Thread 60678434

Ripple:
>had to buy a company that is allowed to eat some of the crumbs left behind by DTCC
>Ripple/XRP not needed or involved at all

Link:
>direclty working with DTCC itself
>Chainlink tech directly involved

>>60678434 (OP)
its such a sick joke. yes i am seething. nothing makes sense. low iq scammers and liars are winning while the high iq autists are losing. how is that fair? how is that logical? how is this piece of shit still top 3 when its a blatant scam and the retards can claim these claims and get away with it, getting rewarded for lying and being stupid? meanwhile dtcc is literally out there saying "hey, its chainlink, retards" and link still hasnt made me retired, i hate this shit world and this shit market

>>60678447
DTCC have been very careful not to explicitly say the role that LINK plays in their new blockchain based systems. Let’s hope they can be a bit more open at smartcon

>>60678434 (OP)
hidden road wasn't even a big player, they just bought up companies for their licenses, the actual companies and funds were quite literally going red

>>60678451
the thing is they will probably not admit it till after price impact
even then it will be a slow release
cant startle the heard of sheep

>>60678447
>low iq scammers and liars are winning while the high iq autists are losing
But the high iq autists ARE winning - Sergey keeps lining his pockets with profits and becoming richer while retail holds the bags. All is how it's supposed to be

>>60678447
>nothing makes sense
ripple just did better advertising xrp that is all and the fact that they don't mind lying their ass off helps

>>60678451
they don't benefit from explicitly saying chainlink, which is why they don't say it that often and if they do it's usually in content created from link themselves. from the DTCC perspective they just want something that does the thing chainlink does regardless who does it. However, if a service were to be faster and/or cheaper than chainlink and ensured the same level of security, who's to say they wouldn't choose it? Their loyalty is not to chainlink specifically but the world chainlink brings, they probably still believe a competitor can exist.

>>60678434 (OP)
>one settles value
>one provides price feeds
They aren't even in direct competition for the same product.

>>60678573
>herd

Ripple buys a company for 10% of chainlinks market cap.

Linkies seething, like clockwork
KEK baggies

>>60678434 (OP)
>to help settle
They need the DTCC to settle for them. The audacity to insinuate this as a partnership. Fucking retards

>>60678585
>Sergey keeps lining his pockets with profits

KEK you cripplets are such a big fat joke.

Sergey:
>dumps $1 billion per year
>large chunk of that goes to the network (nodes, stakers)

Ripple:
>dumps $2.6 billion per year
>100% goes into the Ripple execs pockets because XRPL network nodes are expected to work FOR FREE

>>60678434 (OP)
Nobody outside this board even mentions Link in the same sentence as top coins like XRP or BTC.

>>60678601
>>one settles value
>>one provides price feeds
Both are Chainlink.
Neither are Ripple.

>>60678824
>XRPL network nodes are expected to work FOR FREE

>>60678824
You're never going to even break even bro. Get over it.

>>60678592
>ripple just did better advertising xrp

They really didn't.

>>60678434 (OP)
link is totally not needed. do not buy link token people, its used to fund chainlink labs.

just watch sergey's vid with trump and trump basically telling little spergey with the tap on the shoulder to Run along kid. sergey pleading with trump Please ser please. DO NOT BUY LINK TOKEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>60678447
>why are scammers best at crypto scamming

>>60678447
>>60678592
The key is the ARG/XSG marketing efforts where people do it for free.
Ripple execs and backers are literally several SDs smarter than the backers of LINK.

>>60678447
>low iq scammers and liars are winning while the high iq autists are losing.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA

i love how link boyscouts keep trying to give little warnings about how price is gonna explode, and every single time it backfires

>>60679364
>>60679370
>>60679374

>LINK is dumping harder than everything else again
Jesus Christ, why can’t I have this

>>60679393

2021
>he envisioned be able to retire once link hits $1,000

2025
>he creates collages of random dudes jerking off

life truly has a sense of humor eh boy

>>60678829
holy based

>>60678447
Linkcel seethe is delicious. I live for it, and it’s not even over yet, it’s only just begun.

