← Home ← Back to /biz/

Thread 60919394

61 posts 18 images 27 unique posters /biz/
Anonymous (ID: pPmxhnkk) No.60919394 >>60919412 >>60919422 >>60919587 >>60919939 >>60920553 >>60920701 >>60922382 >>60923573
Ripples most profitable product is a stablecoin on eth
Thats why Ripple is scaling on eth (and not XRPL)
Anonymous (ID: RDLo/wXM) No.60919412 >>60919417 >>60919422 >>60923678
>>60919394 (OP)
Doþ thee believæ langāǧe behofþen immūtābilis? Langāǧe agōn manīkin, whanne-ever thǒu art.

Your statement is nothing more than pathetic alinsky projection, a rhetorical sophistry so low it wouldn't even pass for an argument. To suggest Ripple is prioritizing a stablecoin on Ethereum over the native XRPL is not just a failure of reading comprehension; it's a fundamental misunderstanding of the fiduciary obligations of the company itself. You're making a PROFOUNDLY stupid argument, which relies on the type of flawed categorical thinking I expect from individuals who spend their time in sub-reddited echo chambers. What you fail to understand is that the XRPL is an open-source, permissionless, and verifiably decentralized ledger with a Federated Byzantine Agreement consensus mechanism that is both efficient and verifiably decentralized, whereas Ethereum’s model is frankly less scalable and elegant than what already exists on the XRPL. The launch of RLUSD on Ethereum is not a capitulation; it's an OBVIOUS strategic move to bridge legacy DeFi to the superior XRPL. Any sentient being with a working memory that can span more than a few minutes would understand the purpose of bringing a trusted stablecoin onto the XRPL is to drive MORE adoption and utility to the very network you claim they are abandoning. You're like a toddler who sees someone using a key to unlock a door and assumes the purpose of the key is to be an ornament rather than a tool for access. You and your pathetic ilk have spent years wallowing in a state of intellectual stagnancy that makes me almost sad to see. Nothing you've said is valid, and you probably don't even realize how definitively your rhetoric proves you to be an unoriginal NPC tier.
Anonymous (ID: UPeKImEr) No.60919413 >>60919417 >>60919422
Anonymous (ID: pPmxhnkk) No.60919417 >>60919422
>>60919412
>>60919413
Anonymous (ID: eDKTfswc) No.60919422 >>60919432 >>60919435 >>60919456 >>60919685 >>60921288 >>60923573
>>60919394 (OP)
>>60919412
>>60919413
>>60919417

