Thread 60882418

Now he’s telling them that their lawsuit ending means dick all

they literally spent all the investor money on that lawsuit and lining their pockets, now they have nothing except a sub $100M defi tvl ghostchain and are being openly insulted by financial giants kek

>>60882418 (OP)
holy fucking shit why do all the retarded cunts talk like that now
>this isn't that. this is that. hard-hitting fact. and this this that. it's all about a hard-hitting one-liner.
did they get a firmware update or some shit

>the same c level exec speaking at smartcon for the first time is publicly dunking on ripple and xrp leading into the event
yeah they're dropping a bomb this year aren't they

>neutral shared governance
>the best incentive is no incentive
Sounds like he is making a strong case for ripple over other more centralized governance chains (those with incentives). Now isn’t that quite interesting

>>60882444
how you manage to think ripple is anything but centralized is truly a mystery, at least you have the courage to face each day with confidence given your disability

there will be great gnashings of teeth and fits of apoplectic rage as the unbelievers are made undone

Tom is a dawg! SWIFT officer blowing fuddies to bits!

>>60882448
Ironic…not being able to make a logical argument while calling someone disabled…lol

>>60882418 (OP)
He's completely right in the regard that there shouldn't be a single company that controls the entire money transfer network. Look into Swift's diverse history and you can draw stark parallels with chainlink's development.

>>60882459
XRP Ledger uses a Unique Node List (UNL), a CURATED SET of validator nodes that participants AGREE TO TRUST. By default, Ripple publishes the recommended UNL, and most participants simply adopt it. Nodes outside Ripple’s UNL are IGNORED. Protocol changes and upgrades are effectively proposed, developed, and shipped by Ripple Labs. Validators on the UNL vote on amendments, but since Ripple controls the UNL and publishes the reference software, it alone steers the direction.

In practice, Ripple has de facto veto power over changes to the ledger.

>>60882448
> at least you have the courage to face each day with confidence given your disability
This is the best thing ive read all week lmfao

>>60882471
That's a big reason why most industries would rather refuse to adopt ripple's technology. If they wanted to they would've already on boarded.

Imagine the amount of arbitrary bullshit that paypal, mastercard, and visa proposes.

>>60882459
>Institutions don’t want to live on a competitors rails

Hes clearly stating that institutions don’t want to depend on infrastructure owned by a competitor. Ripple in this case. He emphasizes compliance should come from industry wide standards, not one company persuading regulators lol

>>60882483
Correct

>>60882483
Then you just create a bunch of walled gardens, which is what crypto was created to do away with…Tom obviously does not understand the ethos of crypto

>>60882471
Cleanest dirty shirt in the hamper…What is a better option in your opinion?

>>60882538
>>60882551
retard

>>60882551
Trustless decentralized blockchains (like ETH and others) working in harmony with private chains (like JP Morgan's Kinexys and others) unified through a standardized interoperability layer (Chainlink)

>>60882538
What do you think Swift has been working on for the past decade, if not addressing the very walled garden issues you’re talking about?

>>60882563
Whomever owns the most eth has the most control over the network…this centralizes power in the richest eth holders….sorry but that is not decentralized, not even close

>>60882576
A way to hold onto the status quo I’m sure

>>60882583
Holding ETH does not give you governance rights over the protocol itself. No matter how many ETH someone owns, they cannot unilaterally change the rules of Ethereum unless the rest of the ecosystem agrees and upgrades.

ETH ownership lets you stake and become a validator. But staking doesn’t give you absolute control, validators must follow consensus rules or get ignored by the network. Dishonest behavior is punished by slashing which makes them lose their staked ETH.

Decentralization comes from independent nodes, which anyone can run on Ethereum without staking anything. Non-staking nodes enforce the rules and can reject blocks that don’t follow consensus. This means even if a rich whale tried to force a change, the rest of the network could fork away and ignore them.

What can centralize Ethereum is if a handful of custodial staking services (e.g., exchanges, Lido) control too much staked ETH. But that’s a liquidity/validator concentration risk, not a fundamental “who owns ETH = who controls Ethereum” dynamic. The Ethereum community actively debates and monitors this (Lido’s self-limit proposals, solo staking initiatives).

>>60882591
And whats the status quo?

