Thread 60898540

SWIFT not going to develop its own cryptocurrency, says it plans instead to work with other cryptos, mentions Ripple/XRP and its cross border settlement ability by name.

tl;dr: Buy Link, Buy XRP, it honestly doesn't fucking matter, you just win either way.

We. Are. Unironically. ALL. Going. To. Fucking. Make it.

>>60898540 (OP)
>mentions Ripple/XRP and its cross border settlement ability by name.
Source?

LINKCELS IN SHAMBLES

>>60898545
>>60898544
Ok but where can I invest in the coffee shop credit card factory bank

>>60898548
Coinbase

>>60898540 (OP)
>>60898544
Nevermind i found a source.
>At the core of SWIFT’s strategy is the ISO 20022 messaging standard, a framework that enables richer, more structured data in financial transactions. This standard serves as the foundation for connecting SWIFT’s institutional members with modern payment technologies, including digital currencies. SWIFT has announced November as the deadline for full migration to this standard, and Grainger made it clear that SWIFT is not entering the business of issuing or generating digital assets. This separates SWIFT from entities like Ripple, which use digital currencies such as XRP to facilitate payments on distributed ledger networks.
>Ripple’s presence in cross-border finance has long invited comparisons to SWIFT. However, the two are now more likely to converge than collide. By integrating XRP and similar digital assets through ISO 20022 rather than replacing or ignoring them, SWIFT preserves neutrality and sidesteps the challenges associated with issuing a native token. This approach positions XRP at the forefront when SWIFT chooses to go forward with its blockchain integration, ensuring that Ripple’s payment system remains compliant and relevant within the evolving financial landscape.

>>60898575
KEK. ”Bullish for XRP” there is always some way the tards will spin it

>>60898575
The way I see it, XRP is going to be used to facilitate lightning fast money transactions globally, hence why theres so goddam many of them, and Link is going to power the administrative side, smart contracts, accounting and the like. I don't see how you lose with either coin. I saw a post a long time ago that said Link XRP and Graph were the 3 insider tokens. Slowly but surely that anon is being proven out true.

>Inb4 Graph has been a fucking shitshow.

Dont I know it, I lost my ass on that one too but im still holding, waiting to see if it finally wakes the fuck up and does something.

>>60898593
There's a reason Chainlink is involved in countless pilots and tests and XRP is involved in zero. They don't need XRP. Ever since regulations started coming in every fintech is creating their own chain and their own stable coin. The XRP bull case requires everyone to be on the XRPL and the Swift CIO himself is saying that the future is multi-chain. At this point Ripple's only hope at the XRPL being relevant into join the CCIP network.

>>60898593
I think SXT will replace The Graph

XRP for bullish

>>60898592
>>60898575
>>60898544
>>60898540 (OP)
>https://www.ainvest.com/news/xrp-news-today-swift-avoids-cryptocurrency-launch-integrate-fintech-ecosystems-2506/
>>60898601
>CIO himself is saying that the future is multi-chain
The article is a little old and obviously pro-xrp but essentially says the same thing there.

"Multi-chain" doesn't mean CCIP exclusive either. Swift isn't enforcing their 11,000+ bank partners to not use competitors, and there are many joining in now. Which is not good for link. I hate that it gets glossed over.

>>60898624
Yea, same way that "technically" no one forces you to use Microsoft Windows but it commands a solid 90%+ market share. I don't think at this point in the game anything can legitimately threaten Link. The game is already won on their end, its just a waiting game at this point.

>>60898636
>no one forces you to use Microsoft Windows but it commands a solid 90%+ market share.
That's the problem. Link doesn't own 90% of the market. A better comparison would be the OS/2 vs Windows vs MacOS era. And not assuming it'll be the 'windows' by default when more competition is pouring in each year.

>>60898650
>Link doesn't own 90% of the market.

Not yet anyway. Then again, neither did MSFT when they first started.

>>60898540 (OP)
Grainger said some things about SWIFT. XRP shill author weaves XRP into article even though Grainger didn't say anything about XRP at all. I hate you fags so much fuck the judge who let Ripple off you are funding a company that gives you zero ownership in the company you're fucking stupid.

>>60898636
>>60898650
https://youtu.be/-rM9jg3Ovv4?si=vpjOPDZDRT0JC6FP&t=2020

>>60898624
Chainlink is attached to the hip with Swift. Swift connects 11,000 banks. Swift literally is the banks. If CCIP is successfully integrated into Swift's existing system it's over for any competitors.

