images
md5: ac61464205e57178d56bb61eb3e73318
🔍
Why do Linkies not understand that it doesn't matter how many partnerships, how much usage, etc. it has? Like they all just have these mental breakdowns nonstop "BUT WE HAVE SWIFT" "BUT WE POWER ALL OF DEFI" blah blah. Sure that is all true, but you are ignoring the reality in front of you which is that the market does not give a fuck. Why do you continue to belabor over a truth that continuously smacks you in the face? It's not a good investment, it doesn't matter if it is the most adopted crypto, because the price of the token doesn't go up as much as other tokens and you guys know in your little hearts what you want is to make money. So why do you keep bashing your head against the wall hoping for reality to suddenly change? Just buy tokens that actually perform well, get rich, and go live your real lives.
dr;ns
$1000 EOY
November is the singularity
>>60686898 (OP)I think we all understand that anon.
But what else should we do with our money? Gamble on a different shitcoin,but one that doesn't even have the bullish (albeit ignored by the market) news?
Please don't suggest we gamble on a random top 50 coin because there's no telling what their price action will be in this nonsense market
>>60686921I hear what you're saying but you can ride momentum, the runs that shitcoins like HYPE and SUI had didn't happen in 2 days. You had weeks to jump on and make an easy 50%+ profit. Just need to pay attention to the market.
>>60686908If LINK ever hits $1,000 it will probably happen 10+ years from now.
>>60686942Be honest, weeks to jump in from where? Where was the indication that random coins would pump (outside of the wider market)?
>>60686898 (OP)You must make 20 threads a day, what a loser lmao.
>>60686951In fact, let's do an experiment anon, right now
I'll put $100 into literally any crypto or stock, we'll record the transaction, keep the thread alive and then we compare in a week whether it would have been better as staked link.
You game?
>>60686951When HYPE launched it was $6 and within a week went to $14. Ok fine you missed that. A week later, $24. Ok fine you missed that. A week later, $32. What's the excuse watching a token everyone on xitter and reddit were talking about go 5x in 3 weeks and not stopping for a single day during that time and saying "maybe I should grab a bag"?
I'm not talking about the things that do like a 200% in 1-2 days then dump.
>>60686972Because what you're talking about aren't things that can be predicted.
Prove me wrong, pick a crypto, keep the thread alive, I'll throw away 100 bucks on an experiment
The few
T̶h̶e̶ ̶P̶r̶o̶u̶d̶
The Marines
>>60686972If PUMP had done a 10x you’d be incredulously asking us why we missed that too, but it dropped 50% instead.
Your reliance on hindsight bias suggests you’re aiming at real 90IQ retards.
>>60687018Part of the fuddie employment contract is that they can’t shill other coins.
>>60687011PUMP was dumping from the start, momentum was never there.
>>60687018I'll just pick XRP then. Even XRP will out perform LINK over the next week.
>>60687029Just to be clear, you’re a multi-millionaire chart reading visionary who is spending his spare time between ski trips seething about Chainlink on a completely dead imageboard?
>>60687028>>60687029Lol
Okay anon, it's 11pm here, tomorrow after 5pm I will buy $100 of xrp as your chosen shitcoin and we can compare the results against my staked link
Shall we say 1 week later?
>>60687029And for clarities sake, you predict xrp will gain 50%, like the missed opportunities that you mentioned earlier - Which you believe are predictable and a safer bet than link
I'm sure that's what you meant, or why else would you mention them
Is this thread what happens when fuddies don't just spam incomprehensible nonsense about Wikipedia and bad cock cage memes?
>>60687057Anon? Have you abandoned your thread? Shall I bump it until you get back?
>>60687023>can’t include the whole clipkek stinky winky such a pinky
EVERY NIGHT AND EVERY DAY
WE ALL HATE LIIIIIIINK
FUCK STINKIES
>>60686898 (OP)Its simply not worth gambling on anything else for short term gains by risking the Link stack.
