meme
wtf is going on? this along with the jeet spamming AI pics is honestly the most demoralizing shit ever

>>60500264
sounds like something an ass mad xrp/pyth holder would say

>>60500314
I GIVE 0 THOUGHT TO XRP OR PYTH
ITS ABOUT LINK
FISHY ON THE OTHER HAND IS KEPT UP AT ALL HOURS WITH XRP ON HIS MIND CONSTANTLY. I BET HES TWEETED ABOUT XRP AT LEAST 10 TIMES ALREADY THIS MORNING. PATHETIC BEHAVIOR, REALLY. ITS SAD HOW ANOTHER PROJECT LIVES RENT FREE IN HIS MIND AT ALL HOURS. PROBABLY NEEDS TO GET SOME PROFESSIONAL HELP.

>>60500343
no one here mentioning fishy and we got you blasting away in ALL CAPS talking about how hes posting about XRP...what sounds more pathetic a paid poster or you getting mad about a paid poster no ones talking about

>>60500363
>t. fishy
stop being so blatantly butthurt

>>60500363
THIS ENTIRE THREAD IS ABOUT THE TWITTER INTERACTION BETWEEN THE DISGRUNTLED HOLDER AND FISHY. READ BETWEEN THE LINES, BROTHER

>>60500279
ya everyone knows cll is disgustingly rich, they make a ton of money selling tokens

you know how many "integrations" and "partnerships" that have less revenue than a local deli a billion dollars can buy? quite a bit

>>60500381
In not a single image posted is fishy mentioned and they are cropped to not show anything else, since also no link to this is provide i had zero idea about whatever Twitter drama is unfolding

But since apparently we are know just a twitter repost aggregator this is to be expected

>>60500405
Can we stop posting this retardation that the faulty ccip dash board is the only revenue cll has, the pricefeed revenue alone is massive

>>60500521
>the pricefeed revenue alone is massive

got any data to support that claim? last i remember it was like 10-30m/yr. abysmal compared to the mcap

>>60500669
OF COURSE NOT.
LIKE WITH EVERYTHING REGARDING CL LABS, THE TRUTH IS OBFUCSCATED
TRUTH>>>TRUST FOR EVERYTHING (EXCEPT FOR CL LABS)

>>60500279
something people don't mention about that clip is it implies that he will leave his cornell professor gig and go full time at chainlink, or at least be there enough to justify an office.

>>60494882 (OP)
So, token. Needed?

>>60494882 (OP)
so where in mumbai you heard that posting your own twits in biz/ was actually a good idea?

hey guys - checking back in here...the post from op now has over 40,000 views

the painful truth is the reality about the grift is out there now, and the team is absolutely panicked

catfishfishy isn't sleeping well. you can tell by his frequent spazouts

your hubris was your downfall

>>60494882 (OP)
He forgot to mention that not only will the token NEVER go up, but CLL will IPO eventually with their own stock which will 1 gorillion x, cucking all l*Nk baggies for eternity. Sirgay and his VC and banker frens will rule the world for the citadel while linkies le hodl XD their tokens to the grave, sleeping in the pods and eating the bugs.

>>60496192
>it's impossible to make a post on crypto twitter without getting thousands of views
not true at all

>bot accounts

not applicable to the op post... pretty much all the comments were actual people


dont cry so hard boy

>>60496355
you gotta get some better material kid

>>60496364
>Anyway, i hope he gets sued for slander.

by who? chainlink labs cayman entity

this dude is a classic example of how dumb cult members are. you really think they'd sue someone
this kid doesn't realize how many skeletons are buried in cl's closet, he prob doesn't even know what discovery is

>>60498537
>All you need to know is, they have never had a need to "dump tokens" to generate money for their expenses.

absolute bullshit
where the fuck does the funding capital come from then

>>60498546
>they were looking at the price chart instead of the mcap chart
correct!

>>60499603
>But correct that there isnt direct buy pressure from the network, hence we speculate if you wait for that it'll be far too late

bingo

>>60499603
>In any case i like how the fud moved from link very bad doesnt work pyth better to link great protocol but token emissions

why would you "like" losing money? are you a c u c k h o l d

you're essentially donating money to a sportsball team and cheering as they "win"

>>60499627
>LINK is not equity. It’s a utility token, not a stock
everyone is aware of this
however it was sold to investors as crypto equivalent to equity

>It’s used to pay for oracle services,
bullshit, chainlink labs gets paid offchain

> secure the network through staking
there is no staking

>, and align economic incentives
empty buzzwords

>decentralized
it's not tho

>• Paves the way for fee-sharing models in the future.

ahh yes le "future"

> LINK’s growing utility across banks,
lmfao
are you talking about the tests?

>that’s how real value accrues.
it's down 80% tho


> Would you rather the team not fund operations and stop building?

they haven't built anything after 6B in funding tho
i want them in prison and we're getting closer every day

>>60499676
nah it's just the truth

how much are you down from last cycle? post your holding and i'll calculate for you

>If you were looking for a short-term meme coin pump

link is down 5 years straight

do you work for the team?

>>60501049
tell them to send us another LARP who's information-drop timing is just good enough to suggest he is adjacent to some juicy information but its just out of frame like its behind a potted plant and we cant really see it but we know its there but the LARP is too concerned with his job to give us more specifics but trust me bro its really good im so excited for your ducks in a row

>>60499772
>Dont get started on the scam that is solana

that's pretty funny considering cl just made a big deal about adding their chain to ccip

so you're conceding your cult works with scams?

>Its quite funny that the twitter retard

but you're down 5 years straight against the market
can you really call anyone else a retard?

it's almost impossible to do that, that's how hard it is

like if you put a gun to someones head and said you have to underperform 5 years straight, most couldn't pull that off

except for you

>>60500521
>, since also no link to this is provide i had zero idea about whatever Twitter drama is unfolding

this is a great example of the brain level of a cult member

this dude sees 6 screenshots from a twitter thread yesterday and says he can't find it on the internet without someone directly providing him a link

wow

>>60501124
what in gods name are you babbling about kid

slow down and take some deep breaths

>>60494882 (OP)
bhahahaha I said the same thing 2 years ago tho these clowns they will not listen. study hope, the allure of gain, and greed and you will understand why people won't listen or try to understand how something works and rather live in a fantasyland. just think about all the loser coins that's been on this site in the last year and the 'confidence' people showed while shilling it. go read the scam boards on reddit and see the thousands and millions taken daily by the oldest of scams alive.

