← Home ← Back to /biz/

Thread 60809399

60 posts 22 images 33 unique posters /biz/
Anonymous (ID: a6Fkf91i) No.60809399 >>60809416 >>60809433 >>60809489 >>60809879 >>60811077 >>60811480 >>60812834
/LFG/ – Link Flip General #1
>https://link-flip.alwaysbeshipp.ing
In this thread we observe the status of the LINK Flippening and laugh at XRP baggies. Current Flip Ratio is 9.5%. We are climbing, XRP baggies are crying! LFG!!
Anonymous (ID: ZiQObTw9) No.60809416 >>60809583 >>60810253
>>60809399 (OP)
This is hubris
Anonymous (ID: RCce0ZyU) No.60809433 >>60809437
>>60809399 (OP)
It's funny how easily you can spot this is AI made. The emojis. The gradient in the progress bar.

Nothing wrong with this though.
Anonymous (ID: dLRj/TpB) No.60809437
>>60809433
Kek I was thinking the same thing. I have to keep instructing ChatGPT to not use emojis. It even uses fucking emojis when generating comments in code.
Anonymous (ID: F7BpvZzd) No.60809465
>9.5%
Fuck, we're so early
Anonymous (ID: NPj5Obrz) No.60809489 >>60809523 >>60809576 >>60809603
>>60809399 (OP)
>$260 per LINK puts it at 3rd place
This is extraordinarily depressing, Chainlink will never be $1000. What would happen to cause Ripple to lose relevance? Why would Chainlink flip Ripple? Why does Chainlink exist if Chainlink Labs is a private company? What value is the Chainlink Standard if Chainlink Labs controls who gets to use it? What value is the Chainlink token if private banks pay Chainlink Labs in dollars in private deals behind closed doors? Why would globohomo ever care about truth and transparency?
Anonymous (ID: bWf7HPEE) No.60809523 >>60809544 >>60809573
>>60809489
>What would happen to cause Ripple to lose relevance?
korean whales selling off, crashing the price.
>source
check what happened the last 2 times
>Why does Chainlink exist if Chainlink Labs is a private company?
same for ripple, cardano, hbar etc etc
Anonymous (ID: NPj5Obrz) No.60809544 >>60809573
>>60809523
So you're saying Chainlink is just as much of a scam as ripple, cardano, hbar etc

Sad
Anonymous (ID: /YOi8VCx) No.60809555 >>60809560 >>60809563 >>60810576
AN ISLAND OF STRENGTH IN A BLOOD RED SEA
Anonymous (ID: a6Fkf91i) No.60809560
>>60809555
Based and checked
Anonymous (ID: kxBRp30i) No.60809563
>>60809555
CHECKED
Anonymous (ID: /KlzCLCa) No.60809565
Link just walking from lunch table to lunch table
Anonymous (ID: dLRj/TpB) No.60809573 >>60809576
>>60809523
>What would happen to cause Ripple to lose relevance
>>60809544
>So you're saying Chainlink is just as much of a scam as ripple
These can't be true at the same time. On one hand you express disbelief at Ripple losing relevance (implying it holds relevance to begin with) and then on the other hand you imply that Chainlink is just as much as a scam as Ripple for having a somewhat similar setup (Chainlink Labs, Ripple Labs).

Which one is it? Either Ripple is a scam and it will be easy for it to lose relevance, or it isn't a scam and neither is Chainlink for sharing traits with it. Call it, concerned fellow holder.
Anonymous (ID: dLRj/TpB) No.60809576
>>60809573
Meant to quote >>60809489
Anonymous (ID: PaFUfu1k) No.60809583
>>60809416
It is but it's also funny
Anonymous (ID: mdbczp3l) No.60809603 >>60809610
>>60809489
>What would happen to cause Ripple to lose relevance?
Ripple never really had any relevance. Nobody ever used it.
Anonymous (ID: NPj5Obrz) No.60809610 >>60809614 >>60809621
>>60809603
Yet it is 10x bigger than Chainlink by market cap and the 3rd biggest crypto on Planet Earth
Anonymous (ID: mdbczp3l) No.60809614
>>60809610
All despite never having any relevance whatsoever.
Anonymous (ID: dLRj/TpB) No.60809621 >>60809653
>>60809610
So the 3rd biggest crypto on planet earth is just a scam, it's inconceivable that it loses relevance though, and the fact that Ripple Labs owns the Ripple network is not a problem, but Chainlink Labs owning the Chainlink network is a problem, but when you note that it's a similar setup suddenly Ripple is a scam too. Got it.
Anonymous (ID: NPj5Obrz) No.60809653 >>60809661 >>60809666 >>60809672
>>60809621
Ripple is not a scam. Did I say that? Ripple deserves it's place at number 3. Chainlink is over valued at number 11.
Anonymous (ID: dLRj/TpB) No.60809661 >>60809693
>>60809653
You:
>Why does Chainlink exist if Chainlink Labs is a private company?
Anon:
>same for ripple, cardano, hbar etc etc
You:
>So you're saying Chainlink is just as much of a scam as ripple, cardano, hbar etc
You
>Ripple is not a scam. Did I say that?
Following this train of logic, either Ripple is a scam or Chainlink isn't (based on the private company thing). So I'll say again: call it, fuddie.
Anonymous (ID: mdbczp3l) No.60809666 >>60809693
>>60809653
>Ripple deserves it's place at number 3. Chainlink is over valued at number 11.
Ripple has no users today and virtually zero interest from banks and institutions.
They also dump a lot more money on their holders than Chainlink.

