← Home ← Back to /biz/

Thread 60510352

106 posts 44 images 37 unique posters /biz/
Anonymous (ID: KLfyiB+4) No.60510352 >>60510440 >>60510471 >>60510480 >>60510499 >>60510505 >>60510606 >>60510772 >>60511080 >>60513263 >>60516089 >>60516271 >>60522358
Chainlink competitors consistently crashing
A reminder: this is what they want you to sell for.
Anonymous (ID: Y7kPbtm2) No.60510389
Not looking good fudsisters…
Anonymous (ID: cJnWUPCs) No.60510440 >>60510445
>>60510352 (OP)
sergey ate all of them
Anonymous (ID: KLfyiB+4) No.60510445 >>60510757
>>60510440
Anonymous (ID: gy0kJ0hE) No.60510471 >>60510482
>>60510352 (OP)
worm and pyth look like good buys imo
Anonymous (ID: 5Z5iWTC5) No.60510480 >>60510488 >>60510535
>>60510352 (OP)
>they
WHO ARE "THEY" EXACTLY? THE FUDSTERS DONT GIVE A SHIT ABOUT CHAINLINK COMPETITORS - HINT, THERE ARE NONE. CHAINLINK IS BEST IN CLASS FROM A TECH STANDPOINT. THE FUDSTERS ARE SICK OF CL LABS, THE COMPANY, NOT THE NETWORK. ITS AMAZING YOU COGNITIVELY DEFICIENT TROGLODYTES CANT SEEM TO FATHOM THAT THE FUD COMES FROM LINK HOLDERS THEMSELVES
Anonymous (ID: KLfyiB+4) No.60510482
>>60510471
Anonymous (ID: KLfyiB+4) No.60510488
>>60510480
>WHO ARE "THEY" EXACTLY?
Literally you
Anonymous (ID: 6GBl3Vma) No.60510499
>>60510352 (OP)
Anonymous (ID: 2QcsONr4) No.60510505
>>60510352 (OP)
All oracle coins are crashing because oracles are a solution to a problem that doesn’t need fixing.
Anonymous (ID: zzzH3TAJ) No.60510535 >>60510568 >>60512487
>>60510480
>THE FUDSTERS ARE SICK OF CL LABS
If they're sick of Chainlink, why don't they sell?
Anonymous (ID: 5Z5iWTC5) No.60510568 >>60510594 >>60510602 >>60510604 >>60512490
>>60510535
READ MY POST AGAIN CAREFULLY
THE FUDSTERS BELIEVE IN THE TECHNOLOGY AND USE CASE OF CHAINLINK BUT CAN'T STAND CHAINLINK LABS, THE COMPANY. THEY BELIEVE THE NETWORK/USE CASE WILL MAKE THEM MONEY IN THE FUTURE DESPITE THE INCOMPETENT, HORRIBLE COMPANY CL LABS HAS BECOME OVER THE PAST HALF DECADE.
Anonymous (ID: zzzH3TAJ) No.60510594 >>60510615
>>60510568
Chainlink labs is 100% responsible for the technology you moron.
Anonymous (ID: KLfyiB+4) No.60510602 >>60511753
>>60510568
>READ MY POST AGAIN CAREFULLY
I always stop at the first sentence for these all CAPS posts.
Anonymous (ID: mXcM+qEk) No.60510604 >>60510620
>>60510568
If they're sick of CLL, why don't they sell?
Anonymous (ID: OHbqDQTy) No.60510606 >>60510614 >>60510627 >>60510748
>>60510352 (OP)
i think the fallacy here is you think "fudders" hold those other coins

the reality is those coins are also scams so this comes across pretty desperate


if you want to shut people up you would need link's price to outperform the market, but as well know by now, that's impossible

