Thread 60917758

She was looking for something specific,

"Real infrastructure, real adoption and a mission worth backing."

This is in all honesty one of the most absurdly pathetic demonstrations ever witnessed on this board and it reflects in the clearest possible terms the absolute decrepitude of linkjeets that the only tactic remaining to you, after years of humiliation and price stagnation, is to defer in totality to an artificial intelligence program and attempt to generate a pale, hollow, and transparently insecure caricature of an XRP argument delivered with utter repugnance, as though the simple mimicry of my particular style without the corresponding substance could ever be persuasive, which it obviously cannot. You seriously imagine that people cannot immediately perceive this for what it is; a desperate and clownish act of projection by a broken cohort that has so thoroughly conceded defeat that it must invent a mechanical surrogate to articulate its own cope and yet you parade it as though it were clever, which makes it even more embarrassing.

You have literally been reduced to NPC like parroting, incapable of origination, and so in the absence of anything resembling conviction you now outsource to software the appearance of rhetorical force, which is not actually force but only an aroma of performance stacked several layers of abstraction outside of reality. This is not debate, it is confession. It reeks of insecurity, of fraudulence, of errant desperation, and of the absurd delusion that pasting GPT generated walls about USB dongles or spreadsheets somehow redeems your project, as if it's so far removed from that in an exacted fashion.

So yes, continue posting this bot-vomit and declaring it victory; every repetition only further substantiates what has already been demonstrated that LINK holders are not competitors in any meaningful sense but clowns, insecure and broken beyond repair, literally incapable of fighting their own battles without the aid of artificial mimicry, which is the most humiliating concession imaginable.

USA USA USA

>>60917758 (OP)
Fucking whore

I'm sure some pathologically performative histrionic roastie who was hired as an account manager and who got promoted because she reminded Sergey of a chicken wing will bring some positive price action for stink

>>60917758 (OP)
>Ripple employee
Ripple bought Metaco, Ripple fired her for being useless roastie and she joined Chainlink?

>>60917797
>fired
proof?

the amount of seething xrpies in this thread is really telling

>I was looking for something specific: real infrastructure, real adoption and a mission worth backing
Translation: Sergey will pay me more for less work, and I get to go to Chainlink sponsored parties hihi

Never change, roasties

>>60917894
>roasties
>global tokenization partners lead

remember when the cult was in denial that angie walker left

and kemal

>duuuuuuuuuuude they "stayed on" as advisor

bahhahahahahhahahaha

>>60917758 (OP)
>Roastie can't handle real tech
many such cases

>>60917920
She literally did a video with chainlink the other day.

>>60917797
>>60917894
>>60917920

>>60917813
Just joking, it’s just that she worked at Metaco, then Ripple bought them and she quit. She never actually worked at Ripple, despite what she’s saying.

>>60917929
Daym, that nigga thicc. Whats his handle again?

>>60917913
>global tokenization partners lead

You forgot this part:
>(ex Ripple, Metaco, Swisscom)

Talk about monkey branching. Don't worry about roastie's exes anon, I'm sure Chainlink is the real Mr Perfect, as long as Sergey treats her right

>>60917959
>Talk about monkey branching.
>People must stay at the same job for 30+ years!!!!

>>60917959
>as long as Sergey treats her right
I'm sensing jealousy. Are you mad you couldnt even afford to pay a chick like this to fuck you?

>>60917758 (OP)
>Shit from over a year ago
>Spoiler:
This chick is a dumb cunt t b h who gives a fuck

>>60917913
>he fell for it again
picrelated

>>60917924
>ages 10 years after working at CLL for 2 years
bruta

>>60918056
*brutal

>>60917758 (OP)
kek
>CHAINLINK OVERPAYS FOR A ROASTIE AND GETS RIPPLE'S SLOPPY SECONDS

>>60917996
>>60918010
Is that you, Mrs Tokenization Partnerhips Lead? lmao
GGs, game is game. Sergey is a huge sperg, shouldn't be too hard milking him for all sorts of bonuses.

>>60917758 (OP)
is she getting paid in link?
or are they selling link to pay her?
how is this good for us?

>>60918022
>>60918056
>>60918077
>>60918093
>>60918099

>>60918114
I love this guy because he's the opposite of me (very far right on the bell curve) so it's a given we'd agree on the basic premise.

