Thread 60775071

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/12-year-old-girl-struck-sex-toy-thrown-wnba-game-brooklyn-suspect-soug-rcna224292
>See people betting on whether someone is gonna throw another dildo at a WNBA game and what color said dildo will be
>Realize you can rig the bet by doing it yourself
>Do it
>Accidentally hit a kid with it
>Now facing potentially being charged as a child sex offender
>Also everyone saw the beavis and butthead shirt

So, was his attempt to cash in worth the potential sex offender status anons?

>>60775071 (OP)
>>Now facing potentially being charged as a child sex offender
What is wrong with America

>>60775071 (OP)
Social media is literally collapsing the internet into a padded room where the only thing you can talk about are cat pictures and car modifications.

>>60775084
>Hit a child with a dildo
>Shocked at potential sex offender charges
I'm pretty sure most of the world would consider assaulting a 12 year old with a sex toy at least within consideration for sex offense charges.

>>60775071 (OP)
Lmao. This is a psyop.
>don't throw dildos on women for fun, goy!
>see? he's a jailed pedo now
>don't try to "start" anything
>don't try to win either

>>60775071 (OP)
Charging him as a sex offender is overkill, but it's also a solid case of play stupid games, win stupid prizes

>>60775143
If I took my kid to a game and then she got hit by a dildo I'd file for something that would get the person who threw it on a list.

>>60775217
Yeah that's fair. I think a decent lawyer could still beat the sex charges but it's still disorderly conduct and probably something else. If someone is throwing dildos in public I don't feel bad for them, but I also don't think it necessarily has to be an automatic sex-offender charge unless the act and intent were heinous and sexual in nature.

>>60775234
The main problem is you can argue it wasn't sexual in nature but you're gonna have to find a jury that doesn't agree with that when the reality is you hit a 12 year old with a sex toy. Even if you argue hitting her specifically was an accident it'll still be a bit of an uphill battle considering your motives of either "join in on a stupid trend" or "influence a crypto betting site" don't exactly make the jury sympathetic.

>>60775244
This, but let's see how much of this board's autism is too severe to see it like this.

>>60775071 (OP)
Looking forward to the interesting times when people realize you can use decentralized betting markets for murder-for-hire.

Let's say you've got a beef with Santa Claus.

> place a $10k bet on a public betting market that Santa Claus will not die violently by the end of 2025
> if nobody kills Santa, you get your money back
> if somebody intends to kill Santa, they can take the other side of the bet
> if the killer is successful, they get the $10k as reward as the bet resolves in their favor

There is no direct connection between the killer and the guy with the beef. They don't need to know each other or trust each other. They can't scam each other. The betting market is not liable for facilitating murder (I think).

>>60775263
That’s what the plot of Ari Jules latest fiction book is pretty much based around

>>60775263
>The betting market is not liable for facilitating murder (I think).
Actually I'm pretty sure if someone did die and they could trace it back to wanting to make money on a betting site, they'd crack down hard on that shit. These kind of sites only really exist right now due to general mainstream obscurity.

>>60775071 (OP)
godspeed, king

>>60775310
>>60775310
For deniability, you wouldn't even need to bet that Santa Claus died violently. Just predict something vague, like that he was going to be headline news by a certain date.

>>60775310
If it's a centralized site they would definitely try to crack down on it. However, the betting market could be entirely decentralized with cryptocurrency and smart contracts.

1. Publishing the bet on a blockchain.
2. Placing cryptocurrency in escrow administered by a smart contract.
3. Resolving the bet using an oracle or a second round of betting like this: after the deadline of the original bet is reached, people stake money on the outcome, which is now publicly known (Santa died or didn't die), after a short staking period, the minority side of stakers lose all their money to the majority side.

>>60775342
Yeah but all it'd take is the killer being found to have done it after putting a bet on his death and then the authorities are gonna start cracking down.

>>60775346
The website itself would probably get taken down. Unless you really encrypt the site but at that point you basically just made a deep web hit site again.

