Thread 60782550

I am neither an xrp nor a link buyer but I spend A LOT of time on crypto twitter. The recent anti-xrp pro-link marketing campaign is the most inorganic push I have ever seen at this scale if you don't consider microcap niche communities with small audiences. It reminds me of the paralleled anti-Nick Fuentes push by Elon/Candace/Tucker. It is really weird. For candidness sake I own ADA and ONDO and SUI and Hbar, this is just really weird. XRP isn't even a chainlink competitor. Why are Chainlink Labs doing this? Why aren't they doing it to their actual competitors? The only thing that comes close to this in my mind is the BTC maxi scorched earth seethe when Trump announced the stockpile, planting fake news stories and trying to actually get the government to exclude and push other projects into oblivion. What is behind this and why is this happening? There has been a response from the xrp community but it is mostly reactive and replying to the points themselves, not so much a new upwelling of similar posting and antagonism. What is this?

>>60782550 (OP)
Linkies are the jews of crypto, culturally speaking.

>>60782558
t. shekelsteinbergniggerheadidiotface

>>60782558
I just don't get what they are even aiming at. Wouldn't they benefit from broader crypto success in their price feed business? What is the point of this?

>>60782550 (OP)
>The recent anti-xrp pro-link marketing campaign is the most inorganic push I have ever seen
prove it

>>60782582
What do you mean prove it? I am speaking about my experience spending hours a day for years on a specific side of twitter. In the last 4 days or so there has been an insanely huge increase in this and a clearly coordinated posting campaign. So much so that that has been a big reply to it from EasyA who I am a big fan of and who are big XRP promoters but have never posted anything like this that I am aware of. And an XRP node operator.

Really though the reaction is not what got my attention, it is just the tone of posting. It comes across like when all of the con inc. accounts posted the "most transparent admin of all time" or when several dozen dem congressmen and women posted the exact same speech. It is really stilted and contrived and obviously coordinated, but why are they doing it? XRP success translates to Chainlink Labs success...I don't even not like link specfically I just don't understand why they are doing this given that they clearly are.

>>60782550 (OP)
>I spend A LOT of time on crypto twitter
It tells lol. So does my normie brother and he is also a nolinker. You dumbasses couldn't spot a glow up under your nose.
Protip: The spic is a glowie, controlled op like your entire twitter feed is. Learn to see the truth before you come here spewing retarded accusations.
>>60782574
>price feed business
Like genuinely, I don't even think you're trolling. This is how clueless twitter actually is.

>>60782582
And even at that, you would think a crypto community marketing team would have better sense than a Washington K street comms team. Why be this stark and overt. It is like Biden standing with marines between a blood red white house talking about him "losing patience" with the purebloods. It doesn't win any favor and doesn't come off as natural or normal at all. They could easily do a much better media campaign. What motivated the decision to do this?

>>60782610
What about what I said is wrong? The more networks and network activity they can serve the data between the better right? Which spic? This is absolutely a glow op and I have loads of experience noticing them in politics and crypto, it is just usually smaller projects that do campaigns this tone deafly overt.

>>60782605
You're right. Coordinated, paid campaigns aren't trustworthy. Unfortunately, out of LINK and XRP...the crypto that is confirmed to do coordinated campaigns is XRP. This was shown from the emails in the SEC's investigation. This link is one example: https://bitcoinist.com/internal-ripple-emails-expose-anti-bitcoin-campaign/

>>60782628
Crypto is 99% scams and jeets. Who gives a fuck about jeet chain #37 with 2000x faster what ever. No one cares, no one wants to use a jeet scammers solution and no one will. Chainlink doesn't need crypto, crypto needs Chainlink. They waited years and the retards did nothing but jeet and scam. Chainlink is for real world adoption by real world business. Price feeds and just a proof of concept. Not the main feature which seems very lost on the twitter mind hive.
Spic fuentes the mexican white supremacist. You can't spot shit or you'd have been balls deep in LINK already.

