Thread 60830839

It cant be more clear as day. He’s basically mocking Ripple’s old “Swell vs. Sibos” stunt, implying that Ripple’s attempt to challenge Swift didn’t amount to much.

Hes spelling it out for the low IQ retards that call themselves the "XRP army".

>>60830839 (OP)
swift lank xerp BANKS OOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
NIGGERBOARD INTENSIFIES!

>>60830839 (OP)
this is bullish for chainlink

>>60830839 (OP)
Tom is cocky. This time it's unironically different.

I'm really starting to warm up to this nigga, is he the inventor of Zcash?

>>60830858
Hes arrogant because he understands exactly who holds the power. Meanwhile, the XRP community bizarrely thinks they have some kind of leverage over TradFi, very odd.

Rent free, first get back to ATH, baggies.

>>60830891
Zoom out. The GENIUS ACT that had nothing to do with Ripple, marked your tippy top.

xrpaypigs live in a lala land and will refuse to acknolwedge this. they are unirocanilly posting about qanon and pizzagate in xsg right now kek. the most low iq investors on the internet

>>60830899
Nigger you zoom in on the HOURLY chart, you are mentally inept and GRASPING for literally annything to use an argument.

>>60830839 (OP)
This has literally nothing to do with Chainlink.

>>60830953
Youre literally on a downtrend right now.

>>60830983
>Youre literally on a downtrend right now.

>set chart to yearly
>60 cent to 2,8 dollar
>this is a downtrend

>>60831031
Still worth less than in 2018. Not sure what youre bragging about.

>>60830839 (OP)
Tom is unironically an actual Link marine. Incredible to have such an ally from a pretty high place. He knows actual Link culture and lowkey acknowledges Linkies on twitter.

>>60830839 (OP)
saarr this is illegal post! ! xrp have many good supporter ! y u fude good coin ? block chain tech

stop posting ripple hate on fourm or u be reported

>>60831041
That reasoning certainly applies to link.
Kek baggie what are you doing bro.

>>60831093
whos talking about chainlink?

>>60831093
gm kumar have u took u r morning street shit and came back to defend your scam coin, xrpoo?

>>60830839 (OP)
I imagine the largest fax machine company CEO also disliked the inventor of email. Lol The XRP thesis isn't that it will be used by SWIFT, it is that it may temporarily buy that it will replace SWIFT. The endgame of this is SWIFT becomes unneeded and irrelevant and tapered out unless it discovers some new way to do things that is somehow a generational leap in technology from what they have. GPI is a huge cope flop. SWIFT is legacy tech in a generational death rattle eeking out its last few drops of necessity as it reaches technical obsolescence. Their best product doesn't come within 1/100 of competing from an actual performance (speed/cost) perspective. Whether you like XRP or whether XRP succeeds or not this is true.

>>60831116
>Projecting this hard
XRP is the Christian coin. Linkies are the jews of the crypto community who argue and message like permanently butthurt and repressed leftists.

>>60831110
Cope incel

>>60832154
HAHHAHAHAAHAH OH LINKIES OH NO NO NO HAHAHAHAHAHAA

>>60830839 (OP)
Chainlink is the chosen one.

>>60831116
The irony. Fucking Kek.

>>60830839 (OP)
Where did he say he dislikes xrp?

>>60832154
https://x.com/RippleXity/status/1958446177013108866

Look how stupid your community is. Calling you guys retards, is an insult to actual retards

>>60832282
Chainlink literally had to launch a campaign to try and distance themselves from you cause you creepy ass ugly incels scare normies away. Kek

>>60832299
That moron literally linked the swift trials. Did he even read it? lol

https://www.swift.com/news-events/news/live-trials-digital-asset-transactions-swift-start-2025

actually weird how he now seems so invested in chainlink winning, you'd think swift would remain more neutral but he's all in

>>60832154
>>60832165
>>60832299

>>60832601
He is desperate for narrative steam to remain behind CCIP because it underperforms from a technical perspective and being so dominant, in an era of disruption and evolution in their space, they can only hemorrhage users at faster or lower rates and hope for the disruptors to be banned by less amenable admins (won't happen given legislation that will be done by end of this year).

>>60830839 (OP)
>noooo we have to use XRP because 800+ partners are planning on using it its not fair no no no no nooooo!!!

>>60832601
why would he be neutral on a thing they invented?

>>60830839 (OP)
The xrp vs link battle intensifies, lmao. Good entertainment. I will buy more useless and pepe, though, not touching either with a ten foot pole :)

>>60833258
It isn't so much a battle as it is XRP never thinking about link and link influencers talking about XRP more than link without exception or cease and XRP influencers responding to a recent turbo-astroturfed paid marketing campaign, never having mentioned them before across years.

>>60833311
Maybe people are just tired of hearing fake news from the XRP community?

>>60833311
Checked as FUCK

>>60833342
Maybe you are projecting and irrelevant and desperate for attention by parasiting onto a real project? Otherwise if you are so confident, why act so nervous and insecure as a literal baseline identity?

