confirmed that Swift is going live with Chainlink this year (Sibos/Smartcon), how do you feel, anon? You ready for the repricing event?

>>60686062 (OP)
aaah the fidget - erc20 epic internet fight :D

>>60686062 (OP)
Where was that confirmed?

Also, obvious fake and gay link versus xrp false flag bait thread

>>60686072
Tom confirmed it. Try to keep un anon.

>>60686081
From MySpace?

>>60686100
From SWIFT

77.7%

>>60686062 (OP)
Riplets like to watch

>>60686104
>77.7%

???

My body is ready.

>>60686118
You made it fren. You just don't know it yet. Sit back and relax.

>>60686133
i really hope that anons who make it can handle the wealth

>>60686133
But I'm a linu maxi

>>60686146
Any tips anon? You seem experienced. Sudden wealth syndrome is no joke from what I've heard.

>>60686062 (OP)
ATH = $52
Current = $18.52

>>60686164
at a minimum, having one hobby that keeps your mind healthy, and one that keeps your body healthy. I also believe that a person who lets wealth control them likely does not have a healthy relationship with themselves, their family, or God.

>>60686233
I'm mainly worried about how to handle the social aspect of making it. Friends asking for money, taxes, having to explain what you do/did or coming up with some story..

>>60686171
got em
fuck stinkies

>>60686311
Don’t sell it all at once and buy a lambo lol. Sell enough to pay down debt, buy nicer clothes, take a long vacation and then decide what you want to do.

Price. Chart. Dilate.

>>60686311
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/oCco6BpFPos
I forgot about richard until just now

>>60686460
Yeah this shit is scary. I feel like everyone is gonna hate me once I make it and/or will try to take advantage of me.

>>60686470
godspeed, brother.

>>60686311
after you make it, wait an entire month for the high to die down before doing anything with the money.

>handle the social aspect of making it
there's an upper limit in everyone for how well you're living is ok for them before jelousy sets in. understand your friends will, if not intentionally, subconsciously try to bring you back down to their level. crabs'n a bucket an ting.

understand you'll likely lose those friends and need to make new ones at your new level.

>>60686470
Don't worry. You're not going to make it.

>>60686117
the image that broke xsg

>>60686062 (OP)
>-1%

>>60686062 (OP)
>be bullrun time
>be link
>can't even hit a quarter of ATH
>baggies celebrate
>baggy make 4chin cuck post
>bear market starts
>ironic-Palpatine-peakStarwars.mp4
>baggie gets cucked (as usual)
>Terrible linky timing (as usual)
Try reposting when it isn't dumping anon

I only got 239 link cuz I sold some when it hit close to $50 in 2020 to buy a car

What can I realistically expect the price to be

>>60688185
$300

>>60688191
@grok is this true?

>>60686062 (OP)
Wont xrp just replace Swift ? Making Link obsolete at the same time.

>>60688908
Once SWIFT is connected to blockchain through Chainlink the desire for it to be "replaced" will diminish, so the fact XRP hasn't replaced it yet means it's never going to happen

>>60688908
XRP wont replace SWIFT, thats what you cultists wont ever get this system is ingrained into a lot of banking entities that it would be suicide to just replace it. Its not a like a battery that they could just discard and replace with a new one. They would rather integrate something to it rather than outright replace it.

>>60688191
$70-$110 is closer to reality

>>60686062 (OP)
I still don't get this meme (either way) so in this case swift is asking for permission from xrp to be with chainlink?

>check bankless new podcast episode
>oh nice they have a section on the genius act
>*remembers they interviewed sergey like a year ago*
>can't wait to see their reaction to him being there
>they don't mention his name (even in a video he is visible in and they are showing on screen)
what? is this hiding strategy this strong? do they hate us because we laughed at them for not knowing what link does?

Swift is in the bag

LINK to $1000

>>60686118
Imagine being this out of the loop

>>60686333
I am just going to live off the staking rewards and unfortunately continue waging until if/when Link is like $5k.

>>60686164
Balance habits that consume and create. We eat and shit

Aw sweet another seethe at XRP thread.

Aw sweet another fake xrp V link fuddie thread

>>60686062 (OP)
XRP is a network for settlement and Ripple are a competitor to SWIFT who do not use the link token at any point in actual service of value, only for data feeds. You fundamentally don't understand XRP technology, Ripple's business, or embarrassingly your own technical investment. At a scale that is SO embarrassing it is kind of unreal.

>>60686062 (OP)
>I bought xrp instead of link!

>>60686117
Ripple literally sent 3 people who all had tickets. Brad had bigger things going on so did those instead of making an embarrassing groveling spectacle of himself vying for a photoop from a president who literally didn't even turn to address him and then swatted him away.

