Only xrp matters all these other fucking coins are bullshit just admit it already

I have 45000 xrp.

Okay then, execute this smart contract or else ill execute your dog?

Oh wait? You cant?

Thanks, I rippled up.

>>60617661
XRP EVM does do smart contracts though
https://www.mitrade.com/insights/news/live-news/article-3-942934-20250708#:~:text=The%20XRP%20Ledger's%20long%2Dawaited,smart%20contract%20functionality%20on%20XRPL.

>>60617686
>hold on, i can only have sex while my balls are clamped inside a cock ring

Thats what an EVM is

>>60617692
>okay so maybe you can do this but not if I shift the goalposts
Okay, I guess.

>>60617701
>look we have a sidechain that can do the heavy lifting for the more important chains.

Okay so execute a smart contract with xrp directly

>>60617641 (OP)
Link has news like this every other minute

ripple is using bny
bny is not using ripple

>>60617641 (OP)

When the fuck are these threads going to be deleted for advertisement/spam?

>>60617892
Its not an ad, just because you dont like a project doesnt mean you should dictate conversation here liberal

>captcha 4kkka

>>60617892
why didnt they use their own custody service? Why did they buy standard custody?

>>60617641 (OP)
How does this use XRP and why didnt they use their own company, standard custody?

>>60617859
/thread

token not needed

>>60617641 (OP)
>XRP is reliant on BNY
wait I thought banks were going to use XRP, it seems like XRP is using banks instead

>>60617709
>Y...Yeah, ok, you can do it, now do it exactly the way I want you to.

This is still moving the goalpost. Don't throw your back out.

The harder XRP and XLM pump

The bigger the seethe on /biz/

>>60618074
Oingo boingo nigger

>>60618077
Like clockwork.

>>60618122
>See! If I keep shifting the post far enough then I'm right!
Why are you so mad? A third of this thread is just you.

>>60618136
So execute a smart contract on XRPL then.

Go on.

>>60617641 (OP)
LOL XRP IS LITERALLY JUST HOPING BANKS USE THEM AS AN OPTION AMONGST DOZENS OF OPTIONS WHEN THE INITIAL PLAN WAS REPLACE THE BANKS. I WOULD BET LITERALLY ANYTHING XRP EVENTUALLY TRIES TO BE A PART OF THE SWIFT SYSTEM, CAP THIS.

>>60617661
>memecontracts
Not needed.

>>60618182
Not even hoping, they've given up on XRP and switched to a stable coin model. It's not needed anymore, but Ripple has to keep money coming in so they can expand Ripple's stable coin ventures.

>>60618194
>hold on, i can only have sex while my balls are clamped inside a cock ring

only icp matters
all other coins are bullshit

>>60617641 (OP)
Lying runs the "industry" of cryptocoins.

The salt, the seethe, bieps, fishy and friends really have been making my day.
Cope harder you riled up turbofaggots.

>>60617641 (OP)
>Ripple uses the services of BNY
>"GUYS BNY JUST PARTNERED WITH RIPPLE!!!!"

>>60618197
Do you really believe this?

>>60618444
>believe
What's there to believe, that's literally what's happening.
Ripple moved from XRP as "bridge currency" for cross border transactions to RLUSD as a stablecoin for cross border transactions.
These two usecases are in direct competition.

>>60618461
RLUSD to XRP to another stable.
Why would other countries want to use USD all the time?

>>60618474
You can just exchange one stable for another directly you know.
Why on earth would you use a third coin?

>>60618494
>You can just exchange one stable for another directly you know.
you magically convert usd to euro without a 3rd party?

>>60618513
>without a 3rd party
Who said this?
I said without a third COIN.

>>60618527
Whats the difference between using a 3rd party and a 3rd coin? its still converting usd to euro.

>>60618533
>Whats the difference between using a 3rd party and a 3rd coin?
It's an extra coin and two extra transactions.

It's completely unnecessary added complexity.

>>60618538
At the end of the day its the same for the sender and receiver.
You send one currency and the other receives another currency.

