Thread 60796728

Inflation is fucking everything Im barely top 60 percentile now

>>60796728 (OP)
There is absolutely zero chance the average 18-24 years old has a net worth of almost 100k. The majority of them don't even have more assets than debt.
The only way this chart can be true is if we count the parents' wealth for all the people that haven't moved out yet, in which case the chart is total nonsense and completely useless.

>>60796788
My kids will have well over 100k in their 529s by the time they're 18. Even though I'm the "owner" of the accounts, I would count that towards their net worth rather than my own

>>60796728 (OP)
this is household i.e. it's counting 2 people

>>60796843
neat that doesn't change what he said
the avg 18-24 year old does not have 100k lol

>>60796883
A 2023 breakdown from DQYDJ provides clearer figures for the 18–24 age group:
Average net worth: $112,104
Median net worth: $10,222

Youre wrong buddy

>>60796871
Well if thats the case, then "we" have 360k, even as europoors.

>>60796905
here's a source with more believable numbers:

https://finallylearn.com/average-net-worth-by-age

18-24 median: $8,216 avg: $28,707

>>60796905
So the chart is wrong because the 50% mark for 18-24 should be $10,000, not $88,000.

>>60796728 (OP)
>tfw 18-24 group
>tfw only 60th percentile

Stop comparing yourselves to other people. They lie acuity their net worths anyways.

>>60796905
you have no idea how percentiles work, retard

>>60796905
>Average net worth: $112,104
>Median net worth: $10,222

Third-world tier of wealth equality, lmao.

>>60797161
>muh wealth inequality
no amount of government policy can stop nigger subhumans from maxing out their credit cards and taking on unsustainable debt

>>60797196
>credit is now assets instead of liabilities

>>60796728 (OP)
comparison is the thief of joy

>>60796728 (OP)
>34
>1.8m
>90th percentile

These graphs include flyover states to bring the average down. I am closer to the 75% if you don't factor them.

>>60796788
Yeah this chart is very suspicious, no data sources listed at all. Like is this worldwide data? EU/US only? College grads only? I'd really only believe these numbers if its restricted to adequately-employed homeowning college grads or something like that. If it were worldwide then the entire thing would basically be red except for the top right box.
>>60796905
You just contradicted OPs chart with this figure, the 50% mark should be 10k not 80k. Just goes to show that something is suspicious here at least.

>>60797150
The guy I was responding to was referencing averages, retard, hence my post. Try using your brain before impulsively replying because it makes you look stupid.

>>60797514
>The guy I was responding to was referencing averages,
if you weren't an autistic freak, you'd realize he was referring to "average" in the colloquial sense, not the statistical average

>>60796728 (OP)
I'm bottom 30% now

>>60796728 (OP)
This chart is pure bullshit.

>>60797948
>calls people autistic
>doesn't realize things can be interpreted in different ways

>>60798208
nobody that isn't autistic reads what OP posted and thinks statistical average. you've missed the context clues. you either have a 4th grade reading comprehension or you're autistic. now proceed to cope

>>60797304
By that logic they also include metropolis cities which should also be unaccounted for...

95th to 50th

i should have sold. oops