>>60690654
cope

>>60690648
well damn

>>60690659
you do know brad is on the board with loeffler hines and atkins, he was literally sitting at the table with trump not off to the side like some silly russian faggot who has to plead to get papa trumps attention.

>>60690659
You have literally zero argument. You don't sound confident or erudite you just look like an idea insecure actual retard who is in a coin cult, the gayest kind of cult imaginable.

>>60690653
>I'm up 6x over the last 6 months instead of down over 50% over the last 4 years.
Stinkies gonna stink

>>60690707
It is so funny to watch how insecure linkies on this board or Twitter get when you play the full video instead of the screengrab of the forced handshake that hilariously had something like "Trump catching child predators" at the bottom of the feed. They share the pic over and over but the literal unedited/unclipped full form reality of footage is so embarrassing and hilarious they don't evven know what to say and just seethe. The fact the video itself which if they were right and if the pic they use were construed what actually happened, should be the most potent marketing material conceivable, but despite their wilfull cognitive dissonance, they know how cringe and desperate and weird it looked starting with Sergay working his way onto the stage after the signing and hanging out on the fray next to Winklevoss, pretending to be distracted and forcing the moment to Trump's complete dismissal and incredulous looks of those Trump was actually talking to.

still coping, still crying

never change xsg

>>60690745
You are barely even a person at this point. You replaced your personality with an increasingly frustrated/repressed obsession with a crypto project that doesn't even use your token. What is more pathetic than this? Lol

>>60689345
>do they hate us because we laughed at them for not knowing what link does?
IIRC the bankless guys are full on methheads so yeah it checks out.

>>60689164
>I still don't get this meme (either way) so in this case swift is asking for permission from xrp to be with chainlink?
I justs used that meme because it gets me free bumps from both sides.

>>60689372
I don't need to

any updates on staking v1?

>>60690759
mastercard

>>60686062 (OP)
"..."

>>60690918
that chart is as retarded as brad garlinghouse boasting about "xrp been outperforming bitcoin". get fucked, bankster fanboi

>>60690910
Also doesn't use the link token and also just uses the CLL service for data feeds which mean nothing to tokenholders whose purchases probably subsidize the partnership. Lol

>>60690648
>XRP is a network for settlement
No, Chainlink is.
See pic.

XRP's version of settlement is fundamentally retarded
>sell asset X for XRP
>send XRP from wallet to wallet
>sell XRP for asset Y

And not only is it retarded, but Ripple itself admitted this system is demand neutral for XRP. Meaning it does not pump the price because the XRP is bought and sold immediately.

>>60690938
Mastercard uses Chainlink nodes, therefore it uses the Link token.

Price??? Chart?

>>60690989
nigger

>>60688185
>What can I realistically expect the price to be
$20 or below

>>60690929
Chart...? Oh, and... price?

>>60690973
As much as some LINK holders like to hate on XRP and/on any other L1, and I can see why (bridge currencies as a concept is a 2017 meme, etc), let me remind you that if one aims to diversify from just holding LINK/BTC, XRP is not a bad idea because XRP fundamentally benefits from noob liquidity. If you think a (big) amount of people are about to get into crypto (i.e. "noobs"), what do you think these "people" will be buying? The $100.000 coin? The $3.000 coin? Or the $3 coin? Lower price = cheaper = more room to grow. That's how they see it. Though you can also diversify this way with DOGE or any other popular memecoins.

>>60690975
No they don't. They use Chainlink Labs software for data feeds. They do not settle or store value on the network and they do not even necessarily use public nodes and will probably like everyone else license private software. Your thesis is ILLITERATE

>>60690973
In the DTCC trial they did not even use LINK for settlement on CCIP. They trialed multiple other public and private networks like Hyperledger and Corda because Chainlink is expensive and slow. Ripple did not "admit this system is..." they said that the ODL product itself was relatively demand neutral outside the deflationary burn in transactions. This has nothing to do with their backend settlement through Hidden Road, tokenization of assets or cross-liquidity between them, etc. You literally don't even understand your own token's thesis.

>>60690973
Sergey has a subscription program. He keeps all the payments for himself. Even those payments that you say are majored for certain services, they don't trigger a link buy. They just go in his pocket.

