i was sure a repricing event had to happen
there's no way swift could enable this market in november 2025 with a fucking 10-20 dollar link as the collateralization underbelly.

there is no fucking way.
but here we are, 3ish months away from "global finance going on chain" and nothing is happening

there's no frontrunning from big institutions to buy up link
they're literally not buying the shit, what the fuck?

it shouldn't be possible that these two things are true, together:
1. chainlink is going to bootstrap 1-2T tokenization efforts for 2026 starting november 2025
2. the price isn't at least 100-200 dollars for financial security of the protocol layer

i'm at the peak of doubt with cl rn.
if this was going to be securing value, they'd need it to raise in price to collateralize the value up front. it's not happening.

i've given up.
7k link across 7 wallets.
im a fucking meme retard.
i'm giving up. selling now, already started. if this takes off, remember me. i don't think it will anymore. i actually think this is going to stay in this range forever, and will never fucking break 100, let alone 200.

fucking stupid. im fucking stupid.

We now know crypto is worthless. Get over it

>>60732975 (OP)
>i'm giving up. selling now, already started
Good. It will pump when you sell

>>60732975 (OP)
You know you've won when fud only consists of price complaints and not the underlying concept or legitimacy.

>>60733000
Checked

>>60733000
No. Personally, I know I'll have won when the price breaches the $100-200 mark.

>>60733000
price is everything you drooling retard. no one is buying

>>60733000
nice trips
price complaints? dude, it's been 6 fucking years.
from working in finance i know that collateral has to be present first before you initialize a product, not after. this is the biggest fud im feeding myself.

it just indicates to me its not going to be used in the open corridor i thought it was, and more than likely will be a gated use of the oracle network without the token for 1 - 2 years to validate it works in production, but still securing that 1-2T value with reversable levers in place held by the institutional product managers.

i feel like that's exactly why the price isn't going to move, and also, why after the market realizes it, it'll drop further until such a point they may decide to use the actual decetrnalized network, but i have no idea when the fuck that is. i might buy back in in late 2026. this isn't going anywhere imo for another 1-2 years.

>>60733000
i never said its never going to go sky high.
im just saying it wont for a fucking long ass time.
its 2023 again.
logically they're not going to fucking put 1-2T and risk it all in link right now. if they were going to, it'd have repriced due to institutional pressure to get the collateral where it needed to be.

what? you fucking think you're smarter than me and it's magically going to fly to 200$ between november 4 smart con and november 25 launch date? why the fuck would they risk such a small window to bootstrap collateral? game theory dictates that they should've accumulated and run up price by now to secure the financial layer. IT HASNT HAPPENED.

done, im liquidated out and holding onto 1000 for the memories.
have fun holding this shit for months waiting when it crabs between 12-22. im recapturing my lost mental heatlh. im tired of believeing my real life will start "next year" every year.

>>60733037
If they can manipulate it down they can manipulate it up. It'll be where it'll be

>>60733055
magically they'll manipulate it up to 100-200 to secure 1-2T in planned tokenized assets 2026 in 3 months? sure

going to spend this 100k on height lengthening surgery to get to 6 foot instead and have a real life now "next year"

>>60732975 (OP)
>>60733026
>>60733037
>>60733050
>>60733059
Oh wow I sure am feeling some Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt fellow chainlink (ticker LINK) OGs. I think we should all sell and or unstake at the same time because of these very convincing posts which were definitely typed by White hands!

>>60732975 (OP)
No need to frontrun anything as Sergey will give the remaining supply to large players to kick start the network.

>>60732975 (OP)
i'm fucked up from it all too but i wouldn't expect frontrunning or anythign if you know how these big institutions work
they would be given link or at big discounts with heavy ndas, their employees can't inside trade at all or anything
the thing that fucking me up is that there has been no speculative run to $50 or $100 yet
everything is now out in the open and still there is no reaction from the market, doesn't make sense

Token not needed

>>60733026
Sadly chainlink is just a proof of concept, after theyre done testing, the big boys are gonna release their own in house oracle networks. You really thought the banker dynasties were just gonna nobly let the unwashed masses invest into the digital oil rig infrastructure which will give them generational wealth to rival them?? In your dreams, it's a big club and you're not in it. They are thankful to retail for funding the beta test network though.

It will run to $70 then crash to $6 in the bear market

>>60732975 (OP)
anon what the fuck is wrong with you? List three (3) good reasons for selling.

>>60732975 (OP)
NGL it does look bad. Thoughbeit, it simply makes more sense to hold on till 2026 because a godcandle out of nowhere is still a possibililty. Normgroids aren't even interested in Bitcoin right now, let alone Chainlink. The jews would have no problem creating a narrative, after the fact, that the rise of Chainlink was totally unexpected.

The worst that can happen is that you hold and the price falls 30-50% from here and then you can sell and wash your hands of it.