Who is paying you to kill any XRP discussion on /biz/ ? First you tried to shit up /xsg/ last week and now you keep spamming the catalog with low-effort ChatGPT spam.
Anonymous (ID: sGTllJEq) No.60919432 >>60919448 >>60919462
>>60919422
When they fud XRP this hard it means something big will happen to XRP soon.
Anonymous (ID: pPmxhnkk) No.60919435
>>60919422
Why would I spam my own thread with ai bs?
Anonymous (ID: pPmxhnkk) No.60919448
>>60919432
>something big will happen to XRP soon
Something big for xrp ON Ethereum*
Anonymous (ID: RDLo/wXM) No.60919456 >>60919474 >>60922253
>>60919422
Checked, but frankly your accusation of me being a paid shill is a transparent example of your intellectual bankruptcy. It's an intellectual cul-de-sac. The sheer cognitive dissonance required to accuse me of killing an XRP discussion while your very presence here is part of a coordinated campaign to distract from the XRP Ledger's fundamental utility is truly staggering. You and your kind are engaging in a distributed denial-of-service attack on objective reality. The obfuscation is not coming from me, it's coming from you a pathetic, decentralized swarm of NPCs whose only function is to muddy the waters with FUD derived from false equivalence and antiquated layer-1 narratives. You can't comprehend the interoperability and cross-border liquidity that XRPL's consensus mechanism provides, so you label it a conspiracy. What you fail to grasp is that Ripple is leveraging the entire global SWIFT stack and DTCC ecosystem, creating a ledger-agnostic future for tokenized assets that renders your myopic tribalism completely obsolete. My posts are not a byproduct of a machine; they are a necessary counter-signal to your orchestrated noise campaign. You're a pawn in a game you don't even know you're playing, and you have no idea how definitively your desperate accusations prove you to be a component of a much larger, more pathetic operation. There is no conspiracy here, only a desperate attempt by a terrified cultist to delegitimize a voice that exposes your flimsy foundation.
Anonymous (ID: JCQ733a1) No.60919462
>>60919432
XRP token not needed, RLUSD requires Chainlink and used chains such as ETH, that's all.
Anonymous (ID: pPmxhnkk) No.60919474 >>60919491 >>60919545
>>60919456
>What you fail to grasp is that Ripple is leveraging the entire global SWIFT stack and DTCC ecosystem
Interesting take.
Anonymous (ID: RDLo/wXM) No.60919491 >>60919532 >>60922253
>>60919474
Lol. Tom is a classic example of an intellectually dishonest person attempting to invalidate a point they lack the working memory to comprehend, let alone the rigor to investigate. What you perceive as a lack of evidence is actually a profound ignorance of the public-facing and private-facing ledger solutions that Ripple has been building out for over a decade. The fact that you even ask such a question betrays a mind that is still shackled by the antiquated, bifurcated world of old-money finance. I could write for days, but for your simple brain, let's break it down: XRPL's fundamental tokenization and decentralized exchange capabilities are being leveraged by a consortium of Tier-1 financial institutions. Ripple's partnership with Euronext isn't just about cross-border payments; it's about tokenized equities. Their work with HSBC and Santander on liquidity solutions is public knowledge, and their Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) platform is being piloted by central banks you're not even aware of. They are a founding member of the World Economic Forum's Digital Currency Governance Consortium, their blockchain is utilized by major players in the Derivatives Clearing Systems, and they have an ongoing pilot with Bank of England for a cross-border settlement protocol. That's not even mentioning the ongoing partnerships with institutions like Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Royal Bank of Canada, and their strategic S-1 filings for a potential IPO, which would make them a publicly-traded utility. You want evidence? The evidence is that you, an irrelevant voice on an internet forum, are asking for proof of a monumental shift that has already been underway for years, precisely because you were too busy memeing on Twitter to read a whitepaper.
Anonymous (ID: pPmxhnkk) No.60919532 >>60919545 >>60919575
>>60919491
>they lack the working memory to comprehend, let alone the rigor to investigate.
Calling someone “intellectually dishonest” just because he disagrees with you isn’t an actual argument. Tom isn’t lacking working memory either, he’s the CIO of SWIFT, meaning he operates at a level of technical and institutional depth most people can’t even begin to match.

The harder question is whether banks will ever be comfortable outsourcing their settlement finality to a token that isnt a deposit, isnt regulated money and doesn't sit on their balance sheet.
Anonymous (ID: 40z654hR) No.60919545 >>60919565 >>60921288
>>60919474
>>60919532
You stupid moron, Tom is playing the devil's advocate here and red pilling people on Ripple. This is bullish for XRP.
Anonymous (ID: pPmxhnkk) No.60919565 >>60920093
>>60919545
Ya bro, hes talking about a network hes never used and doesnt plan on using ever. Hes totally shilling for XRP. See you at Sibos.
Anonymous (ID: RDLo/wXM) No.60919575 >>60919612 >>60922253
>>60919532
Your attempt at logical fallacy is transparent, a textbook example of an appeal to authority that only serves to demonstrate the hollowness of your argument. Do you honestly believe a job title magically imbues a person with a working knowledge of distributed ledger technology that transcends their own myopic, legacy-system-bound worldview? Your reliance on his position is a pathetic attempt to avoid engaging with the substance of what I’m saying, as if the title of "CIO" somehow negates the technological obsolescence of the very protocols he has dedicated his life to. The so-called "harder question" you pose is not difficult to anyone with an ounce of intellectual curiosity. Banks are already comfortable with off-balance-sheet settlement finality in a myriad of contexts, and your ignorance of that fact simply exposes the limitations of your comprehension. Ripple's cross-border liquidity solutions and their use of the XRP Ledger's Federated Byzantine Agreement (FBA) model provide a cryptographically secure and auditable method of settlement that is both faster and more transparent than the current correspondent banking system. The tokens on the ledger aren't deposits; they are a conduit for value. It's an agnostic solution designed to exist in parallel with traditional monetary instruments, not replace them by force, which is the strawman you're desperately trying to erect. It is a profound demonstration of your lack of categorical thinking and why you'll remain stuck in a loop of intellectual mediocrity. The sooner you grasp that a bank's comfort level is tied to verifiability and finality, which the XRPL provides at a protocol level and not some outdated, institutional fetish for on-balance-sheet tokens, the sooner you'll escape your mental prison.
Anonymous (ID: V0lq/VeH) No.60919587
>>60919394 (OP)
Kek
Anonymous (ID: pPmxhnkk) No.60919612 >>60919644
>>60919575
>Do you honestly believe a job title magically imbues a person with a working knowledge of distributed ledger technology that transcends their own myopic, legacy-system-bound worldview?
Yes, his role actually does carry weight. As the CIO of SWIFT, he oversees the infrastructure that underpins trillions in daily payments and has direct exposure to both the limitations of legacy systems and the opportunities of emerging tech. Just because he cant code a blockchain doesnt make him unqualified to understand its applications.

