>>60852849
It did exist, wonder why they pulled it. Basically Lutnick saying they're putting treasury data feeds on chain so government orgs can use it with their own on chain products.
>>60852662 (OP)
unless these reporter scumbags add Chainlink (ticker: $LINK) on their publications then this could be done via any other oracle/protocol. it could've built in house by them. it could be XRP or whatever the fuck. it could be SON. DOGE. anything. >none of those shitcoins play a part in this narrative retard
neither does chainlink judging by trump's treatment of sergay a few months ago on camera, lmao. a pat on the shoulder and a few nods. i smell a huge dump if this is a nothingburger not involving chainlink, be careful linkies, you know your token dumps the hardest.
>>60853537
They said for "verifiable data." They are not using it for anything except data feeds in their ethereum specific stablecoin, and not in the XRP specific one or in other services, which they use other oracle providers for.
>>60852662 (OP)
It's unbelievable how LINK's biggest flaw is so simple. Chainlink's biggest customers are CENTRALIZED. This means they are centrally controlled. For example, the US Commerce Department is a single source of truth. Therefore the Department can publish truth data directly on the blockchain, completely circumventing Chainlink and its technology. The technology is not needed. It is a lolbertarian fantasy which fortunately will never come to fruition.
>>60853537 >call Chainlink the standard
For a price feed on their stablecoin
Chainlink is needed to accurately show the astronomic price increase of XRP.
Just like it will bring all the value to the XRPL
Just like it will enable defi for RLUSD and XRP on eth.
We thank chainlink for bringing value to the xrpl.
the future is multichain
>>60853176
Of course you do. Are you retarded?
If you only use a single oracle for that source, and that oracle is compromised, then the data isn't getting on chain.