1girl
md5: 23f6c21e52e015753f3e4b240904b8fe
🔍
>>60687361said the beta male xD
incelibacy becomes thee xD
>>60686898 (OP)>>60686942>>60686972>>60687029>effeminate fudcuck manifesto begging people to sellThe death and torture of fudcucks can't happen soon enough desu
>>60687406You lost linktranny. You will never be a real cryptocurrency, you have no blockchain.
why is bonk ripping upwards? because their revenue is sky rocketing
why is pudgy penguins ripping upwards? because they have massive revenue and leveraged that insane brand awareness
why was pump valued so highly during the presale? because they had massive revenue
its incredible how link seems to be the only company in the world where you're not supposed to base its value on revenue and instead point to endless partnerships announcements and integrations. really makes you think
oh and of course hype as another obvious example of an absolute money printer
>be me
>intern for chainlinklabs
>first zoom meeting
>hosted by rory
>the title is cuckdom: an enjoyer's perspective
>wtf but ok they're BOLD plus its a paying job so idgaf
>*poker face* throughout the entire "experience"
>rory seems to be enjoying like really enjoying his time lecturing the shills on the personification of adem
>his cuck fetish made literal virtual flesh
>all the shills post their twitter handles in the chat
>dont have one yet
>get called out by rory because twitter is where all the good posters went
>he says "you'll never make it in this shill game with you aint no good cuck son"
>mfw
>mfw i have no face
>this image has been deleted due to censorship
>mfw i am now a paid cuck for chainlinklabs ex-professionale
>>60687707ILL GET YOU FOR THIS YOU FUCKING BULGARIAN IF ITS THE LAST FUCKING THING I DO
>>60686898 (OP)Linkies do not understand that the coin is truly a scam and not needed.
I can hire Chainlink Labs oracle services right now and use zero (0) coins for that. LINK is just a fucking literal merch.
>>60687782Same here anon. Why won't others understand
>>60687361This
Which is why fuddies are reduced to comparisons in hindsight, e.g. pretending to be xrp holders but only after xrp has had it's best year in nearly a decade
Real xrp holders have quietly stayed in their /general/ for years and had no opinion on link
>>60687769>>60687707this flavor of link posting has always been my favorite, that and chuddie kiddo posting
>>60688320>it's not worth the risk, it's much preferable to keep holding for decades without any price appreciation how does one end up like this?
FML took tiny goyim crumbs. Had link for 10 years sold now regret it. Pengu sold,eth,sol, even gay ripple. Some at a loss.
What happened to the bullrun!! OK so if you had max 15k-20k where would you put it? They always tank again in Aug.
I'm thinking link,mkr,swft. Memes coins r gay rug pulls. I promise if I make it I'll hand out some sheckles.
Links been pissing me off..
>>60686898 (OP)>but you are ignoring the reality in front of you which is that the market does not give a fuckThe fact we maintained ourselves around rank 11-15 all these years shows that the market do care. To see what happens to a crypto the market doesn't care about, see BAT
>>60686942>you can ride momentumYou're obviously very new and naive or you're purposefully trying to make people lose money
>>60686898 (OP)Why do nolinkers not understand that nothing but a $400 per link will get me to part with my stinkies? I'd rather ride it to 0 than unstake at this shitty price level
>>60687687I heard XRP's revenue is absolutely bonkers
>>60688503I don't know where I would confirm this, how it affects the xrp price, nor do I really care
>>60686898 (OP)I just don't get why it's and erc-20 on mETH
we understand LINK to $1000
>>60688483Actually I just made this thread to prove that LINK is a good investment. I think
>>60686921 really said it best in just the 2nd reply.
I hold over 50,000 LINK since 2017 btw.
>>60686898 (OP)They don't even do the things they claim. Being used for data feeds is not moving or storing value. LINK the token has zero value prospect.
>>60687687none of that is relevant, it goes upwards because the money behind it is upping the price of their product, which nowadays is just some shitcoin that goes up for now. They can use the revenue which they generate with their own money as excuse but that does not make it true.
>>60686898 (OP)As an analyst I know said very well: "there are people who only swear by the value and the use of the asset", others don't care and look for momentum, others mix the two (me)". He also added: "You can have a dilapidated apartment in Tokyo or New York next to a stinking industrial one, it will still be worth more than triple in surface area, with a garden in an average city, it is not always logical"
>>60687007haha, what the fuck was that
>>60686942So I just have to wait a decade to become a multimillionaire? Doesn't sound so bad to me
>>60686898 (OP)let them be. I sold it for supra long ago.
>>60686968This is stupid. An average coin of all other top 50 coins minutes BTC and eth is over time not better than link by the simple fact that most other crypto is far behind chainlink in any metric.
Ofc you can hit a lucky one and it outperforms link over a year but most didn't in the past years.
It's just FUD and trolling let's be real. Ofc easy to troll linkies