Thread 60880685

>>60880685 (OP)
Jesus, another 600M.
The last one was only two weeks ago.

Ripple dumped more on their holders in two weeks than Sergey does in a whole ass year.

truly the cucks of crypto

>>60880695
I-it’s for the secret treasury! Also they are paying for the lawsuit that they lost but now will pump to $37500 by end of year if they just dump a little more on retail, I’m guessing you didn’t dyor its so obvious, check YouTube and instagram.

>>60880706
No, they had 10x this bull, icp are the cucks of crypto and kinkiest take 2nd place

>>60880790
>kinkiest

*Linkes*. The fuck autocorrect

>>60880685 (OP)
Are you new niggers? That is what every slow exit scam shitcoin doing, dumping it's never ending supply every week/month/year, till the cult is maintenable.

>>60880768
And don't forget, it's not the team dumping which is way more despicable! For XRP it's actually the founders who have huge chunks of the XRP float that they dump regularly, and that is less damaging than the Chainlink team subsidizing the network, because subsidizing is le bad. Chainlink is way worse for saying they will use 35% of the supply to incentivize the network and then turn around to do exactly that. They should be thrown in prison. I'd rather my founders personally dump the tokens and use them to buy luxury cars.

Just look at how disgusting they are

>>60880768
Actually the cope was
>the 200M XRP is staying in that wallet
>ok so it got moved out, but it's not going to exchanges
>ok so some of it is going to exchanges, but not a lot

But it was a lot. Millions per day, every day.

>>60880810
Actually I'm pretty sure this is a Ripple Labs wallet.
The personal dumps from the founders are in addition to this.

>>60880685 (OP)
Ripple haven't sold to retail in over 5 years. Terrible failed forced meme of that bug eyed guy.

What is with all the XRP attacks lately? /xsg/ has become unbearable

>>60880695
Chainlink sells/distributes more link (relative to its total supply) because:
~45-50% of 1 billion link (~450-500M tokens) has been sold/distributed via ICO (35% in 2017). Ripple sells less XRP relative to its supply (~20-25%) of 100 billion XRP (~20-25B tokens) sold, mostly via escrow releases (200-500M XRP/month) and ODL partnerships. Ripple sells exclusively to partners and ODL users. CLL just dumps on you. Ripple controls less than half of total supply. Link isn't even 20% sustainable by native revenues. CLL lied about the tokenomics and comingled 2/3 of the entire float and have been selling directly to retail and dumping on you and eating your savings to make payroll and inflate business and payrolls and... by inflating supply selling directly to you. They have already done a huge share.

>>60880830
Escrow unlocks every month automatically without Ripple control. Sometimes they sell (exclusively to partners, not retail, unlike CLL who dump on retail), sometimes they relock. Every few months, retards rediscover or commodify a feature of the XRPL that everyone in the commuity has known about for a decade and think/larp like you uncovered some deep gem fud. Lol DESPERATE

>>60881547
you have to be insane to believe thats true

who do you think pays the thousands of paid shills? they make no revenue so obviously they're paid by selling tokens

>>60881547
>Ripple haven't sold to retail in over 5 years
It's all being sold to retail, this wallet is just two transactions down from the 200 million XRP transaction in OP: rBNCyNEwpaEbGP9nqkQeYcvwYAwwKkRzTR
and it sent more than 8 million XRP to Binance just today.

You can't draw a single breath without lying you jew snake.

>>60881618
It objectively inarguably is true per the SEC themselves. See pic related in:
https://warosu.org/biz/thread/60854424#p60854805

>>60881628
They sell to clients through blind bid/ask on exchange order books to intermediate direct offering and prevent a securities contract and have since May 2020. You are objectively wrong because you don't even know how their business is structured. See archive in >>60881630.

>>60881645
>sell to clients through blind transactions

How do they know who the fuck they're selling to when the transactions are blind?

>>60881650
The clients are blind. They know who they are.