An 8 year hustle and counting. Good luck trying to get common sense through to a baggie.

lol im not selling lmao xd

>>60501207
kek me neither. bought more last week, too

>>60501142
It isnt about not being able to, its about having zero desire to spend the time to find it considering how many twitter reposts we seem to do here
It used to be considered etiquette to post a link or a sign of hiding something if you didnt
But there is nothing to hide here, so i don't get why the play book doesnt add that in

these full time losers are working against the idea we don't care what they say and we just keep buying loads of Link lolol there's literally nothing they can do while their overlords sell us cheap Link while being forced to keep the price down lmao easy money

>>60498543
the token hasn't had any real remand since 2017 and there is nothing that would indicate it's about to change anytime soon. I've seen thousands of 'insider' larps like yours over the years
>bro they don't want you onboard, le secrete project trust me bro xD

>when your scam is so clever you get invited to the White House

HE CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT

le secret project secret project xD

>>60499475
Thanks for this.
I encourage everyone to take a look, I see:
2023 Dec 15: 750,000 LINK sent to Binance
2023 Sep 15: 1,750,000 LINK sent to Binance
2023 June 16: 4,500,000 LINK sent to Binance
2023 Mar 03 1,000,000 LINK sent to Binance
This averages 306K every two weeks.
But it isn't 700K every two weeks.
This may have even been sent to Binance for liquidity purposes to stop the price spiking.
In any case, if you are relying on ChainLINK as your sole source of income you have bigger problems than the price action.

>>60501091

>>60501688
>This is not a LARP, I don't know what will happen with the price
Sorry, I should have explicitly written:
>I am not an insider.
>This is my speculative opinion only.
For the mentally challenged.
And for anyone else taking my post as financial advice: Don't be a retard.

>>60502633
SUCH AN DISINGENUOUS POST. WHY START IN 2023 OF ALL YEARS. THE 700K TO BINANCE STARTED IN 2019 FOR FUCKS SAKES. LOOK IT UP IN WAROSU IF YOU DONT BELIEVE ME

>>60502634

>>60502633
are you legitimately retarded?
https://etherscan.io/tokentxns?a=0xdad22a85ef8310ef582b70e4051e543f3153e11f&p=3

>>60498537
>>60502633
unironically go back

>>60494921
>you play on their intellectual superiority complex, tell them they're in on a secret
that's the hardest thing for link victims to accept. they've been had, but if they admit that to themselves, they are not that superior now, are they? it requires real introspection and the willingness to admit your own faults, many anons will not reach that level of self awareness until their death bed, maybe never

>>60502822
Yet im never selling

>>60502828
and that's ok. it requires strength to say to yourself "damn, these fuckers preyed on my mental weakness and i was dumb enough to give them my money. but i moved on, learned from this experience, know how to spot it in the future and am better for it". not many have discipline like that, you are not alone, anon

>>60502836
>these fuckers preyed on my mental weakness
Apparently they preyed on the mental weakness of Visa too

>>60502874
>another paid blogpost
Oracle integration coming in Q4 2020, stay strong marines!

>>60502885
>paid blogpost
So they preyed on the financial weakness of Visa?

>>60502888
no, VISA hates money and they would never accept to publish a meaningless, non technical blogpost involving experimentation with unproven tech for a hefty reward

Forget it OP, I'm never selling.

1 Link = 1 Hundred Dollars?
Not selling.
1 Link = 10 Thousand Dollars?
Forget it.
1 Link = 1 Million Dollars?
Still not selling. Fuck you OP.

N E V E R S E L L I N G
E
V
E
R

S
E
L
L
I
N
G

The point being made is that success in business does not directly result in higher token value.

>>60502894
>non technical
They did a literal cross border transaction

>>60502900
they literally transferred a bunch of wrapped stablecoins
omg, revolutionary

>>60502903
>omg, revolutionary
Adoption of crypto tech literally is revolutionary for tradfi.
That's the whole point.

>>60502710
I said nobody posts receipts, so >>60499475 posted an Etherscan link and all I did was summarize what was in it but this makes people angry for some reason.

Argumentation, both in law and in real life, places the burden of proof upon the person making the claim, so no I'm not going to go searching the archives for you.

>>60502798
>Anon posts a link
Thanks for this, you're the first person I have seen who has posted proof. When was the most recent time they dumped large amounts of tokens like this onto the market?

I still don't understand why everybody gets so mad every time there is something posted about $LINK. They're angry like they lost money or something.

>>60502909
yes yes, just like Oracle, Google Cloud, Digital Assets, Trade Lens, China's BSN Chainlink experimentations which directly led to actual adoption
fuck off nigga, it's been 8 years
>>60502911
anon, shut the fuck up, you've been thoroughly destroyed and outed as a literal newfaggot top buyer
>pls pls spoonfeed me pls
0x98c63b7b319dfbdf3d811530f2ab9dfe4983af9d
0x75398564ce69b7498da10a11ab06fd8ff549001c
0x5560d001f977df5e49ead7ab0bdd437c4ee3a99e
0xbe6977e08d4479c0a6777539ae0e8fa27be4e9d6
0xdad22a85ef8310ef582b70e4051e543f3153e11f
0xe0362f7445e3203a496f6f8b3d51cbb413b69be2
have fun educating yourself

>>60502914
Tradfi adoption is a future event, and investing means speculating on future events.
Funny how that works right?

But would you like to talk about adoption as it stands right now?

>>60502924
>it was always a 20 year hold bro
great, @ me again in 20 years

>>60494944
People still believe in white paper in 2025? I got burned so much during the white paper meme that it's just another form of bullshit devs try to push that really means nothing.

>>60502926
What crypto other than Chainlink is a closer and bigger tradfi prospect?

>>60502960
>prospect
I dunno you tell me, what crypto other than Chainlink has the most corporate and institutional adoption today? What crypto other than Chainlink has dozens of ETFs applied for them? What crypto other than Chainlink is actually recognized as legal tender by real life governments? What crypto other than Chainlink keeps making new ATHs for 16 years?

>>60502965
>Yeah but long term prospect.

>>60502971
uh-huh, 30 more years until the flip is switched, diamond hands

>>60502965
>what crypto other than Chainlink has the most corporate and institutional adoption today?
we're all ears

>ETFs
That's the exact opposite of adoption, those are paper transactions. Exactly what Satoshi wanted to combat in the first place.
Exchanges park the coins and the ETFs move them around on paper.
Ironically the only functional adoption in relation to ETFs is Chainlink providing proof of reserves for Arkinvest.