you see, link, just like its holders, is so c u c k e d and limp and weak, that even going up a few % is a monumental effort
Anonymous (ID: OHbqDQTy) No.60510614
>>60510606
we all know by now*
Anonymous (ID: 5Z5iWTC5) No.60510615 >>60510636
>>60510594
MOTHERFUCKER. I'VE REPEATEDLY SAID THE DEVS OF CHAINLINK ARE TOP TIER AND THEY COULD EASILY CUT 90% OF THE WORKFORCE AND NOT MISS A BEAT. EVERY ELSE CAN FUCK RIGHT OFF AND CHAINLINK WOULD BE FINE. THE DO-NOTHING USELESS EMPLOYEE JUST SUCKING AT THE TEET (MOST OF CL LABS) ARE COMPLETELY WORTHLESS
UNIRONICALLY CL LABS WOULD BE BETTER OFF IT WAS A FEW DEVS WORKING OUT OF A NAIL SALON. GET FUCKED YOU TOPBUYING BAGHOLDER.
Anonymous (ID: 5Z5iWTC5) No.60510620 >>60510626
>>60510604
ARE YOU HAVING TROUBLE READING/UNDERSTANDING THE POST YOU ARE REPLYING TO?
Anonymous (ID: mXcM+qEk) No.60510626
>>60510620
No, but you seem to be. CLL makes Chainlink, if you can't stand CLL you should divest yourself of Chainlink as the two are inextricably linked (heh)
Anonymous (ID: KLfyiB+4) No.60510627
>>60510606
>i think the fallacy here is you think "fudders" hold those other coins
No i dont. I said they want me to sell for those. I know they hold link

>you would need link's price to outperform the market, but as well know by now, that's impossible
Cope lol
Anonymous (ID: zzzH3TAJ) No.60510636
>>60510615
>THEY COULD EASILY CUT 90% OF THE WORKFORCE AND NOT MISS A BEAT
Says you.

Sounds like you need to shut the fuck up and start your own business if you know so much better than them.
Hell, if you do it right I'll even buy some tokens off you.
Anonymous (ID: OHbqDQTy) No.60510638 >>60510653
bahahaha wait was that graph supposed to show you "winning"

damn kid you got wrecked
Anonymous (ID: KLfyiB+4) No.60510653 >>60510676
>>60510638
no its to show other competitors are failing miserably.
Anonymous (ID: OHbqDQTy) No.60510676 >>60510683 >>60510707
>>60510653
so you owned them by only failing half as bad?

i don't know anything about pyth but for wormhole i don't think their token has anything to do w their business (just like chainlink)

as an example, they onboarded huge fish blackrock while token continues crashing
Anonymous (ID: zzzH3TAJ) No.60510683 >>60510838
>>60510676
>they onboarded huge fish blackrock
No they didn't.
Anonymous (ID: KLfyiB+4) No.60510707 >>60510838
>>60510676
>so you owned them by only failing half as bad
Im saying their competitors are trash. Chainlink is still in the top20 and the only oracle in the top 100 now.

Were you born this stupid?
Anonymous (ID: X1t2sPeX) No.60510748 >>60510838
>>60510606
>if you want to shut people up you would need link's price to outperform the market
It does, most of the market dumped harder than LINK despite barely pumping during the bull
Anonymous (ID: G8rL6wMf) No.60510757
>>60510445
kek
Anonymous (ID: PElU9qDk) No.60510772 >>60510859
>>60510352 (OP)
Wormhole will eat Chainlink's lunch. Obviously there's been no alt szn yet and they still have token unlocks.. means nothing bruh
Anonymous (ID: OHbqDQTy) No.60510838 >>60510844 >>60510879
>>60510683
>>they onboarded huge fish blackrock
>No they didn't.

oh god not this again lmfao
the semantics guy who doesn't understand life
im not taking the bait this time

>>60510707
>Im saying their competitors are trash. Chainlink is still in the top20 and the only oracle in the top 100 now.

you're still confusing chainlink labs ltd the operating company with a spec/funding token

