Thread 60845315

its time to let it go
link is a shitcoin

>>60845315 (OP)
ok schizo

>>60845315 (OP)
stop nooticing

>>60845346
those are men. You also can't call someone "Schizo" when you show you visual, undeniable evidence. That makes YOU the schizo.

>>60845315 (OP)
>My ERC20 shitcoin is important because it is ok?!?!?!?

meds retard

>>60845315 (OP)
yep, its not going above 26, basically confirmed, what a pathetic ath for this cycle lmao

>>60845393
I don't know if it's important, but for some reason it is absolutely dictating Bitcoin moves.

>>60845395
I bet you blame Sergey right?

Why don’t you short btc when you see this?

>>60845315 (OP)
>>60845350
>>60845388

Meds and deprogramming.

You link bagholders sound so much like the retards holding stacks of silver
Next step you'll be blaming jpmorgan for manipulation of price lmao

>>60845423
If my chart is fake, then post the real one.
Has to be that exact timeframe (Aug 15 to today)

>>60845407
I don't blame anyone because all I can do is merely react to a simple fact that seems to be a law of nature at this point: Link cannot pump and will not reach its previous ath ever again. Doesn't really matter who's to blame actually because its so far outside my ability to do anything about it as a single investor. It would be much more retarded to dwell on this fact and point fingers, come up with coordinated btc dumping theories, etc... you may be right or wrong about why but the simple fact remains: it will not pump and therefore is retarded as an investment. It simply cannot pump.

>>60845488
>Link cannot pump
>Doesn't really matter who's to blame

Of course it matters.

>>60845315 (OP)
Classic

I wonder when they finally let it run

>>60845488
/thread

>>60845521
Except Link can and does pump, all the time.
And then Bitcoin dumps the entire market.

>>60845407
nigga alts and btc always move alike lmao

your shitcoin is not even in the top 10

just how retarded are you? for real how stupid are you?

>>60845488
YOUR SHITCOIN IS NOT EVEN IN THE TOP 10 HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAH

YOU THINK BTC HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH AN ERC20 SHITCOIN MADE BY FAT RUSSIAN SCAMMER HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAH

Linkies
>Link is being suppressed so i can not break out.
Also linkies:
>Buy link its a good investment

>>60845530
>alts and btc always move alike
We got a real big brain here guys

>>60845528
You sit through it like a good cuck every single time too, and will continue to do so for the next 20 years while shadow mega elites send links value against btc to near zero. But no worries, you win because you've identified a trend in how its being done!

>>60845537
>it does pump
>but then it dumps
they are literal morons

>>60845552
>>60845550
>>60845533
Why are you so emotional about this, and trying to make it personal?
I'm just posting an objectively observable phenomenon.

>>60845560
>dudes stop attacking me
cry more bitch loool

>Dude, the #1 crypto with 2.21$T marketcap is used to manipulate my 16$B marketcap shitcoin
You can't be serious right now.

>>60845630
>>Dude, the #1 crypto with 2.21$T marketcap is used to manipulate my 16$B marketcap shitcoin
Either that or the most statistically improbable chain of events in the history of line charts has been unfolding these past five years.

>>60845641
Man, at this point, just take your meds.

>>60845658
Will that make reality go away?

>>60845641
Ever consider the assets may just have correlated movements in price? This is like saying SPX is rigged to manipulate the price of AAL

>>60845663
Price correlations like in OP are statistically a virtual impossibility.
Yet in the case of Link it's been happening for half a decade.

>>60845661
your delusions are not reality, dude
you need your medication

This thread is more proof for me.
Just look at >>60845601.
Its just a reaction gif that he had to search for of anime girls laughing at the person he replied to. It's an extremely feminine emotional attack.

>>60845679
>delusions
If the chart in OP is somehow not real, then post the real one.
Same assets, same timeframe.

>>60845684
the chart may be real, but your broken, feeble mind is finding patterns there that don't exist

>>60845691
>finding patterns there that don't exist

Every time Link went over $26, Bitcoin dumped.
Show that chart to anyone and they will reach the exact same conclusion.

>>60845315 (OP)
you're looking at it wrong imo. link shows btc without the fluff hiding whats really going on. link on aug 22, you know the next peak is gonna dump, and what do you know, shitcorn dumped despite not showing it coming. link has no fat to hide whats happening, corn does.

>>60845672
>Price correlations like in OP are statistically a virtual impossibility.
No they aren't, you are making the assumption the assets are uncorrelated and then when reality contradicts you you exclaim that there must be fraud. The reality is that the assets are correlated, or more accurately LINK is highly correlated to ETH moreso than BTC, but ETH is highly correlated to BTC, and thus LINK is also highly correlated to BTC.

>>60845705
:( it's just sad seeing someone as broken as you
i will pray for you, man
good luck out there

>>60845730
>you are making the assumption the assets are uncorrelated
That's not an assumption, they clearly are.