Here is how the CCIP Ethereum to Arbitrum contract works (0x925228d7b82d883dde340a55fe8e6da56244a22c) as an example.
>Users can pay fees in either LINK or WETH.
>When a fee is paid in LINK, it's directly added to a running total of LINK fees owed to Node Operators.
>If a fee is paid in WETH it calculates how much LINK that amount of WETH is worth.
>This conversion is added to the running total of LINK fees owed to the Node Operators. **NO ACTUAL TOKEN SWAP OCCURS HERE**
>Since Node Operators are always paid in LINK - the contract keeps track of how much LINK is owed to Node Operators based on all fees paid (in LINK or WETH equivalent).
>Since users can pay in WETH and Node Operators need LINK, there needs to be a way to ensure enough LINK is available.
>A separate contract called LinkAvailableBalanceMonitor (at address 0x25204a85dBC29300ce60133cedA267aAdb73CfBD) periodically adds LINK to this contract (manually triggered by ChainLink Labs). Ensuring there's always enough LINK to pay the Node Operators, even if many users paid in WETH.
>Since WETH is never actually converted to LINK, the WETH simply accumulates over time in this contract.
>The accumulated WETH can only be withdrawn by the contract owner (ChainLink Labs).
>There's a special function (withdrawNonLinkFees) that allows ChainLink Labs to take out all the WETH.
>This WETH withdrawal can happen at any time, as long as there's enough LINK in the contract to cover what's owed to Node Operators.
So essentially, CCL gets to keep all ETH fees and Node Operators get LINK.
This is not FUD, this is simply how the contract works; they have never used the withdrawNonLinkFees function and it's unclear what they intend to do with the WETH but it needs to be clear to everyone that a WETH/LINK swap NEVER happens.

>>60690973
XRP is available for atomic swap at literally trillions of transactions per second for less than a penny using Interledger Protocol. Chainlink is a slower and more expensive product that literally never benefits token holders and is not even used for settlement and it only used for data feeds.

>>60690929
>Not knowing BTC is the dollar/banker/corpo coin that literally requires centralized L2s to scale to be remotely useful hooking humanity on the L1 promise
Black Rock are literally already messaging that Bitcoin's supply "isn't necessarily fixed." Eth sold out originally in ICO to the CCP and JP Morgan. This is all known and knowable. XRPL scales at L1 with auto-bridging and a protocol layer dex that anyone can access and anyone can run a node.

>>60690759
>You are barely even a person at this point.
>You replaced your personality with an increasingly frustrated/repressed obsession with a crypto project that doesn't even use your token. What is more pathetic than this? Lol
12 pbtid. 5 posts back to back. Tell me anon, have you looked in the mirror at all lately?

>>60691158
>because Chainlink is expensive and slow
Anon... You put so much effort into your craft, why mess it up like this?

>>60691215
All sophistry, no substance. I post substantially replying. You post gush that addresses nothing to try to posture and steer consensus perception of attitudes in this discussion. This is not a substantial way to invest or be as a person. Me posting a lot of substantial shit is not the L for me and W for you you think it is. It is more proof of my claim against you contrasted to me.

>>60691231
It literally is several times more expensive than 20 other networks for actual use in settlement per Chainlink Labs' own pricing table and cannot handle the same tps w/ micropayments.

>>60691237
How many "tps" do you think Chainlink can handle? Do you even undertand what Chainlink is?

>>60691194
>Ondo not using LINK
>securitize not using LINK
>token not used to settle/store value with SWIFT
>token not used to settle/store value with DTCC
>Sergey still has 9b left to dump
>hyperliquid not using LINK (more volume than nance)
>CCIP revenue kebab shop tier
>lost interop war to LZ and W (more TVL, Volume, txs, revenue etc..)
>no build rewards, waiting on regulatory clarity (they aren't, total airdrop value $100 possibly)
>no DECO
>no staking (ETH price feed for 3 years kek)
>advocates swarming biz to change sentiment
>Sergey still fat
>no CCIP for SOL or BTC after 3 years
>66% down from ath
>bleeding out

>>60691243
I do. It is not capable of handling the same volume as Interledger Protocol using payment channels and is much more reliant on underlying specific network mechanics which it facilitates value transaction to/fro (because the link tok3n is not used itself as the value settlement layer)

>>60691243
>>60691258
Would not let me post and was flagged as spam if I spelt the t word because a link jannie faggot flagged its use as such making you schizo substitute to say it. Has been a problem for years.

>>60691258
Sure. Just give me the number. How many tps?

>>60691268
Retard. Even if CCIP is used using the fastest blockchain network in existence which still meets security specs for banks, that underlying network cannot process at the speed interledger can, and interledger is optimized using Ripplenet which is optimized using XRP, which also allows for pooled on demand liquidity and treats value like micro-transmission capable packets. CCIP speed is tied to networks used for settlement (because link is not and would be much slower if it were) which cannot compete with ILP.

>>60691246
>>60691258
>>60691259
hey dude I just wanted to let you know that I didn't read a single word of whatever you wrote because you are using a name which means you are retarded

>>60691246
ok doomer

>>60691298
>Using a name
What are you talking about?

>>60691289
Still no number tho?
How many tps?
How "slow" is Chainlink?
I thought you knew, anon...

>>60691318
Not a doomer. I am extremely bullish on 20 different cryptos. Portraying reality about a specific project sucking and being a huge marketing scam is not being a doomer. Lol

>>60691321
your name...you or autofill put "I" instead of leaving it as anonymous

>>60688185
Likely $30 this year. Bear market 2026, next high unironically $300 though 2027/28.

