Thread 60551405

Whether you're a whole coiner or not, don't listen to china man, just sell before it's too late, and get back to work wagie.

>>60551405 (OP)
I've watched the suicide stack go from 21 to 1 now to 0.1

>>60551435
Let's say btc goes to 1M. 0.1 would be only $100k.

George Prior here: 0.01 BTC will make you a billionaire.

>>60551440
Let's say btc goes to 10M. 0.1 would be then $1M.

*unplugs ur internet*

What now loser

>>60551440
let's say BTC goes to 800M, 0.1 would be 80 million dollars

>>60551448
By the time that happens house will be worth $10M

So many lives will be irreversibly ruined when the Great Price Correction occurs. Future historians and sociologists will wonder how so many fell for such a blatant cult.

>>60551452
people told me a loaf of bread would be $1000 if BTC hits 100k

>>60551456
let's say BTC becomes priceless, you will stand on your knees begging me for just 1 satoshi, but I will not sell it to you no matter what you offer

biz doesn't talk enough about how much cz and binance manipulate the price of bitcoin to liquidate leverage traders. and they do it with binance holders money. it's illegal FTX level shit.

>>60551466
I don't think that BTC will go to zero but it's now beholden to institutional mone, thus no better than the power the Federal Reserve wields with its fiat currency printers.

>>60551466
>not selling when no one is buying
Based.

>>60551452
think about how stupid what you're saying is. Bitcoin has been outperforming houses since inception. You're saying that somehow houses are going to massively catch up without Bitcoin outpacing them?

In a hyperinflation scenario lwhere a house is $10M in the US the dollar is dead and Bitcoin's value will be everything/bitcoin.

>>60551456
We're going into hyperinflation there will never be a price correction in our lifetime. Maybe in 50yrs If there's a revolution and we start cutting heads of rich people (we won't, they will have robot armies and collected all our DNA for genetic weaponry)

>>60551452
>>60551565
you're basically saying the median home will go from $400k to $10M which is a 25x meanwhile bitcoin will do a 20x.

Do you understand how the economy works? do you understand that houses are not a finite scarce asset? People build more houses if the price goes up or they find different ways to afford living.

Bitcoin is fixed in supply.

>>60551435
Exactly this. I got into crypto in 2015, and everyone used to say "you have to get at least 21 BTC", so I guess that was the suicide stack back then.

>>60551615
>do you understand that houses are not a finite scarce asset?
There is a far greater guarantee of the total supply of land on Earth than there is a guarantee of the total supply of Bitcoin.

>>60551405 (OP)
some time in future btc will get locked in faster than there is new ones made and that will keep btc price trend up.

just like "inflation" is just number made up as no matter how much money they print it gets locked in billionares accounts and companies.

btc cycles will continue till the day we die.

>>60551405 (OP)
shovel seller is selling shovels, yeah the cex dicksucking is the bitchud way!

>>60551632
you're a retard dude

>>60551615
Its fraud son It will keep going till it can't. We all did this when we went with rentseeking behavior. But can you blame us? Inflation forced us to buy riskier and riskier assets just to keep our cost of living. Its going away soon, last rounds of musical chairs.

>>60551661
so are you saying crypto will eventually lose value? It seems btc will never go to low ranges again although I don't believe it will hit a million it does appear to be slowly gaining value over time.

>>60551678
Always does, always gains too. As long as you keep BTC de-centralized and not in the bankers games. At least until they all self implode.

>>60551435
it's actually 21>2.1>0.21(you are here)>0.021

>>60551405 (OP)
Haha you guys you only need:
>>10000 BTC to make it
>>1000 BTC
>>100 BTC
>>10 BTC
>>1 BTC
>>0.1 BTC

Can you imagine there's still people with 0.0 BTC? The idiots are going to be slaving away in the electric mines for a few little satoshis that some retard bought with his graphics card rebate check 20 years ago

>>60551405 (OP)
The house:

>>60551405 (OP)
I agree with the top post but I also agree with the chinaman. They're both right.
The true man's way is to have more than 0.1 and to also invest more broadly.

>>60551656
How difficult is it to get more land on Earth?
How difficult is it to change the maximum supply of Bitcoin?
Only a fool who doesn't understand the state of the world would say the second is more difficult than the first...

>>60551767
there is more land that no one has visited in last 10 years than land that is currently used.

My goal is a whole coin still 3/4 there

>>60551776
Not the point, I'm disputing his claim that "houses are not a finite scarce asset", not that houses are an underutilized market with plenty of room for expansion. Bitcoin is a far more infinite asset than houses.

>>60551781
no its not as there is no way to make supply grow from current max supply.
if you start talking about sats lets talk about rooms and sqft not homes.

>>60551793
It's a line of code away from changing the max supply, then you just need to gaslight and censor the community into accepting it just like in the blocksize wars.

>>60551767
Actually, humans do make more land about 48 square miles a year through coastal reclamation. Places like Singapore, Dubai, and the Netherlands have literally expanded their borders. Bitcoin, on the other hand, is cryptographically hard-capped at 21 million coins it’s mathematically finite, not physically. Land can be created, reclaimed, and even accessed underground or in the sea. Bitcoin cannot.

>>60551800
That’s not how Bitcoin works. Yes, the code can be changed, but the network won’t accept it unless a supermajority of nodes and miners voluntarily adopt it. Bitcoin isn’t governed by code alone, it’s governed by consensus. And the blocksize wars you mentioned? They proved exactly that: you can’t gaslight the network into anything. The chain that changed the rules lost. The one that didn’t — Bitcoin Core — is still BTC today.