>>60881628
If Chainlink stopped dumping the comingled supply on you for cash exfil and subsidizing the operators with crumbs, the network would cease literally instantly.

>>60881650
They arrange it in a demand neutral way, which the SEC has ruled is demand neutral. If they were to sell directly to them through exchange the EXACT specific tokens, it could be construed (esp. by prior admin) to be a securities offering. They sell this way deliberately so that they can't be said to be picking up the same handful of sand they take out and can't be reasonably construed as having the expectation of doing so. They are still picking up and putting down the same sized handfuls and the pile is the same size the entire time. There is no token specific impact or weight to supply/demand. IT doesn't matter what sand granules you remove, or if it was the original or not, as long as they are grabbing and sitting it down with their eyes closed. The supply remains the same exactly. This has literally been litigated by the SEC and ruled on by a federal judge. You not doing 15 minutes of research and lacking the patience to even be able to does not change reality, and it is why you invest in the things you do b(link) instead of XRP.

>>60880685 (OP)
>comfy

>>60881665
So they don't know. Because they're dumping on the exchanges.

>>60881630
that's not what that pic is saying at all

>>60880685 (OP)
>companies start to work with ripple or hint at working with them in the near future
>link collaborations
>good rep being built
Why the FUCK do they do this right now? Why now? What's the need to shoot themselves in the foot like this? Is it to suppress the price intentionally like linkies have been claiming Sergey does for the the past few years? What's the fucking POINT OF DOING IT NOW. Holy FUCK I'm out fuck this centralized scam I'm selling for more $Useless as soon as possible.
>>60880798
Linkies are mostly paypigs so they are technically fairly kinky.

>>60881704
Yes, it objectively is. Reread it. You're literally arguing a point even the SEC did not.
>>60881703
Retard. They buy at the same time the amount that is sold. You are DESPERATE having ZERO valid fud. They don't sell to retail. Chainlink Labs does constantly and their entire literal fraud would collapse if they stopped. Literally less than 20% of the network can exist without this and it is all a big money grift to SirGay and Chainlink Labs.

>>60881680
Literally no one even knows who this faggot is. Even xsg had no clue.

>>60881921
Why wouldn't they sell now that the price is high? Selling high is good biz

>>60882071
it objectively isn’t and if you feel so strongly then point me to the specific language from that paragraph that says what you are claiming

>>60880695
Heh the only difference is Ripple has buyers for their shitcoin while Sergay struggles to dump within his means and keep price stable. Such a greedy Russian Jew he is.

But can sir gay do this?

this really upset they xrpaypigs

>>60880685 (OP)
Garlic Bread

Betray

Maximum dump, no survivors.

>>60882071
>yes they dump on the exchanges but not to retail because they time the sells exactly with the buyers

You're retarded for thinking even a single person on here would fall for this moronic drivel

>>60882492
XRP baggies fall for this shit every single day anon. They bought "Nostro/Vostro", they'll believe until the day they die. Even if Ripple Labs' founders get perp walked into a supermax for fraud, they're going to dive deeper into the Q-tier lunacy.

Link and XRP holders really get what they deserve at this point.

>>60882560
Kek.
Your fan hate fiction is entertaining at least.

I would really like to buy xrp at $1 again desu. Sold at $3 too for a fat profit.
Realistically it will bottom at $2 because that's where all the fat whales are limit buying as a hard demand zone.

>>60882492
This LITERALLY has been ruled on by a federal judge to be EXACTLY what I said it is. You eating and parroting narrative for years doesn't change what is actually true.

>>60882106
It objectively is; you are just a laymen faggot with no experience with legal language and no familiarity with specifics of the case or sale structure. The argument posits that ODL sales post-May 2020 target non-investor customers, not "public investors," as the text notes "direct XRP sales to public investors" lacked notice, countered by ODL’s "consumptive use" and Voyager’s fair notice ruling, suggesting no investment intent under Howey. This implies sales were limited to institutional partners, not retail. This argument is stated BY THE SEC themselves, in their own filing, in reference to Ripple sales and the (at the time ongoing) Ripple lawsuit.