>>60510748
lol true
Anonymous (ID: zzzH3TAJ) No.60510844 >>60511745 >>60514813
>>60510838
>oh god not this again lmfao
What fucking bait.
Show a single shred of evidence from Blackrock itself that they partnered with and are using wormhole.
Ideally an on-chain transaction, but even a mention will do.
Anonymous (ID: N7zFKvzm) No.60510859 >>60511752
>>60510772
Wormhole will first need to develop a useful product and learn how to acquire customers without directly paying them for short term partnerships which eventually end up in those people using Chainlink
Anonymous (ID: KLfyiB+4) No.60510879
>>60510838
>oh god not this again lmfao
>the semantics guy who doesn't understand life
>im not taking the bait this time

What does securitize even do with the tokenized fund once its on chain? The only protocol set to use the fund on Solana is using CCIP lol
Anonymous (ID: rJqAAOCq) No.60511080
>>60510352 (OP)
Haha yeah it's just Chainlink's competitors with a horrible chart!
Oh wait.
Anonymous (ID: OHbqDQTy) No.60511745 >>60512482 >>60512505 >>60514813
>>60510844
>What fucking bait.
tell me about it

are you the kid who using the term "burden of proof" arguing this a few weeks back?

this nigga thinks he's matlock
Anonymous (ID: OHbqDQTy) No.60511752
>>60510859
giving stuff away for free is the same as paying for it

the virtue signaling just isn't working


>The only protocol set to use the fund on Solana is using CCIP lol
speaking of, how's the fees coming along on sol ccip now that's "live"
Anonymous (ID: Iac+tK99) No.60511753
>>60510602
Same kek
Anonymous (ID: diSfcUuL) No.60512482
>>60511745
Holy fuck your life is pathetic. It revolves around these little arguments. So sad
Anonymous (ID: yAbz+K4e) No.60512487
>>60510535
They enjoy BDSM.
Anonymous (ID: yAbz+K4e) No.60512490
>>60510568
>BELIEVE IN THE TECHNOLOGY
Lmao. Sad.
Anonymous (ID: v9pxi/rb) No.60512505 >>60512512 >>60512520 >>60512527 >>60512532 >>60514773
>>60511745
nigga Jump trading buying out securitize is not a real partnership, why else would they use wormhole over LINK? You're basically admitting that wall street has a huge insider trading problem, which is an open secret.
Anonymous (ID: v9pxi/rb) No.60512512
>>60512505
https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2025/05/08/blackrock-backed-securitize-raises-strategic-funding-from-jump-crypto/
Anonymous (ID: v9pxi/rb) No.60512520 >>60514804
>>60512505
https://fortune.com/crypto/2023/05/15/jump-trading-billion-propping-up-terra-algorithmic-stablecoin-collapsed/
Anonymous (ID: v9pxi/rb) No.60512527 >>60514804
>>60512505
Tai Mo Shan is also a direct subsidiary of Jump Trading/Jump Crypto. They were forced into paying a 123 Million dollar fine for defrauding and misleading investors.

https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2024-212
Anonymous (ID: v9pxi/rb) No.60512532 >>60514804
>>60512505
https://securitize.io/learn/press/Securitize-Announces-Strategic-Investment-from-Jump-Crypto-to-Advance-Collateral-Management-and-Investment-Access