>>60551800
it would need action from more people that actually are active.
it would just result in a nother bch

>>60551807
>They proved exactly that: you can’t gaslight the network into anything.
>It was the big blockers who gaslighted and censored the network
outright 1984 style rewriting of history

The Cult of the Black Phallus - practiced and retained by the esoteric doctrine of the ruling class

The Elites have taken an oath to subjugate all of humanity and have been operating thereforth since the fall of Atlantis

Fascism's Manifesto: The husbandry of Everything and Everyone; the unified cult pledge and they all love peepee

The Erected Obelisk therefore represents seized domain and the sun doesn't set on this Animal Farm in veneration to the men of Oz

These staged billionaires, ministers and politicians are just a means of narrative building - gradual acclimation for the slaves to accept the world that is to cum

you will swallow and you will be happy

>>60551815
do whatever you want but for the sake of your financial well being and your family put 5-10% into BTC. if you really can't stomach that then go ahead and short it.

>>60551842
BTC is way too risky for there to be a 5-10% allocation, this is bad advice that significantly raises the volatility of people's portfolios for not too significant of a gain in returns (BTC has not outperformed gold over the last 4 years, it was worth 37 XAU in 2021 and worth 32 XAU today).

>>60551405 (OP)
The American dream is to have stable employment that pays well so that a man can provide for his family by giving them a home and a decent standard of living. It's about escaping poverty and living with dignity and comfort. It's not about being rich or owning something special. It's just the idea that you can have something decent by working hard and being a good person.

>>60551405 (OP)
You cant live in a house the way you can in a bitcoin

>>60551854
Like imagine taking the risk of a 4-8% drop in a year, which BTC has historically had (80% drop) for a mere 5-10% gain (chances are BTC will top at 130-200K). The risk reward is not there, an absolutely terrible asset to hold long term in a portfolio at current prices, it might as well be a coin flip.

>>60551405 (OP)
All that has to happen is for BTC to go to infinity, then owning any amount is equal.

>>60551884
>>60551854
That’s false. Over any meaningful time frame — 3, 5, or 10 years — Bitcoin has crushed gold on a risk-adjusted basis. That’s why BlackRock, Fidelity, and Paul Tudor Jones are all in. Bitcoin has a higher Sharpe ratio, better CAGR, and uncorrelated upside.

Stop spreading misinformation and potentially robbing people from making a good choices.

>>60551896
Sure, if you bought 2 years ago this would be the case. Buying now is terrible advice, this is an asset that fluctuates in bull and bear markets, not a stable upward asset like gold. Anyways here's the chart of BTC priced in XAU, as you can see the most it topped out at was earlier at 40 XAU, which if you bought at the high of 2021 gave you a whole annualized return of 1.97%/yr compared to gold. Of course, now it's down compared to then, so you have lost gold.

When BTC was at $15K, you had the chance for a 4-5x at the mere loss of a 1x (crypto dies so it goes to $0), risk reward was in your favor. Now BTC is at $107K, at best it has a 2x and still has a likely chance of another brutal bear market with a 80% drop, especially with Saylor's little ponzi scheme being so big. It is just not worth the risk, being essentially a coin flip.

>>60551854
>4 years back gold wins, go 2, 3, or 5 year back and BTC wins

>>60551615
The dollar is collapsing, dumbass. If you're sitting your wealth in anything but BTC and precious metals you're big dumb.

>>60551928
Yes anon, go buy the top so you can see the price fall to 10 XAU next year. Fact is BTC has not outperformed gold and has not grown at all in the last 4 years, the growth is imaginary due to inflation and the asset is completely stagnant. Worse off, a large percentage of its growth has also been from stealing market share from alts, indicating the entire crypto market has actually contracted since 2021 in XAU.

>>60551937
kek maxis have no response to this
literally getting beaten by a shiny rock

who cares what the number is just get as much as you can

>>60551448
Why would we say something so stupid? Quantum tech will destroy BTC long before we ever get to $1M.

>>60553327
Quantum fud really?

>>60551405 (OP)
>can we please
who the fuck are they talking to? who is we? why are these social media faggots so fucking narcissistic? you are a nobody faggot, not part of some magical 'we' .. shut the fuck up.

>>60553493
If only twitter-posters didn't spam their garbage here, everyone could have lived their lives without ever knowing the retards said the thing.

>>60551697
>>0.021
Funny thing that people did not believe it every single time. Just imagine 100k folios with just 0.021 btc, hard to believe but I would have never thought 0.1 BTC dust would be fucking 10k.

>>60551440
I mean would 100k prevent any one from kys ? i guess maybe.

>>60551487
I'm surprised someone hasn't nuked this casino yet.

>>60551448
Unironically 0.5 BTC is make it territory in 10 years

I have 0.2 btc. I really need to hurry up.

>>60551444
Checked, coinlets wagmi

>>60551405 (OP)
logistically speaking is their a zero sum "limit" to how much bitcoin can feasibly cost? accounting for mining, what people will spend on one, supply, etc.

>>60551707
You dont need more.

>>60551405 (OP)
short btc fucking brainlets, I wouldn't tell you if that impacted me in any way btw

>>60551937
I can see a world where Bitcoin becomes some kind of global reserve, and I can see a world where it dies out as a scam.
Trump and Saylor have made the latter the likely outcome.

>>60551801
If it's profitable for the tiny club of two dozen or so governing whales and mining owners, the protocol will allow for any number.

>>60551444
>>60553666
checking.

>>60551435
Because with mass adoption, we adjust our expectations. BTC is now higher than the mc of silver. Next, it’s gonna pass gold in about a 10x from here. After that, it’s going to start flipping currencies. My guess is that it peaks around a 50x from here.

>>60551405 (OP)
I have an entire BTC and it's very obvious to me that to make it with BTC I'd have needed 10 BTC. Anyone thinking they will make it off of 0.1 BTC is delusional.

You didn't make it if holding required 20 years btw.