The BTC maximalists' karma is about to catch up with them. The spark has already been lit.

kys linkie

>revenge trading
stay poor dude

>>60599650
I'm not looking for revenge, but when I saw the arrogance of the BTC max this cycle, I understood that it was going to end very badly for them, and in the coming months the maxis will suffer. You probably have a final ATH around 120k, enjoy it before the shock and awe

>>60599694
>bitcoin is going up
>b-b-but you b-b-better sell it
>so I can get off the sidelines
nocoiner cope 4/10

>>60599701
You idiot. Bitcoin has probably been the victim of a quantum hack. You think it's going to quietly end here with 80k BTC compromised?

>>60599761
>load ze quantum fud

>>60599761
where you getting this fud from? You sound retarded

>>60599761
source

>>60599779
>>60599780
These are rumors, but they seem plausible, even probable, to me. It wasn't a simple whale that moved these BTC... it could only be done by a well-organized team with access to enormous computing power.

>>60599694
>>60599840
alts will die if btc dies the dinosaur must live on

>>60599892
He's not going to die, but he's likely to dump badly.

>>60599694
Bitshit will hit at least 200k but good alts will 100x and bitniggers will sell their corns at the top to go all in on cumfart69inu hoping for 10x and will baghold to zero. Such is the fate of all newfaggot bitfuck "maxis" (and there are a lot of them this cycle because it turns out there are many people who fall for Saylor's low IQ marketing). I'm a wholecoiner btw so not like I don't hold bitfuck myself and probably more than these retarded "maxis", and not even counting bitshit backed stock in my custodial accounts either.

>>60599761
>So butthurt he has resorted to schizo posting

>>60599779
oh no quantum computers are a myth/conspiracy to push the btc price back to 80k

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2457325-ibm-will-release-the-largest-ever-quantum-computer-in-2025

https://thequantuminsider.com/2024/10/16/iqm-selected-to-deliver-two-quantum-computers-as-part-of-euro-q-exa-hybrid-system

>>60599840
Somehow, in this unhinged schizophrenic level of cope, a secret group developing and harnessing the power of quantum computing to steal BTC and compromise the entire chain thereby making the fruits of their operation useles is more likely than - buy low sell high.

It's not that hard to pick a winner anon. Just time and patience. You are still guaranteed a 10x if you can just swallow your pride.

Bitchuds will seethe as their coin gets flipped by chainlink and tokenizer gold (powered by chainlink). It's digital gold narrative is bfto thx to chainlink tokenizing gold on multiple block chains.

>>60599761
>probably
>super secret squirrel tech is surely going for bitcorns and not the outdated banking/insurance security authenticators
X

>>60599945
Who said I don't have any BTC? I sold it and I'll buy it back when it's low. I also have stocks and altcoins. Honestly, find out what's going on behind the scenes, it's extremely suspicious. If you haven't dug deep, only 80k BTC moved, but in fact it's much more complex. It's possible that this is just a show of force, they're not going to sell them, but they're showing that the hack is possible. We'll know more later anyway. But it smells like a quantum hack, it was imminent anyway.

>>60599559 (OP)
>If quantum computers break encryption algorithms, Bitcoin will be a small issue compared to the social and economic disruptions.

>>60599959
bitcoin is way more outdated

https://www.tradingview.com/news/u_today:4376463c1094b:0-satoshi-nakamoto-bitcoin-whitepaper-turns-16-on-this-date-details

>>60599980
>tiny metals.. wires, yes? spin fast, no. the.. quantum box, it teeth, block chains eat light, i see them, i see them, yes

.

>>60599694
Nuclear wake-up call as all institutions will keep ignoring BTC and migrate their infrastructure to smart contract chains to decrease counterparty risk.
The only ones left holding BTC will be meme firms like Strategy, until the retail death spiral begins as they offload.

>>60599761
>btc gets hacked
>btc gets updated in less than an hour and and the transactions get rolled back
oh wow, its nothing...

>>60602021
The maxis have always been: "I see nothing, I hear nothing." We'll see soon anyway. They will be the cryptographic sacrifice for awareness. The dinosaurs didn't evolve and disappeared.

>>60602021
>and the transactions get rolled back
Never happened, never gonna happen. BTC isn't ETH, where every time Vitalik fucks up, he does a hardfork to unwind things.

>>60602828
if it happens you wouldnt even notice, probably nobody would notice cuz only the hacker would know about the rolledback transaction

>>60602828
not even ETH got hacked tho

>>60602828
This is what bitchuds want deleted from their history.

>>60602851
Dunno about directly, but there have been a bunch of smart contract failures. "The DAO hack" back in 2015 or 2016 was due to a reentrancy bug in Solidity (hah) that Vitalik knew about but hadn't bothered to fix because fixing bugs was boring compared to slathering on new layers of crap features.

Then there was one a few years ago where it turned out anyone could invalidate some signature thing, and some guy trying to learn how smart contracts worked on ETH did exactly that, and locked up millions of dollars in ETH forever (because for once Vitalik didn't say "oh we'll just hardfork and fix that for you").

I'm trying to look up the article I just read a few days ago about that last one. Instead, I can't find it because there are literally dozens of "smart contract bug locked up millions of dollars in ETH" articles about multiple different oopsies. Anyway, here's one of those:

https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2021/12/smart-contract-bug-results-in-31-million-loss.html

>>60602866
Seems fine to me. This is natural to expect when there's only one mining implementation.

>>60602866
Oh no, one single bug, at a time when the entire market cap of BTC was about $300,000 and it had only been used to transfer "money" between a few dozen cyphernerds for about three months (Pizza Day through August 15th 2010).

As compared to at least half a dozen multimillion dollar failures on ETH (formerly ETC), from The DAO onward.

>>60602875
its not a bug, its a feature