Link from the strategic reserve is part of circulating supply: Yes or No?

>>60756525 (OP)
Well they said they will us it in the future, it's not burned, so yes it will be counted as circulating. Unless it's locked by a smartcon tract for a specific period.

>>60756525 (OP)
yes

>>60756525 (OP)
When you reserve a table at a restaurant.,, is that table part of the circulating supply?

>>60756525 (OP)
maybe

>>60756525 (OP)
is there anything stopping Sergey dumping those tokens tomorrow?
No.
They should at least lock the tokens in a smart contract or better burn them

Is the supply circulating in the room right now

>>60756599
Why would they burn them? They stated they won't touch it for years, but it's definitely going to be used at some point. For what exactly is going to be a point of much speculation, no doubt.

>>60756619
>Sergey preaches about legacy finance relying on trust
>Just trust us we're not gonna use these tokens for, errrr, some time

>>60756645
And we're going to have to deal with it lmao. You guys worry too much fr fr.

>>60756664
>Chainlink addresses the "trust over truth" problem in smart contracts by providing a decentralized oracle network that connects on-chain smart contracts with real-world data and systems. This reduces reliance on single, potentially untrusted, third-party data sources and introduces transparency and verifiability into the proces

What do you mean we worry too much. Isn't the whole Chainlink thing exactly based on this issue? Retail shouldn't have to rely on trust?

>>60756671
no one gives a fuck. retard. wake up. all your chains are centralized. it's like I'm talking to someone who hasn't used their wallet since 2018

>>60756705
Fine, but then Chainlink has no usecase.

>>60756732
Price...Oh and chart?

>>60756563
>>60756671
>>60756732
fuddie in extreme meltdown mode LMAO