>X event happens to LINK it doesnt moon but dumps

I swear to fucking christ almighty that this stablecoin is bugged.

Bullish af for XRP (ticker: $XRP)

>discover xrp several years ago
>come to learn why it has the potential to make me very rich
>do my due diligence, look into the company, the lawsuit, the technology, the people involved, their pedigree, listen to the legal phone conferences from the court, everything
>yep, this looks pretty good
>know nothing about chainlink, never hear about it outside of trolls in /xsg/ and from /biz/
>chainlink holders hate our guts and continuously shill/spam our thread
>still have no idea to this day
I asked in /xsg/ last night, but I would like some outsider perspective here - what, specifically, did we do to piss in your cornflakes? Not Bitcoin, or Ethereum or whatever other coins, but XRP and its holders, specifically. Did we snipe some business prospect? Are you competing for the role of providing cross-border liquidity, vostro/nostro?
Walk me through this like I'm 12 Link Marines. What gives?

>>60680930
it gives me (You)s

>>60681442
You perpetuate a non-existent crypto war so people respond to you on 4chan?

>>60680930
Nostro vostro account are buzz words only spoken from the xrp community. Stablecoin atomic swaps dont need them

>>60679364
>>60679370
>>60679374
>>60680163
hey again Adem Kayser
i see you're trying to be a bit more rowdy today
do we need to ask Bram and Edem about what you meant by "peeling back" the "layers of your porn identity" again?

>>60680930
the ESL subhumans that spam link fud like to larp as bagholders for other coins regularly, or larp as linkies upset at said bagholders to try and stoke tribalism and hope that retards with other coins do their jobs for them
its probably the only tactic they have ever come up with that has had some form of success, as some of the retarded crypto twitter faggots on the link side take the bait for it as well

i have not and never will give a fuck about XRP

>>60681536
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/051815/what-difference-between-nostro-and-vostro-account.asp

either you lie or you are just retarded

>>60681572
Succinct summary recent fuddie tactics

>>60681536
What? No, nostro/vostro accounts are very real, very crucial and much less likely to be outright replaced with random stablecoins than liquidity provided by XRP/the XRPL + sidechains for said random stablecoins.
>>60681572
>oh, well it's all faux-tribalism initiated by everyone else
>also this random anon is actually some sacred cow to slay, per tribalism's decree
I see. Thank you for your candor.

>>60678434 (OP)
Guys , why you all scared?
LINK and XRP will both succeed. You guys are like Adidas maxis who cry about Luis Vuitton maxis and vice versa.
It's 2025 and crypto market will grow and grow.

>>60680930
lol
ok anon i'll indulge how can someone pretend to be smart enough to look into xrp and never even look into chainlink? the only people i've ever met irl who discuss xrp are mid left bell curve q anon trump types, and they all think they're going to get rich but can't even explain what DLT means (ie they don't even get the value of bitcoin).

this is probably just bait and you've probably got like 50-100k+ link but i'm bored (and you probably are too)

>>60681661
>bait bait trump midwit qanon etc etc
Not everything's bait anon. The process of learning about XRP and why it's solid legitimately and truthfully did not require any reading or research or even awareness of chainlink, for myself or anyone else who was invested in this prior to me who spoke of it. Maybe that's not true for someone else, but I sincerely gain nothing by lying about something like that. I hold no link, but plenty of xrp.
So again, is there some legitimate reason that XRP/it's founders/holders have/are pissing in link's cornflakes? If so then I am genuinely unaware of what that reason is.

>>60681711
>not everything’s bait anon
no but this is

>>60678447
>>60678434 (OP)

The BIS, IMF and the world bank have namedropped XRP more times than chainshit has verified the weather in some unknown Indian village kek. Literally called a Supranational Currency, and a Digital Reserve Currency. Linkies are absolutely fuming and delusional kek in complete disbelief as we make our way up where we belong, far above linkies.