>>60503008
who's ((we))? WAGMI telegram?
LINKDrake, that you?

>>60503015
We is /biz/, funny how you immediately went to twitter. Seems like every fudder on here does that.
Almost like there's exactly one guy spamming this board with his fud and twitter obsession, across hundreds of IDs.

Now answer the question: what crypto is a closer and bigger tradfi prospect than Chainlink?

>>60503023
since when do (You), a 2020 tourist, represent the entirety of this board?
I already answered you but you're pretending to be retarded, like usual

>>60503046
>I already answered you
ETFs are the opposite of adoption. Answer the question.

>>60503050
>ETFs don't count no no no noooo reeeee answer the question!111111
I already did, see>>60502965
why are you getting hyper fixated on ETFs anon? Can't you think of a single crypto that fits the above description?

>>60503055
>why are you getting hyper fixated on ETFs
That's the only attempt at answering the question you made. And it's wrong.

>>60503059
I already answered you, see>>60502965

>>60503064
The only concrete answer in that post is the ETFs. And they are not adoption.

>>60503068
how is that concrete then?
are you having a stroke?

>institutional investors getting exposure to crypto assets is not adoption
>crypto assets being accepted as legal tender by IRL governments is not adoption
>but paid blogposts of experiments that lead nowhere is actual adoption!!
the unhinged brain of the eternal bagholder

>>60503070
>how is that concrete then?
It's not. Making you retarded for bringing it up.

>>60503071
>>institutional investors getting exposure to crypto assets is not adoption
Not when nothing actually happens on chain.
Adoption means on chain.

>legal tender by IRL governments
yeah in El Salvador and the Central African Republic lmao

Now answer the question: what crypto other than Chainlink is a closer and bigger tradfi prospect?
And while you're at it, what crypto other than Chainlink and ETH has more crypto adoption right now?

>>60503071
>paid blogposts of experiments that *don't even involve the underlying crypto asset* and lead nowhere is actual adoption!!
ftfy

>>60503074
>Adoption means on chain
ok, where are all the institutional txs of LINK then? I'll be waiting
>nooooooooo legal tender status DOESN'T COUNT AS ADOPTION REEEEEEE
lol ok
>Now answer the question
I can't because you keep moving the goalposts regarding the definition of "adoption", it appears we have reached an impasse
you seem to believe that worthless blogposts equal adoption, I do not
>what crypto has crypto adoption
I dunno, where are all the on-chain LINK txs which prove the crypto to crypto adoption? all I see is the team dumping fat stacks to Binance so far

>>60503079
>where are all the institutional txs of LINK then?
Institutions aren't onchain yet.

>you keep moving the goalposts
The goalposts for onchain adoption were always onchain

>>60503080
>Institutions aren't onchain yet.
KEK, zero adoption so far then
at least you tried
>crypto assets as legal tender is not adoption, institutional investors having exposure to crypto assets is not adoption, but blogposts of experiments without a single on-chain tx IS adoption
the unhinged state of baggies lmao

>>60503084
>zero adoption so far then
Exactly.
Hence the word "prospect".

>institutional investors having exposure to crypto assets is not adoption
Not onchain, not adoption.

>>60503087
>""""prospect"""""
25-30 more years, please ignore the ETFs and whatever else might be happening on the market, (WE) will tell you when real adoption happens, just keep hodling!!

also legal tender status inherently implies onchain activity, therefore you got rekt
thanks for playing

>>60503090
Better invest in something other than crypto if you think it's going to take too long for institutions to go onchain.

>>60503094
thanks, but institutions are already adopting a certain crypto and that certain crypto has been printing gains for more than a decade, you just stubbornly refuse to acknowledge it because you married your bags
have fun bagholding

>>60503098
>institutions are already adopting Bitcoin
No they're not. They're just moving paper around while Coinbase is holding it for them.

>>60503102
damn, you better inform world governments they're fucking it up!
https://www.coingecko.com/research/publications/government-bitcoin-holdings

>>60503102
so just like the actual fiat system? I had no idea that the US dollar isn't actually adopted since it functions on fractional reserves!
holy shit, I've been living a lie!

>>60503105
The US is the largest holder, and they literally never bought any Bitcoin or used it in any way. It's literally ally 100% seized coins from literal criminals.

>>60503106
>so just like the actual fiat system?
Exactly.
Precisely the system Satoshi was trying to fight when he created Bitcoin.

>>60503108
>100% seized coins from literal criminals
which literally means 100% onchain adoption, ooopsie
>the system Satoshi was trying to fight
it's hilarious to me that you're invoking crypto ethics and ideology when you're literally shilling the most anti crypto in the space, Chainlink, which is effectively trying to perpetuate the vety system Satoshi wanted to destroy
>quadrillions of derivatives bro!
nonetheless, Bitcoin is by far the most adopted crypto regardless of the definition you choose to use
get fucked

>>60503143
>seizing coins is adoption

What a perfectly sound good faith argument kek
Enjoy your paycheck fuddie, you earned it.

>>60503150
>nooooo using seized assets to establish a government strategic reserve ISN'T adoption despite the fact that those assets exist onchain, in accordance to my made up definition of adoption REEEEEEEEE
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/03/establishment-of-the-strategic-bitcoin-reserve-and-united-states-digital-asset-stockpile/
the amount of mental gymnastics you have to perform here as a shill must be exhausting

>>60503150
you literally bought a globohomo pajeet shitcoin thinking you would have become a millionaire

After 8 years you're still poor and you're worshipping Sergey as a God. What a pathetic life

>>60503164
>spends all his time spamming the same images and low iq posts that use ‘literally’ every single time
Get a job you bum, or at least change up your posting style so it’s not so fucking obvious

>>60503203
you're LITERALLY poor lol

>>60498537
What do you mean just like with bitcoin?

>>60503162
>establish a government strategic reserve
And when is this happening exactly? In two more weeks?

>>60503297
it already exists you clueless buffoon
holy fuck where the fuck are all the sane posters

>>60503305
>it already exists
Not yet it doesn't.

>>60503322
>source: my anus
you're right, instead of taking into consideration a presidential executive order, we should be listening to Angie Walker preaching for the imminent actual, real, tangible adoption Chainlink will have early this year!
...oh wait

>>60503333
>will have early this year
just in time for the bear market

KEEEEK BAGGIES

>>60503333
>>source: my anus
Source is David Sacks

Two more weeks, right?

