>>60807370 >litecoin merged mining
wait... how does that work? is it a good idea to buy scrypt miners for this? I was watching some video and this guy said you can mine like 20+ scrypt shitcoins with a single miner: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZDD3351x28
do you think it is worth it?
>>60807291 (OP)
Why would Litecoin miners help them do this? Dogecoin is merge mined with Litecoin so to 51% attack Dogecoin you have to 51% attack Litecoin. A successful 51% attack on Litecoin would render Litecoin worthless and also make their expensive Scrypt ASICs worthless.
>>60809039
because it isn't true. viabtc makes up more than 50% of the known hashrate, but currently 29% of the total hashrate is unknown. they don't have more than 50% of the total hashrate. you're so dumb you're misreading the zcash chart the same way pubic intended you to misread the monero chart.
>>60809119
Yeah I'm not sure why failing at getting the low hanging fruit has this group going after much, much taller trees
They may as well advertise they're going to 51% btc with the help of xi
>>60807291 (OP)
Feels good knowing I hold mostly ANON and a few other lesser known /gems/ instead of whatever's popular for the sake of it haha... Imagine unironically bagholding DOGE waiting for Reddit or Elon Musk to give it attention, imagine holding XMR because... Well I can't really think of a good reason but here we are. I just wonder, is BTC immune to a 51% attack? I don't know. >>60809158
/thread + based!
>>60810036
i joined CT a couple weeks ago and i cant believe i spent years on this dead shithole instead of twitter
twitter is retarded too but at least theres a pulse
