>>60839477
one approach would be solving tasks through writing verifiable programs covered with tests - ai will keep fucking it up until it gets a correctly working program, and after that the program will always output correct results and will verifiably have no bugs
the other approach would be using unsupervised ai in tasks where a wrong/dumb answer wouldn't cause any significant harm (ai overviews, 90% of 6-figure white collar jobs etc)
the third approach is a human in the loop - ai does the work, a human does the usually easier job of verifying it