>>60756525 (OP)
Well they said they will us it in the future, it's not burned, so yes it will be counted as circulating. Unless it's locked by a smartcon tract for a specific period.
>>60756525 (OP)
is there anything stopping Sergey dumping those tokens tomorrow?
No.
They should at least lock the tokens in a smart contract or better burn them
>>60756599
Why would they burn them? They stated they won't touch it for years, but it's definitely going to be used at some point. For what exactly is going to be a point of much speculation, no doubt.
>>60756664 >Chainlink addresses the "trust over truth" problem in smart contracts by providing a decentralized oracle network that connects on-chain smart contracts with real-world data and systems. This reduces reliance on single, potentially untrusted, third-party data sources and introduces transparency and verifiability into the proces
What do you mean we worry too much. Isn't the whole Chainlink thing exactly based on this issue? Retail shouldn't have to rely on trust?
>>60756671
no one gives a fuck. retard. wake up. all your chains are centralized. it's like I'm talking to someone who hasn't used their wallet since 2018