>>60503342
>3 months ago
>minutes after the executive order was signed
>that MUST mean it still doesn't exist!
holy kek, good one anon
I think it's time for you to take the L and stop posting

>>60503346
Ok so where is the strategic reserve? Confirmation of a single sat going into it?
The Treasury department and various other departments were transfer to send their coins there.

>>60503352
why don't you ask the President yourself man? somebody should inform him that his executive order was never enforced!
https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/
ok, so where are all the MULTIPLE projects that went live early this year, as per Chainlink's Head of Banking and Capital Markets?
confirmation of a single juel going into any of them?
huh?

>>60503362
>why don't you ask the President yourself
"Trust me bro, two more weeks!"

>>60503370
KEK
incredible projection coming from a paid shill of
>two more weeks guise: the crypto
so what about the MULTIPLE projects that were supposed to go live this year man? the fuck happened there?

>>60503376
>two more weeks is good if it's Bitcoin
>two more weeks is bad if it's Chainlink

And Angie never said that.
She said developments are happening related to projects going live in early 2025.

>700k dumps never happened
>team doesn't even need to dump for funding, I have an insider story about this I'll tell you later
>w-why is everybody getting mad guise? I was just asking for proofs!!1!1!1!
>Chainlink is the most adopted crypto because they have the most blogposts
>well aksually it doesn't have ANY adoption yet, but it is the CLOSEST, amirite guise?
>Bitcoin's adoption doesn't count
>ETFs don't count
>asset price doesn't count nor is indicative of adoption
>status as legal tender in actual real countries doesn't count
>w-what? onchain strategic reserve? it doesn't count because they seized the assets
>actually scratch that, the strategic reserve is a lie, please ignore the presidential executive order, he just signed it for fun or something
>Angie Walker never claimed that they moved away from pocs and are focused on actual live production with MULTIPLE projects in early 2025, she just said that stuff with other projects is happening that are going live, no LINK involved lol you misheard her lmao
the ABSOLUTE STATE of LINK shills

>>60503427
Good luck convincing the 20 actual people left on this board that you're not a paid agent.

>>60502914
>0x98c63b7b319dfbdf3d811530f2ab9dfe4983af9d
Do you even know how to read these, literal shit for brains?
This one is just node operators to a non-circulating supply wallet?
You must be functionally retarded to believe serious people just take things at face value.
I bet your idea of "making it" is bagholding and taking screenshots, which would explain why you're so angry and committed to proving how wrong people are for ... wait, let me think, talking about LINK on a Mexican taco-weaving business forum.

>>60503526
THE ONLY PAID AGENTS AROUND HERE ARE THE ONES STILL DEFENDING THIS DOGSHIT COMPANY (CL LABS) AFTER 8 YEARS OF MISDIRECTION, HUBRIS, ARROGANCE, LACK OF TRANSPARENCY, CARROT DANGLING, AND FAILURE. NO ONE CAN BE STUPID ENOUGH TO STILL SUPPORT THESE CLOWNS DAY IN AN DAY OUT WITHOUT GETTING PAID.

>>60503545
We all know it's still you with another ID. You know that right?

Chainlink unironically achieved more than any other crypto in the past five years; development, product releases, current adoption, future tradfi adoption, ...
And they did it all while dumping less inflation on holders than most other cryptos.

Literally the only thing that went wrong is the speculative price. And trying to pin that on Sergey is flat out insane.

Who's being paid is you and your constant high effort pilpul.

>>60494882 (OP)
I don’t know what to do anymore. I’m completely beside myself. I almost feel like we’re going to get rug pulled the moment institutions go live, if they ever do.

>>60503589
t. brown Chainlink advocate

>>60503601
the usual advice is: would you buy the asset today with your current knowledge? if so, keep holding. if not, sell and buy something else

>>60503605
It's all easily verifiable.

And why are you even here talking to advocates? Lonely?

>>60503526
lmfao linkies in turmoil

>>60503540
>retard begs to be spoonfed
>link to him the entire list of Chainlink legacy wallets so he can examine everything for himself
>the beggar calls me a retard
that's why people don't want to spoonfeed you morons
go jump off a fucking cliff

>>60494882 (OP)
>No burn mechanism
>No buybacks
>No scarcity

In other words, no jewish tricks.

>>60503333
That's the thing, anon
Linkies claim they are always early

>>60494882 (OP)
This is literally true.

This was always the stated fud. You actually just finally reached being so far beaten down past being able to lie yourself into deep knowing denial that you are now in a shallower type which soft admitswhat the fud actually is instead of completely ignoring what is actually said. Private oracles and licensed software will be the way it will be used to the extent it will and token holders will continue to be fucked. You all were saying the same about the DTCC/SWIFT trials which both used (multiple) different networks for settlement and did not use link for anything except for price feeds.

>>60503723
The first one was simply internal transfers from the ChainLINK team wallet to one of the non-circulating supply wallets (just like the first one).
There was none sent to exchanges.
Why would I bother wasting my time looking at the other five?

The price action speaks for itself.

>>60505587
>no receipts
>noooo not THAT kind of receipts!!
>w-why would I bother looking at the other wallets, NONE was sent to exchanges, k?

>when was the last time they dumped so many tokens?
https://etherscan.io/address/0xe0362f7445e3203a496f6f8b3d51cbb413b69be2#tokentxns
>b-b-but I can't be bothered to look at the other five!!11
>n-n-non were sent to exchanges!!!

>>60505742
>is asked to provide evidence of ChainLink Labs "dumping" 700K
>evidence of ChainLink labs dumping any real amount of tokens whatsoever
>submits transaction references that point to ChainLink Labs moving $LINK tokens internally
>calls the person keeping them honest a retard & other ad hominem attacks while offering no substantive arguments
>can't talk like a rational human being without insulting their opponent continually
>when confronted with this lack of evidence doubles down by insisting the person keep looking endlessly at the other wallets
>could have linked directly to alleged transactions in the first place
>this is somehow the disputers fault
You didn't provide any evidence.

You seem to be hoping people take what you are saying at face value by providing a wall of numbers a lot of people wouldn't bother to look past, even though they provide no real evidence.

