>>60629473 (OP)
It is literally just a reaction to 6 years of this shit from linkies doing the exact same thing, accompanied by a pump in XRP price. You guys are like fucking jews with the projection. You have a consistent stream of multiple anti-XRP threads for years and years and the second the exact same is done to you you cry blood libel and scream about muh pogrums. It is so insufferable it is insane. Also link is being continuously displayed as literally not being needed or used in the products CLL are building
>>60630439
nice damage control, biepum/fishy/semantics arguing linktard shiller
never forget who this guy is, and his signature phrase >swift, dtcc, euroclear, ...
>>60630404
I have been a neet browser here since /biz/ formed. You are not even remotely close. It is not even comparable. It is also constant and enduring and linkfags brigade EVERY xrp thread every time with the same non-arguments, refusing to discuss actual tech or idea and just rhetorically gushing and spinning in weird ways and trying to misdirect argument from substance. It is CONSTANT and has been for at least 4 years, getting much worse lately. You either didn't notice it because you looked in a fixated way or you didn't notice it because you are poor at analysis, which is also why you probably invested in link.
>>60630540
It's very comparable, there are and simply almost always have been more Link fud threads than XRP threads all together. I'm not blind. There is always without a doubt a Link fud post, but not always an XRP post. Especially before this cycle.
>>60630546
It is at least 3 to 1 XRP hate threads clearly formed by linkies vs. link hate threads clearly formed by xrp. This ratio has probably decreased slightly over the period of fatigue over the past year or so, but was a LONG time coming. If you include link shill threads, the ratio is consistently at least 5 or 6 to 1.
>>60630585
By volume it is definitely true. Link was probably the most supported coin on biz in the 2010s but most of us sold in 2018ish with the big marketwide bust. The legacy from there was like the legacy of current BTC maxis. Same thing happens over and over again and again. Tech literate people lead the pack and predict a trend, the trend happens, tech illiterate normies flood the zone trying to recapture the trend and narrativize it into cult status. Over and over again. The original link project seemed promising and obviously at a few cents was very undervalued. Currently there is not a clear investment thesis and none of CLL's actions make it seem like they are building products geared towards incentivizing its use in a real or lasting way. Sorry this is just true. There are stupider investments but this is like one step removed from people buying shib to try to catch momentum in the sense it is at least nominally a play at utility even if it is a tech illiterate play at utillity that fundamentally misunderstands its own core technology. But most admit they at least semi-consciously understand this every time they change the argument tact to obfuscation instead of dissection of the information and deflection and rhetorical strategies to avoid having to answer critique and accusations of fud etc. It is really weird literal cult tier psychology stuff.
>linktards playing the victim, like they always do
do bad no one falls for your shitting and pissing any more, morons
not buying your shitbags, and the entire board will keep mocking you as long as you continue to spam the entire board with the janny's blessings
eat shit, astroturfers
>>60630454 >and his signature phrase >>swift, dtcc, euroclear, ...
cripplet gets triggered hard when you simply mention some of the big names working with Chainlink. Classic.
Maybe you should respond by spamming five consecutive paragraph posts about SBI. That'll learn 'em.
>>60630744
None of these projects uses the token. This has been litigated in 100 prior threads. Almost every adoption is for private licensed software for price feeds that have no value to token investors who ironically subsidize the arrangement for CLL. Even the DTCC trial did not use it for actual value, they tried multiple permissioned and permissionless ledgers to work as the true settlement, like R3's Corda. Onchain value is not happening and is losing to Wormhole presently and was eclipsed by XRP through one single deployment recently. Chainlink's link associated product literally has less revenue than a food truck in any random city.
>>60630763
This isn't a potent "no u" argument. I made statements of fact which frustrate you so you respond by weird repressive spinning. Reality doesn't join you just because you are obsessed with a token
>>60630713 >>60630763
The fact you have 2 almost consecutive posts which are framed from the cookie cutter reddit "imagine...x" frame which never elaborate into anything of substance beyond a few really really lazy buzzword namecallings and other meaningless rhetoric nothing more or less proves my point. NPC level argumentation.
