← Home ← Back to /biz/

Thread 60911807

61 posts 20 images 45 unique posters /biz/
Anonymous (ID: UlIshYnO) No.60911807 >>60911811 >>60911832 >>60911861 >>60911891 >>60911924 >>60911952 >>60911958 >>60912137 >>60912176 >>60912215 >>60913015 >>60913199 >>60913242 >>60914972 >>60919168
Grayscale Chainlink ETF
Kek fuddies
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1852025/000119312525197401/0001193125-25-197401-index.htm
Anonymous (ID: qECFtgrG) No.60911811 >>60911820 >>60911849
>>60911807 (OP)
>An ETF for an ERC20 shitcoin thats literally not needed

kek
Anonymous (ID: UlIshYnO) No.60911812 >>60916108
>inb4 fuddie wall of texts saying much about nothing
>inb4 OP can't inb4
Anonymous (ID: UlIshYnO) No.60911820 >>60912034 >>60916116
>>60911811
30 seconds! Wow, your F5 key must be as worn out as my N key.
Anonymous (ID: nUXGO2cF) No.60911831
So when can I buy this in a tfsa? I can’t but glink because it is a “pink sheet” investment or whatever
Anonymous (ID: rB0wQ2RU) No.60911832 >>60911846 >>60911871
>>60911807 (OP)
how long does this sort of thing usually take to get rolling?
Anonymous (ID: OHhCbAo3) No.60911846
>>60911832
months, but theres a whole talk about SEC ETF crypto fasttrack, and afaik link is one of the few cryptos that can feasibly get a fasttrack approval. Best case, we get the ETF around october/november, just in time for ratecuts
Anonymous (ID: vRj6Bh+M) No.60911849
>>60911811
You mean an ERC-677
Anonymous (ID: rB0wQ2RU) No.60911851
gongo?
Anonymous (ID: QbAv0Um8) No.60911861
>>60911807 (OP)
Absolutely massive.
Anonymous (ID: PWeEtSdu) No.60911871
>>60911832
About half a year to a year typically due to constant delays. Wouldn't expect anything from it in 2025 but you'll probably get several Chainlink ETFs in 2026 all going live at once alongside other alts like DOGE, XLM, HBAR, TRON, QNT etc.
Anonymous (ID: DWKj6O9k) No.60911891
>>60911807 (OP)
>Grayscale
LOL
Anonymous (ID: zr1+jHi/) No.60911924 >>60913348
>>60911807 (OP)
Same as the ETH and BTC Grayscale trusts, the LINK ETF will become exit liquidity for all the Grayscale trust investors. You can expect a big dump the week the ETF's launch.
Anonymous (ID: VYdJn6+z) No.60911946 >>60911950 >>60911956 >>60911963
Congratulations on literally nothing kek XRP has FIFTEEN spot and futures filings
Anonymous (ID: gVx8IKs7) No.60911950
>>60911946
>indian xrpoo holders seething
top kek
Anonymous (ID: 4nYEM2sJ) No.60911952
>>60911807 (OP)
Cool. Very impressive. Now lets take a look at the price of the LINK token.
Anonymous (ID: 6upvQ5Ok) No.60911956
>>60911946
Don't be a sophist anon. Nobody likes a sophist.
Anonymous (ID: VSTZ+85h) No.60911958
>>60911807 (OP)
reminder gayscale link trust glink only has like $2M worth of link top kek theres zero boomer demand for stink
if you think etf with zero demand and sirgay 1M weekly buyback will offset the weekly 1B selloffs think again
oh nononohahahaha stinky
Anonymous (ID: tRx97Loa) No.60911963 >>60911981
>>60911946
and they still haven't gotten listed topKEK
Anonymous (ID: VYdJn6+z) No.60911981 >>60911985 >>60911990
>>60911963
There are Canadian and European XRP ETFs already. What a coincidence the US filings are due at the same time SWIFT trials XRP in November kek
Anonymous (ID: OHhCbAo3) No.60911985 >>60912020
>>60911981
>What a coincidence the US filings are due at the same time SWIFT trials XRP in November kek
source? I think you lie and will just show me AI articles and no name websites linking each other. I will actually eat my shit if you can show me a swift.com domain article
Anonymous (ID: gVx8IKs7) No.60911990
>>60911981
gm saaar

how was your evening street shit?
Anonymous (ID: I1VUFcYW) No.60912014 >>60912071 >>60914972
It's all coming together