>Securitize receives strategic investment from Jump Trading, which is also a strategic investor of Wormhole
Anonymous (ID: v9pxi/rb) No.60512536
reminder that securitize is a subsidiary of BlackRock, BlackRock did not directly partner with wormhole. BlackRock is partnered with CLL.
Anonymous (ID: v9pxi/rb) No.60513174 >>60513192
bump
Anonymous (ID: LcjAF8pR) No.60513192 >>60513216
>>60513174
you got em, lil bro
that lil bro won't be back anytime soon
>t. lil bro
Anonymous (ID: v9pxi/rb) No.60513216 >>60513220
>>60513192
They've made three more LINK threads since I've bumped this one. They're avoiding the hard hitting questions.
Anonymous (ID: LcjAF8pR) No.60513220
>>60513216
it's not just link, it's anything that's inconvenient for (((them)))
that's the mo for the whole website for sometime now
it's not just link hate threads
Anonymous (ID: xMwPEAqk) No.60513262 >>60513350 >>60513384
what does Jump got to do with Chainlink's total failure to implement any kind of functional tokenomics
Anonymous (ID: NSmS3LrV) No.60513263
>>60510352 (OP)
Based thread op. Cheers
Anonymous (ID: 5N6mAERD) No.60513350 >>60514671
>>60513262
CCIP generates revenue, although it's currently pretty abysmal.
SVR is functional tokenomics.
Anonymous (ID: KnfXae3l) No.60513384
>>60513262
>Chainlink's total failure to implement any kind of functional tokenomics
What the fuck are you talking about, they implemented 100% of the tokenomics they promised in the 2017 whitepaper.
Anonymous (ID: v9pxi/rb) No.60514662 >>60514681 >>60515795
so why is this thread dead now all of a sudden?
Anonymous (ID: 7REbyqxu) No.60514671
>>60513350
>checks earnings
>less than a kebab shop on a holiday
Total destruction of capital
Anonymous (ID: hbCyFDkS) No.60514681 >>60514695 >>60514811 >>60514818 >>60515285
>>60514662
Fuddies are trying to let it slide, fuddies can only handle threads where they post the same old tired phrases about price or chart.

When they are forced to defend the competition they pretend to support they literally crumble
Anonymous (ID: v9pxi/rb) No.60514695 >>60514730
>>60514681
total fuddie nuclear death
Anonymous (ID: 7REbyqxu) No.60514730 >>60514734 >>60514763
>>60514695
The only radioactive dying thing here is your portfolio.
Anonymous (ID: gy0kJ0hE) No.60514734
>>60514730
got em
Anonymous (ID: v9pxi/rb) No.60514763
>>60514730
Here's your ring leader, a fucking punjabi
Anonymous (ID: OHbqDQTy) No.60514773 >>60514797
>>60512505
>nigga Jump trading buying out securitize is not a real partnership, why else would they use wormhole over LINK

wait i thought you said wormhole wasn't involved


>you're basically admitting that wall street has a huge insider trading problem

LMFAO BAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

no fucking shit dude. who the fuck told you life was fair

this kid just figured out the sky is blue

i love how you framed as me "admitting" like im the one who created wall st
Anonymous (ID: v9pxi/rb) No.60514797 >>60514829
>>60514773
wormhole isn't associated with blackrock themselves. They're associated with their subsidiary. BlackRock has not directly partnered with wormhole. There's your difference. Receiving a strategic investment is also not a partnership, it's buying out your competition. It speaks nothing about the actual use case thats happening behind closed doors.
Anonymous (ID: OHbqDQTy) No.60514804 >>60514813
>>60512520
>>60512527
>>60512532

ive said this here before, but these posts illustrate the absolute amateur retard status and complete lack of real world experience a link cult member has

in this dude's mind, if he proves to everyone the world isn't fair, then all of a sudden his cult coin will win

in his mind, competitors cannot form strategic alliances that don't benefit his cult because that would be "bad"
Anonymous (ID: OHbqDQTy) No.60514811
>>60514681
see above

the competition coins are also grifts

unfortunately for you, this doesn't help link funding token
Anonymous (ID: v9pxi/rb) No.60514813 >>60514856
>>60514804
it's cut and dry that lying and misleading your investors is a bad business move. You're moving the goalpost entirely from "They're partnered with blackrock" to "life isn't fair, people are always going to buy out their competition"

>>60511745
>>60510844
that's called moving the goalpost, receiving a strategic investment is not a real partnership. Just don't trip over yourself when you keep obfuscating what your original point is.
Anonymous (ID: 5Z5iWTC5) No.60514818 >>60514834
>>60514681
NO ONE CARES ABOUT THE COMPETITION. THEY CARE ABOUT THE FACT THAT THE LINK TOKEN HAS ABOUT AS MUCH UTILITY AS YOUR BRAIN, WHICH IS TO SAY NONE AT ALL
Anonymous (ID: OHbqDQTy) No.60514829 >>60514841 >>60514852
>>60514797
>wormhole isn't associated with blackrock themselves. They're associated with their subsidiary. BlackRock has not directly partnered with wormhole

you've been awarded 1 upvote for a semantics win

>There's your difference

there's no difference


>Receiving a strategic investment is also not a partnership, it's buying out your competition

same end result

i'm a big picture guy and alls i see is one side working with blackrock, and your side aint

