Thread 60561659

Saylor now controls 4% of all still tradable Bitcoin.

This is like how that 1 Jewish guy owns 4% of all Apu

>>60561659 (OP)
>decentralization

>>60561659 (OP)
The bull run ain't over, look at how depressed and bearish everyone is for alts and how everyone gave up of them. Not very bullish at all, which is why alts will moon so as to punish their lack of faith and commitment lol, crypto is like a bipolar schizo girlfriend that hates you and tries to kill you one second and loves you to the ends of the earth the next.

>>60561659 (OP)
>be cia
>needs beast computer
>all remote controlled
>they're never gonna be this
>dumb
>cia: hold my beer

>>60561680
It's just a lottery, don't glorify it.

>>60561675
If he'd be the only one, but there are at least ten others like him, hiding in the shadows, controlling the strings, scheming on Little St. James 2.0.

>>60561659 (OP)
He owns 1% of the total supply, big whoop

>>60561675
He's a custodian, this is like saying vanguard or Blackrock own 10% of assets

In reality they are just holding other people's stuff

>>60561659 (OP)
You will never be a trad able Bitcoin

>>60561695
You understand that 1% of the money supply control is like Rockefeller level wealth and even that is a historical anomaly

>>60561703
So what? Yes there is a rich guy.

>>60561716
But this is 4x the money supply of Rockefeller- and rapidly rising

>>60561695
Where do these numbers come from? I found 0.13% owning in 2020, and 4% controlling, assuming the usual 15M still tradable Bitcoin.

>>60561730
He owns ~600K BTC, which to the current circulating supply of 20M is 3%

>>60561733
I called that controlling, because he has some obligations to the shareholders. And I use 15M for the amount that is not lost.

>>60561738
In terms of his personal ownership? Apparently he holds ~18K according to Google, so ~0.09% from the 20M number and ~0.12% from your estimated 15M

>>60561659 (OP)
Nice club he's apart of

>>60561749
Yes, that's what I meant, but it seems that private number is from 2020.

>>60561750
I'm not that worried about him being on the cover in itself, it's the combination of what got him onto the cover and the timing.

>>60561659 (OP)
A retarded version of the hunt brothers.

>>60561799
Ever since I read of him a few years ago, I think he heard about them as a kid and decided to do that again at some point in the 2010s.

>>60561799
JPM has been doing the hunt brothers skit with silver for a decade now, but better and larger than they were.

>>60561863
Yes, but they are part of the system, I don't think that Saylar has that kind of backing, or enough blackmail.

>>60561659 (OP)
one wrong move or bump on the head and it's gone forever.

>>60561934
The company has beneficiaries retard

>>60561750
>every person who has ever been on the cover of forbes ever has fucked up

>>60561953
Not every person, but the vibes are strong with this one. I mean, at least a single digit percentage of the world at his mercy, that's how it will go down? No way.

he can never sell lmao