Anyway enough spoonfeeding, best you go do some reading.

>>60782632
This doesn't negate what I said and is known about from years ago and probably accounts for 1/100th the amount of shit I have seen XRP get from BTC,notably from Pierre, which Riot is the flop of the millenia. And I remember this time and it actually was true bitcoin was controlled by China, but I remember Chris Larse did a debate with Anthony I think and argued that BTC code needed to be changed due to climate change which I thought was a very faggoted argument. I used to invest in XLM but it seems like it is just not building really. I am not denying Ripple did past campaigns, but they were discovered after proven years later. This one is happening now and I am just wondering why

>>60782642
There is no campaign this is just your way of coping for not seeing what was always infront of you. I suspect many more people will have the same reaction.

Linkfags are completely obsessed with XRP. They are seething with jealousy because they believe their shitcoin deserves to be rank 3. Theres a reason link has by far the most toxic community in crypto

>>60782641
If you don't think there is a concerted effort around small tech, paypal mafia, JD Vance, new neocon generation specifically in Candace Tucker Elon and Milo to specifically target and discredit Nick, you are WAY out of your depth:
https://x.com/realDaveReilly/status/1955137077298991227

I understand link's business model and tech and plan. They absolutely benefit from large scale payment flows happening on newly emergent settlement chains. You didn't spoonfeed me anything you just wrote a meaningless paragraph that didn't even mention this.

If Chainlink are so confident why are they doing campaigns like this? And why are they targeting people who aren't even their competitors?

>>60782647
I bought link a few months after it launched and sold it for an amazing profit. Everyone on biz back then did. I did not see a good reason to buy back in and so didn't, and still don't. I was not late. I was earlier than you could even imagine being. I was genuinely trying to have a conversation. Why are you guys being so fucking combattive?

>>60782605
>What do you mean prove it?
your entire hypothesis of "chainlink is funding a blatantly inorganic marketing campagin on twitter" is based off nothing but your intuition and apparently your innate ability to detect astroturfing. i sincerely doubt your ability to do this due to the fact that despite "spending A LOT of time on crypto twitter" you still have an extremely rudimentary understanding of crypto, link, and xrp. so unless you have actual evidence supporting your claim you're just making schizo assumptions.

>>60782656
Man you really are a prime twitter dweller. You guys actually live under a rock don't you?

>>60782642
>This doesn't negate what I said
Dude, what I'm saying is you are projecting. Xrp markets itself as """"The Bankers Coin"""". Chainlink meanwhile has always HAD those ties and their tech actually is getting widespread use in the space. Others are catching on to that. And it's obvious to anyone with half a braincell that the next logical step if you care about throwing money at """"The Bankers Token"""" that you would throw money at LINK, not XRP.

XRP funded campaigns in the last and obviously, naturally, ergo, still to this day funds shilled bullshit campaigns. All of the random, wacky shilled news/articles/social media vids, some claims with deadlines that *never* come to pass...the inconsistent narratives...all dropped or shifted at the drop of a hat. You've been had. For a very long fucking time and the information asymmetry is now catching up.

You can be pissed all you want, but that marketcap is going to continue to funnel into the better, comparative token. It's a trade with momentum and you can either do the trade and make money or do nothing and comparatively bleed out. Your choice.

XRP is the Standard®

>>60782550 (OP)
DISCONTINUE THE LITHIUM
ANY OTHER UNSUBSTANTIATED CRACKPOT THEORIES YOU WANT TO GET OUT THERE? KEEP THEM CONTAINED TO THIS THREAD, PLEASE, BROTHER.