XRP bros.. we won

>>60898540 (OP)
>source: ainvest.com
HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA

>tl;dr: Buy Link, Buy XRP, it honestly doesn't fucking matter
In the context of Swift, XRP is irrelevant and Chainlink is the key.

You cripples really need to start coping with this whole Swift thing.

>>60898540 (OP)
Saaaaars! Xerp shanelank banks! Teeeeheeee

>>60898678
Chainlink is useless ERC20 shitcoin and XRP is the standard

>>60898681
>XRP is the standard

OOF

>>60898685
kek based

>>60898693
cringe

>>60898656
>MSFT when they first started
By stealing code, then when getting a sizable market share started forcing manufacturers to only sell PCs with windows. Sounds more Ripple to you?

Again not a great comparison considering swift will not be enforcing exclusivity. And a even worse comparison when looking deeper because linux is the worlds most used OS (Android), longterm backfired for Microsoft on phones, but I digress. Bad comparisons.
>>60898670
>REAL WORLD TOKENIZED ASSETS
There are about a couple dozen hundred thousand billion competitors doing the same thing. I'm exaggerating, but ignoring the problem doesn't make the price go up.
>>60898673
>Chainlink is attached to the hip with Swift
Only it's not, i don't think you guys get it.
It currently exists without chainlink.
It could exist without chainlink in the future.
It will exist with competitors to chainlink.
They intentionally left the doors open for competitors.
>Future is multi-chain.
Multi. I feel like I'm the only link holder left that hasn't drank the kool-aid. Working with swift is great shorterm. Longterm this inevitability gives us the same problem as everybody else.

>>60898613
XRPish for BULL

>>60898702
>it's not
Chainlink is pretty much the only crypto that Swift directly works with, continuously does tests with, writes articles about, hosts at Sibos, sends speakers to their conference, etc.

You really need to start coping sooner rather than later.

>>60898540 (OP)
How will Swifties ever recover.

>>60898721
Yeah lets keep glossing over the problem.
>intentionally left the doors open for competitors.

>>60898736
The thing is there are no competitors and of course SWIFT is going to try to appear as neutral

>>60898740
>there are no competitors
Please tell me you're trolling?

>>60898702
>By stealing code,

Stopped reading here. Oh youre just another fudder flinging shit, just trying to do it in a more elegant way. This isn't honest, good faith conversation, youre just seizing on negative shit to say.

I dont give a fuck if Bill Gates pulled it off by sucking dick and eating ass, he fucking did it.

Speaking of, SUCK A DICK fuddie. Chainlink will one day control when you go to the restroom and whether its to take a shit or piss. Seethe about it.

>>60898624
Can you retards stop sharing ainvest articles? They literally shit out ai articles like this to get clicks from clueless cripples. It's pathetic

>>60898736
>for chains, Swift specifically uses and mentions private chains, ETH, and Avax
>"THIS IS BULLISH FOR XRP"

>for oracles, Swift exclusively uses, works with, talks about Chainlink
>"THIS IS NOT BULLISH FOR CHAINLINK"

>>60898702
You still don't get it. Chainlink was literally built for Swift. Chainlink basically is Swift.

https://youtu.be/o6frxYOk4fA?t=670

>>60898736
>>60898746
>Buh Muh...muh Linux.

That dick aint gonna suck itself fuddie. Hop to it.

>>60898611
As a disappointment yes it will

>>60898747
>Stopped reading here.
Well you should have kept reading maybe you would've read "Sounds more like Ripple?" But sure I'm fudding by saying chainlink doesn't steal code. You are retarded.
>>60898749
I found the source of OPs pic and shared.
>>60898754
Mad your comparisons are bad and i was trying to have a serious discussion. Maybe hop out the circle jerk for 5mins and actually have a longterm outlook on your investments that isn't based on sucking bill gate's dick. Ever try that faggot?

>>60898540 (OP)
You retards make me sick. You know it's a ponzi scheme, you spit in the face of god by rejecting gold and silver, you're just kids but you're going to be rug pulled so hard when market crisis comes and liquidity starts to get drained out of everything.

>>60898592
This is literally pro XRP you dumb nigger kek and swift “compliance check” is such hilarious cope considering Ripple invented basically all crypto policies world wide.
>>60898601
Pure midwit compium and fraudulent linkcel statement. XRP is the single most trialed crypto there is. Did you niggers forget that Palau trialed the US federal reserve issued CBDC? You faggots are insufferable and maintain your hope based on literal lies kek
>>60898685 (this user has been doxxed by XSG)
Nothing but DELICIOUS LINKCEL SEETHE ITT kek

>>60898785
>Did you niggers forget that Palau trialed the US federal reserve issued CBDC?
Ripple's CBDC suite doesn't use XRP kek

>XRP is the single most trialed crypto there is
What trials did XRP ever do? Bank of England back in 2017?