>>60833342
Maybe you're desperate to try and attach yourself to the number 3 crypto in the world

>>60833311
You've been crying about this for 2 weeks now. Chainlink is gaining steam, and the closest peer (in terms of trying to reach the same institutional audience, even if the products differ) it can punch up to is XRP. A crypto that, objectively speaking, is NOT further ahead than Chainlink, but has 10x its marketcap. It's a no-brainer to compare the two if you're the underdog in this situation. So much to gain.

And of course, being the #3 crypto and currently peaking, XRP has much more to lose. I would be getting anxious too.

>>60833403
Link isn't even in the top 10

>>60832137
Damn dude this is written like a child or just someone with literally zero real world understanding. Do XRP holders really believe that some fly by night crypto with zero adoption is suddenly going to erase 200 years of banking infrastructure that has been built? Even if this somehow even brought value to the system (it wouldn’t) the timeline alone would be enough to destroy any potential business case.

>>60830858
Yeah it's obvious that Swift is going live this year. Gonna be fun.

>>60833409
Irrelevant. There is nothing of substance between LINK and ETH. Just stablecoins, ghost chains, memecoins and scam exchange tokens.

>>60833363
>>60833361
No, ripple is trying to attach itself to Chainlink and Swift. See link
https://x.com/RippleXity/status/1958446177013108866

Why did Ripple announce Swell AFTER chainlink announced Smartcon?

I have just shy of 3000 LINK.

>>60830839 (OP)
Extremely bullish for XRP. Swift is literally shaking in fear and hates XRP because XRP is huge competition that is to replace swift as the standard

>>60833484
>XRP is huge competition
Theyre not even competition to Ethereum lol

>>60833484
XRP's purpose is to drain retail liquidity that would otherwise flow into LINK.

>>60833491
Simple as.

>>60833464
Because they are competing against SWIFT? Lol What a revelation. They did the same for SIBOS one year. SWIFT is salty over it. Meanwhile Brad posed with SirGay in the pic SirGay posted from the VP dinner and XRP influencers never even mentioned link until the new heavyhanded paid anti-xrp marketing campaign and targeted attack. link people talk about XRP more than anything and it isn't even close. If confident, why act so insecure and be so annoying/weird?

>>60833403
It objectively is ahead of link. Your company is not your token. You get 2 weeks of good price action after a probably million spent on low level influencer engagement after XRP 6xd 7 months ago while link did nothing and link sat still for years currently 50+% below its ATH and you act smug. It is kind of unreal and hilarious.

>>60833948
Why would a crypto with the marketcap of XRP talk about LINK? Of course they didn't. But then Sergey and Brad were both vying for Washington's attention, and this is where the banter started.

Having much more to lose against an underdog like Chainlink, xerpies have been rightfully getting nervous about this development and the banter seems like a real threat to them. Good. I think it might be a real threat as well.

>>60833981
>Why would a crypto with the marketcap of XRP talk about LINK?
Why would Ripple pick the EXACT same date as Smartcon for their event?

>>60830839 (OP)
we all hate cripple
chainshit isn't much better either

>>60833464
Ripple Swell has been going on longer than chainshit has even existed, it’s annual and every single year all of the big boys from central banks and IMF/BIS/world bank show up.

>>60834030
Because they are scared, obviously.

>>60834055
But what's the point? Chainlink's event will mog them to oblivion. It's not a good look. I think they fucked up honestly.

>>60834075
They poached that Ryan Rugg chick. Easy to do when you know all the big wigs are in the city anyway.

>>60834045
the real big boys will be at smartcon tho

>>60833948
>Because they are competing against SWIFT?
You have to be pretty low IQ to believe this narrative lol

>>60834045
So same day, same month, and same city? Do they have buses ready to shuttle them over too?

>>60834119
LMAO!!!!!

MOST OF CHAINLINK SHILLS ARE EXPOSING THEMSELVES AS BASEMENT-DWELLING NEETS WHO HAVE NO IDEA HOW ACTUAL BUSINESSES OPERATE
MANY TIMES, CORPORATIONS HOLD THEIR EVENTS IN THE SAME CITY AT THE SAME TIME TO MAKE THINGS EASIER FOR THE ATTENDEES/GUESTS. THIS IS ESPECIALLY TRUE IF THERE IS CROSSOVER BETWEEN THE TWO EVENTS AND THERE ARE SPEAKERS COMING IN FROM DIFFERENT CITIES, COUNTRIES, ETC.

>>60834208
>Chainlink decides
>Ripple obeys
Sounds about right.
QNT foodtruck vibes.

>>60834208
Has Ripple ever booked their event the same day and city as chainlink before? Or is this the first time?

>>60834240
COULDNT TELL YOU, BROTHER. I DONT GIVE A SHIT ABOUT RIPPLE

>>60834248
The answer is they havent.

>>60834208
Be that as it may, this was a pretty obvious power move by Ripple lmao. I respect it. It means they see Chainlink as a serious player, too.

>>60834577
>power move
Checked but i don’t think so. More like desperation

>>60832299
literally me