>>60882418 (OP)
>Desperate executive from dying industry being disrupted desperately lashes out, hoping to keep unnecessary rent seeking intermediation alive.
>Taxi company owner and labor unionists don't like Uber, who'd've thought!!!!
It is crazy it is this hard for you to understand, and that you are on the side of the rent seeking jews.

Yeah I heard the same blah blah not gonna make it shit with buttcoin back in 2013

>>60882437
They're all using chat gpt to write their posts. Literally how chat gpt structures things.

It's not just [something trivial sounding] it's the [something deep sounding]

>>60882418 (OP)
>>60882430
SWIFT is working with Ripple and using XRP. They're scared.

https://www.ainvest.com/news/xrp-news-today-swift-tests-xrp-speedy-cost-bridge-global-payments-2508/

I can't help but notice the sudden XRP fud the past few days. What's happening? Has this ever happened before?
>t. only lurked biz for 3 months

>>60883477
These things take time

>>60883400
>Comparing SWIFT to taxi companies

>>60883664
Yes. XRP is 3rd biggest crypto behind ETH & BTC. Basically alot of retards here & twitter treat crypto as sports teams and get pissy when their "team" isn't 'winning' like XRP is.

>>60883681
t. pissy retard

>>60883664
this is a LINK board, newfag
xrp was never taken seriously here until you mongoloids started shitting up the whole board post 2020

>>60883661
did you read the article you are linking? it is just ai slop with missing sources

>>60883739
Nah, for xrptards, you dont need a source, you dont need a primary source you just need a few websites saying ripple X Swift without linking any actual source or linking each other

Guy for the life of him WILL NOT be able to list an official swift article of ripple working with swift

>>60883678
It is dysfunctional centralized inefficient price gauging legacy system vs. disruptor. SWIFT are 70 year old software and their GPI is completely late flop. CCIP takes 5 minutes longer than XRP to settle. It is literally hundreds of times slower and hundreds of times more expensive, no exaggeration. You are incapable of understanding analogy, which is why you bought link. How would you have felt if you didn't have breakfast this morning?

>>60883731
No it isn't. Link is by far the most universally hated project on this board, especially its investors. This hasn't been a link pro board since literally 2018. Linkies bake a dozen threads a day hating other projects and can't even keep a general alive. Do you ever wonder why? How is it a link board if you can'tt even keep 1 single bake of a link general alive?

>>60883762
You are deranged. At least 10-20% of the catalogue on any given day is LINK related whether its FUD or general news related to the project. If you think you need a 'general' to talk about a coin you're brain-damaged. Also there's a new jannie that hates LINK.
LINK has been baked into board culture for 7 years now and that hasn't changed because a bunch of desperate mouthbreathing newfags showed up who are too braindamaged to do any due-diligence and buy the 'banker' coin because 'marketcap is a myth' who have torn this board to shreds. there's few oldfags left here now but this is forever a LINK board.

>>60882600
>A hard fork just flew over my house.

>>60883661
>They're scared

Who's they?
The OP image is the CIO of SWIFT saying XRP is shit. He would literally be the guy in charge of any xrp swift collaboration.

>>60883777
CHECKED

>>60883777
Based and true
Checking those digits

>>60882418 (OP)
My 3rd time asking for the source on this image that isn't a linktard twitter account. No links? Fake & gay?

>>60883749
this is what rippletards unironically believe. they are swooped off their feet by flashy terms that make them think they are part of an elite financial cabal (terms like "settlement", "nostro vostro", "iso 20022" without having a fucking clue what those terms mean of whether they are significant in whatever context, they just blurt it out)

not only they really believe SWIFT is going away, but they also believe that their premined, 13 year old scam vaporware project is under thousands of NDAs and that adoption is JUST AROUND the corner now that le epic lawsuit is no more

there are fates worse than death

>>60883948
All this fud is making me so bullish. Especially when it comes from linktards LMAO

We must be so close XRPbros

>>60883948
>believe SWIFT is going away
Swift didn't exist for 99.999% of human history. It could easily go away, some gay fartcoin could replace it 20years from now.

And again >>60882418 (OP) anyone have a legitimate source on this image? Anyone at all?