>>60775071 (OP)
>what platform allows these bets

>been following this lighthearted WNBA prank since this weekend.
>whats the worst that could happen?
>it turns out like THIS
>any cryptocel who has ever mentioned crypto to anyone will now be associated with THIS
Honestly caulk it up as a huge L for the industry. But it’s also bullish because if this was somehow manufactured and is now being pushed by the msm, it’s a 400IQ way to fud the public out of what’s to come.
>I refuse to buy crypto if it allows THIS to happen
Maybe this really is the supercycle we’ve all been waiting for.

>>60775380
I want to know what fucking retard decided "hey the best way to promote our crypto is to do some stupid tiktok level pranks that'll probably result in someone getting a criminal record".

But hey don't pretend that crypto bros didn't have a bad reputation before.

>>60775071 (OP)
I just think it's really funny that the so-called defenders of women's sport integrety and safety are also the very same people who are throwing dildos at the players and calling them fatherless whores. What did we do to end up in this retard clownshow society?

>>60775097
Can you charge someone if their child finds their dildo in their unlocked drawer?Per your post I guess it’s a dangerous item and would be like leaving a gun or drugs in a drawer.

Child endangerment at the very least.

>>60775399
There's a difference between a kid finding or seeing a dildo and hitting them with it.

>>60775411
accidental contact.

What’s the difference?

>>60775414
Good luck convincing the jury to let you off easy lol
>No no you see I was just trying to throw it on the court
>The 12 year old girl just got in the way

>>60775423
Yeah, juries are brain dead. More news at 11.

>>60775423
I really don't see the problem here. In america people are allowed to parade down the street and perform gay sex acts in the immediate vicinity of children. Accidental dildo contact seems pretty tame

>>60775481
bro he threw a dildo at a 12 year old. At minimum he's being brought up on assault charges for doing it at a sporting event, but the possibility her dad has it tried as a sex thing because it was a sex toy is there too.

>>60775244
>The main problem is you can argue it wasn't sexual in nature but you're gonna have to find a jury that doesn't agree with that when the reality is you hit a 12 year old with a sex toy.

You don't even have to convince the jury. The defense lawyer just has to convince the prosecution to drop the charges before trial even starts. I've sat in on a murder trial before, and it taught me that there are lot of things that happen prior to the trial that are equally as important as the trial itself.

I just see the sex charges as something they're throwing at him to see what sticks, but ultimately will get dropped before trial. I see your point, but I'm just thinking that building a case for it would be more difficult than you think it is.

>>60775486
He didnt throw it at a 12 year old. He hit a 12 yr old accidentally while trying to throw it onto the court

>>60775096
I love cats.

>>60775539
Yeah the "guys I only hit the kid with a sex toy in the middle of a DIFFERENT crime" is gonna go over real well. Especially when this is part of a series of incidents the WNBA and their sponsors are probably going to be leaning on the prosecution to put an end to by making and example of your sorry ass.

>>60775588
>yeah the "guys I only hit the kid with a sex toy in the middle of a DIFFERENT crime" is gonna go over real well.

Yeah it could. Especially if he takes a plea deal to not be a sex offender

>>60775486
How would her dad have any input into how "it's tried", retard? That's the prosecutor's decision.

>>60775761
If we're being realistic, I'd say they hit him with the sex offender charges but offer a plea deal without them. Helps scare off any potential copycats and encourages him to take the deal immediately.

>>60775812
He's the one who'll be filing charges in all likeliness.

>>60775071 (OP)
How the hell did he end up hitting the girl while aiming for that big-ass court?
I highly doubt the young girl was on the court; even if she was sitting courtside he shouldn't have missed the open court
Dude deserves every bogus charge just for his shitty aim

>>60776010
Only prosecutors file charges.

>>60775248
wtf is wrong with tunisia

>>60775084
it's just a legal tactic. Prosecution comes-up with the highest amount of charges possible, defense negotiates it down in a plea-bargain so nobody wastes any time or money on a trial. Unless he has a truly horrible lawyer, I doubt that particular charge sticks.

Thot destroyed