>>60618557
>At the end of the day its the same for the sender and receiver.
It really isn't.
Added complexity means greater risk of failures and exploits.

>>60617712
unfortunately for you, they are all fake

>>60618560
If crypto is added complexity i guess we should all sell up then.
Enjoy your day.

>>60618570
"Crypto" isn't added complexity, using three coins instead of two is.

>>60617641 (OP)
They are all scams none of them "matter"

>>60618461
No it isn't. You are a low IQ person who never even understood the XRP thesis and literally just parrot heteronomous culture narrative from specific coins you follow like a NPC. The ENTIRE original usecase for XRP was to be a liquidity bridge to walled gardens and asset classes (like RWA tokenized assets, bonds, stocks, etc.) across traditional and blockchain networks etc. The entire XRP community believed that there would be specific currency stablecoins on chain and when USDC and RLUSD were launched, both were celebrated massively by the whole community. David Schwartz has been talking for YEARS about how there will be hundreds of private stablecoins which need to be able to transmit between each other, not to mention if RLUSD is used onchain it burns XRP. It also breaks the global stranglehold of issuance and cross-fx trade and exchange without such a behholden seat at the table and gives the smallest credit unions software that literally allows them to outcompete the largest correspondent eurodollar banks in the world in international payments if they don't themselves join. BNY Mellon is the largest custodial bank in the country and oldest bank as well and they are currently the primary custodian for RLUSD. Ripple are applying for an OCC license and Fed master account which would allow them to park XRPL USD assets at the Fed as collateral even. Ripple's purchase of Hidden Road (broker dealer that already settles trillions annually) led to RLUSD being able to be used in commercial bank collateral transactions and clearing, with XRP being used backend operations. And all of this is only talking about payments, which are 1/30th of the XRP usecase. If you don't see how stablecoins turbocharge XRP adoption and bridging between tradfi and defi etc. you never understood the XRP usecase and never even tried to because this was all 101 stuff talked about by the chief representatives of the community and within the community for literally a decade.

>>60618644
>The ENTIRE original usecase for XRP was to be a liquidity bridge to walled gardens and asset classes
Banks don't need Ripple to provide liquidity kek
All they need is a communication layer between all the different DLTs.

You're writing all that shit to hide the fact that you have no basic point.

>>60617641 (OP)
What does any have to do with the token xrp literally nothing, congrats you funded a company that you own none of

>>60618688
Yes, like Interledger Protocol, optimized using XRP, which allows them to forego nostro/vostro locked liquidity, made liquid cross-asset tokenized on any chain or network public or private.

>>60618048
But I'm the bank.

>>60617641 (OP)
Yeah okay but price, oh and chart?

>>60617641 (OP)
don't cry when they rugpull this

>>60618644
you're simply describing the "hub and spoke" model and USDC and USDT already do it and have been doing it for years. RLUSD is the new cope from Ripple, the entirely useless marketing company that has never produced anything of value in its many years of operation.

>>60619229
In actuality you'll be able to use RLUSD and other stables to take your XRP and instantly change it to a stable on the ledger and spent the USD at the point of sale or real world tx.
It's the entire point and always has been.
It's a BRIDGE between official currencies and can/does act many times as a currency itself.

However, the world will run on local denominated state fiats. So you hold whatever you want and use whatever you want.

>>60619237
>In actuality you'll be able to use RLUSD and other stables to take your XRP and instantly change it to a stable on the ledger and spent the USD at the point of sale or real world tx.
This is one of the dumbest things I've ever read on here.

>>60619255
kek

>>60618811
You don't need XRP at all to unlock liquidity across chains, you need cross-chain architecture.

Interledger Protocol is an attempt at such an architecture, but it's completely centralized so it defeats the purpose of using blockchains.
And it doesn't need XRP at all.

>>60617709
>the heavy lifting
Heavy lifting your bags because nobody gives a shit about ETH anymore kek have fun holding unscalable shitcoins.

wow, it's amazing all these experts know all the intricacies of a coin they have 0 interest in
makes me feel really bad about my investment...
*checks price*
ooh wait....
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>60619447
>they have 0 interest in
Ripple is a blight on crypto as a whole, and especially sitting at the top like that.
Functionally it doesn't do anything, and nobody wants anything to do with it.

