>>60804856
I've seem him but don't pay attention. It's the ones like DonAlt, Bluntz, WIZZ, and in particular XO who just seems to have whatever the opposite of a boner is for LINK.
>>60804861
It's funny you say that, anon. I actually left biz sometime last year. I've only come back today because it's been kicking up again. Take that as you will, but nonetheless, from outside of the weird vacuum here around LINK, that is not the way I've read the market at all.
Fartcoin is lower than its December highs.
SOL is lower than December highs.
ENA is lower than December highs.
Those are the first three I checked because they all took up a lot of airtime over the last 18mos or so. It's the majors that are doing well, like ETH and XRP and BNB, but among its peers LINK has had an exceptional month, and you can't argue that. If you're arguing on other timelines, okay I guess, but I'm saying it has been ripping highs for weeks and there isn't a peep about it. If you were looking to rotate profit from majors into alts, LINK would be top of the list I would think. But these X influenzas don't talk about it. They shill random shit that haven't shown any signs of strength.