>>60881552
Boo hoo fucking baggie retard, XRP is a scam and takes up too much market attention it needs to be completely dismantled and until it’s out of the top 10 I will shred you retarded fucks all day long. XRP is a scam and I will enjoy watching you lose all your money.

>>60883390
Calling people baggies when 94% of them are in profit and 100% of xsg bought below .50 for years and are now up 5-6x in the last 8 months or so while you are down 60+% from your ATH 5 years ago is pretty unreal. Doing so over and over in every thread is desperate and pathetic projection.

>>60881645
>>60881665
>>60882071
>>60883340
The federal judge literally said that when dumping on exchanges, Ripple doesn't know who's buying and the buyers don't know who's selling.

What is wrong with you.

>>60881630
>See pic related in:
>https://warosu.org/biz/thread/60854424#p60854805

You may want to try actually reading the pic.
It doesn't say anything about Ripple not selling to retail.

>>60881630
ESL?
SEC literally said that XRPs defense is that by them selling on the exchange, retail WOULDN'T KNOW its ripple dumping on them meaning it WASN'T a sale -> ie being a security.
Literally their whole argument of not being a security was that they're dumping on retail lmfao

>>60883390
So this is what losing out looks like.
delulu

>>60883388
oh, okay, I get it now, you're a retard who interprets things however he sees fit

>>60880685 (OP)
Don't worry only like 35 billion left, xrp fags are the dumbest fucks ever

>>60882350
You don't get it. Price manipulation is good because they are on our side!

>>60882077
>>60883388

>>60884354
Well given that there is limited supply and no staking or node rewards it's safe to assume they only care about the token going up I'd say.

>>60884338
It is not interpretation, it is literally an objectively indicative statement and direct implication of it by the SEC themselves.
>>60888038
Cope with having no argument and literally not understanding your own investment.
>>60883829
The sales mentioned were all pre the timeline I mentioned. All of the litigated challenged sales were from a time period over 5 years ago. Spend more than 15 minutes on something before assuming to understand and speak declaratively on it. It has been YEARS. How do you STILL not know this?

i keep seeing op face posted, what is it

>>60889089
>The sales mentioned were all pre the timeline I mentioned
That pic simply describes how all sales via exchanges work.
You clown.

>>60889167
Yes but in a way you are literally no exaggeration retardedly misunderstanding if you think it translates to Ripple dumping on retail. The setup is explicitly SO THAT THEY DO NOT directly offer the exact tokens to the buyers. That is literally the point. They sell the equivalent amount the buyer buys in a demand neutral way, filtered through the exchange order book so that the specific coins are not exactly and directly the same tokens Ripple sold. Reread the analogy of the sand grabbed from the pile. They pick up the same amount they sit down and at all times the sand pile remains the same size. This is not hard to understand and if you can't you are literally, like NO exaggeration, retarded. The judge ruled they are demand neutral and the SEC argued same. You not understanding this and arguing what even the SEC did not is fucking INSANE.

>>60883867
Yes it does, you are just 10% informed on what is built into its statement. See:
>>60883388

>>60883994
They are setting up blind bid/ask for the exact same size which at all times (except possibly for like a second) translates to a net 0 impact on supply by way of exchange, and if anything leads to demand purchases on part of market makers shoring up liquidity requirements as operations scale. You guys are acting like there is a only an ask and no bid and no blind process. It is so low IQ it is kind of hard to imagine even thinking without knowing that you are linkies who spend actually zero time researching and STILL don't know this after fucking 5 years. Pathetic. See:
>>60889203

>>60889112
Some desperate failed meme by linkies. Literally no one knows who he is including anyone in xsg but they keep spamming it to try to force him as the face of XRP or something because they keep losing arguments in every thread and can't cope so they do this gay shit to cope because they don't care what's true and are integrity-less jews/leftists in how they argue and form positions.