I mean I didn’t buy in as early as possible into LINK but I do have a stack, just wanted to point out that you could buy LINK at $.30c and it’s now at $18, whereas XRP no matter how much you buy will absolutely never reach even half of that price.

>>60681939
lol

enter here we are crafting the next luna rugpull

>>60678447
It’s almost like the link coin or whatever you want to call it isnt needed

>>60678447
chainlink is a scam too, they make functionally 0 dollars

you can run all the critical structure for defi just as well at $1

>>60680930
>I did my due diligence on xrp and it looked good
Well that just means you're retarded in a literal and functional sense.

To this day, xrp has no users in crypto/defi despite being one of the absolute oldest cryptos/dexes in existence.
That's insane. Explain that.

Banks don't want to use it either because they don't need a "bridge currency" when all the assets are already tokenized.
And even if somehow the entire world used xrp as a bridge currency, ripple itself admitted this would not impact the price of xrp.

>what, specifically, did we do to piss in your cornflakes?
lol
Thomas the Link fudder is arguably one of the most prolific spammers this board (or even website) has ever seen, and he's an xrp shill.

>>60682338
>chainlink is a scam too, they make functionally 0 dollars
Link nodes have been making 100 million per year since 2020 or something. Probably a lot more now but the Dune dashboard is dead.

>you can run all the critical structure for defi just as well at $1
Bitcoin, ETH, ... worked perfectly well at less than $1 too.

>>60681620
>nostro/vostro accounts are very real, very crucial and much less likely to be outright replaced with random stablecoins
You're fucking retarded.
You don't need nostro vostro at all when you're atomically settling tokenized assets that have proven and certified reserves.
That's kind of the entire point of tokenization.

>liquidity provided by XRP/the XRPL
With tokenized assets that have proven reserves, the liquidity is 100% onchain already.

You're clueless about all of this.
But then I guess you have to be if you're holding XRP.

>>60683423
>You're fucking retarded.
Woah, good argument you got there.


>You don't need nostro vostro at all when you're atomically settling tokenized assets
Correct, XRPL natively supports fully atomic cross-currency payments

Willful ignorance at its finest.

>>60683481
brother, no one is gonna use xrp for anything
banks arent gonna hold a shitcoin to be a bridge currency

they're gonna run their own private ledgers and use CCIP to let retards get into defi

XRP has zero usecase

>>60683484
Nice opinion you got there.

>>60683481
>XRPL natively supports fully atomic cross-currency payments
The tokenized assets themselves already fully support atomic settlements.
Why would you need XRPL?

>>60683490
xrp'eons cannot be saved XD

>>60683493
>tokenized assets themselves
What are they tokenized on?
If they are tokenized on a chain that enables atomic settlements such as the XRPL , why look any further?

>>60683505
>What are they tokenized on?
Not XRPL.

>If they are tokenized on a chain that enables atomic settlements such as the XRPL
All blockchains enable atomic settlements.
What are you talking about.

>>60683503
Why would I need saving? average buy is 45 cents. Sad you missed out buddy. Better luck next time.

>>60683511
we arent swinging weiners. were swinging winners.

>>60683510
>Not XRPL.
There are financial institutions tokenizing on the XRPL right now. https://app.rwa.xyz/networks/xrp-ledger

>>60683510
>All blockchains enable atomic settlements.
What are you talking about, not all chains allow for cross-asset, cross-chain atomic settlement.

>>60683514
Why do you talk like a faggot?

>>60683522
why do you keep getting checked nigga

>>60683524
I stand corrected, why do you talk like a niggerfaggot?

>>60683510
Holy shit your brain is fucked

>>60683526
i genuinely hate black people(jack black is alright)

>>60683520
>There are financial institutions tokenizing on the XRPL right now
XRPL is one of the absolute least used public blockchains for institutional tokenization.

>not all chains allow for cross-asset, cross-chain atomic settlement
What are you talking about, XRPL doesn't do cross chain anything.