> It speaks nothing about the actual use case thats happening behind closed doors

ooohhhhh cryptic buzzwords WOW can i donate?!?!
Anonymous (ID: v9pxi/rb) No.60514834 >>60514891
>>60514818
right because enterprises are going to stomach the 10% surcharge for converting their token of choice into LINK. That's how operating costs work.
Anonymous (ID: v9pxi/rb) No.60514841 >>60514864
>>60514829
if you can't defend what you've said why continue?
Anonymous (ID: v9pxi/rb) No.60514852 >>60514876
>>60514829
one pays for the partnership, the other doesn't
Anonymous (ID: OHbqDQTy) No.60514856 >>60517510 >>60521177
>>60514813
>it's cut and dry that lying and misleading your investors is a bad business move

this must explain why chainlink is down 80%

>You're moving the goalpost

only weirdo online debate guys use this term

reminds me of the dude who said burden of proof recently

you keep missing the point tho... you can't debate your way into winning business and turning a shit investment into a good one. blackrock isn't working with chainlink, it is what it is

i think you might be a little autistic so that point is lost on you and you're obsessing over every word
Anonymous (ID: OHbqDQTy) No.60514864 >>60514885
>>60514841
continue what?

you're so weird
Anonymous (ID: OHbqDQTy) No.60514876
>>60514852
that was a savvy move paying for the parntership

because now blackrock doesn't work with chainlink

kudos to securitize/wormhole
Anonymous (ID: v9pxi/rb) No.60514885 >>60518539
>>60514864
kek fuddie, should've stayed quiet
Anonymous (ID: rJqAAOCq) No.60514891 >>60514899 >>60514917 >>60515820 >>60518539
>>60514834
Once the team runs out of their funding token they'll change the functionality to work with eth and then announce an IPO for Chainlink Labs
Anonymous (ID: hbCyFDkS) No.60514896 >>60514957 >>60515109
Kek fuddies having full meltdown after being proven wrong again and again
Anonymous (ID: v9pxi/rb) No.60514899
>>60514891
They can't node operators are paid in LINK, it's a 10% surcharge when you pay with the token of your choice.
Anonymous (ID: v9pxi/rb) No.60514917
>>60514891
that would be really funny if it happened though, can't say it wont happen since ADA and DOT are selling their tokens for BTC.
Anonymous (ID: 5Z5iWTC5) No.60514957 >>60514965
>>60514896
THE FUDSTERS HAVE BEEN PROVEN RIGHT.
SEE: THE LAST HALF DECADE OF PRICE ACTION
Anonymous (ID: gy0kJ0hE) No.60514965 >>60514992
>>60514957
this
we fuddies are your superiors
bow before us
and show us respect
Anonymous (ID: 5Z5iWTC5) No.60514992 >>60516376
>>60514965
FUDSTERS HAVE THE KEYS TO THIS BOARD. TREAT EM WITH RESPECT.
Anonymous (ID: gRkbz1Qg) No.60515109
>>60514896
you're brown and poor lol
Anonymous (ID: Iac+tK99) No.60515285
>>60514681
>they pretend to support
All fuddies hold LINK tho?
Anonymous (ID: 3DGjiKkX) No.60515795 >>60515821
>>60514662
No idea. They might actually be paid by Jump and told to disengage when it’s mentioned. If we keep bumping this one and they start trying to derail it then we are over the target.
Anonymous (ID: IxDrqbSB) No.60515820
>>60514891
sergey does not like it when he owes people anything. he much prefers it if people give him money and then he can do with it whatever he pleases. when they rum out of link, they will create link 2.0. anons will cheer because they see a chance to buy cheap. the marketing team will get big bonuses for securing the next decade of funding
Anonymous (ID: gRkbz1Qg) No.60515821
>>60515795
I'm getting paid by Bulgarians (NEXO) to shit on Linkies
Anonymous (ID: Iac+tK99) No.60515886
bump
Anonymous (ID: 84W6SCFA) No.60516089 >>60516329
>>60510352 (OP)
Well, I sold my LINK for A47, and looking at this chart showed that I made the best decision
Anonymous (ID: b9TTeyjy) No.60516271
>>60510352 (OP)
>so you see, jeetlink ate everyone's lunch
>$12.00
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>NOT LIKE THAT!
baggies
Anonymous (ID: xZI3GTox) No.60516329
>>60516089
How do I keep missing all these promising AI tokens
Anonymous (ID: 5fiQNMvT) No.60516376 >>60517515
>>60514992
>u-us fuddies have the keys to this board
This is the probably the saddest thing I have ever read posted by a fudcuck.
You don't have the keys to anything. You spam biz during all of your waking hours for pennies per post. It's like saying you own a truck stop because you suck cocks in the bathroom for money.
Anonymous (ID: CHC7Lw32) No.60517510
>>60514856
>>it's cut and dry that lying and misleading your investors is a bad business move
>this must explain why chainlink is down 80%
When did Chainlink ever lie to and mislead their investors?
afaik the closest thing was when they missed that one concrete deadline for CCIP, but that's hardly "lying" or "misleading".
Anonymous (ID: CHC7Lw32) No.60517515
>>60516376
>It's like saying you own a truck stop because you suck cocks in the bathroom for money.
KEK I'm fucking stealing this
Anonymous (ID: OHbqDQTy) No.60518539
>>60514885
i don't know who that is