>>60889203
You have mental problems.
When you sell on an exchange you do not know who's buying.

The judge's order literally equates the "programmatic buyers" (meaning the buyers on exchanges) with public buyers.

>>60889112
it's the blue ID fidget with 16 posts, makes him uncontrollably seethe

>>60889213
Unbelievably pathetic and long held L. You tried spamming the same shit in like 5 simultaneous threads and literally not a single person in any of them or any of your posts in xsg recognized who this faggot was.
>>60889212
Holy fucking shit you are retarded as FUCK. THAT IS LITERALLY THE POINT. I said twice now the entire purpose of the transaction structure is to MAKE SURE THEY ARE NOT DIRECTLY BUYING THE EXACT SAME TOKENS. There is no token specific impact or weight to supply/demand. IT doesn't matter what sand granules you remove, or if it was the original or not, as long as they are grabbing and sitting it down with their eyes closed. The supply remains the same exactly. This has literally been litigated. The tokens on exchange are the sand pile. Ripple walk in blindfolded and with one fist sit down a handful of sand while simultaneously the partner does the same but inversely picks up the same amount at the same time. It is IMMATERIAL whether they pick up the exact same tokens, they pick up the exact offsetting amount to make the exchange demand neutral. For the exchange to scale, the market maker has to have sufficient orderbook depth. They LITERALLY do this so that they cannot be said to be doing a securities offering of the exact tokens to the buyer directly. Holy shit this is not complicated. And meanwhile Chainlink dumps 2/3 of the float which they comingled and lied about on retail to prop up their zombie network that cannot sustain 2/10ths of itself in revenues to bilk your savings. The projection and incapacity to understand 5 year old data that the SEC has argued contrary to your position on as the adversary and the court has ruled contrary to is so fucking delusional and desperate it is easy to understand why you invested in Chainlink.

>>60889228
Lol From same CEO. Them using CLL for data feeds is fucking NOTHING.

>>60889227
>to MAKE SURE THEY ARE NOT DIRECTLY BUYING THE EXACT SAME TOKENS
This is the most retarded shit imaginable.
Centralized exchanges don't transact tokens during trades.
The only times they move tokens is when you deposit them and when you withdraw them.

Ripple sells via centralized exchanges, they have no idea who's buying.
They're selling to retail.

>>60889228
Same Ceo in >>60889237
Also see the recent comment from SBI Global Asset Management CEO (pic related)

>>60889234
>Them using CLL for data feeds is fucking NOTHING
Except they're using CLL for settlement.

>>60889236
Nigger this is so stupid there is literally zero way you understand it. For months the same structure was used to fud XRP BECAUSE IT IS DEMAND NEUTRAL. You are like incomprehensibly, unreachably stupid. If I have 5 apples and someone agrees to buy 5 apples to use my product and I place them into a larger pile of apples and they remove the same amount simultaneously, the exchange is demand neutral between us and I did not profit off dumping to retail. THE POINT IS TO AVOID DIRECT SALE OF EXACT SPECIFIC APPLES. THIS IS NOT COMPLICATED.

>>60889242
>the same structure was used to fud XRP BECAUSE IT IS DEMAND NEUTRAL
lol
ODL being demand neutral has nothing to do with sales via exchanges being sales to retail.

>>60889239
No, they objectively are not. No one uses link for settlement. CCIP LITERALLY doesn't even use link for settlement. CCIP offers settlement in the chosen settlement ledgers (sender/receiver). Link (to the extent it is used at all) is used in an intermediary data process that adds 100x the time and cost to the procedure, literally. At no point is it used in settlement or in actual value movement nor does it even vaguely peripherally touch it. You know this and lose on it in every thread. You chose a REALLY low IQ investment you literally don't even understand the core product of and spam this shit over and over thread after thread to cope because even though you know you were proven objectively wrong, you still refuse to cope.