>>60505835
MY GOD IS IS THAT FUCKING HARD TO FOLLOW A BLOCK EXPLORER? THESE PAID SHILLS ARE GETTING DUMBER BY THE DAY
https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0xdad22a85ef8310ef582b70e4051e543f3153e11f

>>60505947
>700,000 $LINK tokens were sent 18 times to the same address throughout July and August 2019.
We have also established:
>8 million $LINK sent to Binance between March 2023 - Dec 2023 from ChainLINK Labs non-circulating supply
Okay, now what?
Why is this a problem?
There were approximately this many wallets in 2019:
>18 June 2019 ~32,000 wallets
>18 July 2019 ~49,800 wallets
Compare to pic-related.
But keep using all caps and throwing ad hominem.
Why is this a reason people who buy, trade or hold $LINK deserve abuse and ridicule?

>>60505754
Why is it so hard to write a sentence above each transaction or address demonstrating what they demonstrate? Then you'd have something that could be easily screencapped or copypasta'd instead of making (at present count) 37 posts mostly looking like a screaming basedjak jumping up and down clenching his fists, misquoting and misrepresenting what is being said?
I mean I know you are stuck at the computer most of the day because of your need to continually dilate, but it'd be better for your mental health to try and be calm and rational.

Picking up loads of cheap Linkies atm

>>60506059
>REEEE SPOONFEED ME I'M A RETARD I CAN'T COMPREHEND TRANSACTIONS ON A BLOCKCHAIN EXPLORER HOLD MY HAND REEEEE
>btw the 700k dumps never happened, team doesn't have to dump tokens for financing, and I know a guy who knows a guy from pre-ICO, very funny story, I'll tell you about it someday
rope yourself, unironically

>I need neatly summarized copy pastas, I CAN'T look up the fucking explorer myself, I CAN'T look up the archives for any evidence of those 700k dumps, REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE HALP ME PLS
https://warosu.org/biz/?task=search2&ghost=false&search_text=700k+dumps&search_subject=&search_username=&search_tripcode=&search_email=&search_filename=&search_datefrom=&search_dateto=&search_media_hash=&search_op=all&search_del=dontcare&search_int=dontcare&search_ord=old&search_capcode=all&search_res=post

>>60506380
Spoonfeed me some more, is there any reason pic-related pops up when you try to examine some of this "dumping" on etherscan?

Also, why shouldn't someone buy, trade or hold ChainLINK?

>>60506390
Is that a link to your blog vitalik?

>>60506401
yes, the reason is that you're literally a clueless newfag stacklet, I bet your entry was this year, as well
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x82ccb142644d2de82e7becd9cd8db97c62cd4736fd48e99348e49c3d2fa7a5d2
>>60506425
you're also a reddit/twitter tourist as it turns out

>>60506401
enough spoodfeeding friendo, how about you sharing with ((us)) the story about the team's funding situation which makes you laugh each time you see those "unsubstantial" claims about 700k dumps
you know, that pre-ICO story

>>60506444
>>60506438
>41 pbtid
>two whole days

You're 100% being paid to do this.
also checked

>>60506453
>muh pbid
only shills use this (((argument)))
you've 100% already posted ITT on a different id
you're almost certainly part of the paid LINK advocate team

>>60506455
>spends literal days obsessing over link
>"I'm not paid, YOU're paid"

The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you

>>60506459
>noooo stop debating
how very jewish of you

>>60506453
>Paid
It's likely vitalik.
Chainlink operating on his network makes him seethe.
Notice how he can't answer two basic questions I posed in >>60506401
?
The latter question about why any of this matters to someone buying, trading or holding, he won't touch. Imagine investing as much time and energy as he has and people still don't give a fuck.

>>60506463
Why the fuck would anyone spend two whole ass days debating a coin they don't own and even hate?
Every day for years?

You're paid to be here, end of story.

>>60506480
>It's likely vitalik.
kek did we ever find out why he even has that hate boner for Sergey? After seven years we deserve an explanation.

>>60506480
all I'm noticing is that you're suddenly very hesitant to share your story
why's that?
>>60506498
why did you just swap ids though?
you're certainly paid to be here and derail any critical threads, end of story

>>60506480
so far you were very eager to summarize all the links to the eth explorer, yet somehow you've missed this one entirely
>https://etherscan.io/tx/0x82ccb142644d2de82e7becd9cd8db97c62cd4736fd48e99348e49c3d2fa7a5d2
hmm, I'm noticing indeed

>>60506530
It's a Sunday and you have nothing better to do than fume all day about a coin you don't own and even hate.
Are you sure you don't just want to end it all? This is no way for any human to live.

>>60506530
>why did you just swap ids though?
Accuse others of that which you are guilty.

>>60506537
>so far you were very eager to summarize all the links to the eth explorer, yet somehow you've missed this one entirely
Since you are down to misrepresenting what I wrote and continually dodging the question as to why any of this is relevant to people investing or trading $LINK today, I summarize for the lurkers:
- Retard 60502914: posted 6 transaction ID's which can be examined on etherscan
- In 60503540, I point out that the first address is just internal transfers between ChainLink Labs team wallet and a non-circulating supply wallet.
- Retard 60503723: claims he provided "evidence" and won't spoonfeed.
- In 60505587, I repeat none were sent to exchanges and ask why I should keep looking (burden of proof rests with the claimant).
- Retard 60505742: misrepresents what I wrote, dodges the question as to why I should trawl through six transactions when the first one showed nothing, fails to explicate what the evidence is.
- Retard 60505754 replies seemingly to no one and quotes a single transaction.
- In 60506059, I note there appears to be evidence of ChainLink Labs sending tokens IN 2019 and in 2023 to a single address.
- I ask why any of this is relevant today, especially since there are 15x as many wallets as there were in 2019 when this first appeared.
- This question remains unanswered.
- Retard 60506380: tells me to kms and AVOIDS ANSWERING the question as to RELEVANCE of these transactions or the purpose of abusing people asking.
- In 60506401, I ask why some of these transactions he has submitted as evidence have a message CAUTIONING the observer that THEY WERE NOT MADE BY THE ADDRESS SENDING THE TOKENS.
>i.e. the transactions are not real, they are a form of spoofing.
- Retard 60506438: suffers a catastrophic meltdown now that he's been found out. Continues with the ad hominem attacks and fails to answer the question.

Transaction spam on the blockchain is a real thing kids, and only proves that these guys are REALLY desperate.

>>60494899
>>60494882 (OP)
>Slav
>not a scam
Wow. Are you guys like 5?

>>60506655
YOU ARE COMPLETELY HOPELESS IF YOU CAN NOT FIGURE OUT HOW TO FOLLOW SIMPLE TRANSACTIONS ON A BLOCK EXPLORER.

