>>60642470That interview was kinda weird, the original statement about dropping Bitcoin mentioned nothing about fraud.
People were making their own theories about what he meant when he said fraudulent, like double-spend or RBF (which was completely wrong, multiple users who actually bought games with Bitcoin confirm that you don't get the games without tx confirmations, so RBF and double-spend is irrelevant). Or that the Bitcoin was stolen or bought with a stolen card, like
>>60644440, which makes no sense since even if the card was chargedback, the BTC can't be clawed back, so he keeps 100% of the crypto payments.
The true reason they originally posted (pic related) made the most sense. The fees during Dec 2017 were just unsustainable. I regularly make BTC payments (for my VPS) so I remember how bad it was, 300-330 sat/B fee was the average, so yes, $25 was a pretty common fee. I actually switched to other chains for payment back then. Although the worst fees was during the peak of ordinals, 500-1000 sat/B was the frequent going rate.
In comparison, the current going fee is around 3 sat/B.
I think he just forgot the original reason, and what was fresh in his mind was the NFT games that they banned on their platform (which were actually the scammy ones) and mixed up his reasons for the NFT game ban and the reason for dropping BTC payments