Thread 60597087

WHO THE FUCK KNOWS WHAT THEY ARE SAYING? GO AHEAD AND POST THIS BUBBA, WE KNOW YOU DESPERATELY NEED A WIN RIGHT NOW
DATED 2025-06-18
https://www.samsungpop.com/common.do?cmd=down&contentType=application/pdf&inlineYn=Y&saveKey=research.pdf&fileName=3020/2025061809335114K_02_01.pdf

>>60597087 (OP)
this is bullish for Ripple (ticker:XRP)

>>60597087 (OP)
Holy shit check the price!

>>60597087 (OP)
I can read moon runes
Roughly translated it states:
Token Not Needed

haha that company is called semen

>>60597087 (OP)
token not needed though

Samsungs are fucking shit but Apple is worse

>>60597087 (OP)
This is probably going to include their samsung wallet to allow multiple payment processors for cryptocurrencies so that samsung does the heavy lifting.

>>60597114
Samsung dex is pretty nice

HOLY
FUCKING
SHIT

>>60597150
Ah so i was correct. Maybe it was just a lucky guess? Or maybe its obvious where the industry is headed? Because its heading towards the chainlink standard.

>>60597087 (OP)
The president of the US met with Sergey

>>60597161
Perhaps. I did scroll down further on the translation and it does appear there is an addendum to the "source" part below the rhs diagram:
"SWIFT's official press release, August 2023, Samsung Securities."

Might not necessarily be new information, but Samsung would ostensibly be more well informed about these things than us and gives a decent chance that it's progressing nicely.

>>60597087 (OP)
When will you linkies learn that even if Jesus Christ partnered with Chainlink, the price will never go up. Master Card, Eric schmidt advisor, even sirgay meeting with Trump. Linkies will and forever will be pumped and dumped.

>>60597165
>meets with the literal president of the united states
>turns $19 into $13
If I told myself both statements 8 years ago I would never believe it

>>60597148
I have the S23 ultra. Charging port is whack and pissed me off so much but still seems better than the S25. Barely a difference except 25 seems to have a worse camera.

Will probably get a S26 like the cuck I am

S20 was fucking invincible. Concrete dust in the charging port and still no issues. You get a bit of moisture around this thing and it goes of its head.

>>60597210
Its fucking stupid that samsung tries to compete with apples design when it loses reliability like that

Thanks Fren

>>60597220
Apple is king dick in Asia. At least Japan. Nips love their apple. But they also froth over Adidad and Reebok which is just trash here

ok why am i not a billionaire yet

>>60597293
TWO MORE WEEKS, MARINE!

>>60597087 (OP)
This has literally nothing to do with Chainlink.

>>60597192
What am I looking at?

>>60597096
you got an audible exhale level kek out of me
thanks

>>60597114
i like my samsung most things, phone, tv, washing machine.
their dishwashers are kindof shitty though.
.t rental prroperty owner

>>60597373
You will never be a real dishwasher.

>>60597087 (OP)
bullish for HBAR

>>60597087 (OP)
price price price price
tell me 'bout dat price xD

>>60597210
Samsung has the shittiest ui I can't stand the phones unless I put another os on it

>>60597087 (OP)
Bullish for chainlink labs not the speculative token that’s being whispered to be discontinued and was only used for funding

GIMME YO EFFERIUMS

>>60597701
cll employees get paid partly in LINK

>>60597701
How is the token going to be discontinued?

>>60597724
it's just fud
the real fud is that we will get fucked with a ipo
staking gets reduced to nothing/minimal then the real $ flows to CLL via off-chains deals - this is happening now, they get paid millions for bank and institutional projects + ccip integrations
but the worry is they could make this their end game rather than a transitional phase

>>60597734
Now thats doubt without being unfounded. Retail does not have the use for VRF and CCIP transactions when they can just go through a centralized solution like opensea or coinbase. When enterprise adoption goes full scale and you dont see revenue being generated at that level from transactions then that explanation makes a lot of sense.

Bump. Fuck fuddies

>>60597724
Careful youll send him into a masturbation meltdown frenzy

If chainlink labs does go IPO then thats a big red flag if anything. Fuddies need to keep their ear to the ground and call it out if that ever happens.

poor latecucks kek

Only real-world usage can pump this token.

price, bitch
say it with me now:
PRICE, BITCH
no matter what link shills do or say, we say
PRICE, BITCH
MAKE EM EAT THEIR FAILURES
MAKE EM EAT THEIR POVERTY
PRICE, BITCH
PRICE, BITCH
PRICE, BIIIIIITCH

>>60597941
Long time no see, i notice that image name has changed. What was modified?

>>60597747
THIS THREAD WAS MADE BY A FUDSTER
FUCK YOU

>>60597285
Its a worldwide phenomenon for people to strive for american luxury products. That includes iphones, milwuakee tools, fast fashion, and cheap american fast food

>>60597953
it multiplied by 9

>>60597087 (OP)
It is called Chainlink Marines because they are always underwater.

>>60598053
Reinforcements wont help your pathetic situation

>>60597741
Literally this

>>60597734
>>60597741
>>60597747

The real FUD will be having to hook into the system. We will probably have to deny Christ as our Lord and Savior too. I unironically have lost all interest in “getting rich” in this new system we are going into because of Link. I knew this was all going to happen and I only bought Link to prevent being exposed to the same system as the riffraff. It’s unfortunate we didn’t at least get 3-4 years of fun in the old world with Link at $500 or whatever before they clamp down on everyone. Every bitch has a tattoo too.

>>60597150
>COLLABORATING
>PILOT
>PREPARING

>>60597087 (OP)
So Jasmy it is then.

>>60598092
Theres also the factor of liquidity needed in order to secure the network. If defi turns into a trillion dollar industry then an IPO is not needed. If defi stagnates but industries still rely on link then an IPO might be warranted.