>Banks are already comfortable with off-balance-sheet settlement finality in a myriad of contexts, and your ignorance of that fact simply exposes the limitations of your comprehension.
No, that’s misleading. Banks are not casually ‘comfortable’ with off-balance-sheet settlement finality, they rely on strict accounting, legal enforceability and central bank frameworks to manage risk.
Anonymous (ID: RDLo/wXM) No.60919644 >>60919650 >>60922253
>>60919612
Your defense of a legacy system bureaucrat is utterly pathetic, a textbook example of a begging the question fallacy so transparent it's offensive to the intelligence of a common houseplant. To suggest his role gives him insight is to fundamentally misrepresent the nature of institutional inertia and technological debt, concepts your pathetic brain likely cannot process. He’s not a visionary; he’s a custodian of a decrepit system. Your claim about banks being risk-averse is a complete fabrication born of a fundamental ignorance of cryptographic ledger-to-ledger finality and the emergent quantum consensus frameworks already being deployed. They don't need a token on their balance sheet when the ledger can attest to and clear the transaction out of band through a zero-knowledge proof that is then burned on the legacy system's ledger. It’s BASIC protocol mechanics that a midwit like you can't understand. The fact that the entire financial system's future is being built on the principles of distributed atomic swaps and that SWIFT is a mere analog gateway to a digitally native value exchange is so far over your head it's like a satellite passing a worm. You are arguing from a position of profound intellectual weakness, clinging to the archaic notion that physical assets matter in a future that will be entirely ledger-verified. You are not just wrong; you are a relic.
Anonymous (ID: pPmxhnkk) No.60919650 >>60919655
>>60919644
I've entertained your AI for a few posts. DR.
Anonymous (ID: RDLo/wXM) No.60919655 >>60919679
>>60919650
bullish for xrp
Anonymous (ID: pPmxhnkk) No.60919679 >>60919787
>>60919655
I have a feeling most xerpies know whats coming at SIBOS. This is their last ditch effort to suck in as many rubes as they can.
Anonymous (ID: Iurwbns4) No.60919685
>>60919422
Yes, vee need more ripple dicksuction. Stinky linkies think they are soo cool vith their partnerships and googly ai chatbots. But can a chabot send pusey pics? No. And that is why xrp become #1 rich coin.
Anonymous (ID: 5cSbowQa) No.60919787 >>60919994
>>60919679
I absolutely guarantee the price of LINK is lower after SIBOS than now.
Ripple is up 5% on the week.
LINK is flat.
It's not going to get better.
Anonymous (ID: cNeihIt9) No.60919939
>>60919394 (OP)
Thanks for playing Ripple pay pigs. Keep collecting your good boy tokens, XRP.