Meanwhile Chainlink has massive usage today and the highest interest from banks and institutions among all of crypto.
All while dumping 1/3rd on their holders compared to Ripple.

By every single observable metric, Ripple is many times worse than Chainlink.

>Ripple is not a scam. Did I say that?
Yes you did.
You implied that having a private company behind Chainlink is bad, and then you said it makes Chainlink just as much of a scam as ripple.
Anonymous (ID: /KlzCLCa) No.60809672 >>60809708 >>60809725 >>60809725
>>60809653
>(you)
Anonymous (ID: NPj5Obrz) No.60809693 >>60809705 >>60809706 >>60816028
>>60809661
Chainlink is a scam. Ripple is not a scam. Clear?

>>60809666
I never said Ripple is not a scam.
Anonymous (ID: dLRj/TpB) No.60809705
>>60809693
Not clear at all. Explain.
Anonymous (ID: PaFUfu1k) No.60809706
>>60809693
Kek
Anonymous (ID: cQcPmqX1) No.60809708 >>60809735
>>60809672
QRD on these 2 Asian Xrp shills?
Anonymous (ID: BSFirmRY) No.60809725 >>60809735
>>60809672
>>60809672
I hate link as much as anyone with a brain would, but this faggot is just a scammer. Astroturfed his whole "project". Its literally just scammers accusing each other of scamming, they are all right, because they are ALL Scammers
Anonymous (ID: /KlzCLCa) No.60809735
>>60809708
those two future hapa-incel mass shooters unironically post here

>>60809725
>I hAtE le STINK!

shut up faggot no one cares
Anonymous (ID: BV82aZxZ) No.60809772
who cares?
t.linkie
Anonymous (ID: ylP3fFdK) No.60809879 >>60810461
>>60809399 (OP)
why does this site exist lol
Anonymous (ID: Z9DpqtIJ) No.60810253
>>60809416
And it will be their downfall.

Will they act as smug when the counter runs backwards?
Anonymous (ID: m8zSxT8k) No.60810461 >>60810487
>>60809879
To harvest xrp seethe
Anonymous (ID: Pp//IOyU) No.60810487 >>60810557
>>60810461
can you show on the doll where xrp touched you?
Anonymous (ID: m8zSxT8k) No.60810557
>>60810487
sure
>points to doll penis
xrp uses its mouth exclusively btw
Anonymous (ID: KciJYcBF) No.60810576
>>60809555
Checked, fuddies seething
Anonymous (ID: cxlqhq6f) No.60810582 >>60810589
it's hilarious how the boyscouts are euphoric over being down over 50% in usd versus 2021

to add further insult to injury, given the catastrophic inflation the world economy has seen since, you're down easily another 25% in purchasing power

so to summarize, you're down 75%
Anonymous (ID: z63jyMML) No.60810589 >>60810656 >>60811452
>>60810582
ok but XRP is down since 2018 instead of up, what gives with that? LINK is way up. What gives? lol.