>>60883970
>And again >>60882418 (OP) (OP) anyone have a legitimate source on this image? Anyone at all?
You might need a linkedin acc to see it

>https://www.linkedin.com/in/tomzschach/recent-activity/comments/
>https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7366097353767829504?commentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Acomment%3A%28activity%3A7366097353767829504%2C7366357113553485824%29&replyUrn=urn%3Ali%3Acomment%3A%28activity%3A7366097353767829504%2C7368230186762289152%29&dashCommentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Afsd_comment%3A%287366357113553485824%2Curn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7366097353767829504%29&dashReplyUrn=urn%3Ali%3Afsd_comment%3A%287368230186762289152%2Curn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7366097353767829504%29

>>60883975
It's just odd this didn't hit any crypto news. Normally this guy mentioning xrp at all get some news article.

>>60883997
Bullish XRP news is kept quiet. XRP fud is not. They want people out.

>>60883998
lmao check your sentence before posting, literally dunked on yourself

>>60884005
Yes, XRP has all the connections.

>>60883998
>>60884005
>>60883997
Here I will change this sentence to its correct form:

>Bullish XRP news is shouted from the rooftops. XRP fud is not. They want people in.

Just like when Schwartz is being asked if his parallel computing patent was the first patent on the blockchain concept, and he didn't deny it to hype XRP, absolutely hilarious

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0R2Tfx-ZPA

>>60884023
Sadly, the patent is missing just the one small piece that makes up blockchain aka cryptographic hash chaining, but no biggie, close enough eh?

>>60883749
>SWIFT are 70 year old software and their GPI is completely late flop.

Post a picture of your hand.

>>60883932
Why not just go on linkedin next time and dyor?


>https://www.linkedin.com/in/tomzschach/recent-activity/comments/
>https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7366097353767829504?commentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Acomment%3A%28activity%3A7366097353767829504%2C7366357113553485824%29&replyUrn=urn%3Ali%3Acomment%3A%28activity%3A7366097353767829504%2C7368230186762289152%29&dashCommentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Afsd_comment%3A%287366357113553485824%2Curn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7366097353767829504%29&dashReplyUrn=urn%3Ali%3Afsd_comment%3A%287368230186762289152%2Curn%3Ali%3Aactivity%3A7366097353767829504%29

>>60884380
It's just a lazy deboonk attempt.
>hurr no one linked me to this readily available source? Must be fake!

>>60883664
It goes in cycles, one coin will get fudded to shit while another is shilled, currently XRP is the fud coin.

>>60883661
>ainvest.com

>>60883749
>imagine being this retarded

>>60883661
This.

>>60884979
Why are cripples obsessed with "nostro-vostro"?

I have never heard of this thing, is it some kind of icon in their cult?

>>60885181
Exactly.
No need for a bridge currency when tokenized assets exist.

>>60885218
It's a problem for traditional assets, but not for tokenized assets.
Tokenized assets are inherently liquid globally.

lol poor Tom, he has to tard wrangle in public and he can't even call them for what they are

>>60885181
>If tokenized deposits and regulated stablecoins scale, why would banks pay a toll to an external asset, when they can settle directly in instruments they already control and trust

everyone saying bridge currencies will change everything are completely forgetting this thing. The fact every bank will make a stablecoin will make bridge currencies for them completely irrelevant. They will just settle via atomic settlement ie stablecoin against stablecoin.

It's the same scenario for crypto, why would anyone exchange their LTC against BTC and vice versa by doing this: LTC -> XRP -> BTC instead of LTC -> BTC
it just adds an extra step for no reason

>>60885238
Like I can see the case for XRP if we didn't have all the indicators in the world that we're clearly moving towards a world where fucking McDonalds will have a stablecoin or will use a stablecoin

>>60884979
>freeze drying specialist calling SWIFT CIO a clown for not mentioning the XRP cult's 27T nostro-vostro myth
L M A O

>>60883777
checked, linkies always get digits while XRPturds need to get relegated to their shitty one schizo thread

>>60883777
large big check over here

>>60885243
It'll mostly be bank coins I think, not necessarily corpo coins (I could see that but way less of a use case for most businesses). But yea, point being - XRP absolutely not needed. At this point the truth is XRP is already DOA, it's the biggest zombie coin. The writing is on the wall, all that is left is the hot potato game of which retail morons get left holding bags for the rest of their lives. The XRP execs are already filthy rich from their sales, so nothing really left for them to care about.

>>60885283
>At this point the truth is XRP is already DOA
I'm convinced thats the whole and sole reason they even made RLUSD.
Bridgecurrencies are dead before they even started, but its still "early" to get a piece of the stablecoin market. I think they will be way more successful with that and will give them potentially a long tail of income.