I love how nothing they type can make us stop buying Link lololol ther's simply just nothing they can do about it -classic

>>60506931
I'm getting Jonestown vibes

>>60506655
>- In 60506401, I ask why some of these transactions he has submitted as evidence have a message CAUTIONING the observer that THEY WERE NOT MADE BY THE ADDRESS SENDING THE TOKENS.
>- Retard 60506438: suffers a catastrophic meltdown now that he's been found out. Continues with the ad hominem attacks and fails to answer the question.
>Transaction spam on the blockchain is a real thing kids, and only proves that these guys are REALLY desperate.
whoa there. wtf, are you saying or stating that the 700k "transfer" are not as such? please provide url to these spoofed transactions, i want to dig deeper

>i.e. the transactions are not real, they are a form of spoofing.
and to this end, WHO is doing these fake transactions, and where is the actual LINK from the circulating supply? like, where is it being held or has been through all these years?

please do create a thread if this one dies, i want to dig into this

>>60507016
I'm getting rich vibes

>>60494882 (OP)
>>60494887
>>60494893
>when midwits get the concept 8 years after the 2017 ico scams

Seriously man, wtf.

>>60506906
Explain why the sender is not the signer in the top three transactions in this link or stfu:
https://etherscan.io/address/0x75398564ce69b7498da10a11ab06fd8ff549001c#tokentxns
>>60507053
Link as above.
i got there by throwing the second address from: >>60502914
into etherscan.io.
0x75398564ce69b7498da10a11ab06fd8ff549001c
Then you click "Token Transfers (ERC-20)"
then click the copy button on any of the top four transactions TO address.
Etherscan will then produce the warning i posted in >>60506401, which tells you that the transaction was made by a different address than the one sending the token.

This led me to lookup transaction spoofing on the ethereum blockchain, and it is a real thing.

You can click on the transaction hash in the first column to see more information.
Pic-related is one of the bogus transactions they claim are real, and is the reason they are now quiet.
The first "From:" (grey text) is who initiated the transaction.
The second "From" (black bold text) is the address sending the tokens to the "To" (black bold text) right after it.
The address in each should be the same.
If you mouseOver the From or To, it will tell you the entire address.
I had to copy and paste an inset to show the address of the "Chainlink: Team Wallet 1", but you can verify this for yourself.

This is a direct link to the transaction in pic-related:
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xa51da8b278d882268cf5b9aa175a8ebd397dcb1569b7bc734fd971cdba45fe18


>WHO is doing these fake transactions
A rival project, someone who lost money or missed the sub $1 days and is eternally poor.
In all likelihood, it is a couple of indians who get paid to do this by somebody.
And just think, they've been fudding people with this fake crap for a couple of years now.
Even if it was real, who cares? what's the dif?

>and where is the actual LINK from the circulating supply?
if it was spoofed nothing was moved. it can only fool a human reading it who doesn't understand how to check.

>>60507409
YOU'RE BEYOND HELP, DUDE.

>>60507409
Because not enough space in last message:

>Why do this?
To undermine confidence in the project. Same reason there are sixty threads a week shitting on ChainLINK, such as the bogus claims that a ChainLink price oracle failed and caused the mass liquidation on AVAX:
https://warosu.org/biz/thread/60430633

>>60507419
>Not an argument

>>60501617
Saying shit like this pisses them off to no avail.

>>60503079
Hahaha you’re having another meltdown I love to see it.

there is no shame in admitting to yourself that you bought a dud. most investments are duds. the genius about chainlink is that their target demographic is terminally online losers that can't admit when they are wrong. trick them once into buying and they will never sell. it might seem wrong to take advantage of their superiority complex, but that's just business

>>60507455
BROTHER, ITS NOT DIFFICULT TO FOLLOW THE TRANSACTIONS
GO TO THE ADDRESS I POSTED EARLIER:
https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0xdad22a85ef8310ef582b70e4051e543f3153e11f
FIND THE FIRST 700K OUTFLOW ON 2019-07-02
CLICK ON THE ADDRESS ENDING IN 0165
https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0x1f9e26f1c050b5c018ab0e66fcae8e4394eb0165
ON THE DESTINATION ADDRESS ABOVE, GO TO PAGE 10/16 AND SEE THE 700K INFLOW
NOTICE THEY SENT 200K WITHIN MINUTES TO ADDRESS ENDING IN E834
https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0x7878e3c9ab231fcad38fb98a45ed9775a1a9e834
FIND THE 200K INFLOW ON THE ADDRESS ABOVE
WITHIN 4 MINUTES, ALL 200K IS SENT TO BINANCE
A FEW DAYS LATER AN ADDITIONAL 175K IS MOVED FROM THE WALLET ENDING IN 0165 (ORIGINAL 700K RECEIVING WALLET) TO A DIFFERENT ADDRESS, THEN INSTANTLY TO BINANCE
CL SENDS THE 700K BATCHES TO AN ADDRESS, THEN BREAKS THEM APART BY SENDING THEM TO SECONDARY ADDRESSES, THEN SENDS THE FUNDS FROM THOSE ADDRESSES TO BINANCE

>>60507493
Kekfuddie never selling

>>60507497
no surprise there, the marketing team is worth its size in gold. which probably comes out to 300 ounces, which is sill a lot compares to the 100 ounce hr department

>>60494882 (OP)
>you're not getting access to Chainlink's business by holding Link
Uh, yeah you are:

>>60507409
0xfe992BCBE5de8E504F5543C5F240F76db3529E34 is an EOA, aka a user

0x75398564ce69B7498dA10a11ab06Fd8fF549001c is the contract holding the tokens.

EOA triggered the contract to move the tokens to the new Chainlink Supply 16 address.

>transactions don't exist
>a rival project made them to make Chainlink look bad
>he wrote all that shit instead of admitting he's an actual newfag who doesn't understand how smart contracts work
AHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHA HOLY FUCKING SHIT

>>60507496
>BROTHER, ITS NOT DIFFICULT TO FOLLOW THE TRANSACTIONS
>GO TO THE ADDRESS I POSTED EARLIER:
>https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0xdad22a85ef8310ef582b70e4051e543f3153e11f

BROTHER, it's not hard to understand the question being asked here - these were done in 2019.
Q1. (5 marks) Why does this affect anyone buying, trading or holding $LINK today?