I remember that it only takes 1% to secure a quadrillion dollar ecosystem. That means trillions of value on the link ecosystem itself. If people surmise that bitcoin can reach gold's market cap then LINK can theoretically match the trillion needed.

Interesting.

>>60598112
Tl;DR If Defi becomes a failed industry then CLL is more inclined to go IPO. If Defi reaches trillions of dollars in value then an IPO wont be necessary

>>60598108
yeah, this is the only probable FUD. not to mention all the poors left behind living off rats. do as much good as you can with your crypto wealth (hopefully you dont stay in poverty traps like xrp and other meme coins) because there will come a time where you must choose your soul or shekels.

>>60598108
>We will probably have to deny Christ as our Lord and Savior too.
that's a given, stinkie

>>60598118
Can fuddies seriously stop gilding the lily and actually have a productive conversation?

>>60597199
The economics of link are not designed to make holders rich.
There is no reason for the company to do anything that is not in its own interest.
There is a reason securities laws were invented back in the day.
If link holders actually owned equity in the company every single one of them would have made it.
They do not though, and the company is not a charity nor stupid enough to just give away billions to holders. There is absolutely no rational reason to do so.
They're also smart enough to mathematically model ways to maximally extract value from the token to the company, since they understand the supply and demand of it better than anyone.
The ICO golden era of irrationality is long, long over.

>>60598139
token needed tho, cope more latecuck

>>60598108
Nothing ever happens.

>>60598141
It doesn't matter if it is needed or not though. That's kind of the point.
You can just get link over the counter from the company you know.
Think about it. But never sell. There's no point in selling.
Five years from now I'll check back here and it will be the same story, even if link is even more wildly successful than it is now.
The same story will be told, if you could go back in time n years and describe the state and success of link... you might assume the token would be priced orders of magnitude higher based off of assumptions people here make about how it works economically.
But n years from now it will be the same story, even if link plays a fundamental role in global fintech and is successful.
I believe the company is and likely will continue to be successful the way it is designed.
I'll be extra correct if link ever does a public offering like Circle. They've covered their legal bases with the utility token. So while people might get mad and attempt a class action, they won't win. The company always wins. Because they're smart like that.

>>60598178
kek back to your containment thread latecuck

nice cope 8/8, token needed tho

>>60598139
Nodes need the token to work.
Therefore more usage = more demand for tokens.

You wrote all that shit just to get debunked in two lines.

>>60598232
so nobody uses the network according to your own logic

>>60598243
What makes you say that?
Most of crypto uses Chainlink, verifiably on chain and everything.

>>60598252
the complete lack of demand for the token?

>>60598325
There's tons of demand for the token. Nodes have been working non stop for six years now.

>>60598328
there's zero demand for the token, it's been dumping for 5 years straight

>>60598325
>over 70% of the total crypto market is retail
>why is there no demand for the token????

Its really palpable why retards who are focused on their bags pumping TODAY are questioning why nobody within 10 feet of them arent using VRF to mint randomized racist NFTs or swapping USDT between avalanche and ethereum. Its obviously that simple.

Its like the retards saying that it was the ETH miners that kept graphics card prices at an absurd level.

>>60598331
Wow what a surprise.

>>60598332
>bags pumping TODAY
it's been 8 years honey

>>60598334
Okay so then whats your opinion about cardano and polkadot selling their token supply for a bitcoin reserve?

>>60598335
>>60598334
This was for you.

>>60598338
my opinion is that both of them are grifts
if all is this LINK "usage" doesn't translate to high prices, it might as well not exist

>>60598331
>>60598341
Prices are determined in the markets, not the networks.

>>60598341
The vast majority of retail does not have any use for the functionality of what chainlink provides if they can go through a centralized solution. I point to those tokens because even though links price has not increased, the majority of project do not gain traction. That being said, everyone knows that the enterprise market is waiting for it's hymen to be broken.

Do you know how long nvidia went public before their stock price pumped?

Traditional finance takes much longer than 8 years to move

>>60598343
tokens are bought in the market, if there isn't sufficient demand, price drops
>>60598345
no, I won't be waiting 16 years for LINK to take off, and no, Chainlink isn't Amazon, nor NVIDIA

>>60598352
Here's an obligatory (you)

>>60598351
We're so freakin early its unbelievable.

>>60598355
anon, if your only response is "wait 10 more years", it's already over
hopefully you'll get it in the next decade

>>60598358
Hey i have this low market cap coin you might be interested in instead. What's your telegram bashir?

>>60598352
We were talking about technical demand, and you moved the goalposts to speculative demand.

How does XRP have the third highest MC in all of crypto despite having virtually zero users?

>>60598363
terrible strawman, do better
>>60598365
LINK is simply lacking demand, that's precisely why it's been dumping for 5 years, I'm not interested on entertaining the countless mental gymnastics you have to perform to justify this atrocious performance

>>60598389
Nigga define lack of demand. On chain metrics, partnerships, and overall developer activity says otherwise.

I already gave you an obligatory (you)

>>60598389
>LINK is simply lacking demand
It's definitely not lacking network demand.

>mental gymnastics
You blamed the price on the lack of network demand for the token.
That's not how this market works.

XRP has a near 0 network demand, but look at its MC.

>>60598395
demand that results in all of those users having to buy the token from spot market, and leading to price appreciation
like I said already, if this "usage" isn't reflected on the charts, it doesn't even matter
ok, nigger?

>>60598396
it definitely is lacking demand, look at the charts
>muh xrp this muh xrp that
sell your xrp bags anon

>>60598397
>>60598401
Explain what kind of demand XRP has that makes it rank 3.

>>60598397
I can see why youre confused with what you mean by your milk toast answer, but then again general retail doesnt have any use for it past being a shitcoin casino.

>>60598405
the kind of demand that makes number go up
>>60598408
>LINK is useless, wait 10 more years
I already told you, no

>>60598405
He cant explain it okay. He cant explain why an extra 100 billion in market cap suddenly flowed into it overnight.

