The designer of Zelenskyy’s outfit literally confirms: yes, it’s a suit.
Not a traditional one but a tailored suit with military elements. Still a suit.
So if even the creator of the outfit says it’s a suit… what are we even debating here?
This is an official statement from the brand behind the design.
Why does Polymarket allow UMA whales to engage in scam?
People deserve to know the truth.
>>60585683 (OP)Bro stop acting like the defender of truth. Ur just some degenerate looking to 100x his money. You dont give a fuck if its a suit or not, and if yes was at 99c youd be buying no and saying its not a suit cause its not a traditional suit.
Get scammed retard
Whales always win, a lesson everyone has to learn.
>>60585689This
>>60585683 (OP)Ugh sweaty, the 1 gorillion prolongings of the timer shouldve given you a hint by now that your money will be taken.
No tie = no suit. Simple as.
>>60585724nah ur just a little fegit.
and everyone on 4chan these days is a normalfag, thats why i dont come here anymore. bunch of retarded ass zoomers like you.
if u werent here in 2016/2017 youre literally never making it little zoom zoom. get ready to spend the next 30 years working, theres no escape for you bitch. go suck on ur gay ass vape and cry about it.
it's gonna be a 50/50 split and therefore "no" owners will get rekt in shambles as they see a -50% dark swoon slash to their cuntfolios. (the average yes owner has $10 in it vs the $30,000+ the no owner has)
>>60585733Ah yes, the rich guys who always make good bets if you check their history simply became retarded this one time. Do you need a translstion? Youre gonna get fucked with no refunds
>>60585744oh no whatever will I do with 10 less dollars. afraid little cunt
>>60585747Thats probably 1/10th of your bank account anyways.
I’m cautious whenever a market has already priced in one outcome — in this case, “No” — because it means most participants believe the decision is settled.
Still, I’m willing to bet on Polymarket
’s integrity and hope they fix the resolution to “Yes.” The risk/reward is outstanding at 1:82.
Why? Because it’s their chance to show the market that they won’t fold to manipulation (despite past such cases), do some free marketing about the situation and how they made it right (they are trending for a reason), and set this up for an upcoming POLY token launch.
>>60585822there is no conclusion, they keep prolonging it and no ones doing shit about it. they dont really care at this point
A broad variety of media outlets referred to it as a suit. 2) Zelenskyy's referred to it as some sort of suit on an interview. 3) THE OUTFIT DESIGNER said it can be considered as a suit, through an official Instagram comment. UMA should vote based on general consensus. And the general consensus overwhelmingly leans towards "YES". There is absolutely no reason to vote for "NO". Any votes justified by UMA holders' or Polymarket staff's own opinion is completely irrelevant. The general consensus is that YES, HE WORE A SUIT. Period. YES is the only correct answer. Any other option will make both Polymarket and UMA completely untrustworthy for eternity..
>>60585822This would be true in an ideal world but in reality it will resolve to no, a few twitter fags will write angry words and it will be forgotten in a week without further comment by Polymarket.
first time getting kiked dude? you dont remember GME? let this be a lesson to you and stay away from anything with kikey little rat claws in the pot
>>60585822they don't care mate. Have you seen polymarket employees posting on twitter? They are faggots
And noone has asked /fa/ about their take on the suit/not-suit?
Fucking retards.
notie
md5: f42f52c5567f05d51e84582b909d4e8c
🔍
>>60585709>t. dumb jeet nigger monkey has never worn a suit in his life
So zelensky spent tax dollars and many multiple hundreds of hours of correspondence and coordination of a team of people just so he can look like a bum in an army green shirt while pretending to be "in the thick of it"?
How many does he have? I'll bet this ensemble of clothes cost Ukraine well over a million dollars and he can justify it by saying "I needed to look a certain way to convey something so our country gets support."
Sickening. And sickening how easily a retard like me can see that, don't you think?
>>60585822Lol they’re going to hide behind the uma vote.
>>60585683 (OP)>can indeed be referred This means it can also not be.
INCONCLUSIVE
noone who enjoys suits would call that a suit
>>60586296thank you john from idaho oblast for your retarded comment
>>60586496Correct
>muh decentralized>sorry chuds if whales are manipulating the bets, we as POOlymarket are not directly responsable of any outcomesNO REFUNDS
Polymarket is fucking retarded anyway. We already had this thing without the esoteric crypto shit. It's called BETTING, and it worked by the bookie deciding when you won not you putting up tokens to argue with other bettors over what just happened lol.