>>60618444
"Here’s what happened to XRPL in the period since 2023. The ledger earned $1.15 million in fees over the course of 2024, an increase of just $567,000. At the same time, its market cap grew by over $80 billion from $33.32 billion at the start of 2024, giving it a price-to-sales ratio of 103,826."

"Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are another area where the XRPL is lagging. According to data from Messari, the blockchain averaged about 550 daily NFT traders in 2024. Even in a market such as this, where NFTs are struggling, Ethereum typically has five thousand daily traders. "

"It also appears that the XRPL has struggled to bring on native smart contracts, something that is table stakes for the blockchain now that its tunnel-vision focus on payments is being expanded. But as of June 30, Ripple Labs launched an EVM-compatible sidechain with Axelar that could supplement this gap. XRP will serve as the gas token and native asset for this new blockchain, perhaps unlocking another source of demand for the token aside from paying for payments on the XRPL. But the company has a lot of work to do to use this avenue to create real, non-speculative user demand for XRP."

Aside from the ascendance of stablecoins in general, Ripple may have had another reason to launch RLUSD: the scarlet letter attached to XRP as a result of the SEC enforcement action against Ripple Labs. “Ripple may have felt like they had no choice but to issue a stablecoin in order to convince banks and other financial institutions to work with them,” said Owen Lau, executive director at Oppenheimer & Co in an April 2024 interview with Forbes. “These firms may not have been comfortable holding and using XRP because of the volatility and regulatory overhang [stemming from an ongoing lawsuit with the SEC].”

things sure are looking good for XRP

>>60619482
cant even link the article webpage, fucking retarded board

>>60619489
read it here

>>60619473
damn... must suck 2 suck

>>60619473
>Ripple is a blight on crypto as a whole
If Ripple rolled over to the SEC crypto would be dead right now. They're unironically the savior of the entire space which is why the entire market has been following XRP since November 2024. Say thank you.

2025 and there’s still fudniggers in here daily trying to get some sort of high from fudding kek

>>60619435
>guys guys guys! My bags pumped! Due to utility! Not at all due to speculation! The flip has switched!

>>60621252
This but for bitcoin, ETH and chainlink. All shitcoins nobody uses for anything other than scamming.

>>60621261
>guys my token of choice isnt like the rest, it was literally promised by (((schwatrz))). Even though my native chain of choice cant function with smart contracts. It has tons of more utility

All going according to plan

>>60619266
>completely centralized
Designed by Stefan Thomas and Evan Schwartz at Ripple Labs in 2015.

An open-source protocol that enables value transfers across different payment networks, such as banks, blockchains, and digital wallets.

works like the internet;, routes data, allowing for interoperability between otherwise incompatible systems.

Its an open source protocol and you retarded nigger say its centralised?

This was developed 2 years prior the chainlink WHITEPAPER.

>>60619473
>especially sitting at the top like that.
Its a blight burning your eyeballs out and you are a sore loser who missed out because you are married to your bags and keep telling yourself you are ''in it for the tech''.

kek baggies

>>60619266
It is literally optimized using Ripplenet which is optimized using XRP, being built on its technology. It was specifically designed to do this by Ripple when banks told them they loved the Ripple product but needed it to be able to scale to millions of tps. They designed this and went back to them and they were thrilled by it.

>>60621920
Extremely well and succinctly put (both responses).

>>60621920
>open source means it's decentralized!

The absolute state of cripples, holy shit

>>60624006
Twisting the words again fishy?
Not centralised does not mean decentralised.
THE STATE OF LINKBAGGIES

The Interledger
The "Interledger protocol suite" can be used among any network of participants, public or private. There is no single network that all parties must connect to to use these protocols.

"The Interledger" is the name of a public instance of the Interledger protocol suite which seeks to provide a coherent global financial infrastructure. Ideally, anyone connected to the Interledger should be able to transact with anyone else, each using the underlying systems and currencies of their choice.

