In a few months, we will be in total and infinite hilarity watching BTC maxis get screwed and weak hands regret having sold. I know it, you know it.

>>60584173 (OP)
Unlikely. The paradigm change is here, BTC will become the universal store of value, and everyone will have to lend at premium for their bags.
They will rule with an iron fist and lots of malice and contempt for the nocoiners, and there will be no alternatives to the BTC system.
This is the cheapest it ever will be, buy now, don't miss out, buy buy buy.

>>60584195
Sorry, I don't believe in this speech that serves to impress the plebs. Only a mildly insane person would think that this will happen. For them, it's a way to make money like any other. I'm not anti-BTC, I'll buy some in 2026 when it has collapsed to sell it for more, as I did in the last two cycles. It's an asset like any other.

>>60584173 (OP)
>regret having sold
You mean having not sold?

>>60584209
The usual response would be to insult you and screech sidelined and stay poor.

>>60584195
>Universal store of value
>When Satoshi, an unknown entity, has 1million BTC to dump on us
>When most of China controls BTC

yeah not gonna happen

>>60584327
That would just be 1/15th inflation. Big BTC lending markets could conspire to never accept these early coins for a direct full sale, just gradually for lending, for the plebs to fight against each other.

>>60584327
And let's not mention China, it's in our best interest. Or something like that.

>>60584173 (OP)
BTC maxis gatekeep utility while yelling “store of value” like it's 2017
>I have been paying rent, hotels and even car rentals with xMoney while stacking cashback on the side
They can keep screaming “digital gold” while I'm out here using crypto like it’s meant to be used, frictionless, borderless, real life payments. Let them cope when utility chads flip them without touching a CEX

>>60584173 (OP)
BTC dom will continue rising and rising and pathetic shitcoiners who felt priced out of bitcoin will continue to lose money holding dogshit scams instead of the only crypto that matters

>>60584209
It’s bullish but not insane. It’s literally what BTC was designed to do. Whether or not you believe it will come to fruition is up to you. It’s a lot less insane to say this now than it was 5 years ago.

>>60584195
Bagholder talk

>>60584173 (OP)
>>60584209
Muh cycle is dead

>>60584173 (OP)
Theres gonna be a pullback but not a crash. Those days seem to be gone. But for newfags its best to accumulate cash and wait for the pullback. Or say fuck it and go balls deep in alts and dont wait. This may likely the alt season "last hurrah" but we have to see regulation. If burger and chink markets get cucked the rest of the world collectively does so as well

>>60584195
Lel you are exactly why btc is going down also pic related

Banks wont buy your tokens, they'll generate their own.

>>60584504
My nose is so beaked right now

Fooled into believing false scarcity coupled to fake demand; via rehypothecation and wash trading. Btc is backed by stablecoins which are backed by digital dollars backed by cash deposits at the bank. Consider that there are over 50 stablecoins for every dollar they claim to be pegged to, and there are 2000 digital dollars for every dollar in cash deposits; the price of crypto is a demonstration of how a single dollar can be leveragedly expanded 100,000x over. This is why btc follows the major stock indexes and gets dumped whenever someone cashes out and even dumps when there are buyers. Dark pools and foundations release dormant tokens which serve to increase the supply; there are an infinite amount of btc. Especially when you realize who vehemently pushes for (((democracy))). They already control most of the network, nodes, and miners; all it takes is 51% to trample out the other 49.

>>60584520
If it's so easy go ahead and make a btc for yourself. Just one extra btc, should be easy, noone will notice it amidst the other 21 million. Then you can sell it and buy more gold, whose supply (as we all know) is hard capped and has never subject to dilution.

I think this is bait, but it's decent bait, so here's your (you)

>>60584195
>store of value
you can't store value

>>60584209
>collapsed
rates are still at 4

>>60584593
No, but they use this phrase, I just try to fit in.

