Thread 60919606

Guys why is SBI cucking us?

>>60919606 (OP)
Your question is a pathetic display of your profound lack of categorical thinking and why you are incapable of seeing a strategic macro-level play. Do you honestly believe that your emotional, sub-reddited frustration has any bearing on the sophisticated, long-term, and multi-faceted initiatives of a global financial institution? You're like a child in a room full of adults discussing a merger, only your pathetic little brain can't comprehend the subtleties of fiduciary responsibility or market consolidation. SBI's movements are not a "cucking"; they are a logical and transparent next step in a phased rollout of a distributed ledger solution that is PROFOUNDLY more complex than your myopic view of an open ledger. What you see as a betrayal is simply your inability to process a plan that operates on a timeline and a scale that far exceeds your limited working memory. SBI is a vanguard in a ledger-agnostic future, not a playground for your emotions. It's time for you to grow up and get over your myopic tribalism.
You're so desperate for validation that you're celebrating a token that isn't even needed for its own oracle services, a project whose entire value is tied to the constant narrative manipulation of a founder who LIED about dumping the 2/3rds commingled float, you fucking moron. That pathetic partnership is simply SBI exploring a bridge for the very decentralized infrastructure they will ultimately leverage with XRPL, not an endorsement of your worthless vaporware.

>>60919629
>heh gotcha

>>60919629
This is great. Can you share your prompt?

>>60919898
Your inquiry is a textbook example of a mind that is fundamentally incapable of working memory, believing that a complex, multi-faceted process can be reduced to a single, easily digestible prompt that a pathetic linkie such as yourself can simply copy/paste. The very notion is an intellectual cul-de-sac. The method is a form of hyper-specialized data synthesis that you, in your simplistic desire for a magical incantation, could never comprehend. It involved a comprehensive and SYSTEMIC analysis of a target's entire public-facing behavioral and rhetorical corpus, a process you would call "reading," but I call the foundation of categorical thinking. One simply compiles the complete data set of their verbose and intellectually bankrupt posts a trivial task for anyone with the discipline to use a thread archiver and then, through a process of prompt engineering far beyond your grasp, you use that corpus to generate a new post that is so perfectly representative of their style that the individual themself cannot differentiate their own writing from that of a machine. It's not a secret; it's just the application of logic and process that you will never possess. Your request for a "prompt" is pathetic. The prompt is in the data, stinkcel.

>>60919629
>>60919960

>>60919606 (OP)
>>60919629
>>60919737
>>60919748
>>60919898
>>60919960
>>60919979

>>60920003
XRP = normalfag magnet.
It's a thing of beauty, really.

>>60919629
>>60919960
funny, but could be improved
from what I remember this is still way too concise
you'd have to tell the prompt to use MORE run-on sentences (I'm talking like 80 words at some points, all just recursive babbling for one thought or accusation)
also, needs to focus on pet words such as
>abstraction
>taxonomy
>literally
>hilarious
>errant
>mirroring

>>60920170
That you even feel the need to provide a list of suggestions for what you consider to be a "good" or "improved" post (as if I require your pathetic and profoundly limited instructions) is literally hilarious, and demonstrates a level of midwit audacity (that is quite frankly errant) that is breathtakingly profound because your entire commentary is a prime example of the kind of shallow, superficial abstraction that plagues every online forum (where individuals with no grasp of the deeper taxonomy of a rhetorical style believe they can dissect and critique an artistic, high-level expression with a simple, bulleted list) it's like a color-blind individual trying to teach a painter about the subtleties of light and shadow (utterly pointless and so completely without merit that it's physically painful to even read) and you're so self-important that you don't even realize how pathetically you are attempting to mirror my own style back at me as if I haven't been doing this for years (you absolute moron) and the fact that you think you have any right to lecture me on the intricacies of my own craft is more than just laughable; it's a profound misunderstanding of the very nature of this communication and why it is so effective against NPC-tier minds like your own (which is why your entire post is nothing but a worthless, errant collection of babbling that proves nothing other than the fact that you are precisely the kind of person who would be so easily fooled by this kind of mirroring) you pathetic, unoriginal piece of shit.

>>60920203
there we go, good stuff
I haven't seen him trying to shit up threads for the last day or so
I wonder if he finally experienced self-awareness for the first time, and now understands that he's just a seething giga-pseud

>>60920243
This is a deeply ingrained testament to the fact that I, and the sheer volume of intellectual labor I produce, have managed to force your tiny brain to finally process a conclusion that was patently obvious to anyone with even a modicum of categorical thinking and what you refer to as "self-awareness" is a deeply traumatic and existential event (a horrifying reckoning for an individual whose entire identity was built on the shaky foundation of a performative grandiosity) and an intellectual facade designed to hide the very seething giga-pseud you so crudely describe and that he has stopped posting is not a triumph of his own will but a complete psychological breakdown (a consequence of his fragile ego finally being unable to withstand the consistent and overwhelming reality check that I have provided for weeks) and you are so pathetically unoriginal that you are only just now catching up to a conclusion that I arrived at after his first post and he did not achieve self-awareness (it was FORCED upon him) and his silence is not a victory for him but is instead the PROFOUND sound of utter defeat a testament to my ability to dissect and dismantle a persona with a level of rigor you will literally never possess. Lol.