>>60624040
You can make an excel file "decentralized" by this logic.

>>60624060
Nowhere did i say that you illiterate ape.

Excel is a shared data format
Interledger is a protocol enabling secure, automated settlement across diverse systems, not just a shared data format.

Do you understand the difference between an excel file and a protocol?

>>60619229
When USDC bent the knee and moved onto XRP we literally all celebrated, including Ripple. This brings insane utility to XRP ass a bridge for reasons already said. You still don't get the intermediary bridge concept.

>>60624060
It is decentralized in the sense you don't depend on a centralized trust party to run it and the codebase is fully knowable. Not even clear what your argument for why this is bad is unless you are just quibbling over semantics to cope? They gifted it to W3C and Mojaloop to build into the tech stach.

>>60624103
Making .xls files "decentralized" involves a bunch of protocols: tcp/ip, HTTP, ...
You can make .xls files "decentralized" by allowing state changes via internet, and then if you really want you can make a transaction to any chain containing a message with the state of the excel file (after any consensus method you like).

That's basically how Interleder works.

>>60624146
>It is decentralized in the sense you don't depend on a centralized trust party to run it and the codebase is fully knowable.
Same with spreadsheets.

>>60624153
Not clearwhat argument you think you're making.

>>60624153
To your first point (just read) Interledger literally is aiming for ILP to be the tcp/ip of the value layer of the internet. Either way connecting parties can use it toscale XRP usage indefinitely using payment channels.

>>60624177
That ILP is a centralized product.
Just because you can optionally use a blockchain to record ILP-related data doesn't mean shit because literally anything on the internet can do that.
It doesn't involve any blockchain at all. Let alone XRPL.

>>60624194
>optionally
>involve any blockchain at all

If its all voluntary and free to use whatever part of the protocol you like (hence open source lol). Then what part of it is centralized?

>>60624213
>what part of it is centralized?
What part isn't?

>>60624194
Again, third time, it is built in a way that is literally technically optimized using XRP cross network and banks asked for it as such. Banks and institutions et al can now access pools of on demand liquidity and make real time micropayments:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wuctvfnuk1A


https://www.mitrade.com/insights/news/live-news/article-3-690529-20250312

>>60624213
the term decentralized and centralized is a meme in my opinion.

>>60624224
You claim
>ILP is a centralized product
Now substantiate that claim. Proof of burden is ont he one making the argument. Im saying its not.

>>60624194
So is Ripplenet. The XRPL can be scaled through them for institutional use cases and inevitably settled on the public XRPL which anyone can use and access with a protocol level dex and automated marketmaker and XRP default autobridging.

>>60624227
>>60624230
>>60624237
None of the transactions done through ILP are inherently on chain. It's basically a cloud service.
You have to choose to use a chain, which anything on the internet can do.

>>60624224
You are making an equivocation. ILP is decentralized among parties and as a knowable, deployable software which may just scale out even as a new layer in the internet code stack. This is not centralized in the way you are hoping it ifs construed to be.

>>60624258
>ILP is decentralized among parties
No it isn't.

>>60624254
You use the flexibility and optionality of the protocol, the fact that nobody is forced to use the protocol/service as one central authority decides as an argument that it is centralised?

Am i understanding this correctly?

>>60624276
yeah, centralized systems tend to be really flexible. That's because you don't have multiple parties working to agree on a consensus.