>>60889247
>No one uses link for settlement.
I said they use CLL for settlement.

And if you use CLL, you 100% use Link.

>>60889245
The sales via exchange ARE ODL you fucking moron. It is the same process. They are entering supply that is immediately offset. This would be like adding money to your account and having someone else remove the same amount simultaneously. Did I give you money if I did so? Am I a charitable person for doing so? No, because it means fucking nothing and does zero.

>>60889254
>The sales via exchange ARE ODL
No.
The sales via exchanges are blind.

>>60889253
They literally already use XRP as a settlement currency. Their CEO which you cited says they are building their entire crypto strategy around XRP and that he thinks it'll become the number one most valued crypto in the whole market. The SBI Asset Management CEO says XRP is "not just another crypto. It is the wealth transfer of our generation." Them using CCIP broadens their settlement infrastructure doing zero to their use or buildout using XRP. They never use link for settlement, they just (maybe) use it for data feeds insofar as they use CCIP at all for cross-ledger settlement. You literally don't understand the 101 of this subject.

>>60889262
>They literally already use XRP as a settlement currency.
If they are, apparently they aren't too happy about it since they just adopted a competing system.

>>60889257
The sales via exchanges ARE ODL. That is how ODL is structured. It is amazing how arrogant you can be while knowing so little.

>>60889263
It isn't competing. Lol It uses the settlement ledgers chosen by sender and receiver which has the enriched messaging standard to send including blockchain payments now (or will finally and totally as of November this year once migration is complete). You LITERALLY don't know how payments work. I genuinely don't know how you can still not after so much time. Even if you are incapable of discovering it on your own, it is NOT this hard to understand within the extent of explanation given here and in prior threads. You are either a paid fudder (likely) or a fucking actual retard. Ripple themselves are a competing payment player disrupting SWIFT's shitty tech but SWIFT do not control who settles with what ledgers.

>>60889271
>26pbtid
it's like spammy's too stupid to do anything but take the bait LOL
i'm looking forward to you killing yourself by the way - make sure to livestream it - and don't worry, no one will miss some grifter peddling trash like ripple on biz literally all day according to your posting habits

>>60889264
ODL has zero traction anywhere, not to mention zero transparency.
They're dumping on the exchanges. They've been doing exactly that for 13 years.

>>60889271
>It isn't competing.
It is.
With Chainlink, digital assets are settled directly, without a bridge currency.
ODL's settlement requires the use of XRP as a bridge currency.

>>60889283
Oh wow once you are clearly beaten in argument suddenly the pivot to "guys isn't it cringe he replies" lol. COPE WITH NOT HAVING AN ARGUMENT OR UNDERSTANDING YOUR OWN SHITTY INVESTMENT THESIS.

>>60889289
>INVESTMENT THESIS
kek hi Adem

>>60889289
>you have to debate me AGAIN bro
nah
a few months back I made you run like a whipped dog from a couple threads because you had absolutely nothing and couldn't argue with someone who knew what they were talking about
then you kept trying to make the same points in later threads despite being shat on
you're either too stupid to absorb new information, or you're just doing pilpul shit
and like any retard or jew, you only deserve mockery or to have your head ventilated

>>60889213
sounds hilarious, give me the source so i can laugh at this cross eyed retard too

>>60889227
whoa there buddy you seem upset, no one is reading all of that
see you at sibos

>>60889307
>no one is reading all of that
He's counting on it.
His argumentation style is to be so retarded and verbose that people just stop debating him out of sheer attrition.