>text wall
You're going into detail about the 2019 transfers which is not an issue in dispute.
I have already acknowledged them in >>60506059 where I wrote:
>700,000 $LINK tokens were sent 18 times to the same address throughout July and August 2019.

I refer you again to Q1, which you have failed to answer, and by extension failed the aptitude test.
You are welcome to respond with more all caps posts because it is very persuasive to everyone looking on.


>>60508651
>EOA triggered the contract to move the tokens to the new Chainlink Supply 16 address.
Thanks for this.
So observers, bear in mind while blockchain spam is a thing, the issue pointed out in >>60507409 is likely a non-issue (EOA = externally owned account). I'm taking 60508651 ID: i50E68+ on good faith.

However, IDs:
pqNT80fh
8XPhF2Uk
Are acting in bad faith as any normal person can see, and they can't explain why these transfers in 2019 and 2023 putting $LINK into circulation are a bad thing, given all of it was eventually intended to be in circulation.
They won't explain how and why it affects anyone today, as ChainLINK, like most assets, is intended to fluctuate in price.

In their mind, bagholding and taking screenshots makes you rich.

>>60508738
WHAT POINT EXACTLY ARE YOU TRYING TO MAKE? MY GOD YOU ARE TRULY BEYOND SALVATION. A LOST CAUSE. GOOD LUCK TO YOU.

>>60503206
>c(s)hart
>stinkies will tell you that buying any (other) shitcoin is worse than holding a literal Russian scam shitcoin
Linkies live in a cult.
sad, many such cases.

I have never seen so much targeted hate towards a financial asset in my life. It's convincing me that buying link might be a good idea.

>>60508830
shut up stinkie
pathetic bitch

>>60508853
I dont even hold any. If youre actually from a rival project I suggest slowing the hate down a bit. Make it a slow burn, too much can have the opposite affect. Psychology of the market and identifying bottoms when sentiment is at the lowest; though im not sure a targeted campaign from link competitors counts as sentiment so this may be a completely false reading.

>>60508798
You do not understand fundamental asset exchange kinetics.
You believe bagholding makes you rich.
>>60508853
Post photo of your hand with ID and timestamp, brownoid.

>>60495005
I don't even hold link, and I personally thought it sounded like less of a good idea than some other cryptos or stocks, but i can identify a paid shill when I see them.
The snarky attitude that makes you want to punch someone through your screen, you've obviously been coached on how to make people angry in the very specific way all the shills for obvious shill topics like BBC posting do.
But who paid you and why?
I can only imagine a competing company. Or perhaps someone with a largej put contract on link.

>>60508830
You're seeing a lot of vitriol from the linkies themseles now because the project has existed since 2017, is a literal requirement to use if you don't want your shit hacked, is a requirement if you want to build anything Web3 worth a damn that isn't shifting memecoins back and forth, is literally the only crypto project being used by banks for their private blockchains, and Trump has Chainlink guys helping to advise on legislation on crypto in the US.

All of this and the price is in the dumps. While if you got in during ICO, you did fantastically. If you got in after that, but premainnet, you're doing well, but are likely in 6 figure hell. If you came in after that, you're probably in low 5 figures. That's jack squat. Most people are in 6 figure hell and late linkies are most certainly low 5 figures and anyone after 2021 hovers between breaking even and being in the red. This is demoralizing the heck out of the community because any other project would have made them multimillionaires by now with the amount of achievements they made.

This is why no one is taking >>60508738 seriously. He wasn't there for the Chainlink Crypto summit of 2019 where Sergey fat fingered a 70K Link send to binance, sent in a 630K fat finger send and then went on stage to give the same speech the entire link community at the time could have made.

In any case, Link is going to explode. It's just when is the case. But they're trying to shake as many 4chan autists out as possible and they're doing a damned good job of it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvJxjth9vtU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a45TWLH73LA

>>60502903
>they literally transferred a bunch of wrapped stablecoins
>omg, revolutionary

LOL
you have to realize you're talking with kids that have zero real life experience


does anyone else find it hilarious that a bunch of edgelords ended up worshipping a banking coin

>>60502955
>People still believe in white paper in 2025?

chainlink is pretty much the only cult in crypto still talking about hypothetical research papers
it's crazy how far people in the cult were left behind
it's like for them time froze in '21 while the rest of the space moved on

i saw a dude complaining that link didn't pump off bs announcements and he cited litecoin and walmart lmfao that's how stuck they are

>>60503589
>Chainlink unironically achieved more than any other crypto in the past five years

did you mean chainlink labs ltd? maybe, but nothing to do with the funding coin

but i'd argue hyperliquid has done way more

>>60507493
>there is no shame in admitting to yourself that you bought a dud. most investments are duds. the genius about chainlink is that their target demographic is terminally online losers that can't admit when they are wrong. trick them once into buying and they will never sell. it might seem wrong to take advantage of their superiority complex, but that's just business


this guy nails it
whoever did the original marketing here was a goddamn genius

he perfectly understood the personalities here and exactly how to play them

8 years later and they are still voraciously defending their cult

this is some cia level shit

>>60510432
>>60510443
>>60510472
do you have any idea how weird it is that you care this much?

>>60509389
>duuuuuude le conspiracy

you're not well

Also PSA for all -

>Link August 2020: $20
>Link June 2025: $13.80

grim

>>60510476

is it any weirder than worshipping a 25 year old spray on beard as your "god"

>>60510490
Not a soul on this earth knows what you even mean by that.

>>60494893
> But none of that matters when the supply inflates like Venezuela.

Chainlink is hardcapped at 1 billion tokens. For somebody supposedly educated in chainlink he can’t even get basic facts correct.

650 million tokens are currently in circulation and so the maximum amount link can inflate is 35% more supply. There are dozens of tokens that have inflated much higher than link in the top 100 including coins like solana

>>60510526
yes they do know
chainlinkgod zach rynes


>>60510755
>Chainlink is hardcapped at 1 billion tokens

yeah and then what when they run out?
you either print another token/ipo/raise debt
all 3 options further dilute

>There are dozens of tokens that have inflated much higher than link

this is true but most of those coins have higher buying pressure so their investors haven't been destroyed
also isn't link supposed to be different? ironically it's bearish when you say everyone else is doing it because you just grouped yourself with all of the other grifts
why don't they set the example and be better than that? spread the dilution over the next 15-20 years instead of 5 to slow down inflation

>>60510820
Nobody knows what you mean when you say he is "worshipped" you moron.