>>60683529
explain

>>60683540
>institutional tokenization
Yet its happening, that seems to bother you?

>>60683540
>doesn't do cross
It seems to cross your mind on the regular. You can deny what you want. Its not changing anything.

>>60683547
>ok I admit XRP has no use as a bridge currency
>ok I admit XRPL is one of the least used institutional tokenization platforms
>ok I admit XRPL doesn't do cross chain anything

wow, clean sweep.
Now ask yourself what you're speculating on by holding XRP.

https://x.com/driver61d1/status/1889797172461445151

Holy fuck the dtcc literally has THEIR names on all shares in the system except those who directly register them. Employees there got caught shilling and claiming that “naked shorting isn’t real”. The FED and the DTCC are private… how do people not realize how deep the tentacles go. The DTCC can see Al shares in the system in realtime but they still allow illegal fake shares to exist.

Famous companies who have been naked shorted:

OverStock
GlobalLinks
Dole foods
GameStop
Bed Bath & Beyond
And countless more over decades.

>>60683565
your emotions on the matter doesn't change the fact that it's happening

>>60683565
Woah, severe case of XRP derangement syndrome. I admitted none of these things. You just have trouble accepting reality.

>>60683572
>>60683573
The total count for RWAs right now is $13 billion, which is 10x smaller than Defi.
And XRPL doesn't even hold 1% of the RWA market share.
It's absolutely hilarious.

Plus XRP as a bridge currency is completely obsolete.
Plus XRPL has virtually zero Defi presence.
Plus every institution on earth will have their own stablecoin, so RLUSD not needed either.
etc. etc.

What narrative is left for XRP?
Completely baseless price action, aka a speculative bubble.

>>60678829
All those years of “xrp is for settlement” mumbo jumbo just went *poof*.

Thanks Visa, very cool.

>>60683606
>XRPL doesn't even hold 1%
Because all these developments have just started in end 2024, early 2025. We are halfway the year.:

Early 2025: RippleLabs drops multi-purpose tokens & permissioned DEX for regulated DeFi on XRPL

Q2 2025: EVM sidechain launches for Ethereum compatibility

Mid 2025: Metadata standard added for institutional DeFi & token tracking

Mid 2025: TokenEscrow, batch tx, permissionedDEX updates rolled out

Jan-Jul 2025: RWA tokenization spikes 2260% ($5M $118M)


>RLUSD not needed
2024-2025: RLUSD stablecoin grows fast, drives 430%+ payment volume surge.
Market Cap $557.696.859 in half a year
Monthly Transfer Volume $3.096.704.605

Notice how first you had to downplay the use as cross border and CBDC. Now you are talking about Defi and recently stable. The fact you need to increase your fud talking points makes you acknowledge the fact that the XRPL is growing in use and capability.

>What narrative is left for XRP?
As a base use case its making you seethe.
The rest we shall see upcoming period. Dont worry, if link actually does what it promises and also increases in price I also win. I hold both namely.

>>60683705
>Ripple’ rwa developments just started en 2024
Lol what about all those years of “institutions will use xrpl for settlement of institutional assets”?
You’re a pilpulling snake. Ripple has nothing.

>>60683722
lol what about all the enterprise integrations LINK had since 2018 with Google, Bsn, Samsung, Interwork alliance etc

>>60683722
Well it turns out to be true, its happening.
https://app.rwa.xyz/networks/xrp-ledger

>Ripple has nothing
Denial, cope, seethe, pathetic.

>>60683730
Less than 1%.
That’s a rounding error.

>>60683742
>Less than 1%
Keep track of that metric for me the upcoming year. I dont even have to ask, im sure you will.

>>60683747
Two more weeks?
Ripple is getting absolutely smoked on institutional adoption by chains less than half its age.
It’s a dead ghostchain.

>>60683766
Then why the seethe and hate? If its a dead ghost chain why do you need to verbally shit yourself in this thread and throw a tantrum?
Its still number 3 btw. Still after you having your little moment.

