Anonymous
(ID: Jm3r9xXw)
7/2/2025, 8:13:08 PM
No.60573464
>>60573698
SHORT NOW = Literally free money
There is simply not enough inflows to keep BTC over 109k
Anonymous
(ID: g8fRtz/v)
7/2/2025, 8:18:45 PM
No.60573504
>>60573560
bobo, in 3 hours and 42 minutes the kangaroo market opens, in 5 hours and 43 minutes the asian markets open.
they could fomo pump it hard.
anyway, im long but i have a hedge short position open as well.
Anonymous
(ID: jCi58nF9)
7/2/2025, 8:29:33 PM
No.60573560
>>60573576
>>60573504
besides fomo, any good news on the front?
Anonymous
(ID: dnjetVAF)
7/2/2025, 8:31:26 PM
No.60573576
>>60573598
>>60573560
powell getting replaced, big beautiful bill, market getting used to trump tarrif tacos, i don't know, pick one
Anonymous
(ID: Jm3r9xXw)
7/2/2025, 8:34:51 PM
No.60573598
>>60573576
Some and mirrors
And still the dollar crashing against all other currencies.
Anonymous
(ID: n8igzhbn)
7/2/2025, 8:37:23 PM
No.60573619
Net Nominal Demand: n = d-s+h
Where:
d: Bitcoin’s demand
s: Subsidy
h: Hodler Sales
All in nominal terms
+n line go up
-n line go down
As s is fixed in bitcoin terms, we can calculate the neutral demand, the demand from which h does not diminish: s*price = $344m/7d @ $109k. h is finite, so any n > 0 will deplete h in-the-limit.
Over the last month, we’ve been averaging almost a $1bn/week into ETFs alone, almost 3x the necessary net inflows to support a $109k price.
Why do you persist in denying empirical reality, bobo?
