>>60814730
>Imagine thats all you got going, shilling link and making it your personality.
I never understood the obsession people have with this fag, but from a professional standpoint he is doing quite well. There are 4 tiers:
>People who hold LINK & shill LINK professionally
Pretty sweet gig actually, I think most anons would if they could. If Sergey offered me a job arguing with retards on Twitter for money, I might finally make an X account.
>People who hold LINK & shill LINK for free
This is most of us here (if you consider discussing your investment as "shilling", which I know is what many of our dear fuddies believe). Doesn't really seem to require any cognitive dissonance to hold this position, it's pretty straightforward.
>People who hold LINK & FUD it
This is where it starts to get weird. Definitely some psychological thing going on here, possible trauma or other irl mental defects, but at least they will make it. Discussing Chainlink religiously makes sense if you hold it, even if it's only negative.
>People who don't hold LINK & FUD it
Objectively the weirdest people in this list, even more so if they made it their whole personality. Little financial gains to make (they never show shorts), only possible "positive" outcome is they get a "told you so" moment if LINK fails. Think they are in good company due to #3 but will be left in the dust by their compatriots when LINK hits 3 digits and beyond.
So out of all people to make LINK their personality, someone that is actually getting paid do it stands most to gain, and is therefore probably one of the lesser pathetic entities that roam the LINK community. Fuddies on the other hand...
>inb4 hi Zach
My god is not some 26 year old twatter eceleb, nor is he my arch nemesis. The only time he enters my consciousness is when you guys bring him up on /biz/. Re-evaluate your life if this child takes up so much of your headspace.