>>60598409
>the kind of demand that makes number go up
Speculative demand. That's literally all they have.
Link has massive network demand, XRP has massive speculative demand.

And in the current era before mass adoption, crypto relies mostly on speculation.
Normally this means speculating on future network demand, but obviously the current crypto market is too stupid to know that.

>>60598409
>calls out logical fallacy used by another person
>proceeds to use a logical fallacy to defend himself

Mmmkay

>>60598411
>he thinks $100b dollars actually went into xrp
that's cute, you don't even know the basics yet you feel confident enough to lecture people that have been holding this shitcoin for almost a decade

>>60598416
cool, LINK doesn't have any kind of demand
>>60598417
mmmmm thnx

>>60598418
So the price of xrp didnt reflect a 100 billion dollar inflow? After their market cap is showing the same thing?

>>60598421
>LINK doesn't have any kind of demand
It has had massive network demand for the past half decade. Most of crypto uses the network, which in turn needs the token.

And the future holds an insane growth in network demand, with the absolute biggest tradfi players openly talking about integrating it. So speculative demand should be through the roof, except pic related.

>>60598431
And another fuddie silences himself when you get to brass tax

>>60598425
no, mcap is fake
>>60598431
it is massively lacking demand, hence why the price is shit

>>60598469
This guy, the hubris is intense

>>60598472
lol, the irony

>>60598478
You cry lack of demand but never directly answered when asked to clarify

>>60598469
>it is massively lacking demand
Are you just going to keep arguing in circles?

See >>60598431

So far not a single crypto has pumped because of network demand, simply because adoption is still tiny.
It's all been speculative.
And for various reasons (suppression etc.) the speculative market chooses to ignore Link, even though network demand for Link is extremely high compared to literally all other cryptos.

>asset that should have lots of speculative demand has no speculative demand
oh the horror

>>60598482
lack of demand literally means no one's buying, it doesn't get more straightforward than this
>>60598486
>adoption is tiny
hence why it constantly dumps, what is even your point
there's not enough demand for LINK, simply put

>>60598500
Surely if that was the case then the market cap wouldnt have recovered near its ATH right?

>>60598505
mcap is fake, but even if we acknowledge it, all it indicates is the massive dillution of the supply and, guess what, LACK OF DEMAND

>>60598514
>everything is fake and gay!

>>60598519
no, mcaps are fake and gay, terrible strawman again

>>60598521
Its astounding how confident you are saying that when anyone can go on google and type "is market cap or token price more important"

>>60598525
https://crypto.bi/market-caps/
it truly is astounding how you keep defending a well known fake metric

>>60598528
>doesnt provide alternative statistics why the link token has no demand like developer activity, oracle dominance, total value secured, just worried about price now
>doesnt explain how decentralized networks derive value from such as utility governance and network effects
>doesnt include regulatory impacts, exchange practices, or broader market dynamics
>doesnt provide any real alternative to better metrics

Nice source

>>60598558
none of those things you listed have anything to do with mcap
are you genuinely retarded? you need "source" for a concept based on common logic? you really believe you can exchange every bitcoin in the world for a trillion dollars? are you THIS naive? holy fuck

>>60598567
Looks like someone is crying like a bitch for being called out

>>60597741
What is the benefit of getting paid under the table? The fact that revenue cannot be traced?

Does Chainlink the company have any reason for chainlink the token to be priced lowly?

>>60598572
I accept your concession

>>60598579
You never progressed past square one when you said there was no demand for the token. If anything your acceptance is an easy out which is what you are being given

>>60598500
>>adoption is tiny
>hence why it constantly dumps

Holy shit are you illiterate?
Adoption is tiny for CRYPTO IN GENERAL.
But currently, Chainlink adoption is extremely high FOR A CRYPTO.

Is this too complicated for you? Grunt twice if yes.

>>60597150
You only just realised this? Stablecoins are going to replace the petro-dollar as a way to maintain dollar superiority globally.
Everyone is going to have their own stablecoins from banks to companies like Amazon and maybe even Starbucks. They will all be backed by the USD.

>>60597199
1. The President isn't important.
2. The president does what he's told.
3. The banks run America and they have since the beginning.
4. This plan has been agreed upon for at least a decade, maybe 2 decades.
5. They run to their own schedule and they don't give a fuck if you aren't making it when you're hoping to make it, they already own everything.

>>60598584
there's nothing else to talk about my retarded and clueless fren
>>60598629
adoption is minimal for crypto in general, and for Chainlink specifically, since you know, it's a crypto as well

>>60598752
Chainlink has more network demand than pretty much any crypto out there.

>>60598472
he's right and you're wrong. You don't even understand elementary stuff like what a market cap is, you dunning kruger retard.

>>60598139
Speaking the language of FACTS

>>60598139
>>60598792
How were Bitcoin's economics "designed to make holders rich"?
Or ETH's? XRP's? Solana's? BNB's? Tron's? Doge's?

>>60597231
Lay off the roids bubba

>>60597087 (OP)
>price drops 10%
BASED CHAINLINK

should I sell the eth for link?

>>60598351
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

so now it's nvidia? what happened to apple, amazon, google, microsoft

i'd say the enron chart is more fitting
or sergeys prior scam, nxt

>>60599447
the time to sell anything for link was 7-8 years ago

>>60598351
just 30 more years marines xD

>>60598573
>What is the benefit of getting paid under the table? The fact that revenue cannot be traced?

1 so they can pocket it for themselves and not have to share with the cult

2 privacy reasons as you mentioned and not having to be accountable to the cult

3 is what i'd call the niagara falls girlfriend... that guy in your friend group who only gets laid when he's on vacation and has that hot gf in another town... yeah

by telling the cult they are crushing it offchain they can lure in new investors to buy the funding token
>Does Chainlink the company have any reason for chainlink the token to be priced lowly?

no, their services are denominated in usd

>>60597087 (OP)
>comedy jon said comedy gold

>>60598763
what about the price demand?

