Remember that institutions want fast, scalable, low-cost, and secure solutions. This is why Sol is the terminal game of finance. You can call me an Indian all you want, but that fact will never change.

>>60685662 (OP)
> Sol is centralized, and the casino of low quality coins is bad for its image, and therefore will drive institutions away.

>>60685710

Yet another zoomer newfag that doesn't know how to greentext. Will you faggots leave my fucking board already!??!?! Go back to tiktok.

>>60685721
>please stay on topic, thank you.

>>60685710
Eth isn't decentralized... Plus, institutions have been using centralized systems for a very long time, do you think that bothers them much? As for the memecoin casino Solana, which is currently working on changing its image in relation to this, I don't see any reference to memecoins in their recent publication, everything is focused on finance.

>>60685779
Seethe harder!

>>60685788
Nobody's boiling here. You're using that expression wrong, saar.

This board's about as retarded as I imagined.

>>60685815
Seeeeethe!

>>60685832

>>60685662 (OP)
what is the Contact adDress saaaaar?!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

>>60685907
It's only for people who can have a sexy life. Seriously, no one can give me a substantive answer. The only argument in favor of ETH is its false decentralization. It's pretty pathetic.

>>60685841
Seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeethe!

>>60685941
>ETH
Is it eth? okay buying 10 more eth benchod! thanks for the advice saar!

>>60685662 (OP)
>fast, scalable, low-cost, and secure
ETH L2s

>>60686121
Solana remains faster. In a world where everything is decided by split seconds, this handicap will destroy you in the long run. L2 is just a band-aid on a broken machine.

>>60686190
I can create a faster chain on a 10 years old notebook unironically. Its not an achievement when you centralize things.

>>60686295
Also 99% of solana tps are system messages and wash trading. Its a theater like XRP.

>>60686190
>Solana remains faster
in a real world setting there is latency between user -> rpc node -> mempool -> searcher -> validator, regardless of block interval. solana's advantage is finality time, but this is ephemeral, since ethereum will pursue single slot finality within the next few years

>>60685662 (OP)
>Remember that institutions want fast, scalable, low-cost, and secure solutions
they also want their OWN Layer 1 chain and dont want to share a chain with niggers like you or buy your niggerish scam token.
they can only get this on Avalanche, thats why they are all going Balls deep into Avalanche.

>>60685662 (OP)
>>60685779
>>60685815
>>60685841
>>60685941
>>60686190
Based Solana poster. Did you know that SOL is cheaper, faster, and more decentralized than ETH? Well now you know.

>>60686295
Of course, but Solana is the ideal compromise. You all say it's centralized. That's not strictly true; Sol is still more decentralized than the old system. In fact, Sol has exactly the centralization needed to create a chain with the speed required for institutional use. Extreme decentralization is just a system for making everyone vote on the pizza topping, but in the end, we'll still choose the anchovies.
>>60686308
proof ?

>>60686369
Please leave, sir, the great and the good of this world are talking together.

taraxa for POS and kaspa for POW win
everything else is too slow or centralized
off course there could be VC backed clones of either project that shitcan them

>>60686614
Avalanche has the BEST technology and Solana cant compete. all facts!
>>60686647
>taraxa for POS and kaspa for POW win
ghostchain garbage.

>>60686729
>ghostchain garbage.
that's why I said anyone can just clone their tech with actual VC backing and make them irrelevant overnight (taraxa is obviously already irrelevant)
both of their technology is unmatched though

>>60686729
>>60686743
Avax is agonizingly slow, and the whole p-chain, c-chain, and whatever else thing is backward. As for Taraxa, it's a scam you're trying to sell on /biz/ for some reason I can't remember. You should find a hobby like picking flowers.

>>60686743
Avalanche has better technology and is decentralized.
and its better at everything.
has better tokenomics, better adoption, its faster, more decentralized, fully customizable, smarter people work on it etc.
none of the other dogshit chains can even compete.

>>60686776
This is false, Avax is terribly slow and not decentralized. You can't compete with Solana's 1700 tx/s real speed.

>>60686771
>Avax is agonizingly slow
it has literally sub second finality and is actually decentralized and open source. your shit is none of this.
>and the whole p-chain, c-chain, and whatever else thing is backward
multi chain was always the future. Avalanche is far ahead, only brainlets think that its possible to put every transaction in the world on a single chain.
thats not how it works or what anyone wants.
can you build a custom Layer1 on Solana? no you cant but on Avalanche anyone can you nigger.

>>60686784
>This is false
no its not, the transactions are faster than you can hit F5 and faster than even a blockexplorer can update. clueless nigger clearly never used Avalanche.
>You can't compete with Solana's 1700 tx/s real speed.
Avalanche scales, Solana does not and never will.

>>60686803
You only win on block finality and the Nakamoto coefficient (irrelevant as explained above). Solana crushes you on everything else. Besides, no one builds on Avax because of the delirium around your multiple chains because it complicates things. I know this because I wanted to set up a project on Avax three years ago and when I saw this MESS I ran away immediately, it would have taken a considerable amount of time.

>>60686826
>You only win
yes with Avalanche you only win. its always winning and will continue winning in the future.
>no one builds on Avax
cope

>>60686812

>>60686841
>>60686826
tps is a meme breh

>>60686833
Well, Avax's total victory is really not visible... The data I just showed says it all. Just know that we briefly reached 1700 tx/s a few days ago. Avax may have a small place somewhere. Quite honestly, I don't hate Avax; I think it's better than ETH, which only has its false decentralization to show for it.

>>60686841
that image doesnt prove anything and has nothing to do with reality.
>>60686858
>Avax's total victory is really not visible
maybe to a myopic nigger with assholes instead of eyeballs.
shits for brains retard.

>>60686869

>>60685662 (OP)
>PoV Solana network lost consensus and crashed again for the 9th time

>>60685662 (OP)
>be hobbyist dev
>see Solana gain a lot of traction in late 2023
>decide to start playing around with it
>read though docs and check node hw requirements
>can't self-host because no 10Gbps internet
>AWS monthly costs higher than my entire Ethereum node hardware + lifetime running costs
>kinda lose interest
>later find out smart contracts require Rust
>lose the last drop of interest I had in developing on Solana
A normal user will never run a node. He will happily use RPCs and solscan without caring what's happening in the background. But a big reason what makes crypto valuable is its low barrier of entry i.e. decentralization. If only profitable projects and big crypto companies can justify the few thousands in operating costs, it leaves a lot of hobbyists like me out. Maybe it's by design, but it's not for me.

>>60687063
Indeed, I admit that it may not be the best blockchain for amateurs. Solana prioritized speed from the start. RPCs are normally the solution in this kind of case... I would be dishonest not to tell you that it is not done on purpose. I am not selling Solana contrary to what people believe here. Solana is for big business.