>>60683777
It’s a travesty for a dead ghostchain to be the third biggest crypto. It’s as shrimple as that.
Witnessed though

>>60683777
>Its still number 3 btw
the only thing ripple succeeded with was shilling it and create a psychotic cult that believes everything they read on twitter and that is a good thing for price, they will never gain any institutional adoption however or taken seriously by anyone with actual pull in the tradfi space

>>60683568
Elaborate like I'm a 5 year old retarded gorilla niglet

>>60683606
how is this shit even in the top 20 still

>>60681572
rattled

see this >>60680163, that's your life kid

>>60683777
>Then why the seethe and hate? If its a dead ghost chain why do you need to verbally shit yourself in this thread and throw a tantrum?

valid question

the answer is they are extremely insecure

chainlink is a guy who hasn't gotten laid in 5 years, and even then it was only once

>>60684424
>how is this shit even in the top 20 still

same reason doge is top 10, shib is top 25, and like 4 other memecoins in top 100

you can either recognize market patterns and accept reality as is, or you can fight it by spamming tech buzzwords at people while losing money

>>60684556
>chainlink is a guy who hasn't gotten laid in 5 years, and even then it was only once

I get crossborder payment, linkie tries to get cross border payment
I get banking license, linkie tries to gets banking license
i get expensive turkmenian prostitute, linkie cannot afford
GREAT SUCCESS

>>60684569
>recognize market patterns
There is no pattern to this market, only blind and fully random speculation and manipulation.
XRP is a prime example of everything wrong with the current crypto market.

>>60685048
>There is no pattern to this market, only blind and fully random speculation and manipulation.

you should have said there is no pattern that YOU recognize
but they are certainly out there, you just don't understand them

>XRP is a prime example of everything wrong with the current crypto market.

the market is never wrong

the link marine arrogance doesn't allow you to be objective about why you're losing money

it's a very childish thing to blame a bad market, and you can do that until you're blue in the face and you can tell yourself you are winning arguments

but you aren't making money

>>60685172
>the market is never wrong
Ripple's CTO says it is though.

>muh XRP army vs Linkmarines
Have you considered a third option? It's called Flare. Flare will unite the two opposing armies and mold them into one.

>>60678844
im a retard can you explain this image in simple words please?

i know xrp is garbage but i want to get angry

>>60678451
>DTCC have been very careful not to explicitly say the role that LINK plays in their new blockchain based systems
Why though?

>>60683802
>my feelings > the facts

>>60678434 (OP)
>>60678451
All you have to do is watch the DTCC "Great Collateral Experiment" video to see they aren't using ripple. The addresses, which I've conveniently included in a screenshot are all EVM based. There's also something about ETH version at the top right.
https://x.com/TheLinkPanda/status/1915055617854824817

>>60686271
I think we can't even wrap our minds around the insane amount of money that is about to pour into tokenized assets, specially when the entire stock market gets tokenized.

>>60686049
NDA, regulations who knows

>>60686049
see >>60678593 and >>60686339

>>60686362
There exists no competing suite of products, and won’t for at least several years

>>60686421
i understand that but they likely did not sign an exclusivity deal which means they still have the potential to use other infrastructure. yes WE know that they will all use link because everything else is vc cringe vaporware but they have to be very careful because let's say bezos just gets bored and makes it his mission to make a faster and cheaper version of chainlink because he doesn't want sergey to be the first trillionaire

>>60685345
Basically Ripple marketed the XRP token first and foremost as a "bridge token".
When an institution wanted to make a cross-border transfer or transaction, the system would go like this:
>asset X is sold for XRP
>XRP is sent from wallet to wallet
>XRP is sold for asset Y

The problem of course is that the system means the XRP is bought and sold almost instantly, meaning there's no value capture at all. And Ripple admitted as much in their own court submissions.

And not only that, but the entire concept becomes moot when asset X and Y are both already tokens themselves.