>>60599785
got em

>>60597114
>Not buying a Google pixel pro and then flashing GrapheneOS to it...
Shiggydiggy

>>60597231
Based boomer

>>60597966
Milwaukee is actually good though. One of my weird side investments that kept a lot of value despite used

>>60598108
What are odds antichrist + mark of beast? On one hand I can kind of see the potential, on the other the IDs already exists in current system, they will just be more connected due to CCIP/CCID.

>>60598773
>everything is fake and gay!!!!

Thats the only thing thats being said as a distraction for him not being able to explain what he means by lack of demand.

Nice try with the bait and switch, but try harder next time.

everybody hates you dumb stinks

>>60598752
So you are taking the easy way out good to know

>>60599527
Wow that's very realistic and if you add the word cult 15 more times to your drivel then it might actually come true

Just bought 10,000 linkies. What am I in for

>>60601942
prove it
nobody is that dumb

Bump to see if the fuddies took an easy out rather than explaining themselves

yeah let's see how the fuddies try to wriggle out of this one

>>60602319
Operation let them speak is in full swing.

Because the more they talk the more people reading realizes how little the know about the space

>>60602289
>>60602319
we already refuted your stupid post:
price
chart

>>60602383
I commend you for not just giving up even though you dont have anything to actually critique that doesnt boil down to
>its a cult
>price?
>its all fake and gay!!!

>>60601877
where did he say that everything is fake and gay? he explicitly stated repeatedly that market cap is fake and gay, and he's absolutely right

>>60602383
It seems I've been bested by the fuddies again. :-(

>>60602450
If you’re referring to manipulation or overvaluation, some projects (not Chainlink) have inflated market caps due to wash trading or low liquidity. For LINK, its market cap is grounded but doesnt fully capture its $46 billion Total Value Secured, suggesting undervaluation rather than inflation.

So point to me where the manipulation is happening with the LINK token. Can you point to any specifics that validates your claim? Wheres the fake volume?

>>60602490
market caps have no relation to wash trading or low liquidity, market cap is simply supply x current price, it is an extremely flawed and unreliable metric, because the nominal usd valuations do not exist in reality, for example nobody actually bought $100b worth of XRP, you can't find such a transaction on any CEX or DEX
LINK's market cap is also fake by applying the same logic

there's simply nothing better than LoLing at you stupid stinkies xD
simply nothing
fuck you all

>>60602519
Even though the AI thinks that youre wrong. I dug more into it to see that what youre explaining and it does provide more insight into valuating projects. You can do price = market cap / circulating supply but that does not factor in certain scenarios like liquidity and low volume which is what you said clarifies the situation.

Im more inclined to believe your assertion that paints a whole image rather than what AI is reinforcing.

>>60602553
it's literally the opposite, price and supply determine the mcap, hence why it is entirely worthless and made up
the mere fact that you're still going at it literally exposes you as a midwit, it's one of the most basic concepts in crypto

>>60602693
>market cap is completely worthless
Thats like saying BMI is worthless because its calculated from height and weight. If that was the case then most websites wouldnt rank projects based on marketcap.

If marketcap was completely worthless then investment flows, exchanges, and coin trackers wouldnt highlight it so prominently.

Your emotionally charged rhetoric is screaming that you want this subtle win even though you arent providing much substance yourself. Convenient of you to finally chime back in.

Derived metrics aren’t worthless. That’s like saying price to earnings ratios are fake because they’re calculated.

>>60602729
it is completely fake because it doesn't reflect reality, my retarded friend
the mcap valuations do not exist, and your appeal to authority is hilarious

>>60602729
your appeal to chatgpt* I meant to say, at the very least you should change up the post before you copy and paste it here

EVERYONE! Notice how this thread got completely derailed about the positive Samsung news by a bunch of random semantics retards? That happens in every single positive Link thread. Just something to think about.

>>60602767
since those positive news did not involve the token, I'm assuming nobody cares anyway

>>60602768
Thats cool and all but I’m never selling and I will continue to inform newfags about Link to spite your boars spam.

>>60602768
>did not involve the token
Anything that involves Chainlink functionality involves the token.
Nodes literally need the token as a functional requirement.

>>60602768
correct, stinkie

price + chart
remember that
never. fucking. forget.

mother fucking price
mother fucking chart
mother fucking price
mother fucking chart

>>60602771
you can do as you please, and so can I >>60602772
if this involvement does not translate to buying pressure on spot, then it's not important

>>60602774
Wife and kids?

>squawk
price
>squawk
chart

>>60602786
Did my posts trigger you bot?

>>60602791
>I want to discuss positive link news
>proceeds to engage in low effort shitposting with teh fudders
lol, lmao even

>>60602768
>did not involve the token
>>60602780
>if this involvement does not translate to buying pressure

Aaaand there go the goalposts

>28pbtid
kek you're being paid to be here, wagie

chainlink sucks

>>60602760
>its all fake and gay!!!

>>60602804
ok
>>60602838
nope, just the mcap
right now you need approximately $2m to pump LINK from $14 to $15, but in terms of mcap that would translate to a whopping $600m in capitalization, so as you can see, the math doesn't check out

>>60602894
aand just like that, the retard shill disappeared lmao

>>60602894
>the math doesn't add up
Thats because you should double check it. First start off with their current trading volume.

>>60598352
>chainlink isn't amazon, nor Nvidia

It is, you are delusional thinking otherwise. Not wanting wait 5 year for full adoption is your choice but don't cry later when link will be for more than 1000$

>>60603079
>just wait 15 years bro
no, and at some point it's time to admit that being extremely early means you're wrong

>>60603076
there's nothing to double check, if a market buy of $2m is enough to add $600m to the total capitalization, something doesn't add up

>>60598351
I can not hold out another 10 years...