Meanwhile Chainlink:
Swift, JP Morgan, Visa, Mastercard, DTCC, the US Government, the Brazilian national central bank, ...
Actually some of these are live kek

>Palau
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>60898769
dr;woytstdff (Didnt read, waiting on you to suck that dick fud faggot.)

>>60898785
>With Palau having the US Dollar as its national currency, the PSC was simply a Dollar-pegged stablecoin, with the pilot phase involving three local retailers and 154 government officials who volunteered to conduct the transactions.
>three local retailers and 154 government officials
Congratulations on this, seriously.

>>60898856
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>60898856
>in b4 a long winded paragraph about how insanely bullish this is, with half of the paragraph being totally irrelevant to what is being discussed

>>60898797
Imagine being this retarded and misinformed about XRP in 2025 kek. Every major currency has already tested XRP.
>>60898856
Uhhh linkcel? Palau uses the US dollar, and the head of treasury was interviewed and they themselves talked about how they were mandated by the federal reserve of the United States to test the eUSD, you think a military occupied nation that uses a currency that doesn’t belong to them is going to do something without the consent of their handlers? Ugh I know, nothing to do with chainlink, sorry!

>>60898785
>The pilot program included three local merchants and 154 government officials who voluntarily transacted with PSC. Ripple funded the project with a $25,000 donation, most of which—over $14,000—was distributed among merchants to circulate test stablecoins.
>The issue? The Ministry of Finance reportedly did not obtain all the required legal approvals. The agreement with Ripple was not verified by the Attorney General or the National Program Director, as required by local regulations. Although no funds were misused and the finances were transparently handled, the public auditor flagged it as a warning.

So Ripple bribed some corrupt government officials to get this approved, spent a whopping $25,000 on the entire thing, and all they did was probably go to restaurants and buy lunch. Holy shit lmao.

>>60898880
>Every major currency has already tested XRP.
Ripple's CBDC suite doesn't use XRP, stop lying.

And pretty much every chain under the sun has seen way more CBDC use and experimentation than XRPL.

>>60898888
Thanks ChatGPT, now tell us about the interview with the treasury department.
Here, get the transcript from one of the many videos interviewing and official like this one https://youtu.be/Ee33Jvk1xhs?si=ZIrxk66KNOBlNSmL
Thanks, ChatGPT.

Weird how xrp always has to include themselves into anything, OP news post was basically:

>SWIFT Grainger talking about tokenization and that its a multichain world. NEVER MENTIONING XRP IN THEIR OWN WORDS.
>Auther of article inserting in his own sentence that its somehow about XRP or that this might be a reason XRP will be used
And then like clockwork, 2 or 3 AI crypto websites start making AI articles that Swift grainger sees XRP as an option to implement it for their statement when nothing like that happened

Has any XRP bagholder addressed how often this happens?
It feels like this really is the end all argument because no xerpie has ever given me an explanation of why this happens

So is anything in here not ai? Obviously XRP is going to be chosen, but like this is ai nigga floydbot

>>60898890
You are a literal retard. The product that you’re talking about can’t even interact with CBDCs because it’s not a blockchain. CBDCs can ONLY interact with a blockchain, because they’re fucking blockchains. The XRPL is the blockchain that can host CBDCs, a CBDC is a digital fiat currency, as is a stablecoin. Stablecoins exist within the XRPL, just like CBDCs have existed in private ledgers on the XRPL.
Also before algorithmically stabilizing a fiat currency became the norm, XRP invented “trust lines” which even satoshi talked about. If you don’t see how a CBDC can only exist within the XRPL and not offchain then you are willfully retarded.

>>60898896
that guy isn't a government official, he literally says he's a project manager for Palau in the video

>>60898611
>SXT
Kek, this shit will be dead in a year. Not needed.

>>60898904
What the fuck are you yapping about.
The Ripple CBDC platform runs on private forks of XRPL that doesn't collect or burn XRP at all.

XRP is not involved in Ripple CBDCs.