>>60845737
>shows a chart showing clear price correlations
>entire thread is about how BTC's price is correlated with LINK in a apparent attempt to drag down the price of LINK
>...
>These assets are clearly uncorrelated
???

>>60845747
correlation =/= correlation

>>60845747
They are correlated I mean.
I misread your phrasing because it makes no sense.

>>60845757
Then why are you surprised that when BTC falls LINK goes with it?

>>60845759
I'm definitely not kek

Shit Tyrone, what are you doing?

>>60845764
I don't really understand your point then, you understand that the prices of two assets are highly correlated with each other (for whatever reason) and then you think that larger and more difficult to move market is being rigged to drag down the smaller and easier to move market.

My question to you is, if MMs conspiratorially wanted to keep LINK below $26, why not just short sell LINK or play games with the order book depth such to depress LINK's price? Why go through BTC as an intermediary?

chainlink may gain prominence over bitcoin

>>60845777
>I don't really understand your point then
Clearly.

Holy check btw

>>60845784
>Holy check btw
Kek is on my side of the argument :^)

>>60845787
Your side of the argument is "I don't understand your side" lmao

>>60845315 (OP)
The same market makers who are pumping and dumping link are the ones also dumping Bitcoin. They ride Bitcoin up cycle their gains through link, then dump both it and Bitcoin. This happens with a lot of coins but you gay retards make it all about you.

>>60845804
>then dump both it and Bitcoin
And apparently these people purposely wait for specific Link price levels to do it.

>>60845811
>Omg people have prices they like to sell at? Wtf is this witchcraft??
It's called the limit order button dipshit.

>>60845819
Isn't it weird for people to set their Bitcoin sell orders at Link price levels?

>>60845811
Or is your problem just that market makers don't have a price target of a jillionty dollars and are selling before you do?

>>60845315 (OP)
Ethereum doesn't seem to be having this trouble :)

>>60845827
Link was $12 three months ago you baby

>>60845840
We were talking about market makers dumping Bitcoin whenever Link hits 26

>>60845315 (OP)
it's the binance niggers most likely,

>>60845844
You mean Link has been crabbing in the same price range for a month, the same time Bitcoin and the entire market has been crabbing?

>>60845859
Link has only been crabbing there because Bitcoin dumped every time it tried to go higher.

>>60845863
Link is up 34% against Bitcoin in the last month you whiny baby

>>60845878
And it would've been a lot higher if not for the obvious suppression.

Assuming btc dumps when link pumps, how come link went recently from $15to $25?

>>60845922
Because Bitcoin didn't suppress it along the way.

>>60845315 (OP)
You're retarded. You can see just before your little boxes that when btc pumps, link pumps and when btc dumps, link dumps.
You can pull up any altcoin chart and all these peaks and valleys would match with btc.
You are a loser who can't admit to himself that he fucked up.
>waaaaaah everything is plotting against me and suppressing my shitcoin!!!
You sound like a nigger blaming everything on racism, instead of just admitting they're a dumb lazy nigger

>>60845932
ok, why not then and why now? Is it easier to suppress at a higher price?

>>60845936
>>60845759
What is even wrong with you people kek

>>60845963
This shit has happened at lower prices too.
Bitcoin kept Link under 9 for like 18 months during 2022-2023.

>>60845963
In case you weren't paying attention, yesterdays bitcoin dump caused Chainlink's weekly candle to close under major resistance instead of above it. Whether that is significant is up for debate, whether this was intentional is up for debate. What isn't up for debate is that it happened.
>Is it easier to suppress at a higher price?
Yes, this weekly candle just signaled that Chainlink will most likely move down to the bottom of its current range (about $12-$15), and will probably take a few months to attempt another test of the resistance. IF there is any actual suppression going on, suppression to paint the map in a certain way at key points is way easier to achieve than to attempt to suppress an asset at every daily candle.

>>60845863
Btc causes all alts to pump, when it dumps all the alts dump.
Bnb has a very similar chart to link, you can just as easily say btc is suppressing bnb.
How can you say its all about link when literally every altcoin is being prevented from going higher each time btc dumps.
Obsessed schizo baggies with main character syndrome

>>60845922
>>60845932
LINK is heavily traded against ETH (both in perps and directly via the LINKETH pair, particularly on DEXs), and ETH mooned due to stablecoin mania centered around Tom Lee's BMNR.

>>60846007
>when it dumps all the alts dump.
That's the point, James.

Stop posting and lurk more.

>>60846012
Why wouldn't MMs just short the alts directly? It would be cheaper than manipulating BTC's price and accomplish the same objective of "suppressing the price".

>>60846016
Who knows.
Shorts on specific alts would be a lot easier to track and trace than just general Bitcoin dumps.

>>60846007
>you can just as easily say btc is suppressing bnb.
You know what, post a chart like in OP for BNB.
Show Bitcoin dumping every time BNB reaches a specific price.

We'll be here anxiously waiting, ganbatte ne!