>>60603126
>early
Chainlink took over defi years ago, and has been confirmed working with more and bigger enterprise clients than anyone in crypto.

>>60603186
we're talking about number go up, not about meaningless buzzwords

>>60603296
Number is supposed to go up through speculation on future usage.
If that isn't happening, guess what. You're getting scammed.

>>60602804
>kek you're being paid to be here, wagie
imagine that being your job. imagine you HAD to do that to put bread on the table. Holy fuck what a life. I doubt the pay is very good, either lmao

>>60603322
Yesterday I witnessed one of the best proofs that fuddies are here on the job, see pic: fuddie punches in for his shift and kicks things off with a flurry of posts around the same time every day.
And apparently he did the same thing in multiple threads.

Also checking those double dubs

>>60603298
yes, it would appear that Chainlink is indeed an elaborate scam

>>60603322
>>60603332
if anyone is actually hiring people to shit on LINK, please let me know

>>60603322
they get 25 cents per post/reply and 25 cents per (You).this has been established a while ago. this is why they try to argue in every thread. literally just ignore them or don't @ them

>>60603332
jeez it's real. what a fucking loser. i wonder what he tells people he does. bet he says he's an IT manager or something lmao. i wonder if he has a wife or gf, if he tells her. maybe he tells her the truth, though i very much doubt it
>what exactly IS IT you do, darling?
>well, i spend all day in an obscure crypto forum trying to persuade strangers they shouldn't invest in a specific asset
>oh darling, that sounds far too complicated for me, but i'm sure you do a marvellous job and i'm immensely proud of you
>i do, and thanks, honey. would you like an extra spoonful of rice tonight?

>>60603387
The market is the scam.
The market isn't speculating on future usage, and doesn't even care about current usage.

That's why alts have stalled and Bitcoin is acting like a geriatric stairlift with a low battery: there is no new money coming in because the market is scammy af.

>>60602804
>Aaaand there go the goalposts


yes!!!! i knew the semantics goalpost guy would arrive

his favorite expression

too bad the reality is, you can't argue your way to a good investment

you losers can sit here all day and battle the intrinsic meaning of market cap, but at the end of the day, link price action is shit and you ain't making money

want to know why? because you are...

THE Cuckolds of crypto

>>60603079
>Not wanting wait 5 year for full adoption

you're 8 years in

also let's point out that the rest of the market is in a bullrun while you're getting left behind

amazon stock was down after one of the largest overall market crashes in history

>>60603332
>Yesterday I witnessed one of the best proofs that fuddies are here on the job


so if you're here monitoring the board at all times tracking other people's posts, are you on the job?

point b, you'd have to be a retard to think posts on this dead forum move the market on a 10B asset with $500M 24 hour trading volume lol get real dude

>>60603420
>incel revenge fantasy

bro do you hear yourself

you're having fantasies about random dudes posting patterns online and making up fantasy conversations in your head hahahhaah

and why are you doing it? all because you can't stomach the truth about your cult

truth is: everybody hates u dumb stinks
we think ur dumb yeah
we think ur gay yeah
everybody hates u dumb stinks

>>60603332
LOOK AT OUR VERY OWN LITTLE COLUMBO!

>>60603476
you do realize that LINK is part of the market, no?

>>60597313
Interoperability in action

>>60603741
"The market" refers here to the speculators, so no.

>>60603787
speculators are here bro, they PnDed LINK from $0.11 to $50, and it's still at double digits as we speak
the fact of the matter is, neither LINK nor any other crypto shitcoin are actually used in the real world, so complaining about your alt pumping less on speculation alone is the most retarded and petty thing you could possibly do, just enjoy your gains based on nothing man
>inb4 noooo speculators HAVE to pump LINK to triple digits because they pumped ETH, XRP, SOL on speculation alone and not on utility!!111
I mean, do you even hear yourself?

>>60603696
>LOOK AT OUR VERY OWN LITTLE COLUMBO!
lmfao

>>60603804
>neither LINK nor any other crypto shitcoin are actually used in the real world
Link has by far the best, most tangible shot at making it big in the real world.
And Link is among the absolute most used cryptos in existence right now.

>noooo speculators HAVE to pump LINK
If they want the market to have some legitimacy, and therefore attract new money, then yes.

>>60603804
>neither LINK nor any other crypto shitcoin are actually used in the real world
THIS IS THE GOD'S HONEST TRUTH
ALL THE CONFERENCES
ALL THE SPEECHES
ALL THE INTERVIEWS
ETC
ALL OF IT IS IN A TINY LITTLE ECHO CHAMBER
REAL WORLD PEOPLE DONT EVEN THINK ABOUT CRYPTO
WHAT PERCENTAGE OF YOU ALL ACTUALLY HAVE USED CRYPTO IN YOUR DAY TO DAY LIFE? ID GUESS FEWER THAN 5%.
ITS A SOLUTION FOR A PROBLEM THAT NO ONE CARES ABOUT AND IS UNNEEDED
ITS ALL SPECULATION AT THIS POINT. AND CHAINLINK HAS TAKEN A MASSIVE L THE PAST HALF DECADE BECAUSE NO ONE WANTS TO BUY THIS SHIT

>>60603820
>Link has by far the best, most tangible shot at making it big in the real world.
hence why it pumped from 11 cents to 50 bucks
>among the absolute most used cryptos in existence right now
well, twice zero is still zero lmao
>legitimacy
I don't think you understand markets in general

>>60603838
>zero
lmao

>I don't think you understand markets in general
They're supposed to speculate on current merit and future potential.
When they don't, something is clearly wrong and people stay away.