>>60691324
Retard. You were hoping I didn't know what I was talking about but see that I do and that my answer proved you wrong in a way you weren't anticipating, so you are coping by acting like I didn't answer your question when I did. It is limited by the speed of networks it uses which cannot remotely compete with ILP which is optimized using XRP.

>>60691329
Fair point, genuinely did not mean to namefag and was an accident. Totally agreed with your reasoning hating all intentional namefags.

>>60691335
No number?

>>60691233
Ah you're the "muh sophistry" anon. You're not smart or knowledgeable enough to elicit any serious debate here, I'm sorry. The double, triple, quadruple and even quintuple posting is not doing you any favors either.

>>60691348
It is limited by the network used, said twice now, ILP is not, you coping, sophistical fucking retard.

>>60691348
i.e. the limit is different for whether it is using ETH, SOL, etc. ILP does not have this problem with payment channels and is still decentralized and atomic capable.

>>60691374
>It is limited by the network used
So Chainlink is neither fast nor slow. See, it wasn't so hard! <3

>>60686118
>how new of a faggot are you anon.
Ngmi

……………….%77.7

>>60691388
This is the most defiant L I have ever seen. Chainlink is in any iteration by any network any bank would ever use slower than Interledger using XRP, which was my whole point and sole claim. You are acting like I was speaking about something else because you had never heard of interledger and felt like you were entitled to automatic rightness. You were wrong for a reason you didn't originally anticipate and so tried to cope by shaping me in meaningless rhetoric to cope and avoid being as embarrassed as you are. Didn't work and you the coping/seething from you will continue.

>>60691373
You are literally demonstrating what I am saying in real time. You have zero critique and say nothing but post to voice emotional support for your prefered project because you are in a literal greed cult. I am not fixated on any project and support literally 20 of them.

>>60691422
Sorry, not going to engage. Even without anyone seriously engaging you you racked up 26 posts ITT. Just want to point out the irony here considering you posted >>60690759

>>60691431
Exactly my point. You claim you are not going to "engage" but spend time engaging but saying nothing and avoiding argument just to fling sophistical rhetoric at me and in the mix. You say this this way because you know you cannot engage the actual content and don't know enough to even begin to and on a level know you are wrong and admit this to yourself to even be this type of rhetorician who is deliberately fact evasive in this way, but you instead off choosing to individuate this awareness, you repress and double down in a deeper cognitive dissonance. You are exactly what I described.

>>60691438
Keep seething bud.

>>60691504
Pathetic projection and cope

>>60689371
Wen?

>>60691137
>>60691201
It's over Thomas.
Chainlink allows banks to settle any asset they want on any chain they want, without having to first convert to a third asset. This whole idea of a bridge token was always retarded.
XRP's main usecase is dead.

And this "settlement" usecase was never going to pump XRP anyway, Ripple literally said so themselves.

Time to wake up from your stupor.

>>60691246
>>Ondo not using LINK
lol Ondo teamed up with Chainlink to handle settlement(!) for JP Morgan.

You wrote 28 posts and pretty much all of it is hilariously wrong.

>>60693024
It's over Zach, no one is buying your bags

>>60686133
still loading up supra and I know it's a hit.

>>60686062 (OP)
>2017- confirmed that Swift is going live with Chainlink this year (Sibos/Smartcon)
>2018- confirmed that Swift is going live with Chainlink this year (Sibos/Smartcon)
>2019- confirmed that Swift is going live with Chainlink this year (Sibos/Smartcon)
>2020- confirmed that Swift is going live with Chainlink this year (Sibos/Smartcon)
>2021- confirmed that Swift is going live with Chainlink this year (Sibos/Smartcon)
>2022- confirmed that Swift is going live with Chainlink this year (Sibos/Smartcon)
>2023- confirmed that Swift is going live with Chainlink this year (Sibos/Smartcon)
>2024- confirmed that Swift is going live with Chainlink this year (Sibos/Smartcon)
>2025- confirmed that Swift is going live with Chainlink this year (Sibos/Smartcon)
*YOU ARE HERE*
>2026- confirmed that Swift is going live with Chainlink this year (Sibos/Smartcon)
>2027- confirmed that Swift is going live with Chainlink this year (Sibos/Smartcon)
>2028- confirmed that Swift is going live with Chainlink this year (Sibos/Smartcon)

Woah this thread is still here. If it's still here tomorrow, I may think about unstaking my make-it-stack. Probably not though lol.

>>60693024
How come it's #3 marketcap tho ?

>>60693726
Nobody knows. Even Ripple doesn't know.
It's most likely a combination of market maker manipulation and a speculative bubble, same as ADA and Doge etc.

>>60693509
Bumping so that you sell.