>>60898903
So that's why my palms are all fucked up from pull ups kek

>>60898896
>watch a 20 minute video to hear my counter argument
Hilarious that you accuse me of using ChatGPT but you can't even argue in your own words. Like a typical rippletard you're going to link videos and images and schizo collages and say "DYOR spoonfeeding is over". A 10 minute Google search of "palau ripple" shows nothing but this joke of a pilot but I'm sure this random youtuber has the real alpha. Honestly I hope Palau does use XRP. The country ranked 190th by GDP out of 194 countries would honestly be a massive win for Ripple.

>>60898915
Nigger there are testnets for everything. The fact that you can’t grasp the concept of there being a CBDC on the XRPL through a private ledgers when there’s 10 versions of USDC all in different blockchain not even wrapped proves I’m arguing with a retard.
>>60898922
This but for chainlink, kek can’t even google search 90% of the shit you niggers talk about. It’s all made up kek

>>60898925
>testnets
The Ripple CBDC platform is not a testnet. Tests happen on it because it's literally free.
The plan is for CBDCs to run on private forks of XRPL with no fees.

XRP not involved or needed.

>>60898896
>here's a video with proof from a government official
>no government official found in video
>>60898925
>it's al made up with chainlink
kill yourself promptly

>>60898915
>he doesn't know what a trustline is

>guise guise the good banks are telling you what shitcoins to buy guise, they will pump our bags for sure bros!
you're all beyond retarded, both of them are scams relying on muh banking integration narrative

>>60898977
>scams relying on muh banking integration narrative
Chainlink holds like 80% dominance in Defi.
The fuck are you talking about you ignorant fuckwit.

>>60898980
Defi in its entirety is a fucking scam you brainlet
name one useful thing Defi can do
>inb4 muh lending pools
that's a scam

>>60898987
>relying on tradfi adoption is bad
>relying on defi adoption is also bad

soooo what's left?

>>60898991
>guise guise I'm telling you my shitcoin is powering up 80% of the vaporware market
>guise guise I swear to God teh BANKS are signalling to you goy plebs that my shitcoin is going to moon, buy moar now!
such a gullible retard

>>60898693
Why don't people just sell their xrp and buy link?

>>60898996
low token price good
Qtard demographic
trust the plan

>>60898996
Because if Link does a 4x, but XRP does a 12x, then WHO MAKES MORE MONEY you DONKEY

>>60898991
>>relying on tradfi adoption is bad
>>relying on defi adoption is also bad
Kek, this. Guess we have to pack it up guys.

>>60899005
>noooooooo don't buy that scam, buy MY scam reeeeeeeee
you're hopeless

>>60899006
>nooooo Defi is not vaporware and the banks WILL pump my bags any day now
you're retarded

>>60899007
>>60898995
Link scam:
>highly successful in Defi
>highly successful in Tradfi

XRP scam:
>zero traction in Defi
>zero traction in Tradfi

hmmmmmmm

>>60899015
>noooooo my scam is BETTER reeeeeeee
the mere fact that you have to stoop that low and even compare your shitcoin to another blatant scam tells me all I need to know

>>60899012
So what do you suggest we invest in? Being contrarian is not a winning investment thesis.

>>60899017
>my scam is BETTER
Looking at the objective numbers, absolutely.

>NOOOO YOU CAN'T COMPARE TWO ASSETS FROM THE SAME ASSET CLASS AND GENERAL LIQUIDITY POOL
Link is flipping XRP, it's just a matter of time now.

>>60899019
believing that banks are signalling to the world what they're going to pump next is the most naive and delusional investment thesis ever
>daddy what should I buy then I'm a retard pls spoonfeed pls pls
literally anything else you imbecile, what's this ridiculous false dichotomy? are you seriously insinuating that LINK and XRP are the only shit you can buy?
>>60899023
they're both scams and they'll eventually trend to zero, you're an actual retard

>>60899028
I get it, you're a xerpie who's butthurt about banks all turning to Chainlink

>>60899031
>both are scams
>I get it, you hold the other scam
I genuinely keked
I sincerely hope you're not trolling, I like to believe that utter retards such as yourself do exist in this world

>>60899036
so SWIFT just decided to start doing these things for fun and to mislead the retail investor? https://www.swift.com/news-events/press-releases/swift-ubs-asset-management-and-chainlink-successfully-complete-innovative-pilot-bridge-tokenized-assets-existing-payment-systems
KEK you are completely mindbroken, have fun staying poor

>>60899036
If you don't hold either, then why are you here being all butthurt about it?