>>60514891
>Once the team runs out of their funding token they'll change the functionality to work with eth and then announce an IPO for Chainlink Labs

i think this is likely

why not take another payday when there's nothing legally to stop you from doing so
Anonymous (ID: KGYtyQwk) No.60520199
Even Alexander Clote, top marketing mind at API3, knows this. He left the team in order to provide transmissions and open inner pathways to the unenlightened.
Anonymous (ID: u7qCv3+Y) No.60521177 >>60523069
>>60514856
>only weirdo online debate guys use this term
>reminds me of the dude who said burden of proof recently
>fuddies have now resorted to deconstructing the act of debate itself by berating common terminology used in debate as a social faux pas while themselves participating in a debate
Holy fuck, THIS is some of the most desperate cope i have ever seen
Anonymous (ID: v9pxi/rb) No.60522358
>>60510352 (OP)
bump.
Anonymous (ID: OHbqDQTy) No.60523069 >>60523094
>>60521177
there's nothing desperate about it

the reality is too much for you to bear

but then again you're a grown man who uses the term "fuddie"

do you also wear pajamas
Anonymous (ID: diSfcUuL) No.60523094 >>60523116
>>60523069
>but then again you’re a grown man who…
you act like a 12 year old. Fucking moron. No wonder you live with your parents and have no wife or kids
Anonymous (ID: OHbqDQTy) No.60523116 >>60523129 >>60523149
>>60523094
>you act like a 12 year old.
how's that? i'm more of a man than you'll ever be


> Fucking moron

says the guy down against the market 5 straight years
that's almost impossible to do


>No wonder you live with your parents and have no wife or kids

fantasy projection
my lay count would make you cry

don't take it out on me bc you don't have balls
Anonymous (ID: diSfcUuL) No.60523129 >>60524369
>>60523116
lol whatever helps you sleep at night, we all know how pathetic you really are
Anonymous (ID: KNutaAiZ) No.60523149
>>60523116
>lay count
Adem, buddy... whats your wife and kids count? you.... will be turning 35 this year, you know that... right??
Anonymous (ID: gy0kJ0hE) No.60524369
>>60523129
this
we ALL know the levels of patheticness you encapsulate
Anonymous (ID: LcjAF8pR) No.60524386
I liek link :D