>crypto bros really thought electing a rampant Zionist president would be good for their portfolio
I didn't vote for either of those ziodog muppets
>>60515102 (OP)Ah yes Kamala would have been much better! Wait whatโs her husbands early history again?
>>60515102 (OP)Iran is a fucking nothingburger.
Completely powerless country.
The dip.
Buy it.
>>60515102 (OP)Hasn't it been really funny watching in real time MAGA getting it completely wrong every single time? It's like when will they ever learn.
>>60515102 (OP)Both parties are owned by them, retard
Voting doesn't change this policy
It is genuinely baffling to me when anyone thinks a democratic president would have ever in a million years given us anything as remotely bullish as these stablecoin and market structure bills. And they're not even perfect BECAUSE they have to work with democrats.
>>60515232In financial/economic discussions the only time you can criticize Trump is if you ignore the existence of the alternatives which are much worse
>>60515102 (OP)The idea that Kamala represented some repudiation of Zionism is extremely odd. And the Trump admin is still the most pro-crypto administration, it's just that that says more about previous administrations than it does about Trump.
>>60515102 (OP)BTC is still up huge from just a few months ago
Kamala Harris the true crypto president. She would've passed the strategic Bitcoin reserve too