>>60899048
>muh SWIFT, muh appeal to authority, muh pilots!!
as long as they keep giving them cash, they will do as many pilots as they please, you naive and clueless moron
>b-b-but they wouldn't risk their heckin reputation!!!
it's trials retard, they can always say that the experiments didn't lead to anything tangible, we're looking forward for the next bleeding edge tech for experimentation blah blah yada yada
here's a clue for you
>https://killedbygoogle.com/
>>60899050
I'm not, you are

>>60899055
>as long as they keep giving them cash, they will do as many pilots as they please, you naive and clueless moron
do you think were all 12 years old here?

>>60899060
>nooooooo it's unfathomable that institutions get paid by startups for pilots with the corresponding innovation departments they're only doing this because they like to waste resources on experiments reeeeeeeeee
are you 12?

>>60899062
if it were that easy every grifting piece of shit crypto scam would be doing it

>>60899062
So an international banking consortium needs money so badly, because obviously the banks arent making enough, that they accept bribes from startups to do pilots to keep the lights on?
And you expect to be taken serious?

>>60899055
>I'm not here

>>60899062
>Link pays them!
Ripple has a hundred times more money than Chainlink, so where are Ripple's banks?
The only bank they have is SBI, and they're adopting Chainlink now.

>>60899028
>literally anything else you imbecile, what's this ridiculous false dichotomy? are you seriously insinuating that LINK and XRP are the only shit you can buy?
Nowhere did I say this. I just get the feeling that you will shit on anything and everything because you're a hateful little man. So I'll save myself the trouble and ask: what do you think is a good investment in the finance sector? Failure to answer this question will result in an automatic dismissal of all your comments ITT.

>>60898593
>The way I see it, XRP is going to be used to facilitate lightning fast money transactions globally
Why? They don't have any special tech that's impossible to copy or improve, and they don't benefit from network effect either.
They're good at paying people to shill their coin but that's it

>>60899062
how much money do you think the DTCC and SWIFT would need from me to agree for a pilot, like lmao the former has literally federal oversight, and they started working with chainlink before trump could hollow out the federal powers of today.
Imagine if any company could just go up to them and demand a pilot for some money

>>60898540 (OP)
Swift doesn't have their own currency, so why would this come as a surprise to anyone? They help to facilitate global payments between their client banks.

>>60898601
>The XRP bull case requires everyone
Yea, if only like 1/4 of them use I bet the price of XRP goes down bigly.

>>60898752
Yes, that's why it's losing.
It was developed and envisioned by literal octogenarians and they told you about it in a book written by the oldest of them all.
topke You guy are literally invested in boomer tech and got your "inside info" from boomers.

>>60899185
>1/4 of them
Try .2% of them

>>60899189
the infra that banks collectively own and control, and have spent billions developing and sustaining for decades leading to perpetual YoY network growth is… actually losing guys!!! Buy xrp!!!

Here is the thing though. You have to understand this. Now listen up.

Chainlink won. Get it? Do you understand? Chainlink won. This was a war and Chainlink simply won. No, seriously. This is very important. No, no, really. Listen to me. Chainlink won. Nobody uses XRP. Meanwhile Chainlink has secured $93B in total value secured. Proof? Here https://metrics.chain.link/

Nobody likes a sore loser. Nobody. And that is what Ripple Labs is. XRP lost. Ripple Labs will eventually kill it and have it join the grave of all the other dead shitcoins. And then Ripple Labs will jump on the Chainlink bandwagon too (they already did with RLUSD). That's not a prediction. That's a spoiler. I can see the future.

Chainlink and Chainlink Labs are the winners.

Sure, you can go on and continue to post about your schizo bag of XRP but no one uses it. It's a fact. If you hold crypto in 2025 and you still have any hopium for XRP, nobody will take you seriously.

That's how it is with Chainlink now. Chainlink won. It's that simple. It's really that fucking simple. Chainlink won the institutional/banker coin war.

>>60899189
i find it absolutely bizarre that xrpaypigs like this think that swift is actually going anywhere, or that xrp is capable of replacing anything that swift does
its like you don't even understand what swift is in the first place, like it's just another single company or bank and that traditional finance is magically going to leave their table to throw everything into a shitcoin ledger that, while fast and scalable (and it's not even the best solution if that's the only thing you consider,) is hopelessly centralized and can't really be trusted when you factor in the first 32k missing blocks and how it falls over with the CTO shrugging at it going "i dunno why it happened"

anyone with even a basic level of business acumen can look at the situation and understand that self-made bank cbdcs paired with an actual decentralized interoperability framework doesn't require xrp in any sense, and that's exactly the kind of approach which is going to be implemented in most cases at this stage according to their own words

the only real chance you have at this point for a moderate return over a long timeframe is if xcurrent (which isn't even going to be santander's preferred rail with the swift + gpi solution) suddenly decides to reinvent itself to use xrp which would just be seen as as an elaborate moneygrab at that point and then they'd be out of the picture after that anyway

god knows why i'm writing an actual response to a cripple, i might as well try to explain the sun to a dog