>>60624254
They ultimately settle in aggregate on the public ledger. This is not complicated and is noy news-has been knowable for years despite you just learning about it and undeservedly assuming to speak authoritatively on it despite not knowing even this about it. ILP is an open-source protocol not controlled by any single company, blockchain, or currency. It operates as a network of independent nodes (connectors) that facilitate payments across different ledgers without a central governing entity. This mirrors the internet's structure, where no single authority controls data routing.
ILP uses connectors, which are independent operators acting as decentralized exchanges or market makers. These connectors route payments across various ledgers (blockchains, banks, or other financial systems) without requiring a centralized intermediary. Each connector operates autonomously, contributing to the decentralized ecosystem. Inspired by the internet’s design, ILP follows the end-to-end principle, where complex features are implemented at the network's edges (senders and receivers) rather than in the core protocol. This minimizes the need for centralized control and allows diverse systems to interoperate without relying on a single authority. ILP uses HTLAs to secure multi-hop payments, ensuring funds cannot be lost or stolen during transit. These agreements are managed by connectors without requiring a centralized ledger to enforce conditions, further decentralizing the process. As of ILPv4, these conditions are handled off-ledger for efficiency, relying on peer-to-peer accounting. ILP is explicitly modeled after the internet’s protocol suite (e.g., TCP/IP), which is inherently decentralized. It uses a packet-based system to route value (similar to data packets) across independent networks, leveraging existing internet infrastructure. This alignment with the internet’s decentralized design supports ILP’s ability to function without centralized control.

>>60624304
>They ultimately settle in aggregate
>in aggregate
Nope.

>>60624297
Free to choose to record it on a blockchain or ledger
free to choose what chain or ledger

anyone can run a connector, and the network effect is achieved by composing connectors into chains, not by forcing everyone to use a single service

Payments can be routed through untrusted connectors using escrow mechanisms, and participants can choose their own path and settlement method

There is no requirement for consensus among all network participants—coordination is either ad hoc (atomic mode) or based on incentives and bounded execution (universal mode), not on a central decision-maker

In the ILP, flexibility comes from the LACK of a central authority and the ability for anyone to participate, not from centralization.

>>60624263
>>60624304
By integrating with the internet, ILP could leverage the internet’s vast network of nodes and decentralized routing protocols, enhancing its scalability and resilience.The protocol’s ability to split payments into small packets and route them through multiple connectors ensures no single point of failure. While ILP is decentralized by design, there’s a risk that a small number of connectors could dominate routing due to economies of scale or network effects, leading to partial centralization. However, the open nature of the protocol allows anyone to run a connector, mitigating this risk. Interledger Protocol is inherently decentralized due to its lack of a central authority, use of independent connectors, and ledger-agnostic design. If adopted into the internet technology stack, it would likely maintain this decentralization, leveraging the internet’s distributed architecture to enhance interoperability and resilience. While risks like connector concentration or regulatory pressures exist, ILP’s open and flexible design mitigates these, making it well-suited to function as a decentralized protocol within the internet’s framework.

>>60624306
Every private ledger use of XRP between ledgers ultimately settles on the public ledger. Any transfer of XRP between parties (e.g., sender to connector, connector to receiver) requires transactions on the public XRPL. These transactions are recorded on the XRPL’s decentralized blockchain.

>>60624319
This

>>60624319
>In the ILP, flexibility comes from the LACK of a central authority

No, it comes from a lack of a consensus mechanism.

"Centralized" doesn't mean there's a single corporation deciding everything, .xls files for instance are each modified by different people. Obviously.
Hence my analogy all the way in the beginning.
You people are stupid and retarded.

>>60624350
Even this comparison doesn't make sense. You are preloaded with what conclusion to have and fixated/unopen to new learning because you do not care what's true; you just care about uncritically propagandizing against a specific project. See:
>>60624304
>>60624320

>>60624350
>lack of a consensus mechanism.
Centralisation is about control over, not about consensus. Again as stated above, you are free to choose the mechanism but if 2 parties can reach consensus on their own without a third party to check this consensus and the 2 parties agree on this system, why do you need a third one? Transactions are settled bilaterally between parties (sender, connectors, receiver) using cryptographic conditions and fulfillments. Each transaction only requires agreement between directly involved parties, not the whole network.

>>60624350
>xls files for instance are each modified by different peopl
multiple people can modify their own files independently, but that alone doesn't make the system centralized or decentralized; it just means there's no enforced global consensus.

>>60624350
>You people are stupid and retarded.
Not an argument. Usually when people start shit flinging its because they are losing the argument.

>>60624375
>Centralisation is about control over, not about consensus.
If you need to reach public consensus among various independent actors, you're decentralized.

>multiple people can modify their own files independently, but that alone doesn't make the system centralized or decentralized; it just means there's no enforced global consensus.
That's what I'm saying yes.

