>>60846963
Could be
Can you show us all where the trend invalidating dump occurred exactly, bobo?
Has to be at least a timeframe that includes the halving, no 1m chart bullshit
>>60847366
It doesn't feel like denial for me right now anon. It feels like > "finally what what the fuck it took way longer than expected this time and what the fuck was up with these massive dead cat bounces fuck man I was sidelined waiting for this shit to dump."