This system where XRP acts as "bridge token" is called ODL ("On Demand Liquidity"), and it was meant to be Ripple's primary product geared towards institutions.

https://x.com/Rick_Barber_/status/1948404485253955770
Rippletards BTFO

>>60685048
That last post is literally the linkie argument for why links price is in the gutter. Oh the irony

>>60687195
This guy makes pool tables for a living and writes essays on link vs xrp in his free time? Truly rent free.

>>60687198
>>60687242
What even is your point though? The problem with the opposing arguments is none of them logically map onto each other, its always just flinging shit to make people mad, low grade trolling that doesn't work beyond collecting (you)'s.

It stands to reason that the market is largely illogical and places little value on fundamentals. I don't see how this is even debatable. So then the response if they concede this point is usually, "so then you have to deal in reality". Which doesn't actually suggest anything, because the reality is its a chaotic nonsensical market. Sometimes they'll imply they chose correctly, but its always bullshit because nobody can show transactions that shows how they became a billionaire in crypto. Which they would have by now with all the price action, if reading the market were so easy.

That said, humans hate when circles aren't squared in their minds. We like to fill in the blanks. And while autists might be able to accept that there's more to the world than the empirical, midwits will struggle with this concept and force ideas like "the market is rational you just don't get it".

So what you end up with is a situation where a whole lot of boomers holding 4 and maybe 5 figure bags of XRP are thinking its going to magically grow to a quadrillion marketcap and make them rich. While a bunch of demoralized realistic autists are sitting on 6 and 7 figure bags of link fudding themselves and others to pass the time, because they've resigned themselves to the fact that they are living out the insane asylum pasta.

>>60678447
It's not fair or logical but it's Predictable, because the smart dude who played the game 'right' usually loses to the bullshitter who has connections. That is literally how it always goes.

link will unironically be $1000 by 2030

>>60687443
But why

>>60686756
>asset X is sold for XRP
>XRP is sent from wallet to wallet
>XRP is sold for asset Y
What a shit way to make a bridge

>>60687198
Makes you think, doesn't it?
Even the Ripple guy agrees that the current crypto market doesn't value utility and fundamentals at all.

Because if it did, XRP would be out of the top 20 and Link would be top 3.

>>60688372
If ot actually did, both LINK and XRP would immediately plummet to cents of a dollar, so be grateful

>>60678447
calm down little bro
xrp is a 90iq scam
link is a 110iq scam
neither project is worth anything in the grand scheme of things
if you retards actually used blockchain, you'd understand a centralized price feed larping as decentralized oracles isn't worth billions

>>60688384
Well no because Link has tremendous utility. It's been propping up most of crypto for half a decade now.
Based on utility, Link is absolutely top 3.

>>60688405
the only thing propping up its price is speculation, not utility, without it LINK would swiftly return to ICO prices

>>60688412
This is true for all of crypto kek

Based on utility, Link is top 3. No contest.

>>60688415
based on utility, it could very well be even lower

>>60688405
no one cares about utility, what you need to have success is viral marketing and meme prescence. link appeals to basement dwelling incels with no income meanwhiule ripple appeals to stupid q-anon tier boomers with a ton of cash just waiting to be deployed and titanium hands to hodl mode indefinitely.

>>60688420
kek without Chainlink there would be no defi.
Bank of America was writing about Chainlink's key role in Defi four years ago already.

>>60688423
>no one cares about utility
clearly. But they should.
Which is exactly what the Ripple CTO is calling out.

>>60688434
are you paying attention? speculation is the only thing keeping LINK above a dollar

>>60688439
>speculation is the only thing keeping LINK above a dollar
This is true for all of crypto. Bitcoin first and foremost.

Nearly all of the top 15 has only a tiny fraction of Chainlink's utility, yet they're all valued higher.

why the fuck is trump being the epstein files bad for alts oh yOu cAn oNLy pAy foR cHiLD tRaFfiCKiNg in bTC LiNKscUm

>>60688443
and I told you, you should be grateful otherwise it would be less than a dollar

>>60688443
utility is not relevant for institutions, you really think blackrocks going to trust trillions of assets and leverage on a decentralized oracle? hell no, decentralized oracles are for retail gambling only.

