Thread 60805513

In what world is that considered "mooning"?

>>60805513 (OP)
>Maybe if I mangle the chart it'll look bad

Kek fuddies

>>60805530
He used link/eth but eth was 400 in 2020

>>60805530
barely a pump baggie

>>60805565
But it is a pump, loser

What should we sell our link for and buy instead?

Let's test it, what can outperform link over the next week?

>>60805565
Correct, and this barely-a-pump has already netted me another 120k

>>60805575
Very nice, only 60k here

>>60805513 (OP)
Bubbles pop, and charting two moving targets against each other with diverging cycles looks pretty retarded. Even then, in your grotesquely distorted chart the truth is visible.

It’s up 100% from the bottom of that chart

>>60805579
Just allow yourself a moment to envision a modest 3% move up when we're at 200 bucks.

>>60805591
Based, Ty anon

>>60805591
OOOOOOOO I CANNOT WAIT (BUT I WILL)

>>60805581
btc chart tells another story though, lower lows, lower highs

>>60805706
Pretty much all alts got raped by BTC's very strong performance over the past 2 years, especially when BTC.d recovered at the start of this year. That shouldn't been the start of alt season but it got delayed (and rightly so, institutions pouring into BTC pumped it fair and square). Eventually it will recover though. Maxis have this notion that tokens should always print ATH after ATH against BTC to be worth it, but that's wrong. If BTC does a x10 and my shitcoin x5s it's BTC bottom, I'm up x50 in dollars.

>>60805743
>shouldn't been
Should've been*

>>60805513 (OP)
>>60805530
Why are you guys phoneposting pics? I'm not being funny here, but you will NEVER belong in high society

>>60805530
Mother of all bear flags, this shit is going to -$50. To get rid of your link you will have to pay somebody $50 per link to sell.

>>60805782
Cope. You might get a small relief rally but this chart is definitely trending towards a new ATL.

>>60805809
A new all time low...

Incredible

>>60805809
Reread my post, my fellow bear chad. I am also short and bearish as fuck

>>60805856
Look at the axis on my image friend, and weep.

priced in satoshis

>>60805888
>I chart all my stock picks against NVIDIA

>fuddies are still obsessed with what the price was 5 years ago
that's honestly pretty sad. it's like a 30 year old man who can't let go of high school. link is outperforming both btc and eth on the 1Y it's time to move on buddy.

>>60805946
Yeah... Some actual "uncle Rico reliving his high school days" cringe. Where is dudeposter anyway today? The silence is deafening.

>>60805918
all shitcoins are intrinsically linked to bitcoin, there is no more perfect measurement of shitcoin performance

>>60806029
Same goes for USD, except everything I buy is priced in USD.

>>60806029
your own chart says that link has been outperforming bitcoin for two months now

>>60805513 (OP)
>up 5408x since the bottom

>>60806046
instead of being down 90% against bitcoin, it's only down 75% right now. what a great deal!

>>60806059
unless you bought in june, in which case you're up pretty substantially.

>>60806029
This is your brain as a btc maxi: dlt has no value outside of btc. That's so ridiculously narrow-minded. Literally like saying the internet is just for email.

Link baggies will need to 10x from here without btc gaining anything in order to just catch up. Kek baggies u lost

>>60805888
>1 step forward, 2 steps back
>*linkies cheering*

>>60806590
>nooooo you can't be hyped over reversal progress it's le actually bad

>>60806614
Kek baggie

>>60805530
thats a different chart retard

>>60805513 (OP)
Mooning means dropping your pants to show your ass...not the redditfag definition

>>60806964
>noooo look you are a chudfag for thinking a positive event is positive

>>60805513 (OP)
You know what's really funny. They always used Link/BTC chart. Now they are using Link/Eth chart. Whatever makes it look the worst. Always changing the goalposts.

>>60805530
I’m going to be nice once and not FUD to keep you kids out

>>60807298
You are the blackest gorilla nigger. Link/btc looks like shit. How does -90% sound?
It was 35000 sats during the bear market when it was crabbing at $5, now its 20000 sats and you're getting cocky. Ngmi

>>60806324
Not a maxi but BTC is by far the dominant asset in crypto. It has around 50-60% of the crypto market cap. It is bought by government and companies and has the most liquidity. So from an investment perspective it is the less risk prone crypto, so as an investment if I am investing in a more volatile, less liquid, less established asset, I am expecting a higher return (read about the efficient border etc...). That's why everyone measures alts against btc. Can't believe I have to explain this on in finance board.

>>60808026
for now
I’ll bet my dick Chainlink is far more important by 2030

>>60808196
Sure, and you'll be able to measure that against btc. But for now Chainlink dominance is below 2%, it has to start eating btc dominance and gaining sats at some point if you want this to happen.

>>60808352
Lol, I just looked at link dominance and it's 0.40%. So yeah, benchmarking it against btc makes sense.

>>60805530
Are you joking with how ironic this is? You are posting the return based on if the person invested at launch which NONE OF YOU DID. If you bought link 5 years ago you are down like 70%.

>>60808660
Who the fuck here bought link more than a few months after ICO lmfao

>>60806970
Its the more accurate judge of value since the US dollar is still and will always be the stable currency. Stop being a retarded faggot highschool dropout.

>>60808660
>NONE OF YOU DID
kek fuddies

>>60808660
>If you bought link 5 years ago you are down like 70%.
4 years ago*. Only people that bought the 2021 highs are down. Even 2020 top buyers ($20) are now in the green.
>You are posting the return based on if the person invested at launch which NONE OF YOU DID.
:^)

>>60809613
you now remember that LINK trading at 30k sats on January 1st, 2020
people who bought at any point in 2020 are down, incredible cope though

>>60808660
Kek, fuddies actually believe most of us bought the former top

The only bag holders are you guys, anyone who bought below $25 dollars is in profit, which is the vast majority of links existence

You'd need to be a fomo chaser or a RETARD who lost their stack with bancor or LPL and who desperately wanted back in, this buying the top - to be annoyed with links situation right now

>>60809640
I repeat, only ABSOLUTE RETARDS, would have gambled their link with shit like BANCOR or lol

RETARDS

>>60809640
Seriously don't do this shit, don't start disparaging nufrens from buying above 20. Same thing that fucked us last time. Shut the fuck up. To anyone reading this, $20 is a steal don't listen to this smug fag, he's just a Sergey's cock licking goon.

>>60806020
Rent free

>>60809643
No, it was midwits. I never did because it looked too complicated to me.

Nigge4r

>>60805513 (OP)
>I'm mooooooning i gotta mooon

60808660
Hahahahahahahahahahahha

>>60805513 (OP)
>>60805530
>>60805581
Jesus Christ. Thank you guys, was feeling pretty down over holding a shit ton of SON and DOGE during these trying times but this just lifted my spirits... Thank you, seriously.