>>60566611
For the twelve hundredth and final time you autistic fud bot, if they were initially based in the US, or openly discuss revenue, they would have opened the door for the SEC to scream unregistered securities, get sued up the ass, and cause massive delay with adoption with their partners as they wait for litigation to settle, because unlike xrp, link tokens serve a purpose via staking. Shilling the link token for what it does is the equivalent of promising higher returns as adoption grows exponentially. I.E an unregistered security.
How do you avoid that as someone working with SWIFT, JP Morgan, Mastercard, Visa, DTCC, ETC? You shut the fuck up, create the product, and shill growing adoption instead of growing value and need for the token. You don't need to be told how much CLL made last year (3 million, by the way. Check their tax filings in the UK, and the UK doesn't allow token sales to be counted. So that's just plain profit). Why do you think they obsessively post about adoption on X? Could they post revenue data or information related to the main product that encourages price growth of the link token (staking) now that the SEC is friendlier? Yes. Will they? Why the fuck would they give more info for their competition to use against them?
Tell your masters at jump crypto to suck my left nut btw