>>60688448
>you should be grateful otherwise it would be less than a dollar
This applies to all of crypto.

>>60688449
>utility is not relevant for institutions
fucking kek

>>60688446
Trump was known to be friends with Epstein all along, there's literally nothing new coming out.
Biden had the Epstein files the entire time he was in office, if there was anything even remotely incriminating against Trump he would've used it years ago.

>>60688451
looks like the bot broke down

>>60688456
now the bot is a political analyst too
lol, lmao even, it's astonishing how linkies will defend all kinds of atrocities as long as it paints a bullish narrative for their bags

>>60688458
>>60688459
You're not having a good time, are you xerpie?

I'd be anxious too if the execs of my primary investment said shit like "our products don't impact the price of our coin" and "the price of our coin isn't related to utility".

>>60688467
I told you already, without speculation both of those shitcoins would plummet
you seem to not understand that the only reason LINK is at double digits is speculation

>>60688471
>without speculation both of those shitcoins would plummet
But Link would be worth a hell of a lot more than XRP.

>>60688475
but LINK would be worth a lot less than it does right now, are you retarded?

>>60688482
Without speculation BTC would be under a dollar again.

Realize that you have to fud the entirety of crypto to assuage your butthurt about XRP having no utility whatsoever.

>>60688501
you fail to realize that the speculation you keep whining like a baby about is the only thing keeping your shitcoin afloat

>>60688516
>speculation is the only thing keeping your shitcoin afloat

Speculation is the only thing keeping all of crypto afloat.
I've been saying this over and over, how stupid are you (not a question btw)

>>60685226
Bruh, I hold XRP. I only know what those words mean individually.

>>60688405
lol, lay off the coke you exaggerating bastard

>>60688907
It's not exaggerated at all.

>>60688392
They secure hundreds of billions.
A minimum value needs to be maintained for this to maintain securely.

>>60688423
My nigger in Christ, what people care about is inflation. BTC exists because inflation. What inflation are these tokens experiencing? Is it more than 2%/yr? More than 5%/yr? More than 10%/yr??? Without viral meme volumes it's going to realistically take 5 years until link becomes a worthy investment without dumpamentals

>>60686293
>about to
when did I hear that before?
Them old assblaster threads...

>>60678826
more like PAINLINK, amirite?

>>60688392
>t. d-k retard

>>60689025
>could
>2022
>$17

>>60678434 (OP)
dtcc is worthless
ethereum is dogshit, but still ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE better than fucking dtcc

>>60686293
>I think we can't even wrap our minds around the insane amount of money that is about to pour into tokenized assets, specially when the entire stock market gets tokenized.

that's not as close to happening as you think

and b) has nothing to do with link's funding coin

>>60689969
>haha stop exaggerating, Chainlink hasn't been propping up crypto for half a decade now
>NOOOO WHY ARE YOU POSTING RECEIPTS FROM 2022???

>>60690116
Are you retarded? Do you know what the DTCC is? For one, they settle almost all stock trades. Measured in quadrillions of dollars per year. They don't make a ton of money because it's more like a consortium that returns everything to it's members, but it's still measured in billions annually.

>>60683811
>the only thing ripple succeeded with was shilling it and create a psychotic cult that believes
Literally the only thing that matters.
Learn to magic.

>>60693780
>price is the only thing that matters
When a market is speculating only on price itself instead of fundamentals, that's called a bubble. And it's not a good thing.

>>60687806
The simplest thing is the best.

The world literally runs on Excel and Access (or a derivative) to this day.

>>60693844
I didn't say price at all.
I didn't quote the word "price". I didn't refer to price.
I quoted the "belief" portion, which is again, all that matters.

>>60694792
The argument was about Ripple being rank 3

>>60694998
>argument
I wasn't having an argument because I'm not a woman. I commented that belief is what makes everything happen and itt the other anon commented as if it were not.