https://x.com/WatcherGuru/status/1965024039438897401
Anonymous (ID: tRx97Loa) No.60912020
>>60911985
>SWIFT trials XRP in November kek
alright now I know you are just trolling, almost had me, and as for European etfs I think you mean ETPs and Link has them too
Anonymous (ID: akP0IkAB) No.60912034 >>60912102
>>60911820
Do you type “No” a lot?
Anonymous (ID: Z8U6onqE) No.60912071 >>60912094 >>60914937
>>60912014
Seethe fag. (this is the Swell XRP event, coincidence, nope, it's happening, for XRP that is)
Anonymous (ID: DNkStIyz) No.60912092
didnt these fucks already have a glink token not needed scam?
Anonymous (ID: yWLAHlah) No.60912094 >>60912118 >>60913850 >>60915753
>>60912071
>”hello yes everyone, thank you for having me. Yes, Chainlink who we are launching with next week is having a conference just down the block, let’s all walk over there together. XRP is a scam, sell all your XRP. Thank you.”
Anonymous (ID: UlIshYnO) No.60912102
>>60912034
No.
Anonymous (ID: UlIshYnO) No.60912118
>>60912094
Yes.
Sssssss (ID: Oow2fxXF) No.60912121
Its time to bring the swastikas posts and tópicos we cant allow normies to buy out chainlink coin
Anonymous (ID: lpgHtl1T) No.60912137 >>60912152
>>60911807 (OP)
Nothing to kek about you retard. Having ETF applications don't mean nothing. Delete your stupid thread.
Anonymous (ID: aqf4J0CX) No.60912142
our sophistic hubris will be our downfall
Anonymous (ID: kCO57r+d) No.60912148 >>60913348
Wait isn’t LINK already included in Grayscale?
Anonymous (ID: UlIshYnO) No.60912152 >>60912155
>>60912137
I don't think I will. I like (you)s, even if they are from seething fudbots. Number go up and all that, just like the number of LINK that I can claim as rewards from my make-it stack that is staked in the official Chainlink community staking. How does that make you feel?
Anonymous (ID: lpgHtl1T) No.60912155 >>60912173 >>60912260
>>60912152
GO FUCK YOURSELF YOU STUPID FUCK
Anonymous (ID: UlIshYnO) No.60912173
>>60912155
Can you please give me (you)s on this post too >>60912135
Anonymous (ID: qix0UvWm) No.60912176 >>60912188
>>60911807 (OP)
>price unaffected
Many such cases. SAD!
Anonymous (ID: UlIshYnO) No.60912188
>>60912176
We are literally pumping right this second.
Anonymous (ID: kVKZCTYp) No.60912215 >>60916842
>>60911807 (OP)
I thought this was already a thing?
Anonymous (ID: ks2l+jDS) No.60912260
>>60912155
HAHAHAHAHA POOLS CLOSED
Anonymous (ID: w46A7pVb) No.60912934
Ok but....... price?????????
Oh
............... and chart????????????
Anonymous (ID: h+kD81d6) No.60913015
>>60911807 (OP)
Sexy
Anonymous (ID: NdsJ7NAA) No.60913199
>>60911807 (OP)
Price
Anonymous (ID: iXKYZEyd) No.60913242
>>60911807 (OP)
most scams so straight to the top
Anonymous (ID: lRYJXef6) No.60913348
>>60911924
This is dumb. Trust volume is shit compared to market, it wont have any effect at all. Trust was basically there for all people who legally wanted to gain exposure with Link and wait to sell it until it is converted to ETF.