LINK WILL flip XRP, no question about it, just a matter of time. Of course it'll be a combo of XRP dumping and LINK pumping, XRP isn't going to stay at the price it's at now, will go lower for sure from here.
Anonymous (ID: cxlqhq6f) No.60810656 >>60810667 >>60810685
>>60810589
i'd say the xrp cult is doing better tho

also to reiterate, you're down 75%
Anonymous (ID: b5tXkEuh) No.60810667 >>60811452 >>60812060
>>60810656
>7 years to recover ATH
>"""better"""

You're getting flipped, xripplet
Anonymous (ID: z63jyMML) No.60810685 >>60811452
>>60810656
I think you might be retarded, you're now looking at 2 different time horizons. Since LINK goes back only to end of 2017, you need to start there so you're comparing properly. Otherwise let's see where LINK is in 6 more years and we can compare to XRP's 13 year performance then. What will be even funnier is to see where XRP's price is at that time, because it'll be $0.
Anonymous (ID: uaR9r1sX) No.60811077
>>60809399 (OP)
Top signal
Anonymous (ID: cxlqhq6f) No.60811452 >>60811468
>>60810589
>ok but XRP is down since 2018 instead of up, what gives with that? LINK is way up. What gives? lol.

see the chart tho
gains from 7 years ago can't help you
but if you do get a time machine, you should go back and buy the first share of the sp500


>>60810667
>>7 years to recover ATH

link hasn't recovered to its ath tho
see the chart

>>60810685
>I think you might be retarded,
says the guy down 5 years straight against the market
even a monkey throwing darts could beat that


>Since LINK goes back only to end of 2017, you need to start there so you're comparing properly.

L O L what???

so links initial pump counts but ripple's can't be counted
so by that logic i can launch a memecoin today and after it 5x's, i can say it's better than bitcoin
Anonymous (ID: a6Fkf91i) No.60811468 >>60811571
>>60811452
At some point LINK and PISSRP were worth the same 30 cents, we cashed out TOP and bough the BOTTOM, you are still at the BOTTOM and never be at the TOP, kek baggie
Anonymous (ID: puPZ3DST) No.60811480
>>60809399 (OP)
checked
Anonymous (ID: w0k2ecIT) No.60811564
the chainlink reserve finally spoonfed the tokenomics to the crypto normies
Anonymous (ID: cYTmIK1g) No.60811571 >>60811583
>>60811468
Over 80% of Link wallets are in the negative. 94% of XRP wallets are in profit
Anonymous (ID: nNINE3ka) No.60811576 >>60812140
>still needs to x2 to reclaim ATH
>still needs to x10 to beat XRP
>still needs to x30 for me to make it
Anonymous (ID: a6Fkf91i) No.60811583
>>60811571
>Over 80% of Link wallets are in the negative
Like I would care about other wallets belonging to retarted normies. /biz/ Linkies are up heavy. Keep coping and enjoy your 2x, not for too long though.
Anonymous (ID: puPZ3DST) No.60811591 >>60811604
>Over 80% of Link wallets are in the negative. 94% of XRP wallets are in profit
Anonymous (ID: a6Fkf91i) No.60811604
>>60811591
>LINK 25
>XRP barely holding 3 after case is over
Lmao
Anonymous (ID: urHhkjLS) No.60812060 >>60812545 >>60812582
>>60810667
>7 years of buying dirt cheap XRP
You niggers wish you could’ve bought LINK at 2.80 for 7 year, this is the case for XRP. I’m buying a house all cash and my dream car at $5, we are not broke.
Anonymous (ID: PaFUfu1k) No.60812140
>>60811576
But it will do all of those things, get excited
Anonymous (ID: /KlzCLCa) No.60812545
>>60812060
you could buy a mansion and fleet of cars if you swap for the cube standard, but you're obviously retarded
Anonymous (ID: a6Fkf91i) No.60812582
>>60812060
>buying a house all cash and my dream car at $5, we are not broke.
So you live in India? Lmaooo
Anonymous (ID: Pf9Q7Mk9) No.60812784
This 'link' you've posted is quite choice. Mind if I bookmark it?
Anonymous (ID: OH9ZjHny) No.60812834
>>60809399 (OP)
oooooh boy, let's see how this ages
Anonymous (ID: yNPBl2TO) No.60814017
>tfw 94% of XRP holders are in profit while the majority of Link holders are in the negative
>tfw when all the top coins are passing or at least near their all time highs and Link isn't even halfway there
>tfw XRP has 6xd since end of last year
>tfw even top arguer link fags literally have a highschool algebra level misunderstanding of how marketcap and capital flows work, and that 1x increase in principle generally translates to 10x in price which is set by the marginal bid and wealth is created through price transformation, not accumulated across 1:1 input value
>tfw this is not surprising whatsoever
Anonymous (ID: uaR9r1sX) No.60814062
Ok... but.. price!??????? Ohhhh.... and..... chart????
Anonymous (ID: UORrDbVX) No.60816028
>>60809693
your entire life is a scam.