>>60585689>>60585698>>60585709holy copes, the mental gymnastics of No-tards, pure projection
>HURRR your only doing it to make moneyLmao yeah actually, the truth is, in theory, meant to make you money on Poolyjeet yet it seems your scam is coming undone in real time definitely on the wrong side of history, easiest 100x of my life
>>60585822>Community ran betting platform>Turns out its a scam and only 10 whales who control a shitload of UMA tokens get to decide the outcome.
>Biggest yesholder sold his bags
Welp time to dip then.
>>60586825>the controlled opposition No-whale from the frauding poly discord made a moveOH NO NO NO
>>60586905whats the discord?
>>60586936it's a private one for whales to fuck everyone else, hopefully this time it is they who get obliterated
>>60586776>he thinks hes making history betting 10 dollars on a bangladeshi funny money betting site.
The designer is incentivized to lie and call it a suit to sell for higher price
>>60585709You're confusing a suit with some level of formality. A suit worn without a tie is less formal but it's still a suit.
SUITBROS!!!!!
LFG!!!!
3%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>60585683 (OP)>designed to convey authority, subtlety and purposelmao, why are poisonous manlet dwarves like this?
What was the definition of a suit in the market rules? They did have market rules right? They didn't just try to wing it like a bunch of retards?
>>60587716PBS says he wore a suit. Politico said he wore a suit. BBC said he wore a suit. Zelenksyy’s stylist said he wore a suit. CONSENSUS OF CREDIBLE REPORTS, which is the ONLY thing that matters for this market, says he wore a suit. DONT LET UMA WHALES GASLIGHT YOU OTHERWISE.
just throw $100 and enjoy your 50x if lucky
otherwise enjoy poolyjeet crashing and burn after the bad press
>>60586825He spent the past week slurping in increments and then immediately turns around and sells his entire bag at once, for an average of less than 1 penny. When there's still over 24 hours on the dispute.
really doesn't make any sense for a guy just trying to recoup his bags. He knew it was lost to begin with anyway. To me this is more like some rich fuck crashing the price so all us poors can have a good entry
>>60587776The only thing that matters in settling betting markets is the market rules. If the rules were "a consensus of credible reports says its a suit" then both consensus and credible needed to be defined in the rules.
You very rarely get this problem with bookmakers because even markets with ambiguous titles have strict rules. The more I read about this the more I think the whole market should be voided for being incoherent.
>>60585683 (OP)>Uhm yes the outfit can be referred to a suit - though not a traditional one. It is a tailored ensemble that draws from both civilian and military references designed to convey authority subtlety, and purpose
I'd like to go on the record to say it's not a suit. For the purposes of an ill defined bet, I would be ok with that winning or everyone being refunded.
>>60587776None of those outlets are credible.
SOMETHING IS HAPPENNING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YES 3,5%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>60587880>creator of the suit says its a suit>50+ media outlets call it a suit>suit experts agree it's a suitBut yes, you, a random anon, knows it better.
What’s the point of a betting market if you just get scammed like that? No it must be resolved as yes, the integrity of the platform is at stake.
Seems undervalued. I might ape
>>60587903The suit creator literally says in the OP that it's not a traditional suit. Given the context of that Jew wearing bullshit outfits all the time, the point of the bet was almost certainly about a traditional suit. Also, yes, I usually know better than all those retards you listed.
>>60585683 (OP)only UMA votes matter
this is the power of oracles
>>60588106This is polymarkets fault for not specifying a traditional western styled suit. It just says suit, and that’s what it is.
>>60585683 (OP)never bet on stupid subjective shit like this
I am putting a massive bet on NO 25bps rate cut by end of the month
keep it simple.
>>60588106>jewish pilpul/semanticsthis post
you vill lost and you vill be happy, tranny.
I have never even visited that poly website, but that is not a suit, if you were that to a job with a suit dress code you will receive shit for it.
Its a suit you fucking retards
Imagine betting money on something where the outcomes are not defined. KEK.
>>60588158Correct. A suit jacket is from the same material as the suit pants. Blazer and slacks involves matching two things sold separately
so how exactly does this polymarket shit work? I hear that there's something about bonds and coins and shit, but i don't really understand it. do you just keep buying shit and try to influence the decisions?
The mentality of the vast majority of NO voters is of an entirely base nature. They are not whales. What they can only see is a handful of dollars they might win by following scammers. They risk thousands to win tens. And for what purpose? They sacrifice the truth itself for their petty greed. This is the disease of the short-sighted. It is a spiritual myopia, brought on by an emptiness of the soul. This was never about the irrelevant technicalities of whether some Ukrainian comedian wore a suit or not. It is a war of faith, a battle between those who stand up for the truth and the filthy liars who would deny it for pennies. Choose the right side, gentlemen.
https://www.kyivpost.com/post/55194
so even their own kike propaganda called it a suit last week how does it get any more official and credible than that?
