>>60816057
40% of supply not circulating, but ripple is big dick energy while chainlink is incel energy. Ripple massive dumps donβt affect price because there is enough people willing to absorb the sell pressure which isnβt the case for chainlink
>>60816067
I don't really care to play allegiances, I am here to make money. If ripple cultists can't see the tide has now shifted and LINK is the place to make money, that's on them. It was great to be in Ripple the last few months, now it isn't anymore. Time to move on or stay poor. When LINK stops running, find the next thing. Simple as.
>>60816126
By the way its going, around 70 to 90 million links per year would place it at the good ol globohomo alien invasion date 2030, because ofc it does
>>60816155
POSTING THIS IMAGE ISN'T HELPING YOUR ARGUMENT, MY BROTHER.
NO ONE, AND I MEAN NO ONE, THOUGHT THEY WERE GOING TO COMINGLE AND DUMP BOTH THE NODE OPERATORS SUPPLY AND THEIR OWN CL LABS SUPPLY. TO SAY ANYTHING DIFFERENTLY IS REVISIONIST HISTORY
OH, AND CHECKED
>>60816208 >I wanted CLL to give those tokens to the node operators for free
Despite it being gay that they are not more transparant about this, how is gifting 350m tokens to node operators better than what is happening now?