>>60889285
And another pivot. Ripple is "dumping" but also all sales are ODL and ODL has not traction. ODL is demand neutral and therefore fud but also it is dumping! This is the double contradiction built into your incoherent and actually retarded argument. All sales for 5 years have been ODL sales. All CLL sales have been demand negative to exchanges to prop up their zombie operation.
>>60889285
The atomic swap offered by CLL keeps operational breadth to SBI's payment offerings. It does not say "guess we are going to use traditional or illiquid private settlement rails to settle for no reason." XRP improves CCIP's service but CCIP limits XRP unnecessarily. CCIP takes 5 minutes to settle in addition to settlement time (which is improved if using a more efficient payment rail (like XRP)) and costs cents/dollars. XRP using ILP takes 1-2 seconds to clear and 3-5 seconds for full finality, can scale to literally the hardware limit of trillions of transactions per second and can offer decentralized atomic settlement with anyone being able to download and use it and anyone being able to structure the payment channel transmission in whatever network arrangement they want. The entire part of the added 5 minutes is the part involving the link token which is literally just a rent seeking intermediation that may be considered worthwhile for certain defi transactions but is completely unnecessary for payments and MASSIVELY hinders money velocity, cannot batch micropayments (ILP (which is completely free and the only associated costs are implicit to the network costs of whatever settlement layer is chosen which decrease with efficient batching of payments and can be paid using any currency, no requirement for an unnecessary intermediation token) using XRP can).

>>60889292
Not that faggot despite how desperate you are to avoid argument by accusing me to be every retard to cope with being one yourself and trying to win through gay sophistical games that mirror boomer memes where they write fake stories couched in apocryphal attribution to Albert Einstein (except here instead of laundering what they interpret as wit/wisdom which is undeserving on its own in the perceived essence of authority the figure gives it, you cope with being outclassed and having not argument by trying to attach it to some faggot, like a desperate retard).
>>60889307
Cope.
>>60889314
Projection. Over and over. Thread after thread. Argue until you lose, then sophistically spin. Over and over and over. Cope.

>>60889319
>but also all sales are ODL
Pretty much zero sales are ODL you dimwit.
Literally nobody uses that shit.

>It does not say "guess we are going to use traditional or illiquid private settlement rails to settle for no reason."
"Illiquid"?
You know you can just send cypto tokens wherever and whenever you want right?

>XRP using ILP takes 1-2 seconds
Because it's a centralized database that doesn't have to wait for a blockchain to complete transactions.
Because it doesn't need XRP.

Banks want to actually settle everything ONchain. Because they don't want to have to trust anyone.
Hence they want to use CCIP.

>>60889300
Never left a single thread. You get owned every single time. I argue every single point and you never have an answer then make 5 simultaneous replacement threads and say the same thing over and over again acting like you never even heard the data while hilariously mirroring my own language as soft NPC admission you even know and are buck broken. I literally have been late for work just to make sure I addressed every argument then returned later. You have never won a single point ever but every time I complete response and go to sleep or work or whatever, you wait and then post acting like you won something. I always respond later and you have no reply. This is HIGHLY faggoted and desperate. NGMI in finance or life

>>60889323
>Projection
Double projection.
Show me shitting out a single run-on paragraph like this >>60889319

>>60889323
retard

>>60889325
50% of Ripple's total business is ODL and all of their sales are ODL. So either they aren't selling or they have no traction. Your choice but the two numbers are the exact same.
>crypto
That is literally my whole point. They will use crypto rails which take seconds and cost fractions of cents rather than traditional rails which take days and cost dollars. Not sure how you think this is an argument against me. Lol XRP is by far the most established crypto for payment rails in existence whether you like it or not. XLM is probably next in line but lacks the banking footprint.
>Centraliced
ILP is decentralized and anyone can run and use it. It does not itself settle transactions and facilitates interoperability across different settelment networks whether blockchain or traditional, with XRP being a specifically efficient optimization of it. Your argument is literally not challenging anything I am saying outside you claiming ILP is centralized because you have literally no idea what it is and have never spent more than 5 minutes on it. Lol It is objectively inarguably decentralized and more efficient and cheaper for payments and offers payment elaborations CCIP does and cannot. SWIFT is definitely inescapable for payments in the current ecosystem just like taxi services were for NYC transit in general a few years ago while Uber got a foothold but it didn't take long and why would anyone stay with higher prices for a less optimal, business limiting service (they wouldn't). We are in a coexistence phase where SWIFT will not gain any payment volume beyond operational increase from CCIP and will lose to disruptors and alternate non-western payment networks (which XRP can intermediate without counterparty and settle for a fraction of a fraction of a penny with finality in 3-5 seconds with reliable fees to do so lol).