>>60624393
>That's what I'm saying yes.
Then if you agree, your excel argument can not be used to say if something is centralised or not.

>>60624393
>If you need to reach public consensus among various independent actors, you're decentralized.
Decentralization is about the distribution of control, not just the technical presence or absence of consensus.

it's called ripple because the impending bubble bursting of this 175bil do-nothing asset will send rippling shockwaves out and annihilate the crypto industry

>>60624418
>your excel argument can not be used to say if something is centralised or not
I used the excel argument to say exactly that.

Stop what you're doing, go outside for a walk.

>Decentralization is about the distribution of control, not just the technical presence or absence of consensus.
We're talking about crypto

>>60624430
>>60624393
Your xls file literally is a centralized ledger operated across some structured (even if infinitely open) read/write party qualified consensus with certain parties having editorial authority to add or revoke other parties' privileges/access, stored in a centralized way ultimately. That is not comparable to ILP across any metric and is a deliberate obfuscation of a software you JUST learned about and still don't understand even the fundaments of.

>>60624441
In other words, deeper down the equivocation rabbit hole

>>60624423
>Just hit $3
>LINK STILL at $16
kek

>>60624430
>excel argument
A file carrying data is not a protocol transferring data. You can go for a walk.

>>60624430
>We're talking about crypto
And you argument is?

>>60624451
kaboom soon, cripplet

>>60624463
Cope forever, linkcel.

>>60624452
>A file carrying data is not a protocol transferring data.
See >>60624153
>Making .xls files "decentralized" involves a bunch of protocols: tcp/ip, HTTP, ...

Do you have legit short-term memory problems?

>>60624452
>And you argument is?
That decentralization in crypto involves consensus.

>>60624470
>crypto involves consensus. No you want ENFORCED GLOBAL consensus, thats what you are aiming for.
In the ILP there is no single point of control, and anyone can participate as a connector or user. This means the system can be decentralized by virtue of its open participation and lack of central authority—even though it doesn’t use a global consensus protocol.

You give a method on how to ''decentralise an excel file''
And that is somehow an argument wether or not the ILP is centralised or not?

>>60624503
>In the ILP there is no single point of control
If there's no public consensus across various independent actors, there are always single points of control.

ILP is run by "connectors" which don't need consensus so each individual step of a transaction is run by a single connector, which is a massive point of failure, attack, ...

>>60624470
If I provably deliver a dollar bill to you through an undisruptable infinite volume capable teleportation device that can deliver to anyone anywhere any time no matter who says what about it or would like to stop it, is that a centralized process or technology for not needing to reference other connectors?

>>60624514
see
>>60624538

If ILP is "centralized" by your loose definition, then so is TCP/IP, definitionally.

>>60624538
To be clear in this example it is not a single device and anyone anywhere can have one and use it freely in agreed upon ways with other connectors.

>>60624514
>single points of control.
Mitigated by its design. Packetization, error handling, and dynamic routing

The network as a whole does not have a single point of control or failure, because users can choose different connectors and routes

For so many massive points of failure it has been running since 2017.

The public consensus protocols also have flaws.
51% attacks, Sybil attacks, DDoS
centralisation of hashrate

Forks of BTC are a direct result of this.

>>60624538
>undisruptable
lmao
Anyone can run an ILP connector, and you only need one. It's supremely disruptable.

>>60624548
>then so is TCP/IP
No shit. TCP/IP runs on servers, and they can be shut down, blocked out, or fail at any time and they regularly do.

>>60624562
>Mitigated by its design. Packetization, error handling, and dynamic routing
fucking lol
All of this is borderline useless compared to blockchains, which is why they were created in the first place.

>>60624586
>All of this is borderline useless
opinion
Go play with your forking garbage.
Bitcoin Cash (BCH)
Bitcoin SV (BSV)
Bitcoin Gold (BTG)
Bitcoin Diamond (BCD)
Bitcoin Classic
Bitcoin Unlimited
Bitcoin XT

Behold, the supreme consensus mechanism we should all expect banks and financial institutions to abide by.
Fucking lol indeed.

is that the final argument against the ILP? It does not a specific type (forced) global (inefficient) consensus mechanism (resource intensive).