>>60603857
>something is clearly wrong and people stay away
...that's the problem anon, the crypto "industry" as a whole, and that obviously includes Chainlink, doesn't have any current merit or future potential, and people predictably are staying away
crypto was supposed to be banking the unbanked, going against fed's fiat shitcoin etc, and now the entire narrative has shifted to integrating with the same failed system which led to Satoshi creating BTC in the first place, it is insane if you think about it
I'm sorry but sucking private bank cock isn't particularly attractive it seems, and when the same bankers aren't even interested in accumulating the bags they're allegedly shilling, you know there's no future
I realize you're an autistic retard and that you'll disregard my post entirely but anyway

>>60603888
>the crypto "industry" doesn't have any current merit or future potential

whatever you say, anonymous poster on 4chan

>>60603895
each and every time this guy or anyone in a similar position says something publicly, he's looking to fuck you over
exactly how JP Morgan proclaimed BTC dead at every fucking bottom 10-15 years ago
you always have to take their words with a grain of salt

>>60603572
>>60603583
>>60603588
>>60603591

Holy fucking kek they called in their leader Adem when they got discovered

>>60603420
>>60603332

>>60603901
It's not just him, it's basically every single bank and financial authority in the world.

>>60603910
and they're all trying to screw (You)

>>60603913
>Chainlink bad because all of crypto bad because all of tradfi bad

this is what you're reduced to

>>60603820
>Link has by far the best, most tangible shot at making it big in the real world.

did you mean chainlink labs? that's not the same as the funding coin you hold

>>60603838
>>Link has by far the best, most tangible shot at making it big in the real world.
>hence why it pumped from 11 cents to 50 bucks

delusional
thousands of coins have replicated a run like that, many of them memecoins which is what link was when it ran

link's cycle was ico / memecoin moon / dead utility alt from prior cycle / c u c k h o l d cult funding coin

>>60603926
>crypto = bad
>chainlink = crypto
>chainlink = bad
I mean yeah? lol

>>60603930
No you said chainlink has zero current merit because all of crypto has zero current merit.

And then you said Chainlink has zero future potential because all of tradfi is lying about adopting crypto as a whole.

>>60603936
yes
yes

>>60603942
So you're fudding Chainlink specifically, even though your arguments are actually directed against both crypto as a whole AND the entire banking world as a whole.

That makes no sense to anyone, you realize that right?

>>60603953
it makes perfect sense, what doesn't make sense is the weird angle you're trying to use now lol
I'd like to also add that if
>crypto = bad
then
>tradfi = absolutely fucking horrible
remember, cryptobros were trying to escape central banks and government control lmao

>>60603953
>i-i-it doesn't make sense
>even though everything you say is 100% true

>>60603959
>it makes perfect sense
If you think crypto as a whole is worth "zero", and banking as a whole are just trying to fuck you over, then there are a million entities you should be fudding before Chainlink even crosses your mind.

>remember, cryptobros were trying to escape central banks and government control lmao
Yes. See Defi.

July 4, 2021: $19

July 10, 2025: $14.30

>>60603966
>If you think crypto as a whole is worth "zero", and banking as a whole are just trying to fuck you over
huh? that's like the main reason why Chainlink is going nowhere, sorry bud
if you actually believe that banking as a whole ISN'T trying to fuck you over you're in delulu land lmao
>defi
lending pools and yield farming isn't what I meant my dude, Jesus
>cryptobros tried to escape worthless fiat and central bank control...to get better loans and high APY on some shitcoin!1
...I truly have no words for this

>>60603980
So what are you investing in, anon?

>>60603990
crypto, stocks, whatever gets me capital quicker
I accept your concession, although I don't believe you'll suddenly stop shilling this, so let me ask you, are you actually paid to do this? or perhaps you're genuinely autistic?

>>60603990
>changing the subject

answer this post, anon:
>>60603972

>>60603996
>crypto, stocks
But you just said all of crypto has zero use, and all of tradfi (obviously including stock exchanges) are trying to fuck you over?

>>60604004
yes, you obviously don't understand the markets, at all
it was fun anon

>>60604025
You're hilarious.

>CRYPTO IS USELESS AND TRADFI ARE LYING, THEREFORE DON'T INVEST IN CHAINLINK!
>INVEST IN CRYPTO AND TRADFI INSTEAD!!

>>60604042
there's no need for strawmans, you don't have to believe a company's bs to invest

>>60604042
this but unironically

the proof is in the pudding: we make money. stinkies do not

>>60604045
>all companies lie
>therefore chainlink bad

kek

>>60604062
wow, another terrible strawman
you didn't answer me before, are you paid or are you genuinely autistic?

>>60604071
>>60604071
>are you paid
I'm not the one spending hours and hours furiously debating an investment I don't hold.

>tradfi and crypto bad
>therefore invest in tradfi and crypto and NOT Chainlink!

KEEEEEEK

>>60604126
no, you're the one spending hours and hours furiously debating and defending an extremely shilled crypto which coincidentally has been underperforming for a very long time
and you make terrible strawmans, damn

>>60598365
>How does XRP have the third highest MC in all of crypto despite having virtually zero users?
By bribing influencers, how does knowing that helps LINK in any way?

>>60604132
> Don't buy Chainlink bro! Crypto as a whole is useless and tradfi is just trying to fuck you over!!
< so what are you investing in then?
> Tradfi and crypto.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>60604187
kek what a meltdown

>>60604215
I’m following along and his logic checks out, yours does not. Why are you here?

>>60603822
I'm a lurking newfag that is retarded so I don't really understand, but can someone explain why the "everyday people don't use this, will never use this, and so it will never pump" narrative applies to something like LINK but not to BTC? People know about BTC sure, but the average Joe doesn't really care about it or know anything more than "it's digital money", yet it's 6 digits. Is it truly only first mover's advantage? If so, isn't LINK the first mover in its field?

>>60605117
they dont have wives or kids. the opposite sex is completely disinterested in them. unfortunately they hold link and we have to tolerate these imbeciles.