>>60899363
it also demonstrates their completel lack of real world experience. I work in operational finance for an institution (but not a bank) and swift is so entrenched in our systems it would be a significant effort to convert to something else. And that’s just one region within one multinational company. Multiply that by the thousands upon thousands of other banks, institutions, corporations both public and private, governments, etc have entrenched swift into all their systems. So now you take that first number (of all entities using swift) and multiply it by the propriety systems these entities all use. It’s literally operationally impossible to ‘replace swift’ and that’s just from a corporate treasury point of view

>>60899381
see I don't have that level of experience but that insight there really clearly paints a picture for how unrealistic it is
if it's that impractical, expensive, and has to have a result which pays back on that impracticality and cost then it just confirms how far these retards are from reality when they start running their mouths

>>60898702
Chainlink isn't a chain. Pls kys now

>>60899363
They've been indoctrinated since its inception, can't argue with deranged cultists, just like liberals

>>60899363
>xrpaypigs like this think that swift is actually going anywhere, or that xrp is capable of replacing anything that swift does
Bro didn't you hear?
Ripple is trying to become a bank! And as we all know, banks make Swift obsolete!

>>60899541
it needs to be studied, that's for sure
>>60899554
lol - oh wow yes i forgot
xrp is simultaneously going to help the entirety of swift while replacing swift and it will also compete alongside swift, be a bank, an oracle, a smartcontracts platform, and a cbdc issuer all at the same time! it's almost like it's just whatever the bagholder needs it to be at the exact moment they're talking about it

>>60899449
kek not to mention all the other finance functions that rely on swift infrastructure. makes me laugh when these people think it’s some plug and play thing that can be swapped out. In reality It’s like trying to untangle a spiders web that has been wound for like 50 years while the spider is still alive and pumping out more webbing constantly

>>60898807
>>60898769
Linkfags eating their own. Happens every cycle. Top signal.

bullish for XRP

You absolute double niggers. The source material is from 2017 and it's the journalist that mentions cripple, not SWIFT.

We already know SWIFT isn't making digital assets...their plan was always to link all the digital islands up together.

https://bankautomationnews.com/allposts/payments/whats-next-for-swift-apis-realtime-payments-and-cryptocurrency/

>>60898540 (OP)
they literally just announced they're making an L1 called tempo, check twitter

>>60898746
no. do you sincerely think the closest competitor, pyth, is worth worrying about.

>>60902463
>do you sincerely think competitors are worth worrying about?
>T. Blackberry™ - 2006.

>>60898969
Id slip my trustless smart contract into her blockchain, if you cognate my syntax.

>>60899102
We're still waiting I see. Dont let the little shitflinger off the hook. God I fucking hate these worthless fuddies. Go yank the dick out of that other dicksucker's mouth and get to work.

>>60899068
SWIFT doesn't make shit, it's simply a messaging platform between banks, so YES, they do take money from startups
>>60899072
Ripple spent a decade doing the exact same thing Choinlank does right now, worthless pilots with institutions
>>60899102
>I just get the feeling
>I won't entertain your proposal with logic and facts because you hurt my fee fees
>>60899130
5-10mm

>>60899278
based and redpilled

>>60903271
>our faulty price feed is.... get this... like APPLE!!!??!

>>60903289
>her

>>60903271
chainlinks oracle moat is insane, any sofar they've been prevailing against any and all oracle competitors

>>60899381
I was hoping someone would try to debunk this. XRP spammer where you at?

>>60903490
>Ripple spent a decade doing the exact same thing Choinlank does right now, worthless pilots with institutions
The biggest pilot Ripple ever did was with Bank of England.
And that's over half a decade ago.

There's no comparison with Chainlink.

>>60898540 (OP)
Anon, SWIFT is a communication protocol for banks. They don't manage assets and thus won't have collateral to back their currency off of. It's banks that will be creating cryptocurrencies aka stablecoins. However, SWIFT will help them connect and trade currencies.

https://twitter.com/TheLinkPanda/status/1915055617854824817

>>60906849
*link tangentially related