>>60624614
>opinion
kek

>Go play with your forking garbage.
Imagine thinking a fork somehow compromises a chain. Holy kek.

Also, did you notice how you started badmouthing blockchains now?
Why are you trying so desperately to make ILP look decentralized when you don't even believe in decentralization?

>>60618077
I cant choose between xrp or xlm.

>>60624622
>fork somehow compromises a chain
Its a proof of a flawed concept. You wouldnt get it.

>look decentralized
It is

>believe in
My whole argument is that the ILP is decentralised. you are the one promoting 1 specific consensus mechanism and using it to judge all other variants of the technology that ultimatly aims to do the same, transfer of value.

>>60617641 (OP)
no one cares about ripple gov cares about exchanges and stable coins. Sanctioned states care about btc.

Ripple has no use case, same with eth.

>>60624635
>a fork is proof of a flawed concept
You're a regular comedian.

>1 specific consensus mechanism
There are many.
ILP uses none.

>>60624643
>You're a regular comedian.
If a fork is needed it means the base chain was inept or unable to cater to all users.

>>60624643
>ILP uses none.
It works with all, is chain agnostic. Your tribalism is getting out of hand.

Dont worry the ILP enables all chains, even the ones with your favorite retarded mechanism

>>60624657
>If a fork is needed
fucking what kek

>It works with all
So does .xls

>>60624658
>fucking what kek
Forks occur when actors cannot reach consensus on proposed changes. If actors systematically can not reach consensus on changes, the core concept is most likely flawed. You play stupid because we have come full circle. The ILP enables even those chains to interact with one another.

.xls is just a data format, while ILP is a protocol that enables secure, automated value transfer between independent payment networks—something .xls can’t do.
Are you stuck on repeat?

>>60624670
>Forks occur when actors cannot reach consensus on proposed changes
All actors don't have to agree, the majority of hashpower does.

You're simultaneously trying to paint ILP as decentralized, while at the same time trying to shit on decentralization.
This is the type of mental contortionism you have to engage in to shill ripple. Count me out.

>>60624685
>majority of hashpower does.
Thats a flaw, he who has the hashpower controls the network.

>>60624685
>trying to shit on decentralization.
Your flawed definition of it, thats my whole argument. You cant grasp it, you never did. Given your stubbornness you never will. Married to your bags as always. You have the moral obligation to deny the capcitiy of the ILP, if you do acknowledge it, your whole investment thesis and probably your job (advocate for the cubists) is a lie.

>>60624685
>Count me out.
I accept your defeat bieps

>>60624586
The settlement is undisruptable from any other connector. Your argument LITERALLY is nothing can be decentralized because everything has a foundation in technology. So the base layer all crypto is built on is centralized and therefore all networks are vulnerable to system level attacks. But wait, the infrastructure itself is vulnerable to a Carrington Event therefore all decentralization is illusory. This is the deepest equivocation imaginable and a PROFOUNDLY discursive route around the fact you were proven wrong to cope. This is like me saying you acted immorally and you saying you didn't because there is no natural foundation for ought statements of morality. Extremely cringe and desperate and pathetic and not an argument you would make in terms of your crypto, which it 100% applies to and which has its own worse centralizatioin features and risks even on top of it.

>>60624623
Choose XRP if buying just one but buying both wouldn't be a bad idea. XLM is XRP stripped of a lot of function built by a disgruntled past CTO of Ripple who got mad they woulfd not implement his marketing ideas so he left and tried to kill XRP on the way out, went and implemented those ideas and they all failed famously disastrously.