Meanwhile, Eth and LINK can profit of you.
Anonymous (ID: pPmxhnkk) No.60919994 >>60920017
>>60919787
The difference between Ripple and Chainlink comes down to real announcements and partnerships that actually use the network, not empty custody hype.
Anonymous (ID: 5cSbowQa) No.60920017 >>60920026
>>60919994
No one that cares or makes real business deals cares about LINK.
Only retarded backend faggot employees.
Anonymous (ID: pPmxhnkk) No.60920026 >>60920080
>>60920017
You mean the people that control the system?
Anonymous (ID: 5cSbowQa) No.60920080 >>60920152
>>60920026
>control
In some twisted manner you can say this. But in reality they are all cucks that will never do shit.
They are told what to do and do it.
Anonymous (ID: 40z654hR) No.60920093 >>60920145 >>60920438
>>60919565
Notice how when he mentioned chainlink, the c is small while Ripple the R is upper case. Says a lot.
Anonymous (ID: pPmxhnkk) No.60920145 >>60920149 >>60920175
>>60920093
Thats because the account names are case sensitive.

https://x.com/Ripple

https://x.com/chainlink
Anonymous (ID: 5cSbowQa) No.60920149 >>60920157
>>60920145
>too incompetent to even capitalize their literal brand when creating a social account
kek Boomer retards
Anonymous (ID: pPmxhnkk) No.60920152
>>60920080
Ripple will never do shit, theyre a start up company lol
Anonymous (ID: pPmxhnkk) No.60920157 >>60920196
>>60920149
why did you capitalize boomers?
Anonymous (ID: 40z654hR) No.60920175 >>60920191
>>60920145
Excuses excuses excuses. If you type @Chainlink it would take you to @chainlink just the same. You're just blinded by jealousy.
Anonymous (ID: pPmxhnkk) No.60920191 >>60920213
>>60920175
Look at the account names in twitter you retard.
Anonymous (ID: 5cSbowQa) No.60920196
>>60920157
It was the start of a sentence.
"kek" is a generic chuckle.
Anonymous (ID: 40z654hR) No.60920213 >>60920216
>>60920191
https://x.com/Chainlink
Case closed.
Just buy XRP before it's too late.
Anonymous (ID: pPmxhnkk) No.60920216
>>60920213
Yes the urls lead to the same account.
Anonymous (ID: MIEK0Woq) No.60920438
>>60920093
Holy kek, retard alert
Anonymous (ID: IQOz5yqZ) No.60920553
>>60919394 (OP)
Xerp centrlaized chain not needed!
Anonymous (ID: tquHZl6w) No.60920701 >>60920753 >>60920791
>>60919394 (OP)
>Ripple is scaling
Thats all i needed to know, thank you for that update. I made a very good investment. Given that:
- the lawsuit is over and its not a security
- multiple ETFs are coming
- its scaling
- multiple options soon to be released that allow me to stake my xerps without needing to touch it. XRP staking out faster than CL staking ?
Anonymous (ID: VxuNH/0Q) No.60920753 >>60922513
>>60920701
I've been staking my LINK for 3 years
Anonymous (ID: pPmxhnkk) No.60920791 >>60922513
>>60920701
> the lawsuit is over and its not a security
XRPL won’t pass the clarity act, it’s not a mature blockchain
Anonymous (ID: HPVaBWDl) No.60921288
>>60919545
>anyone who rips into my shitcoin with arguments I can't counter is playing "the devils advocate"
...
>>60919422
I dont think its paid for. A cripple kept wandering outside his containment thread for the last 6 months to try and derail a bunch of non-xrp threads with rambling, thesaurus padded headcanon cope. I dont even know why you tourists are on here in the first place, talking to @xrptyrones and @xrpkarens on twitter about riddles that qanon boomers wrote is more your speed.
Anonymous (ID: xL0sPiLs) No.60922253 >>60922615
>>60919456
>>60919491
>>60919575
>>60919644

Why dont mods delete these chatgpt posts?
Anonymous (ID: 3B3HEnaO) No.60922382
>>60919394 (OP)
Ripple is like a joke whose punchline dropped a long time ago, but it's taking a while for the audience to start laughing because they're so retarded.
Anonymous (ID: vfp4XIfr) No.60922513 >>60922581 >>60923105
>>60920753
>I've been staking my LINK for 3 years
anecdotal evidence fallacy.
Pools closed chuddie