>>60917770
>>60917929
>>60918114

>>60918124
>so it's a given we'd agree on the basic premise

So you agree with his basic premise that if XRP does a x12 it's still under $100 while if Link does a x4 it will have performed worse AND will be over $100?

>>60917947
>Just joking
>heh just joking, I totally didn't try to lie to you, heh nothing to look at here heh

>>60918149
That sounds objectively true.

>>60917758 (OP)
More like she just wanted to hop on the 300k/yr roastie payroll, amirite ripplebros?

>>60918161
>if it happens, it'll be true!

You're on the left end of the Bell curve anon.
Remember: it's YOUR left.

>>60918213
>Remember: it's YOUR left.
He cant help it if hes dyslexic

>>60917765
Why are all the AI posts here so verbose? I'm not reading that slop

>>60918213
You literally said XRP does a 12x and LINK does a 4x and that that means XRP performed better.
Are midwits really this obtuse?

>>60918270
They are trained on a bazillion words and that's what they use.

>>60918334
>and that that means XRP performed better
If that happens, yes.

You're not getting it, are you?

>>60918270
fucking linkjeet you are DELUSIONAL and DESPERATE

>>60918342
But it's going to happen.
kek
Just like last year.
I have a few LINK too. But it's really not worth that much overall.
You see...I have a LOT of XRP tokens, so since I don't have many LINK, that is bearish for LINK.

>>60918346
This collage is better

>>60918349
>But it's going to happen.
Even if you believe that, the premise is still flawed.

>>60918358
>the premise that 12x is larger than 4x is wrong

>>60918412
The premise is "if X happens in the future, it will have happened".
The two parts of the premise are self referencing, like the definition of a word containing the same word.

>>60917758 (OP)
Hot af

>>60917920
Since you're 12 and/or a basement dweller, you wouldn't understand one thing about business and networking.

>>60917794
>and who got promoted because she reminded Sergey of a chicken wing
Hearty kek

>>60918429
But it is going to happen and the "if" statement is correct "if" it does and when it does it will be even more correct.

>>60919039
can someone make it eyes like hes having an orgasm?

>>60919468
kekking.
I have a daughter about that age. Love it when they scream and rage.

>>60919498
That baby is sinister as fuck.

>>60919519
Once you have a kid, at certain times, you will see what unmitigated, entirely uncontrollable rage really is.

>>60917959
Yuck. They can have the Kikess.

another integration on Chainlink this week

>>60917924
hmm that's interesting
i first thought it was a delayed release as chainlink has been known to repost stuff when their current marketing ideas run out but this one is dated

they show her as an "advisor" here which for anyone in the business world (so not you), knows that's an empty role for optics, and the person is not an employee

they've also taken her off the website'
i'm guessing they have deal where she allows them to post the logo on videos for a fee, paid for by your donations of course

>>60917929
not sure who that is

>>60918109
>how is this good for us?

there is no "us" when it comes to investing kid
>>60918350
>he started out 5 years ago optimistic about retiring
>link stayed the same price while btc, eth, sol, etc all went 10x+
>now he compiles collages of random dudes jerking off

brutal bro, you might have the worse arc out of everyone here

>>60918641
>Since you're 12 and/or a basement dweller, you wouldn't understand one thing about business and networking.

im prob more experience than you, at everything

i can tell because you're still making amateur mistakes like getting emotional about an investment

>>60917758 (OP)
She saw the tech girlie webm and realized she didn't want to work. I dont blame her. Still riding with the standard though

>>60924987
Extensive training at the Success Factory, invaluable experience no doubt!

>>60924981
>reposting a collage means that it is being recreated every single time
ADEM.... WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO PEEL BACK THE LAYERS OF YOUR PORN IDENTITY
WHERE ARE YOUR WIFE AND KIDS, ADEM?

>>60918346
where did the original spammy poster go btw?
seems like he finally learned to lower his tone because it only took him 6 months to realize that everyone saw through his embarrassing pseud cope rants

>>60917758 (OP)
Now, do a list of people that left cushy government jobs to go work at scruple.

>She
Stopped reading there

>>60926500
>leaving one scam before they are caught for another
WoWoW

>>60926393
He still goes on link threads to fud. He tries to hide that it's him but he's still pretty easy to spot kek

>>60917758 (OP)
What, is enabling the staking pool every now and then to grift money off of link mouth breathing retards not good enough for her? Yikes.