>>60912148
It is currently a trust. In theory, Grayscale buys X amount of link and splits shares among those who want to buy. In practice, everyone buying currently in Grayscale Trust doesnt give a fuck about trading within the trust, they just wanted a legal way to buy Link and sell later when ETF is released, because with an ETF you can redistribute the amount of link tokens and trade at almost the real price on the market
Anonymous (ID: +E/P5aoY) No.60913850
>>60912094
kek
Anonymous (ID: w46A7pVb) No.60914554
Alright.... but..... price? Oh... and chart??
TNN
Anonymous (ID: qNq5kJrI) No.60914937
>>60912071
would
Anonymous (ID: vs3JfFkn) No.60914972
>>60911807 (OP)
>link treasury companies
>link etf
>>60912014
>tokenization of real world assets and stocks
way to go, Sergey,
Anonymous (ID: K6r9mZ0P) No.60915753 >>60915763 >>60915801 >>60916108 >>60918611
>>60912094
You have to be one of the most transparently dishonest and low-effort posters on this entire board if you think some contrived parody of a press conference “hello yes everyone, XRP is a scam,” constitutes anything resembling an argument rather than the kind of cope I’ve called out literally dozens of times across multiple threads. You invent these skits because you cannot engage substantively with liquidity depth, ODL corridors, regulatory clarity, or even the most basic mechanics of settlement, so instead you hide behind a hollow caricature that nobody reading in good faith could take seriously. It’s projection in the most literal sense: you know your position is the scam, so you mirror that accusation onto XRP in the form of this absurd theater, which doesn’t even make sense, and then you pat yourself on the back as if stringing together a fake dialogue is the same thing as engaging with facts. It’s hilarious in the most pathetic way possible. You will notice, as always, that the second you are challenged on details why correspondent banking is inefficient, how settlement risk is mitigated, where billions in throughput have already been documented; you collapse into these tired routines, repeating yourself in ever more errant and abstract ways, clinging to childish performance because you literally have nothing else. If your best shot is to pretend to be an XRP executive making self-sabotaging statements, you’ve proven my point: you are not arguing in good faith, you are coping, you are looping, you are insecure, and the only person convinced by this tactic is you. Everyone else can see exactly what you’re doing, and once again you’ve owned yourself with every keystroke you made.
Anonymous (ID: rB0wQ2RU) No.60915763
>>60915753
xrp
Anonymous (ID: Fu2nASF9) No.60915801
>>60915753
Sunken cost fallacy + projection = xurpies
Anonymous (ID: UlIshYnO) No.60916108
>>60915753
I predicted this (>>60911812), where is my cookie.
Anonymous (ID: hcgEtX9f) No.60916116
>>60911820
kek my n key is actually missing from my keyboard.
Anonymous (ID: MATa65H/) No.60916160
you know $melania has an etf too right?

you can make an etf for dogshit, doesnt mean anyone will buy it
Anonymous (ID: O6o2RqES) No.60916752
Bullish for xrp. They feel like they need a distraction, therefore link is the "obvious play" with swift officially confirmed. Then they will abolish swift entirely and use xrp.
Anonymous (ID: w761LlNu) No.60916842
>>60912215
they don’t have an etf
it’s an otc
They will convert that into an etf
which means it needs to be backed 1by1
that said they only have 30millions in shares
so no real interest but it could mean companies can get exposure to link
Anonymous (ID: kyTkSsaH) No.60918611 >>60919153
>>60915753
This faggot with his walls of text posts, imagine having nothing going in your life so you can spend this much time on a siberian ice fishing board defending xrp of all things. Inquire mental support
Anonymous (ID: TBT5Tfu7) No.60919153
>>60918611
This is in all honesty one of the most absurdly pathetic demonstrations ever witnessed on this board and it reflects in the clearest possible terms the absolute decrepitude of linkjeets that the only tactic remaining to you, after years of humiliation and price stagnation, is to defer in totality to an artificial intelligence program and attempt to generate a pale, hollow, and transparently insecure caricature of an XRP argument delivered with utter repugnance, as though the simple mimicry of my particular style without the corresponding substance could ever be persuasive, which it obviously cannot. You seriously imagine that people cannot immediately perceive this for what it is; a desperate and clownish act of projection by a broken cohort that has so thoroughly conceded defeat that it must invent a mechanical surrogate to articulate its own cope and yet you parade it as though it were clever, which makes it even more embarrassing.

You have literally been reduced to NPC like parroting, incapable of origination, and so in the absence of anything resembling conviction you now outsource to software the appearance of rhetorical force, which is not actually force but only an aroma of performance stacked several layers of abstraction outside of reality. This is not debate, it is confession. It reeks of insecurity, of fraudulence, of errant desperation, and of the absurd delusion that pasting GPT generated walls about USB dongles or spreadsheets somehow redeems your project, as if it's so far removed from that in an exacted fashion.

So yes, continue posting this bot-vomit and declaring it victory; every repetition only further substantiates what has already been demonstrated that LINK holders are not competitors in any meaningful sense but clowns, insecure and broken beyond repair, literally incapable of fighting their own battles without the aid of artificial mimicry, which is the most humiliating concession imaginable.
Anonymous (ID: 59y/wrxc) No.60919168
>>60911807 (OP)
kek shills