>>60510419
Been a holder since 2019, traded it a lot since but still hold and still believe in the project
If six-figures is hell, you're a lazy cunt that probably doesn't understand money

>>60510825
hey semantics guy take it easy

this dude would get in an argument with his own shadow

check the chart son

>>60510820
>27 fud posts by this id

>>60494882 (OP)
i cant belive we have this much fud meanwhile the price is still at 13...


this fcuking coin is going to explode. i meean eX FCUKING PLODE

im new to crypto and buying link. xrp. sol. doge.

>>60512613
HEY ROOK, EVER THINK THE REASON THERE IS SO MUCH FUD IS BECAUSE LIKE YOU SAID, THE PRICE IS STILL FUCKING 13 DOLLARS AFTER 8 FUCKING YEARS

>>60510855
how can you be a holder since 2019 and still have no idea about the 700k dumps? I smell bullshit, you just trying to desperately save face

>>60494882 (OP)
same goes for xrp, ETH, bnb and many others

seems really easy to throw a few grand at this ngl

>>60510855
>had no idea about the 700k dumps
>conveniently ignores the transactions showing nearly 800k LINK straight to Binance in 2023
>doesn't have a clue about the six figure hell meme
>"4Chan"
>"ChainLink"
it's painfully obvious you're neither an early byuer nor an actual/biz/tard

>>60511722
>take it easy
>this dude would get in an argument with his own shadow

t. 27 pbtid

>>60513140
I met the same wall of resistance or silence every time I asked. This time I persisted. You still haven't answered why any of it is relevant today.
In that time I have sold off significant portions of my stack for profit and mostly replenished it.
Also, Kill yourself.
>>60513283
See above, apart from the kys comment.
I recognised the price action was a dog once the RU-UA war started but then i started to trade the channel. For personal reasons, I haven't had much choice but I've done fairly well considering.
Have a good times pic-related as proof, or not, up to you.

>>60513872
>>60513283
Pic-related proof i am ID: 7P9pAShn per >>60498537
And yes, I am a delusional $LINKie who believes that adoption will one day come like a thief in the night.

>>60513368
>>60512574

28 now
looks like you're addicted to my threads


update for all here --- chainlink has dropped to rank 17, will be out of top 20 soon

>>60513872
how is it possible that you've been around for this long and you couldn't just check the team wallets for yourself all this time? are you shitting on me right now?
>why is it relevant
because YOU BROUGHT IT UP and tried to gaslight anons that the 700k dumps never existed in the first place you absolute imbecile
now, where the FUCK is your pre-ICO insider story about the team not needing token dumps to fund themselves??
cough it up already, you newfaggot LARPIng nigger shill

>>60514099
>$LINKie
holy vishnu

>>60514750
>>60514907
>28 pbtid
>48 pbtid
>on biz every day for around 8 hours a day, fudding an allegedly irrelevant shitcoin on a dead board - it's unlikely that anyone outside of the same couple of people every day if anyone bothers to look at all
>they do this on holidays and during weekends as well
These are bots. The alternative is just too depressing to think about.

>>60516203
That anyone sees them*

>>60494882 (OP)
I'm just sick anon.
Got in 2017, legit had 5 million dollars worth at the peak in 2021.
held
swung traded
lost half stack
now at 500k
could've sold in eoy 2024 for more than 1 mil, but instead chose to diversify in shitcoins like taraxa and kns and avi at their peak.
easy come easy go but there is no way I held for 8 years for this.
So I decided a year ago that either I live to 2026 or I check out and take Sergey out with me.
Well not exactly, won't suppuku unless I get caught, if not I'll place a huge short, take the shot, and then will spend it all on hookers in mexico.
It's a nice joke, and anons kek and don't care, but you'll see.

>>60508597
>Holding LINK isn't enough!?
>Where's the profit?
>Sergey loads up the truck and drives to Binance!
Chainlink Payment Abstraction.
The people pay in tokens and then those tokens are automatically exchanged to Link on automatic pools of decentralized exchanges.

>>60514907
I'm not telling the story until $LINK goes mainstream. If you want to be a faggot, continue to be a faggot. Those trinkets are my proof for the OG lurkers and true believers.
>You brought up 700K dumping!
It was literally the premise of OP in this thread, second post in the thread by OP: >>60494887
That is what you are supposed to do in threads, address the premise of the OP, not go off-topic. I'm sorry that you are so upset by this.
You honestly have the focus of an undiagnosed ADHD sufferer and the rationality and behavior profile of somebody taking synthetic estrogen.

>>60516203

dog you're on a discussion board counting other people's posts, mad that they are discussing

take a look in the mirror

>mirror breaks

ok ok it was just an expression

>>60516802
>BROUGHT
SHUT THE FUCK UP ALREADY YOU BRAINDEAD BABOON. NO ONE IS BELIEVING YOU AND YOU CONTINUALLY OUT YOURSELF AS A MORONIC, BAGHOLDING IMBECILE

just an update here - chainlink's funding token link is down 15% since this thread started

this really is one of the worst holds in crypto

it's a shame what they have done to you people

>>60518526
>ALL CAPS, STFU, ETC
No.
There you go mischaracterizing me again.
1. I've proven I'm not a bagholder.
2. There is nothing about me to "believe", I simply heard something that I realised was connected to the project, but because of the nature of what I heard, I know FUDDIES are full of shit regarding funding. What is more likely is that CLL are intentionally suppressing the price to give everyone (financial institutions) ample opportunity to stuff their bags.

Not that you need that kind of info to know something is off about people like you. Who in their right mind spends days on a thread (let alone likely every day) shilling against a token they don't even own?

>>60518531

>>60494882 (OP)
I see you asking aixbt where links token value comes from and it listing a laundry list and you not replying.

>>60518617
ALL FUDSTERS HOLD LINK YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKER.

>>60518847
That's the point, retard.
To bad you're too stupid to read between the lines.
>>60518531
Ever heard of short selling?

>>60518906
>To bad you're too stupid to read between the lines.
>TO BAD
OH THE IRONY. THE JOKES JUST WRITE THEMSELVES.

>>60518637
yo check this out


the chart


bahahahahaha

THE Cuckolds of crypto

>>60518516
>mad that they are discussing
It's not discussion though
It's just repetitive fud spam from you, a suicidal third world porn addict. It's one of the most pathetic things I have ever seen online, right up there with chris-chan - except chris-chan actually got laid lmao.

>>60518962
You are the joke.
>>60519155
Bot just revealed itself.