>>60855957
Selling the airdrop was obviously the rational thing to do.
>dude SXT is like link in 2018
Then why would you not sell all your LINK and go all in on SXT?
>but what if it goes up as much as the UNI airdrop?
UNI didnt go up BECAUSE it was an airdrop. UNI went up because market conditions were different back then and it would have went up if there was no airdrop but instead was simply listed on exchanges.
>dude its backed by Microsoft
Yeah and Chainlink is backed by Swift and look how that turned out. Even if I cared enough to do research on SXT and even if I found that it was very fundamentally sound that doesn't translate to positive price action.
>it was given to me for free so I can't lose any money
Its not really free if CLL dumps LINK to fund the early development of Build projects. If CLL gifted all stakers some Dogecoin, would it make sense to hold onto that? How about if they gifted some ETH?
>its a good way to diversify my crpto portfolio which previously was 100% in LINK.
Before the SXT airdrop, you have always had the option to not be 100% in LINK. There are thousands of cryptos you can buy at any time. The reason many people here are 100% in LINK is because they feel that the risk/reward of LINK outweighs any other crypto. The fact that someone gifted them a shitcoin does not change the risk/reward of LINK vs other coins. Following that logic, it would only make sense to dump SXT and buy LINK.
The only possible situation where it would have made sense to hold SXT is if Chainlink stakers were the only ones who had SXT tokens and were the only ones who could stake them. But alas, SXT was listed on all exchanges immediantly after the aidrop so any old normgroid had access to it, therefore there existed no edge. Therefore SXT is no different than any other shitcoin which may or may not go up for any number of reasons. I'm not in the buisness of trying to predict the market movement of shitcoins. Thats why I just hold LINK.