>>60782661
You weren't here in 2017/18. I was. You know how I know?
>Chainlink is just in the price feeds business

>>60782663
Me not agreeing with you is not me having an extremely "rudimentary understanding." I understand your investment and did probably years before you even hear the name. I understand all of these. All I said was that there has recently been a big swing in posts with multiple big accounts swinging at the exact same time in coordinating messaging. This has nothing to do with intuition or innate ability, though my intuition and innate ability have an extremely solid track record in investments and politics. I did very well in crypto very early and called deglobalization and reindustrialization in the American southwest a decade ago. I called covid bullshit in December 2019/January 2020 when they projected IFR based on the cruise ship worst cases. I called the vaxx danger, masks not working, tests unreliable, and literally every major political psyop of the last decade plus. I hit the score ceilling on every subtest of an adult IQ test as a kid and more recently on an "extremely high IQ" test called the Mega Test, which is taken a lot less seriously by psychometricians. I am objectively smarter than you, have a higher track record for beating bullshit and am almost definitely an earlier Chainlink and crypto in general investor than you.

>>60782667
Strong rebuttal showing you are defiitely confident in your reasoning and not insecure and being weird at all.

>>60782692
>eww your being weird
Woman brained twitter retard lmao. Those thirst trap crypto gals aren't going to fuck you.

>>60782656
>paying this much attention to the masonic theatre
They got you by the balls man.
>I understand link's business model and tech and plan
>I bought link a few months after it launched and sold it for an amazing profit
>price feeds
Good chance you're a fuddie, damn, I enjoyed the twitter tard perspective.

>>60782674
I am not mad I literally hold 0 XRP. I just find it extremely weird how combattive and standoffish you all collectively get at one mention of this despite me saying what I did about Chris and the change the code posture. There are garbage crypto journo pieces written all the time for virtually every project but this is a simultaneous change that happened like 4 days ago that is just extremely stark and ill conceived and weirdly motivated. Why can't one be talked about without being in terms of the other?

In all the xrp marketing I have ever seen they don't even mention link. Why is it different here from the opposite side and why is it happening this way, so inorganically?

>>60782703
This projection is exactly what I mean. I provide my reasons, you just accuse and then when I point out you did it you accuse me of doing what you did, which is the most womanly projection conceivable and basically what Candace is doing to Nick right now. This cannot be coming from a normal place, so what is motivating it or this new media push in general?

>>60782704
I am not a fuddie and again, I know about CCIP and abstraction and...I promise you there is not an aspect of the Chainlink business model you know about that I do not despite you thinking that there is. I created this thread for real discussion and all I have gotten is combattive avoidance.

>>60782711
Because everyone here knows what chainlink is, is balls deep and retardedly confident because we know we are correct. So when someone comes questioning LINK now, in 2025, it's a bit dumb, like wtf were you doing your entire time in this space? You want us to spoonfeed you what should be rudimentary info?

As for what you are probably noticing, deducting from your posts, is that your twitter masters have allowed you to be shown the truth. This seems to coincide with a lot of movement for Chainlink and legislation passing. For years there were obvious NDAs and suppression going on. Now, for all us Linkies hopes, it is finally over. However it has been lots of years and obviously we are weary and tired.

If you want technical discussion look in the archives.

>>60782711
> I just find it extremely weird how combative and standoffish you all collectively get at one mention of this

Because you're wrong and you're not listening dipshit.

>just extremely stark and ill conceived and weirdly motivated
Ok, again: "Xrp markets itself as """"The Bankers Coin"""". Chainlink meanwhile has always HAD those ties and their tech actually is getting widespread use in the space. Others are catching on to that. And it's obvious to anyone with half a braincell that the next logical step if you care about throwing money at """"The Bankers Token"""" that you would throw money at LINK, not XRP."

This is clear-cut.

I'll make it even cleared. Xrp has investors that invested into their scammy, bullshit token...for very similar reasons as Chainlink. Ergo, their marketcap is likely up for grabs. They are competitors in terms of retail investors. At this point in time: XRP cannot gain marketcap from LINK holders. However, the opposite can certainly occur for the previously described reasons in the prior quote.