>>60885283
>>60885293
its funny because some of their normie followers are *so* close to getting it, but cannot follow the logic through because they literally can't into the technical aspects of it

>>60883762
We don't need a general because the whole board belongs to us.
Anyone with enough braincells that has been here since 2017 is invested on LINK.
Nolinkers are just guests, we own the place

>>60884979
>>60885181
He's literally playing the devil's advocate but is actually bullish on XRP. How can you not see that?

>>60885315
That quote... My god. No wonder the SEC went after them.

>>60885345
What part is bullish? This part?
>harder question is whether banks will ever be comfortable outsourcing settlement finality to a token that isnt a deposit, isnt regulated money and doesn't sit on their balance sheet

>>60885238
It’s not their fault, they really just can’t comprehend that. They use words they don’t understand. They say ISO like it’s an integration, not a standard anyone can follow. They say liquidity without understanding what it means.

They’re literally not capable and it’s sad
Most likely, while it’s finally running down endlessly and LINK rockets, they’ll hold to the idea it’s a psyop by the deep state and it’ll eventually turn around

>>60885345
>He's literally playing the devil's advocate but is actually bullish on XRP. How can you not see that?
wow this is absolute insanity like seriously and I thought we linkbaggies were schizo

>>60885326
>Anyone with enough braincells that has been here since 2017 is invested on LINK.
I sold when link hit ATH and assumed i fucked up, I've more than quadrupled that money, married and had a child since then, link never touched ATH again. You guys are Cult A mad at Cult B. Very cringe, all of it.

>>60885406
>just time the pico top bro

If i sold during 2020/2021 LINK would be at +1k and i would be dead

>>60885406
>I sold when link hit ATH and assumed i fucked up, I've more than quadrupled that money, married and had a child since then, link never touched ATH again. You guys are Cult A mad at Cult B. Very cringe, all of it.
have you ever considered that some people sold some of their stack, got a house too, but still have a sizeable link stack? I sold 6k link at $39 and have 2k in the pool so I might aswell talk about this shit on this shitty board because those 2k link might give me nice passive income in the future
>t. me

>>60885406
I mean a lot of us have money already, lol. How do you think we have 10-50k stacks? It was the Ethereum run that set us up early.

LINK is side money that we’ve realized will make more than ETH did if we play smart and hold as long

>>60885359
>>60885373
In Tom's own words, Ripple's stablecoin is interesting. Oh, and banks will be comfortable alright as they will be working with a new bank called Ripple.

>>60885450
> How do you think we have 10-50k stacks?
I fucking wish, I fumbled 11k link on bittrex for fucking IOTA of all things
I bought back 4k link over the last 3y, avg@13.8 and it hurts so much

>>60885482
lmao I hope this is bait

>>60885482
dude, he’s tongue in cheek saying it’s interesting as it’s a complete pivot and admission that a bridge currency is not needed.

someone earlier gave a brilliant example you can comprehend easily - why trade BTC > XRP > LTC if you can just BTC > XRP?

That’s the point of “interesting”. Stablecoins operating on a quick 1,2,3 deployment on: AWS quantum ledger, corda, Hyperledger, quorum, or even Canton network by banks now can have the same relationship with each other as ETH tokens being traded on the same chain, but now cross chain. We’ve entirely removed the need to bridge a currency. The currency itself bridges seamlessly.

You really didn’t think SWIFT would go into the night easily right? They came up with an even more elegant solution than Ripple proposed, completely disintermediating the transfer through a new protocol, removing the risk of a bridge currency’s price stability mid-transfer. They’re not retards, these guys running global banking.

SWIFT is 11,500 banks. They all are part of the decision making.

>>60885482
>In Tom's own words, Ripple's stablecoin is interesting.
As interesting as all other stablecoins.

>banks will be comfortable alright as they will be working with a new bank called Ripple.
Because businesses just love giving business to competitors, amirite?