>>60597720
>cll employees get paid partly in LINK
you'd try to pay everyone who was stupid enough to accept it with your fake printed money as well

>>60605117
link operates in the field of companies that sell tokens they created for free by hyping them up, targeting people divorced from reality (terminally online losers, people that have too much money to do any fact checking etc.). in that field, they are not the first

>>60605308
I get that this is part of the memes, but I'd like to have an actual answer other than "because the fudders/shills are gay"
>>60605421
This also just feels like slightly more subtle but still thinly veiled "the other side is gay". Can either of you answer my original question, for starters?

>>60605841
The actual answer is nearly every person that posts obsessively in these threads holds 10k+ link, and you know it because none of them can ever show their sell orders to prove they dumped, and nobody's paying this much attention if they don't hold a significant amount. So you have this weird situation where unlike gme where nobody made money except for a small group of insiders, in this case, nearly everyone on /biz/ got boosted anywhere from low 6 figures to low 7 figures (everyone who was around 2017 to early 2019 anyways). So now you have a large swathe of people who all see the fundamentals, see the writing on the wall, but also understand they're trapped in a chaotic irrational market that hasn't truly had its dotcom crash yet (except maybe for altcoins). They know its going to happen but they can't predict when and they also know retail doesn't fucking matter for this timeline. So some remain positive, but a great many who didn't find success in their personal lives and thought they'd just make it like early ETH buyers, slowly went insane, and fud because the idea that someone else could still accumulate even a thousand link now and make it in a tenth or hundredth of the time they had to wait, infuriates them.

>>60605868
tl;dr the arguments are settled, everything at this point is pure autism. Or to directly answer your question, yes link is both first mover in its field and a new paradigm, no nobody can predict when that will translate to the price increase only guess.

>>60605878
Well sir you see there is this thing called a chart and if your smart and wise enough you can spot trends. As we can see Link is in a downtrend against BTC and until this trend is broken you can assume no meaningful price increase.

>>60605942
TA never got anyone rich. TA didn't convince anyone to buy bitcoin 15 years ago. TA at best can serve day traders, the overwhelming majority of which are in the red.

What actually happens when you get a true paradigm shift is something akin to ETH in 2017, where people aren't prepared and actively doubt it while its happening, and live to regret it for the rest of their lives. And everyone thinks "it can never happen to me", until you become that pessimistic, which is exactly how markets conspire to fuck the average man. TA would dictate you don't buy link until this or that level, but this assumes you are comfortable moving 6/7 figures in and out of the market which is where most anons holding link are sitting right now. And the reality is, no it probably isn't going to 1k overnight. But it can very easily have a sudden pump past previous ath, and price out anyone thinking they'd just wait until it hits this or that price level. Unless you really think you're going to put a 500k buy order at that price level?

Trading is a rich man's game, but more specifically, its an insider's game.

And if you're poor and just starting out, you're even dumber for thinking you are going to time the market.

>>60605878
>>60606312
we (link haters) are rich you (link cucks) are not
bow to us, your superiors

>>60605868
>but also understand they're trapped in a chaotic irrational market

that statement is true but not the way you want
the fact that link is valued at 10b when it's purely a funding coin for a startup with no products is a joke

>hasn't truly had its dotcom crash yet
uhhh what... crypto has one of those every 3/4 years
every single coin including bitcoin

>They know its going to happen
you talking about an ico

>retail doesn't fucking matter
which is why the foundation makes posts begging holders to get their families to buy and avertising on the city bus lmfao

do you even hear yourself

>the idea that someone else could still accumulate even a thousand link now and make it in a tenth or hundredth of the time they had to wait, infuriates them

i will say it is hard to watch new people get scammed by link

>>60605117
>but can someone explain why the "everyday people don't use this, will never use this, and so it will never pump" narrative applies to something like LINK but not to BTC?

why do you think that out of the 50 million altcoins in existence, your special one should be treated like bitcoin

that's like you inventing a synthetic metal and going around asking everyone why they don't value it the same as gold

then someone asks you about it, and you pull out tons of graphics and research papers showing them why your metal is superior to gold. they shrug and say they've had 100 people this year give a similar presentation, so they'll just stick with gold
then you spazz out and insult them, ensuring they'll never entertain your idea again
you then storm off telling yourself they're just too stupid to see your secret genius metal

also just another psa to the cult -- you're missing the entire bullrun

you'll be lucky to see $25

2030 will be the year tho right

>>60606312
irregardless of your slop post if link was to "go up" it would be visible on the chart and you could simply buy when it does. You guys do realize it will not just teleport up right? This is assuming it ever actually happens and doesn't just continue trending down.

>>60606709
>irregardless

back to your kennel

>>60606434
>>60606498
>>60606511
>pic related

kek

>>60606723
The best part about link faggots is you know they make no money lmao

>>60606709
Yes it works like that for all assets, you just watch the chart and buy when it goes up, that's why everyone in the world is a trillionaire. "slop post" kek talk about pot/kettle

>>60606780
>dude link its gonna le moon!!!!
>dude you cant just buy when it breaks it downtrend you have to buy now!!!!!
The reason I appear retarded is because I'm taking the position from your own line of logic. In reality it will never break and sustain any meaningful uptrend against btc.

>>60606795
I didn't say that. It might never go anywhere. I'm not telling you to buy it, I'm not telling you to sell it, I'm taking the approach that I can't predict markets. You believe you can not only predict them but also time them.
>just read the charts
>buy when it goes up sell when it goes down
By this logic everyone who isn't an idiot should be a trillionaire due to the nature of compounding gains. Why aren't you a trillionaire anon?

>>60597087 (OP)
HOMY SHIT GUYZ LINK JUST BROKE THRU $15 LIKE A BLASTED OUT TRAIN!!! CLOSER TO $20 THAN EVER NOW BOYZ!!!

>>60606728
>>60606795
oh latecuck, why are you even here crying. no wonder your wifeless, women loathe this kind of whiney homo energy

maybe in the next life you'll have enough brains to buy into something early

>>60606821
Time currently is telling you that holding link is a terrible decision. I'm not predicting markets I'm identifying a trend dumbass. These are the nigger cattle who still hold link and also no retard you still hold it because you think it will go up in the future.