>>60846023
Not really, order books and onchain trading are transparent regardless of whether it is BTC, ETH, and LINK. The only exception is if the exchange hosting the order book is lying to you and hiding orders to have a competitive advantage over other traders with its internal MM bot.

>>60846037
>Not really
lol

>>60846051
Explain how, in the absence of fraud by the exchange, how an order book is not transparent?

>>60846061
Order books show someone dumping, yes.
But a dump is just a flash in the pan.

A short on the other hand is a more long-term position that people would be able to keep track of.
Especially in Defi.

Reminder that suppression deniers have yet to show a single chart where this phenomenon happens to any other coin. And no, long term charts don’t count (they’ve tried that angle before)

>>60845339
>You wanna let go? Grab something backed by real world adoption, UTK.

Link just follows ETH

The dumps at $9 a couple years ago were even more obvious

>>60846657
the first 3 really werent tho
june was the final cefi liquidation, august was every market local peak and dump ndx went down too and nov was ftx
unless of course you are arguing that all 3 events were orchestrated just to suppress link

>>60846657
Lol good times. Chainlink is really the main character isn't it?

>>60847490
>unless of course you are arguing that all 3 events were orchestrated just to suppress link
yes

>>60845730
>LINK is highly correlated to ETH
WRONG you stupid motherfucker

>>60847490
Shit happens almost every day. Fact of the matter is Link hit 9 USD four times spread out over a whole year, and Bitcoin dumped from random levels each of those times.
That shit does not happen, statistically speaking.

>>60847731
>Bitcoin dumped from random levels
>random
i am arguing if there is a very clear macro event for the dumping of btc than it is in fact not random
you really are arguing here that ftx was collapsed just because link hit 9 or that the cefi liquidation happened just because link hit 9, i even forgot which was the last one to fall in june
damn it has been 3 years already

BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS HOW YOU DOING BASED KIDDOS POOLS FUCKING CLOSED FUCKING SEETHE

>>60845315 (OP)
Oddly similar to USELESS... What a bizarre coincidence... I wonder if unipcs has anything to say about this.
>>60845393
Thanks for the chuckle, anon.

>>60847908
You do know how history is written, don't you?

WHEN WILL THE SUPPRESSION END THIS ISN'T FAIR STOP IIIITTTTTTTTTTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

>>60848205
>oddly similar to
Not even remotely comparable you retard.

>>60848230
lmao, thanks for the laffs, friendo.
>4I4h2i6h

>>60845315 (OP)
>from completely RANDOM price points

CONGRATULATION EVERYBODY
Market Maker Moscow Brokerages must be pretty frigtened that this doesn't look like their usual DAX/NASDAQ/... stop loss hunting scam

>>60845315 (OP)
Here you go from a previous thread, some tip on who's suppressing link, unverified.

>>60847908
So a whole series of historic events just happened to happen every time Link hits a certain price?

>>60850214
>registered in London

Chainlink baggies are deranged schizophrenics who would rather blame a nefarious Bitcoin cabal and a random Balkan country like Bulgaria rather than admit they got scammed by an obese philosophy graduate.

This is why you'll ALWAYS be poor. kek baggies

>>60845315 (OP)
Anon by this logic ETH crashed BTC. You're retarded.

>>60850270
Show Bitcoin crashing at specific ETH levels over and over.

>>60850285
your 2017 erc-20 shitcoin will never pump no matter how much you SEETHE on 4chan

>>60845533
Of course its not in the top 10. No other coin has bitcoin absolutely nuke when it hits an important level of resistance. Thats not Bitcoins resistance level by the way - Bitcoin is reacting to LINKS resistance level....

>>60848624
A few of these are early ripple investors, pre-dating link’s existence. Interesting.

>>60850543
Seems to match with the fact that we found out just last month that all the biggest Link fud spammers are ripplefags.

>>60850794
Also jives with chainlinks recent pushback and the stuff Tom has been posting lately. I think they knew all along and this recent public display from CLL and Tom is a sign they are going for the kill now and things are ready

>>60850543
Whoever’s suppressing link is doing so with the help of CLL. Perhaps the link vs xrp battle is entirely orchestrated, perhaps the plan was always for both to succeed

>>60845315 (OP)
Reminder that I predicted this after the very first of those suppression dumps in OP pic

>>60852242
>Whoever’s suppressing link is doing so with the help of CLL

>>60845315 (OP)
How do you know Chainlink isn't one of the players doing the dumping? Keep the scam up, keep the baggies thinking it's because of poor BTC performance.
You blame Bitcoin for where Link is. If it weren't for that damn Bitcoin my Link would be werf a millie!! If you think "they're" dumping BTC to suppress Link, how do you know Chainlink isn't one of the players dumping BTC?

>>60852502
>Keep the scam up, keep the baggies thinking it's because of poor BTC performance.

Think for two seconds xerpie, what possible benefit would that give?
How does keeping the price low help "keep the scam up"?

>>60852549
Xerpies and fuddies lack second order reasoning.