>>60885526
BTC > LTC* not XRP, apologies for that

>>60885406
That's cool for you you were lucky but if you were really smart and knew what you were doing you would have bought back at least your initial stack during the $5 crabbing of 2022-2023

>>60885482
>In Tom's own words, Ripple's stablecoin is interesting
yea so interesting they had to buy a stablecoin company because they can literally see the stablecoin train leaving the station and got caught with their pants down
Funny how all the xrp redditors cope was that RLUSD and XRP was planned all along when its clear ripple hasn't had the faintest idea how to enter the stablecoin market just a year ago

>>60885526
i think either this or next sibos they’ll be going all in on this mechanism. toms engagement recently speaks to confidence around a new era of SWIFT and its consortium banks.

also, small aside, but Sergey would’ve been sued into the stratosphere if any of his verbiage was grandiose or not grounded in reality - if not at least kicked out of the conversation.

this alone is an indicator that it’s accurate, and that CCIP and the entire oracle network Chainlink provides is being designated the token protocol arm of SWIFT.

>>60885573
I think its also because of the coming ISO deadline in november, where some of the xrp fanbase thinks the whole banking world will suddenly switch to XRP. Ironically thats the same time smartcon is and tom will be speaking this year, so there will be a real head to head with reality for all this SWIFT x XRP nonsense

>>60885593
it’s sad because they see ISO and don’t realize it’s a standard any well funded company with engineers can meet - not an integration.

>>60885406
>I sold when link hit ATH and assumed i fucked up, I've more than quadrupled that money
Also, if you sold around $50 and only quadrupled your money that mean that you bought in the double digits, so you're not an OG.

And that was a pretty bad investment since LINK actually underperformed the market from the moment it crossed the double digits until the top, so you were basically a dumb too buyer who weren't even that lucky

>>60885593
>I think its also because of the coming ISO deadline in november, where some of the xrp fanbase thinks the whole banking world will suddenly switch to XRP
Too bad the Swift CIO crushed all of that nonsense on Linkedin

>>60885593
unironically I believe they’ll see this traction happening and still think something is happening for them in the background with some weird Stockholm syndrome belief system.

And when it all turns on without them, they’ll still believe it’s a deep state psyop to distract them, holding XRP to Pennies

They won’t believe it’s possible either because of ETFs, but the ETF is only there because THEY are there, they are showing financial interest. It’s not indicative of some global cabal.

>>60885609
they will go the way of GME likely
I can also genuinely see a period of time where thirdworlders are using xrp to illegally/legally send money back home or between each other but in my mind, that will slowly depreciate simply because their own countries banks will natively have stablecoins and they can just press a button from their familiar banking app.

Hell, even now I reckon thats what XRP is used mostly today anyways so good for them ig

>>60885666
third worlders capable of using blockchain would just use an evm L2 chain with a tumbler desu to mask their txs.

genuinely don’t see a use for this more than just the holders believing no matter what comes up.

No Defi
No Tradfi
No Memes
No Usage

Should we rename XRP to RPP (ripple pay pig)

Crazy how the XRP haters talk with such certainty after being wrong about every single thing for over 5 years

>>60886091
XRP haters were right though.
XRPL is still a ghostchain to this day.

ripple will succeed but xrp will not. the biggest lie that ripple sold their community is that xrp's success is to tied to theirs when in reality xrp is only needed on a single product they offer and that product has failed to attract any real customers in the past decade. now they just use the token as a funding tool to build their real business.

>>60886638
>in reality xrp is only needed on a single product they offer
yup: ODL, aka using XRP as "muh bridge currency".

>and that product has failed to attract any real customers in the past decade
Even if it had, Ripple themselves admitted it wouldn't impact the price of the token.
What a disaster.

XRP right now is like Biden when media and Dems kept saying he was in tip top shape when it was obvious he was decrepit.
And then the debate happened and suddenly everyone's eyes opened.
Ripple will have that Biden debate moment pretty soon. The Dept. of Commerce thing was a start.

At least ADAfags are starting to see the light now.

>>60885601
>Also, if you sold around $50 and only quadrupled your money
No. I quadrupled the money I received from selling. I got in earlier on SOL aswell got a nice +4000%.
>>60885427
>link might give me nice passive income in the future
Yeah possible, but it's been years. I don't baghold long term on anything. Big pump = sell. I move on to the next.
>>60885571
>but if you were really smart and knew what you were doing
Why bother when i already made it? Focusing on diminishing returns got me nowhere in stocks, not playing that game with crypto when i already have a winning strategy.

>>60886700
I can't fault your logic, enjoy the money, but understand that LINK is still the best current play and that you're still on a LINK board

>>60886549
>XRP haters were right though.
They all were absolutely certain it would never recover.