See how they keep begging you to keep up the "argumentation"? Trying every trick in the book to keep you engaged?
That's because they're paid by the reply.
>>60630796
You refuse to discuss actual data and try to languish in meaningless gush of unrelated argument strategy. Literal retard shit. Never changes and has been the case in 80% of link involved discussions here over the last few years. You can tell how filled to the brim with piss and anger you are and nothing about what you say has anything to do with technological specifics at all. It is literally just team sports for a team you will never let go of and as the case gets worse and worse you get madder and more vicious and deflective. Now to the extent that even asking to argue is somehow ACTUALLY guilty of what you are doing and not vice versa. You have become so strange and deluded it is derealizing to even experience you in discussion.
>>60631248 >XSG is still infested with linkcel stink
I just manually combed through the current /xsg/ and the previous one, and there isn't a single mention or reference to Chainlink. >>60630655 >>60625708
>>60630391
We have always shit on xrp because it's the midwit redditors favorite coin. There are almost mever entire threads dedicated to it though let alone the quantity. That's fine though because LINK will win in the end regardless of how many redditors piss their pants over it. Kind of like how they tried to keep that orange baboon out of office but only became a laughing stock (again)
>>60631294
You literally post the same thing in every thread and get owned LITERALLY EVERY time. You LITERALLY spend 12 hours a day every day searching XRP threads and posting this despite losing the same argument everytime. Anyone who doubts what I say, search the archives for the pic he posted, or see this thread for an instance of the literally automated discussion he has had probably literally 100+ times. This kind of leftist tier hate obsession disingenuous nonsense argument type to avoid details is exactly what I was talking about. Here is last time (yesterday Lol): https://warosu.org/biz/thread/60615430#p60618685
See the same example thread to see it. Same thing every time; zero substantial engagement, all pissed otff to level 11 copypasted arguments he has had proven wrong 100 prior times (see the linke archive for an example of one such thread). This is exactly what I was talking about. Constant obsessive targeted attack posting and brigading on an inexhaustible loop which you all know is invalid and loses in every single thread but doing so anyways because you don't even care what's actually true and are unable to think of anything even remotely better or substantial. Just endless emotional irrational recycle. Zero percent chance you sare not an integrity-less shitskin paid poster selling integrity for 5 cents a day.
>>60631887
You LITERALLY already lost this argument a day ago. I invite anyone interested in reading it to read the archive in >>60631870. Not going to give you the (You)s or have ean NPC automated argument with you. I have white skin and the archive fully makes the arguments of both sides. Leaving you here Ranjesh.
>>60631956
Literally directly addressed in the archived discussion. Project however you like but you literally had and lost this exact discussion less than a day ago. Lol
>>60630765 > none of these projects use the token
cope, they literally do now with CCIP + staking v1
private rails were step 1, but LINK gets used in final implementation > dtcc didn’t use it
they used ccip with swift on testnet, retard > onchain value not happening
it is, just not overnight. 21x, galaxy, vodafone, anz, all in prod
>>60630796 >That's because they're paid by the reply.
I thought this was retarded a few months ago and that LINK fuddies are just bored holders but I'm starting to think that yeah they actually might be paid to fud.
>>60630439
Rent free biepum.
Thank god my link stack is way smaller than my xerpies stack.
A general would be great for link. A few advocates just cant help themselves. There is always this mentally ill, collage posting, semantic niggering retard. >>60630644
I believe what you're doing is called projection. Usually XSG being brigaded with fud coincides with the board being shat up with linklet shill threads
>>60630391 >fudcuck projecting about projection
The day that fudcucks are tortured and killed by some unhinged, newly rich linkie can't come soon enough.
>>60635549 >Usually XSG being brigaded with fud coincides with the board being shat up with linklet shill threads
Linkies are virtually never in /XSG/
Check the last handful of threads, there isn't a single mention of link.
Xerpies on the other hand are spewing Link fud all day every day. The biggest Link fudders are in fact xerpies, see "hubris downfall" and Biepum.
Anon pretended xerpies were spamming fud these past few days because /XSG/ was getting brigaded. But there isn't a single mention of link in any recent /XSG/ until that one post 6 hours ago.