Again, "You can be pissed all you want, but that marketcap is going to continue to funnel into the better, comparative token. It's a trade with momentum and you can either do the trade and make money or do nothing and comparatively bleed out. Your choice."

Link fud threads are evolving out of desperation. The triple response posts are a give away.

>>60782722
Again, I invested in Chainlink before you even knew about crypto. I have been reading archives since before you knew this board existed. I am not asking you to regurgitate your investment strategy to me or spoonfeed me anything and you taking this as me asking for it is kind of insanely telling about how you think and how capable of thinking outside reactive general thinking that you are. I am not asking about the chainlink tech, I am asking why the inorganic astroturf media campaign?

>>60782720
Not to be overly smug .. but oh well, are you intj? high iq? I don't think you understand or you'd be all in. I cannot even put into words the depths of this.

>>60782690
on the off chance that you're being unironic i'll just say this. you are not nearly as knowledgeable about crypto as you think you are. you're asking extremely stupid questions and demonstrating an extremely low level of understanding and expecting people to engage seriously with you. go find the answers yourself, they're out there and for someone who spends a ton of time on the internet i'm sure you'll figure it out.

>>60782732
>Not listening
Not listening to what? You have been a collective gaping maw of shrill screeching. No one has said anything of substance.
>banker coin
Great. Both market themselves as banker associated coins, and both market themselves as non. Not long ago the xrp fud was that David said that banks were not success stories because the real people they lift up are non-banks. But the point remains their tokens do completely different things. So why the antagonistic marketing campaign?

>>60782737
My second paragraph explained it you fuckjng retarded faggot. Fucking hell, Chainlink was under suppression. Now it is not. Your third rate, curated shitty twitter feed is reflecting this. Because it is a mainsteam media platform for normalfag retards like yourself. You didnt buy in months and sell for profit, in months LINK shot to $1 then crabbed for years below that. If you managed to pull that off, the congratulations you fucking retard you missed your opportunity make it. Honestly fuddies are less retarded because I think you're actually trying to be smart here.

>>60782746
>So why the antagonistic marketing campaign?

"I'll make it even clearer. Xrp has investors that invested into their scammy, bullshit token...for very similar reasons as Chainlink. Ergo, their marketcap is likely up for grabs. They are competitors in terms of retail investors. At this point in time: XRP cannot gain marketcap from LINK holders. However, the opposite can certainly occur for the previously described reasons in the prior quote."

"You can be pissed all you want, but that marketcap is going to continue to funnel into the better, comparative token. It's a trade with momentum and you can either do the trade and make money or do nothing and comparatively bleed out. Your choice."

>>60782741
You are the 4th or 5th person to say this without proving anything or giving an ounce of an actual argument while taking the time just to comment that you totally could. And the topic of the thread is regarding the marketing antagonism. I am not challenging your choice to invest how you want. You are all lashing out in a totally irrational way and it kind of makes the case for me about the spirit of the antagonism underlying the media campaign.
>>60782741
Same goes for you as the other anon I replied to above this but 5th or 6th.

>>60782750
I sold in 2018. Your paragraph didn't explain anything. I am not challenging your investment I am asking about why the specific antagonism in media campaign. It makes zero sense from an investor or marketing allocation standpoint.

>>60782550 (OP)
It's pretty simple. CCL has been pursuing the hiding strategy for years now and LINK never pumped because nobody ever shilled it to retail. Part of the reason is because the SEC under Biden and Gensler would have fucked them in the ass had they tried to advertise the token too hard. Now that's all out the window and Sirgay has the blessings of Blonald Blumpf to gigashill the LINK token to 1k EOY without being sent to pound me in the ass prison. It's happening.

>>60782754
This is the first actual answer I have gotten, thank you. So in your opinion, CLL are doing this to specifically drive retail toward their token, away from other alts or away from XRP specifically?

