>>60782548
>if stablecoins become widely used, basically no-one benefits. it's just 1:1 usd
In reality, stablecoins will very likely only become widely used, if payment processors, banks, brokerages, etc., etc. somehow manage to offer seamless and zero-convenience-loss solutions entirely running in the background, unnoticeable to the consumer that just wants to pay shit.
>Only the chain that the stablecoin is on benefits, and minimally so.
Possibly.
>Crypto has already peaked, it's over. diminishing returns donchaknow. $20k in december. $140k in 2029.
You're an asshole.
>Nobody else will want a piece of the pie when they see the success of (insert first mover).
Check above. What's more likely?
Fragmentation into oblivion whilst complicating everything or things eventually settle on one of the first movers building a legacy and regulatory certainty and security?
USDC, Paypal stablecoin, Ripple stablecoin, ETH, XRP.
Everything else will very likely be in the background only, hidden from public, inaccessible and certainly not making you rich.