>>60624685
What do you think happens when hashpower collects in corporatist ownership like every single natural economic system does across Pareto time? Black Rock are ALREADY talking about how btc supply "isn't necessarily fixed." They are already artificially messing with supply/demand mechanics through futures like they do in gold and silver. Or how about the fact that ethereum was the test bed for dapps the same way BTC was the test bed for value/payments. Neither is 1/100th as efficient or fast as competitors nor can they do have of the functions of the 10 best networks for each side. Nor would it be good for them to be used. Both require extremely shit centralized L2s to be remotely useful or competitive/are literal trojan horse centralization, selling people on the frontend promise of decentralization but scaling them into a systems architecture and UI that once built out is a trap that is worse and more cucked than the system blockchain and DLT were supposed to disrupt and free us from. They are worse technologies that are also less principled in outcome of usage totally taken over by unrepresentative people who changed the entire purpose of them (btc was supposed to be a decentralized anonymous p2p payment network). Every chain worth its salt has or is working on an EVM and all of the tested dapps which were developed on Ethereum can now be ported to and funnel into the actual networks that will be used. Ironically btc can scale using ILP without centralizing, but is still less efficient than XRP and has no on demand liquidity capable micropayments for institutions using Ripple Payments,

TNN

>>60624685
No he isn't. You're literally just infinite regressing the rabbithole of equivocation of the definition of "decentralization."

It’s true. Only xrp matters. Maybe XLM will come along for the ride too because it’s the bastard stepchild of xrp, but yes im tired of pretending that 99.9% of other cryptos matter. Literally everything can be done on the xrp ledger and it can handle all the world’s transactions for everything if the price was one million per xrp. But we will have to wait for that. No way the elites go lazy mode and put everything on xrp no way haha that’d be too crazy and I’m very open minded myself.

>>60617653
I have only 11k. I think I'll just sell when it hits 10

>>60626693
ngmi

>>60626693
You're gonna rope like that fuckhead who bought pizza with 100 bitcoins

>>60618571
Give up bro. You will never get anywhere with the xerpees.

>>60624153
This is it's biggest selling point. I'm not sure what others are reading, but I've been comparing it to a decentralized Excel because of the massive leap forward we are about to take.
Excel and Access were world changing and most people have no understanding of this because of how "simple" they are.

XRPL is to Excel like Email was to fax machine.

The fax machine and Excel were total world game changers of productivity beyond anything ever seen at their time.
Young'ns don't really get this.

>>60618077
>coin go up that means its good!
>quick better join in bitconnect and luna they're really good at going up ;)

look xrp is easily the biggest scam in crypto, so it's probably going to go up. but if you believe a single word that comes out of an xrp holder's mouth you're a fool, doubly so if you repeat them

>>60617653
Good for you, I have some XRP too and UTK, I hope I make it

>>60628171
unironically how old are you gramps

>>60628686
ETH is also a scam. Most of crypto is a scam. So that’s not really a good argument you’re using. Xrp is the scam that actually works.

All this YAPPING and yet nobody is executing a smart contract on xrpl

>>60629646
XRPL doesn't have native smart contracts you fucking moron

>>60629233
I larp as older than I am, but with this type of stuff I kinda am.

I'm in 40s but spent my youth, even at age 10 learning Access basics and working at my family business prior to email being a widely used thing.
The office faxed back and forth with foreign suppliers.
Filled with boomers using Access to design their own forms and in house systems with Access.
The amount of shit still running on an Access db to this day is enormous because it's so efficient, simple, easy to use, and transferrable to anywhere that there is no reason whatsoever to switch, especially in house.

The ability of every office, no matter how small, to flip through the enormous Access manual and create custom in house operations and with forms, picklists for warehouses, client lists, and distribution lists that could be networked was unreal and very few people even that lived through it had any understanding of it.
Simple is great.
XRPL is Access of the next generation.
And by that I mean, that just like Access, 99% will never even realize that this is what's happening. They'll just use it because they were told to by someone who understands and properly utilizes it.

>>60630947
Access was limited by file size, but that file size was so big initially that it made no difference.

SQL was literally invented in the 70s and people now UPGRADE their Access dbs to SQL because they reach the limits of Access db efficiency.

When something simple needs done (which is non stop all the time a billion times a day), then the tool that does it should be very simple and extraneous bs is it's biggest enemy.

So to sum up. Most real work that needs done is literally using 30-50 year old design frameworks.

This project is so retarded lmao