>>60882444
Checked and ironic retard post pilled

>>60885293
How do they make money by offering a stable coin solution, serious question?

>>60883664
Basically Linkies are seething that the shitcoin xrp is wildly overvalued while Link is literally about to form the base layer for global web3 finance and has a quarter of the mc. Linkies are trying to wake people up and vampirise xrps mc in the process.

>>60886826
This, except link has 1/10 the market cap of xrp, which just makes the situation all the more ludicrous

>>60886808
You back the stable coins with Treasury bills and you pocket the interest while your stable coin gives no interest.

>>60886826
It's not just Linkies though, a lot of people are fed up with xrp being ranked that high and its followers lying about everything.
Litecoin, Zachxbt, the Swift CIO, ...

What did happen is Linkies found out recently that the link fud spammers (Thomas, Adem, ...) were ripple shills all those years, larping as angry linkies.

>>60886685
>Ripple will have that Biden debate moment pretty soon.
No it won't. Xerpies are clinically insane. They will never see reality. I mean right now you have Swift literally saying that they are using Chainlink and still they want to believe that it's just some kind of secret code.

>>60886972
>No it won't. Xerpies are clinically insane.
So are the MSM and the Dems, but after the Biden debate even they had to buckle when exposed hard enough.

>>60886986
What would "expose" them hard enough in your opinion? I just don't see it. It's already clear as day who the banks are working with and xerpies just don't care. They will literally just make shit up and send it.

>>60886685
>At least ADAfags are starting to see the light now
charles finally bending the knee totally must have hit them hard
but to be fair cll has kept the totality of their market capture secret for as long as possible with their offchain deal and keeping the numbers utterly hidden
even to this day no real comments from the team, its now all the other teams admitting there are fortunes in tribute thrown in only one direction

The XRP idiots genuinely believe the good news from chainlink are planted by insiders to continúe accumulating xrp on the cheap.

>>60886999
Like I said, the Dept. of Commerce thing was definitely a start.
More of that shit will get the Ripple ball of shit rolling, and once this particular ball of shit starts rolling, it's look out below.

>>60886891
Thanks anon

>>60887023
Yes. They are just delusional. There's no point at which they will see the truth. They don't give a shit.

>>60886895
Thomas and Adem were actually cripples? Lmao, even. I must have missed that thread.

xrp is the biggest scam in crypto

link is the 2nd biggest

if you buy either you're retarded and deserve to stay poor

>>60888207
I’m willing to bet on Tom and if we get scammed together, so be it

Don’t see that being a relatively high possibility though as he leads innovation for 11,500 banks, but what does he know? He’s just dumb right? XRP to the moon.

>>60888134
Apparently this was one of the key moments: https://warosu.org/biz/thread/S60643829#p60649709
And he's being extremely obvious about it lately.

The verbose ripple shill for instance is obviously either him or a similar link fuddie.
Here he is spewing verbal diarrhea about Sergey's dumps while defending Ripple's much larger dumps >>60881571

Here's him too: >>60884456
pretending to hold both Link and XRP but mysteriously only attacking link "advocates" for debunking the xerpie lies about swift instead of the xerpies for lying about Swift in the first place.

>>60882418 (OP)
https://youtube.com/shorts/egqNXPKW674

>>60889191
Those are 2 different cripples, and neither of them are Adem. In my head I dubbed them verbose/sophistry anon and rentfree anon (any negative Ripple thread he'll post a quick "rent free" drive-by unless somehow triggered. When triggered he ends up shitting on LINK, defending Ripple while claiming to hold both, and saying that deboonking Ripple talking points is actually bullish for Ripple).

>>60889230
The second one in particular is very obviously Adem.
He mentions "advocates" six times, as well as his usual list of fishy, CLG, biepum, ...

The first one may not be Adem, but he's absolutely one of the dedicated Link fuddies from the last half decade.

>>60889230
>>60889249
take your meds retards

>>60882437
Triggered chudcel

>>60883664
> Has this ever happened before?
yeah when ripple had more marketcap than bitcoin
XRP was the original chain using their inflation and amount of tokens to boost their rank

>>60889249
yup, the sophistry anon is the "I have to go to bed" or "I have to go to work now" anon who has been high-effort fudding since at least 2019

>>60889230
>In my head I dubbed
Rent free