>>60889345
>50% of Ripple's total business is ODL
What's 50% of nothing?

>ILP is decentralized
It's centralized unless ILP is specifically posting onchain (which it doesn't have to and the vast majority of users don't)

>>60889332
You can't argue so you deflect to say "actually him posting a long description is cringe and I swear it says nothing!" You are trying to dismiss me to avoid having to address what I say, (because you can't ((because I'm inarguably right)).
>>60889340
Go back to Plebbit. Retards of your stripe always misuse the same 4 informal fallacies and "word salad" to cope with having no argument. It is ALWAYS ad hominem, strawman, gish gallop, and word salad, and it is ALWAYS misapplied. Gish galloping is giving an unreasonable amount of claims to a respondent who can't be expected to reasonably respond to them in the allotted time and space. I made a constructive argument in informal discussion on a website with virtually boundless response time. A single paragraph directly addressing claims is not "gish galloping" just because you are a demoralized heteronomous faggot who is incapable of holding an attention span longer than a youtube short.

>>60889348
They settle billions. Are you agreeing they don't sell then? Because again, all sales are to partners, and it can't be both. Do you see what a disingenuous and snakey, weird faggot you are? Why let greed make you SO integrity-less?
>ILP
Holy shit. Lol Read what ILP is. ILP is middleware. Read a single fucking sentence. ILP can be used for legacy systems or blockchain just like CCIP. CCIP is WAY more centralized than ILP, which anyone can use freely. This is AMAZINGLY ironic projection you are literally too retarded/ignorant of the core concepts to even know how it is projection. Pretty funny. Lol

>>60889323
Sophistry will be your downfall.

>>60889357
Sophistry is your religion.

Going to sleep faggots. 4 am where I am. Enjoy posting after I left to cope and act like I am not replying for reasons other than being asleep.

>>60889205
>They are setting up blind bid/ask for the exact same size which at all times (except possibly for like a second) translates to a net 0 impact on supply by way of exchange, and if anything leads to demand purchases on part of market makers shoring up liquidity requirements as operations scale. You guys are acting like there is a only an ask and no bid and no blind process. It is so low IQ it is kind of hard to imagine even thinking without knowing that you are linkies who spend actually zero time researching and STILL don't know this after fucking 5 years. Pathetic. See:
You say all of this as if you KNEW it was like this. Unless you can prove onchain that its like this OR the exchanges disclose that information, that is just complete speculation from whoever you are parrotting this from, you do know that?

>>60889353
>They settle billions.
lol source?

>>60889362
Didn't you know? Anything Ripple Labs does it automatically hecking valid and with the best intentions for holders in mind. Anything Chainlink Labs does is automatically sinister, fraudulent and has the worst interest of holders in mind. All arguments with this retard always boils down to this extremely obvious bias/blind spot.

>>60889089
>direct implication of it by the SEC themselves
the direct implication is literally the opposite of what you're saying. learn how to read, and cut the gish galloping bullshit you stupid faggot, everyone can see through it

>>60880685 (OP)
he looks like retarded savage.

>>60880685 (OP)
About to flip ETH. The eth shitcoin foundation better dump some supply to catch up. This will all end well. Glad I'm a maxi.

if ripple dumps the max amount it's still going to take 3 years to clean out escrow... wtf
at their "current" rate it seems like it will take about 9 years

>>60889838
wtf ripple has bought over $11 billion of xrp since sec lawsuit began as of last year?
wtf