>>60584594
What are the chances Trump makes it through the presidency without getting impeached?
He cut ties to the Hitlergruß and chainsaw wielding rich man of stunted personality, but it's still an armada of political entropy reporting to him directly.
And he's peddling his perfume right between international diplomatic messages, and attempts to replace the dollar with a crypto insider scam largely sponsored by Saudi Arabia.
I appreciate the entertainment, and I think he was on top of Israel's recent chimpout, which is no small feat, but I don't see how this can go on for another three years.
And Trump getting rekt means a good -30%, at least, or more if it's because of economic woes.

>>60584559
See that line going straight down? Btc is created all the time then dumped. You are just not smart enough.

>>60584743
Lel btc can be dumped on a whim, generated, then dumped further.

hello. test test

>>60584209
Economic units have demand not because of belief, but because their supply properties allow demand to alter price primarily instead of supply, enabling economically useful functionality such as Store of Value and other economic abstractions. This is why grain et al, despite having great “intrinsic value” and near-universal acceptance performs poorly as an economic unit, grain has huge elastic supply so increasing demand results in increased supply, instead of increased price, preventing the encoding of economic state information into the price of grain and therefore preventing the use of grain et al as an economic unit.

Gold has been used as an economic unit since antiquity because its low elastic supply render it a fine natural approximation of a unit, but it still possesses elastic supply, bitcoin surpasses gold primarily by possessing perfect inelastic supply, while network effects keep BTC ahead of newer imitations as they fail to improve on the systemically important properties of bitcoin.

Perfect inelastic supply enables the encoding of the price of money into btc via aggregate demand for “economic unit”, in doing so creating a Trustless Price Signal of Money, i.e. THE economic reference point. This massively increases the efficiency of economic calculation.

>bitcoin will die in two weeks
if I had a sat for every time I heard that

>>60584327
There is no way to guarantee more BTC simply by holding BTC, hence initial distribution is of only minor importance in-the-limit, however, BTC also benefits from near-perfect initial distribution with PoW guaranteeing new BTC are bestowed only to positive sum actors.

>>60584426
Why would Medium of Exchange have value? There is no term risk in MoE, further, there is no net demand for MoE! It’s transactional after all, other than some liquidity requirements no one actually holds or wants fiat, the wagie may be paid in it, but only the dullest little wagies actually SAVE (and therein generate net demand) in it, for those with at least ambient temperature IQs, even when you hold “cash” you aren’t actually holding fiat, you (or the financial institution you use) are holding tbills or shares in a money market fund etc. The very fact that we can use hot garbage like fiat as MoE should have clued you into the fact the MoE is trivial, and therefore of no value.

>>60584224
OP is a shitcoiner (probably holds ETH), and he's saying that in a few months we'll finally have an alt season, where BTC dumps/crabs, while alts pump nonstop. He's saying people will regret having sold their alts.

As a holder of another shitcoin, I hope OP is right. But I'm afraid Drumpf won't let that happen. He can't go a few weeks without creating a new drama.

>>60584593
“Storing value” is an economic abstraction enabled by abstract economic units like gold, land, equities, debt instruments, or bitcoin. Bitcoin is the first trustless unit with perfect inelastic supply, this is so valuable because the only way to transfer value temporally is to hold assets that will have demand in the future. Increasing supply is equivalent to decreasing demand so being constrained in supply is necessary. To transfer value into the future I therefore want two things: constrained supply (preferentially fixed) & network of use as an economic unit. I want these things because I know that the future will also want these things, I want the largest, perfectly inelastic, economic unit as it will be in demand in the future, I want BTC. BTC = Value.

>>60584963
>>60584887
Auto-insert copy-paste speech. You are just copying and pasting the official BTC speech without any critical thinking. If you think they are going to abandon the fiat system, you are extremely innocent, literally infants, naked in a jungle and defenseless, and it will be your downfall.

>>60584963
>trustless
you trust miners

>>60585143
>you trust miners
topkek
chinkchongs with minerrigs will screw you over in a split second
>so far so good right

>>60585022
>no argument
Pathetic.
>no critical thought
Says the dull little statist slavemind convinced his infinite supply shitcoin will gain value
>>60585143
>>60585191
Miners aren’t trusted third parties, mining isn’t trust-based, exceptionally dull.

>>60584940
It’s wild how ETH holders are the most bitter of all