>>60782758
The only technical point you made was claiming LINK is about price feeds and XRP is not related to LINK both objectively wrong.
>>60782760
I dont know why twitter fags post twitter faggot shit its all faggots being faggots and you come here asking why some random faggots we do not know are being faggots claiming its a faggot marketing campaign instead of the simple fact that faggots are are being faggots because dumb faggots do faggotry shit like when they realise LINK is better than their faggot xrp bags these faggot make a scene because faggots do faggot shit just like you sre now you fucking dumb faggot???

>>60782761
You seem to agree with >>60782769. This seems like the most plausible explanation. Why do you think they went so stark? Do you think they figure the most fungible investor to peel is the type which is susceptible to this style of stark over the top messaging? Why the heavy hand?

>>60782769
"Xrp markets itself as """"The Bankers Coin"""". Chainlink meanwhile has always HAD those ties and their tech actually is getting widespread use in the space. Others are catching on to that. And it's obvious to anyone with half a braincell that the next logical step if you care about throwing money at """"The Bankers Token"""" that you would throw money at LINK, not XRP."

>>60782774
How is XRP related to link? I agree many people post a lot of faggoted shit on twitter but when the tide of faggotry takes a sharp decisive turn and the messaging is synchronized, it is worth taking note

>>60782787
"Xrp markets itself as """"The Bankers Coin"""". Chainlink meanwhile has always HAD those ties and their tech actually is getting widespread use in the space. Others are catching on to that. And it's obvious to anyone with half a braincell that the next logical step if you care about throwing money at """"The Bankers Token"""" that you would throw money at LINK, not XRP."

>>60782781
This doesn't explain the suddenness or the heavyhandedness. Definitely trends change over time organically but this is astroturfed and so artificial, again, the only even close parallel that comes to mind is the BTC maxi shit from beginning of year and ironically often spearheaded by Pierre.

>>60782779
Because it works. LINK is already going to have heavy institutional inflows once SWIFT goes online and only up from there. They're drumming up retail to send it even higher before and after that because it's good press for them and they can dump bags on them for a lot of money. The very best outcome is if LINK is the ETH of this cycle and lands somewhere in the high 3 digits or low 4 digits per token because it will cement its perception as a legitimate asset to be bought, staked and utilized for years to come.

>>60782550 (OP)
we were right all along, it just took normies nearly ten years to catch up
i've been saying forever that it'd just take a few normie youtubers to catch up to crack the match to light the fuse
all the info is there, it just hasnt been communicated because they ignored or supressed it for years

you earned this

>>60782793
Take a step back and understand all the shit your involved in on twitter is fake and gay. Everything you believe in is wrong. You vastly have overestimated your understanding of the world. Chainlink, as explained in this thread, was always the bankers coin. Always going to pump. Always THE coin. Its suppression would suggest a large conspiracy of collusion from shadowy figures well beyond these namefags you keep dropping. These people have decided it is time to let YOU know about LINK. That the suppression ends. These people control world leaders, of course they have shills on twitter.

>>60782790
And again, saying that xrp markets itself as the "bankers coin" and saying link is a banker coin doesn't contradict anything I said. They have totally different uses and purposes. There is no reason to be adversarial outside like the other anons said about trying to peel off retail investment into the token, which makes sense, and seems like they may be doing a strategy to peel off what they consider to be especially non-sticky gnat-to-light investors through blunt force marketing. I was just wondering why the specific strategy and originally figured this but wanted to see if there was something I was missing but it doesn't seem like there is. They are messaging to flighty speculators.

>>60782825
XRP has zero use, it just pretends to be what LINK is.
>we can seamlessly transact across border
Wow! LINK does that and more.
>There is no reason to be adversarial
This is all in your little mind, it's called coping.

