Thread 60730646

DIVIDEND CHADS THE TIME IS NOW
>work for a few years, stack divvie stocks
>get to be a neet forever
>re-invest any excess for continued growth
>hedged for bear markets
>excess liquidity helps you invest in growth during recovery
>DRIPPING into cheap underlying even further enhances gains
get 'em while they're on sale bros

What is your method to select the best stocks

Imagine being a dividend tard at a young age instead of investing in growth stocks

goog is now a div stock btw

noone has ever explained how dividend stocks are inherently different then any other type of stock

>>60730704
Because there isn't all that much to explain. They pay out a part of earnings to you, which makes the stock go down off. Your risk lies in whether the company is successful enough to nil this

>>60730715
but why would you focus on dividends versus diversifying over everything

>>60730724
Dividends is diversifying as you invest that free cash into whatever else you couldn't fail to mite every time

>>60730715
and the opportunity cost of paying the dividend, many companies have paid too large of a dividend when they should have been investing in R&D or growth/acquisition.

BA is a classic... jack the dividend way way up... build shit airplanes that kill hundreds.... div gets cut....

INTC is another case. Many large pharma companies would be better off investing more in R&D vs the div. etc

>>60730646 (OP)
Been stacking divvies for years.
Will continue to buy divvies while also buying call options on margin for capital growth.

>>60730742
>>60730715
>>60730704
what the fuck?
you think you can neet off of the pitance that a company will give you?
When we talk about DIVVYMAXXING we are generally referring to income focused ETFs.
SPYI, QQQI etc
QQQI has a 13% yield per year for example. that's insane and will snowball quickly if you reinvest.

>>60730801
will qqqi with drip even outperfome just dcaing into qqq

>>60730801
>what the fuck?
imagine thinking you are smart because you found out about etfs sold to customers too unsophisticated to sell options on major indexes themselves

change the op to option selling etfs gen

op states
>stack divvie stocks
but then we get
>what the fuck?
>When we talk about DIVVYMAXXING we are generally referring to income focused ETFs.
SPYI, QQQI etc
add that to the op then?

>QQQI has a 13% yield per year for example. that's insane and will snowball quickly if you reinvest.
wow basic math a child can do. its sad you think basic math is smart or impressive to others. hopefully you understand how these products work....

>>60730948
I will not add specific tickers to OPs.
DYOR faggot, this is not a shitcoin shill thread.
>too unsophisticated to sell options
stupid retarded idiot faggots like yourself will blow up their accounts with even basic shit like selling CCs. Even if you do it day in day out you will not be efficient enough to get a 13% yield, thats assuming you dont get exercised and have to start from scratch.
NAV erosion is not a massive problem in funds like NEOS or Schwab compared to YM.
Even less so if you buy them on sale during a big dip.
kys you reddit spacing fuck

>>60730973
no, just add "DIVVYMAXXING we are generally referring to income focused ETFs.". so other people know its not about dividend stocks.

again, imagine thinking you are smart because you found out about etfs sold to customers too unsophisticated to sell options on major indexes themselves. thats what those etfs do (for you).

clearly you dont even know how they work or what you are buying.

angry idiot gen could be a good name too

hopefully there is a real /div/ gen one day

think of the risk profile too. all of the downside risk with capped upside in exchange for yield.

i didnt even look at the fees charged.

>>60730973
>blow up their accounts with even basic shit like selling CCs
what? how would you do that? its not possible.

those etfs literally sell covered calls lol.

>>60730704
Mostly they aren't. Except for things like MLP's, which definitely are different. Companies that pay dividends tend to be ones that make more money than they know what to do with. Utilities, for example, or Coca-Cola. Companies that have achieved a level of market penetration that they've pretty much tapped out, they can't cost effectively grow any larger, not by advertising, not by product improvement. So the best thing they can do with their spare cash is just giving it back to their shareholders who probably do have other money-making things they can do with it.
The main advantage of dividend stocks is if you do have a need for a regular stream of cash. Berkshire Hathaway owns a bunch of dividend stocks, because they also own a bunch of insurance companies and need cash for insurance payouts. A retiree needs cash income to pay the bills. Yes you could simply sell stocks to get the cash, but dividends are another way to get that cash, one that is differently exposed to market vicissitudes.

>>60730724
Diversification has diminishing returns

>>60730835
>qqqi will outperform qqq

Citation needed

Can someone explain to me if MSTY is still a good investment or am I too late to the party.

>>60732164
Are you bullish on bitcoin in the next 6 months?

>>60730691
Dividend Yield
0.44%

I have 33k right now. What should I slurp on Monday?

>>60732164
MSTY is not an investment, it's a source of income. MSTR is an investment

>>60732348
based strokeposter

>>60731986
I was asking the question

>>60732773
Oh, it will not long term. All income derivative strategies trail their underlying long term unless we have a lost decade with 10 years of crabbing

>>60730801
>QQQI has a 13% yield per year for example
how is this possible?

>>60732799
Inception date was 1/24. QQQ is up 40% in the same time period.

>>60732646
not an argument

you aren't ready for this