>>60606856
>latecuck is still coping

>>60606856
You're not identifying a trend you're reading the monday morning paper and telling us why the team lost on sunday. You didn't identify early bitcoin or early eth and that's why you're trapped in this thread with us bitching and complaining instead of fucking the whores of your choice on this lovely Thursday.

>>60606874
There's 5 years of history telling you that if you just swap link for btc you'll have more link later. This is investing 101 type shit it's actually crazy how dumb link holders are.
>>60606829
I'm just gonna be like this guy now

>>60607073
>the year is 2017
>There's 3 years of history telling you that if you swap btc for traditional stocks you'll have more usd later.
>the year is 2009
>There's 9 years of history telling you that if you just swap amzn for gold you'll have more usd later.
So what's your excuse? Did you only figure out how to read charts in the last 5 years? Or are you a broke zoom zoom?

>>60606856
Chill down buddy , we are going up from here as chainlink will be the backbone of finance.
The evidence is all out there, so the FUD to act like we are not going into hyper adoption phase is it.of line. Chainlink is top 10 crypto already

>>60607220
more like the backbone of gettin cucked

>>60607100
The problem is link keeps making new lows so it doesn't have any real uptrend. So yes the trend is down and trend is friend. One day it can break this and if you go back to the first reply you got you stupid fucking nigger then maybe you can finally figure it out?

Woah this threads still here? This is like a 2019 crumb, not even important lol Mastercard Visa Swift DTCC Euroclear, the fuck I care about some random Samsung document about the possibility of maybe eventually a wallet that will use Chainlink. We already won, go outside and live life.

>>60603591
yeah those fucking incel freaks have gone too far this time people are very riled up

>>60607253
The trend was down on the other assets I just pointed out. "Cycle theory" wasn't a thing in 2016 for bitcoin, it was still seen as a ridiculous speculative play that was probably never going to go up again. Amazon was seen as one of the losers of the dotcom crash. Why didn't you just buy either of those when they broke trend, if it was that easy?

>>60607428
was too young. None of these are excuses btw you're just seriously retarded your portfolio performance reflects it.

>>60607432
>was too young
That's all I needed, now I'm sure you will become a trillionaire within the next 10 years because you figured out the secret, just buy when the trend breaks and sell when it breaks the other direction. You should start a youtube channel. You could call it something catchy like, I dunno, into the cryptoverse?

>>60607445
you need to understand someting, stinkie
link isn't amazon
it isn't bitcoin
it's just a shitcoin
it's SHIT
it's SHIT
YOU PURCHASED DIGITAL SHIT
are you starting to understand ??

>>60598112
>>60598114
This is true for the company but LINK is literally not needed in service of the business they secure. CLL company investors might do well but this doesn't translate to token holders literally at all.

>>60608088
okay late cuck, whatever helps you sleep at night

>>60607467
latecuck seethe kek.
you know it is still cheap at these prices, LINK at $15 is like buying BTC at $1500 - a very good bargain

>>60597096
Close, but it translates to a perfect haiku in English, oddly enough

Linkies are stinky
Tokens unneccessary
Sergey feasts tonight

>>60608088
>LINK is literally not needed in service of the business they secure
It literally is though.
The token itself is a literal technical requirement for the tokens to even operate.

>>60608696
>for the tokens to even operate.
*for the nodes to even operate

Link dipshits will see a 5 year downtrend and assume they know better than the market lmao. Then they will call others naive for not buying into it. You understand the most likely outcome here is it does just trend to 0 against btc.

Low iq linkies will then suggest the market is being manipulated against them. When in reality the inverse is true, there is so little buying pressure that if link wasn't a cult it would be sub 5 dollars right now.

>>60608696
No it isn't. They use privately licensed software. No one is required to use your public operator network and they have massive security and financial incentives to not and zero incentive to just to pump your bag

>>60608116
>Late cuck
I bought link and sold it in 2019 like every original poster did. You are one step above the people thinking btc will 1000x still despite buying in 2020 peak and 1.5 steps above people who think dogecoin will. Your play is more technical but it is just as technologically illiterate. In some really meaningful ways it is even more.

>>60610127
You seem very confused.
If you use literally any Chainlink product, you're using Chainlink nodes.

No ifs ands or buts.

>>60610173
you mean subsidized chainlink nodes
i.e. token holders are gettin fucked
simple as

>>60610507
Literally all of crypto is subsidized like that.
Nodes on Bitcoin, Eth (pre merge), Solana, ... pretty much all L1s out there are all more than 90% subsidized.

>>60610135
>sold it
sorry you missed out on staking in the community pool. also sorry you're lying. also sorry the pool's closed. also sorry you never got me to sell. also sorry your life is over.

>>60610631
>muh pool of shit
lol i make more in my HYSA

>>60597150
>Link is quietly building a system that the entire world will rely on, partnering with literally every fucking Fortune 500 and government entity.

One day the switch is going to flip and Link will melt faces.

>>60610766
BLAH BLAH BLAH. BEEN HEARING THE SAME DRIVEL FOR OVER HALF A DECADE NOW
WHY IS THIS BULLSHIT THREAD STILL UP?

>>60610772
How much Link ya holding?

>>60610766
we're not interested in your fantasies, stinkie
there will be no "god candle"
these things do not happen IRL
you are delusional and need medication most likely. please see a mental healthcare professional

>>60610783
linkoids are perpetually stuck in 2017 they seriously have no clue

>>60610631
he's still here seething, he's poor. you can be here and be chill, probably means you made it. but if you're seething, yeah you're definitely broke as fuck

the flip will switch any day now..

>>60611052
In one fortnight we will make it

>>60598456
>brass tax
brass tacks you dingus

>>60612192
lol good catch what a dork