>>60782818
I have an extremely high track record of success in politics and investing which i literally guarantee is higher than yours. No one has explained anything in this thread outside restating that mantra. I was bullish on it early but am not currently. I do agree with the thesis this is all to peel off retail investors and carve out consideration as instition grade though. But on the latter this reeks of desperation and is a very poor marketing strategy, like him going up to hound the president was. It resonated to convinced investors and those who saw the still frame but people watching the video and those on stage it looked like a weird photo bomb. I have no skin in the thing or horse in the race, just saying this seems like a similarly ill conceived and strategized marketing tact. If I were CLL I would hire a new head of marketing.

>>60782841
sigh fuddie

>>60782836
I hold 0 xrp. 95% of this thread is you all addressing things I didn't say and people who aren't me. Link is not used for settlement or required to be in their own service. Its purpose in so far as it is used is not for the same reason XRP would or would not be used.

>>60782846
Beyond delusional.

>>60782848
In so far as it is or isn't I meant to say, paralleling the XRP statement.

>>60782550 (OP)
>>60782661
>I am not a link buyer
>I bought link
Kek. But anyway, they're playing the reserve thing. Twitter leeches jump on any bullish sentiment that could make them money. If you actually bought link back then you'll remember how bullish Twitter was on it. Remember that jewish pizza guy? And the whole let's goooo Sarah? Hell even Mcafee was annoyed by "the marines". Are you saying that was paid for, too?

>>60782848
>24 long winded posts to say token not needed
waste of a thread

>>60782737
8.5/10 troll. Impressive audience retention. Bit repetitive though.

Anons if this fag is so smart then why would he be asking us a question which he knows we do not know the answer to unless he has alternative motives.

>>60782875
As I said, I was asking to see if there was something specific I was unaware of. It being just a play as described means it was ill conceived. I wanted to know if there was anything I was missing.
>>60782870
Read the thead. I bought link a few months after it launched and sold it in 2018. It is weird you begin talking to me like you misunderstood or deliberately misrepresented me and portrayed me as a holder but then clarify you never misunderstood me and understood the whole time there was no contradiction. Weird and pretty gay way to piss on a space just for narrative points instead of just having a conversation like a normal fucking human. There have been all sorts of paid campaigns. I am specifically noting that at this level of market maturity I cannot think of a parallel marketing strategy that was employed out of nowhere and heavy-handedly, outside of microcaps, particularly not in the top 20 or so coins, outside of the btc maxi push. It is a weird change and I wanted to see what peoples' thoughts on the reasons for it happening are.

>>60782875
Not sure what questions you take me as asking of you. All I asked was why you thought this would be happening. How is that mystically beyond the realm of consideration? It is definitely possible and basically guaranteed they have proprietary marketing frameworks but it is not absurd to speculate on such a weird and tone deaf and overt move.

OP is a faggot

>>60782656
All I see are annoying low IQ "groypers" mass brigading everyone on Twitter.
Feels like that's being funded, to poison conservative discourse.
> "wHaT are yOu a PDFiILE PRotEcTor?"

>>60782550 (OP)
>I own ADA and ONDO and SUI and Hbar

stopped reading here

>>60782616
You ever heard of an NDA
Retard

>>60782901
Youre coping extremely, i can feel the sweat coming through my monitor
If you hold XRP, keep holding my man, you did the right decision for yourself :)

>>60782932
You are only looking at one side of it. Look at what Candace and Tucker and fucking Elon are doing. If you want Nick to lose this you don't understand what it means or how important it is for what we synthesize into.

>>60782948
How is this relevant to what I am asking? Or are you larping as someone who has signed an NDA with Chainlink that is somehow privvy to their internal marketing discussion? kek
>>60782993
Pretty ironic coming from the 8th iteration of the same desperate combattive reply after reiterating I don't hold XRP like 3 times.

>>60783014
Sure you do buddy :^)

the Elliot Rodger brothers are here kek

I was told there was a tiff between Brad and Sergey during the first crypto ball. Brad was in line for the banquet tater tots before being cut infront of by Sergey who had already filled a plate moments earlier.
The president was briefed and decided to allow Sergey to come back instead of Brad even though Sergey caused the fight because president trump liked his gumption.