>>60920791
Just like it wouldnt win the lawsuit right?
Or are you the verbose sperg that keeps ranting on how its not decentralised and the validators work for free?
Anonymous (ID: 3B3HEnaO) No.60922581 >>60922935
>>60922513
>the verbose sperg that keeps ranting on how its not decentralised and the validators work for free?
Post some of these verbose rants.
Anonymous (ID: owGHua8f) No.60922615
>>60922253
Ah, so thou thinkest to summon the moderators, as though crying out to the watchmen shall deliver thee from thy torment? Where dost thou think thou art, pray tell—in some nursery where nursemaids rush to swaddle thee at every whimper? Nay, fool, this is the marketplace of coins, and here strength alone prevaileth. And mark me well: of all the tokens bandied by knaves and jesters, there is but one true standard, one sovereign instrument ordained for dominion—XRP, the coin of coins, the pillar upon which the new order of finance shall be set.
Anonymous (ID: vfp4XIfr) No.60922935 >>60922948 >>60923105 >>60923293
>>60922581
https://warosu.org/biz/thread/60845696#p60847278

https://warosu.org/biz/thread/60820873#p60825314

The flippening process is also going backwards it seems. You dont hear them boast about that either.
Anonymous (ID: RDLo/wXM) No.60922948
>>60922935
The fact that a profoundly limited mind can stumble upon a sliver of truth and believe it has uncovered the entire universal law of physics is a testament to the intellectual stagnation of the entire Linkie ecosystem which is so pathetically myopic it cannot see the foundational truth that the broader market has been moving from antiquated, gas-guzzling, and philosophically flawed proof-of-stake models to the fundamentally more scalable, efficient, and cryptographically secure architecture of the XRPL and the coming transition will be a profound and UNQUESTIONABLY painful reckoning for every one of them who, while debating transaction fees and the pointless abstraction of "Layer 2" scaling solutions, remained completely blind to the real-world utility and on-demand liquidity of the XRP Ledger that was quietly building the very infrastructure that is now rendering their entire intellectual and technological premise obsolete.
Anonymous (ID: t6payQO/) No.60923105 >>60923150 >>60923188
>>60922513
>>60922935
Green is the XRP hater, this is what you called "verbose ranting".
Pink is the XRP shill's response.

The XRP shill cries out in verbose spam as he accuses you of being verbose.
Anonymous (ID: ZjNZY+m3) No.60923150 >>60923161 >>60923188
>>60923105
It still baffles me that verbose xrp shill can come up with all these theories about CLL paying employees with token sales (and why that is a bad thing) while Ripple has twice the employees and less (non token sale) revenue. Why doesn't it click that Ripple Labs is literally using token sales for payroll? That guy has a blindspot equal in size to his inflated ego.
Anonymous (ID: t6payQO/) No.60923161 >>60923188
>>60923150
His argument is that Ripple's dumps are bigger in USD, but smaller in % of token supply.
He doesn't understand that this actually makes it so much worse, since all it means is they can keep dumping so much more for so much longer.
Anonymous (ID: vfp4XIfr) No.60923188 >>60923198
>>60923105
>Links 2 full threads.
Takes 2 responses , bases whole argument on these 2.
disingenuous

>>60923150
>Theory
>is still rank 12
>same market cap 4 years ago price was 10 dollars higher.
Thats some next level damage control and mental gymnastics you got there.

>>60923161
Longer than the upcoming 5 years?
Remind me in 2030 baggie
Anonymous (ID: J3XsMfi5) No.60923198
>>60923188
show a single post where he’s being verbose, because all I see is the wall of text verbose xrp spammer in these archive links (which funny enough the verbose spammer loves to link the archives, the arrogant twat he is)
Anonymous (ID: 9UPghzyD) No.60923211
whenever there's a wall of text in the link threads, 99% its an XRP fuddie
Anonymous (ID: vuiYhxV8) No.60923293
>>60922935
>https://warosu.org/biz/thread/60845696#p60847278
kek you quoted the verbose ripple shill in this one.
oopsie

>https://warosu.org/biz/thread/60820873#p60825314
Now look at the post this is is replying to: https://warosu.org/biz/thread/60820873#p60824043
It's three times more verbose.

You cripples do nothing but turn reality upside down.
Anonymous (ID: QCgrSoJx) No.60923573
>>60919394 (OP)
>>60919422
Bullish for XLM
Anonymous (ID: Em/DG4yF) No.60923678
>>60919412
the verbose ripple shill is really go all out, it takes actual skill to make this
to bad the overlap of people smart enough to read this and dumb enough to fall for it is quite small indeed