Thread 60840433

>>60840433 (OP)
Cripples will suffer

Linkies will ascend

>>60840433 (OP)
Hilarious to see SWIFT cope like this. There will be wailing and gnashing of teeth.

>>60840457
I'm sure the international banking cartel feels very threatened by a ghostchain scam for uber drivers

>>60840479
They feel threatened enough to name it. Linkshills feel threatened enough to name and fud it on a daily basis.

If its a ghostchain with no relevance, why talk about it?

it’s really happening this year isn’t it

>>60840479
They certainly doth protest too much. Every link influencer talks about XRP more than link and never haven't and no XRP influencer even mentioned link until the recent coordinated paid promotion with everyone having the same talking points pre-pump at the same time suddenly one day. Ripple's product outperforms SWIFT, so do a number of other disruptors despite their best efforts. GPI is a huge cope flop. SWIFT is legacy tech in a generational death rattle eeking out its last few drops of necessity as it reaches technical obsolescence. Whether you like XRP or whether XRP succeeds or not this is true. With Ripplenet community banks can literally outperform SWIFT correspondent eurodollar banks in international remittances with easy to use and deploy and maintain software.

>>60840535
>no XRP influencer even mentioned link
bro they literally moved the date of their conference to coincidence with smartcon that's how scared ripple is of a project with 0.1x their mcap

>>60840534
It is

>paragraphs of xrptard seethe
lmao

>>60840535
>>60840489
I love this line of reasoning, like it's so unusual to notice and discuss how fucking retarded crypto retail is and how successful ripple's been in deluding them. Literally everything between LINK and ETH is useless and/or redundant. Why *not* focus on the most egregious example? LINK is literally doing everything XRP originally said it would, valuations simply have yet to reflect it.

>>60840433 (OP)
This has literally nothing to do with Chainlink.

>>60840457
>>60840489
>>60840535
>you are so obsessed with us o algo
KEEEEEEEEEEEK OH NO NO NO DO XERPIES REALLY

>>60840535
You're like a broken record. Did you just copy your posts from yesterday en verbatim?

>muh influencers
>muh coordinated paid promotion
>muh disruptors
>muh gpi is a flop
>muh swift legacy tech
>muh "death rattle eeking out"

Word for word.

>make event to compete with sibos
>fail
>move event to compete with smartcon
hmm i wonder what will happen. pretty weird and creepy thing by ripple too. so obsessed with us linkchads.

>>60840688
https://warosu.org/biz/?task=search&ghost=&search_text=%22death%20rattle%20eeking%22
kek

>>60840654
>it's so unusual to notice and discuss how fucking retarded crypto retail
That sweet sweet linker copium

It def has nothing to do with links mcap being near ath and the price being half of what it was at ath.

My point is even more validated with the copeline. If it actually are retards pumping xrp, why even pay attention to it?

The advocates write books on x about it like butthurt little faggots. Weird thing to do if you "winning" annyway and its a matter of time. What a weird way to spend your time.

>>60840433 (OP)
Absolutely mogged. The xrp community wanted their shoutout and they got it. Once again it’s all true, Tom hates ripple. He will do everything in his power to destroy Bradley. SIBOS is soon, get your popcorn ready.

>>60840535
Your sophistry will be your downfall

https://x.com/SMQKEDQG/status/1959591100995248160
Look at this shit. Is this retardation or actual malice? With cripples you can never tell.

>>60840804
He's got that schizo austism.

Everything he reads reinforces his own vision of what is happening.

SWIFT publicly working with chainlink? It's just cover for XRP.

Delusion.

>>60840433 (OP)
Checked

>>60840535
Honestly I can’t tell if XRP holders are kidding or not when they say stuff like this. It would take 50 years or more to replace SWIFT. There is way too much legacy architecture tied to it at this point, you would need hundreds of systems to fundamentally change. It makes zero business sense vs SWIFT simply adapting with Chainlink. If it were to ever happen, which it won’t, you all will be long dead before it does. It seems like it XRP holders really believe this line of thought they might just be a bunch of zoomies with no real world experience at best, or worst case maybe actually just very low IQ.

>>60840433 (OP)
>>60840439
>>60840457
>>60840479
>>60840489

This is about XRP retards not chainlink

>>60841036
they're literally single digit iq >>60840804

>>60840433 (OP)
Anyone know why Brad hasn't been in the white house lately?

>>60841036
If they (everyone not just ripple) wanted to replace swift they could do it sooner than 50 years, but saying that I don't think Ripple will ever replace swift but it will take a chunk out of the pie.

>>60841161
> but it will take a chunk out of the pie.
Says who? Brad?

>>60841581
Just my opinion, i don't really listen to what the CEO says about their Company of course they are going to be talking it up.

>>60841680
>just my opinion
Ohhhhhh you’re retarded. Thanks for clarifying

>>60841161
It's really not that simple. There are SO many pieces of tech, processes, jobs, etc. that would need to change. That's not the kind of thing that happens quickly. Look at blockchain, just to get to "sling shitcoins across shitchains!" it took well over a decade and that's without needing to rewire any existing elements. Now imagine taking 200+ years of infrastructure and taking a piece of tech that has existed for the last 50 years as a core part of that infrastructure and then just ripping that out. Everything breaks. You can't just plug something new in its place. It is both way easier and way more cost effective to simply adapt SWIFT to blockchain use cases, which as we know is exactly what is happening. And the latter is the key. Banks are businesses. They want to make MONEY. They're not going to spend an absurd amount of money completely upending everything they've built so that they can... use a dead half baked centralized "blockchain" project. There's no business case for it. There is a massive business case for SWIFT to be the rails for tokenized assets. It's very simple.

>>60840804
Actually sad really

>>60840717
Lmao the same level of desperation is in every single post.
Cripples are well and truly the biggest batch of fuckin cooked losers on this board, second only to bsvjeets.

>>60840545
It's because the same people are in on both scams in large degree. Makes sense.

>>60841036
Once they get a banking license I'll immediately use them as my bank and enjoy minimum 2% decrease in all my processing fees.
Businesses all over will do this because we're being raped non stop, day in and day out.

>>60844215
So first we were losers because of no price action. And now we are losers even though we all got rich?
lmao

>>60845139
How did you get rich off a 6x while the rest of the market did 25x+? You put $500k into XRP at the bottom? You were already rich then. Everybody is laughing at you because you DIDN'T get rich while the rest of us did. You could have been buying literally anything else and done better unless you're a completely new market participant in which case you weren't going to get rich off anything except memecoins.

>>60845440
No, I got rich by turning 2019 and many other shit coin gains into XRP at .25-.40 for years on end.
So I turned many many many 10-20x's into XRP and then it went up 3-5x as well.

The reason I won is because I gambled on obvious shit in order to stack long term valuable assets.
It's a timing thing. You must lack it.

You take big profits and rotate them into the next thing that will have big profits. But you do it with something less risky and more obvious because you are already way up.

I'm sorry you live permanently in one timeline.

I'm in the "stack ICP timeline" now if you want a tip.

>>60840804
i think he's just dumb and doesn't know how to read english properly. if not then it was a good troll.