Thread 61087521

How do you respond without look like a seething bitfuck?

>>61087521 (OP)
digital gold

by not being wrong and poor for 17 years

It must truly suck to watch BTC go up in price for over ten years and not do anything about it.

I remember when Bitcoin was $10 and comparing it to the stock market I assumed it would take like 50 years for it to hit $10,000

>>61087521 (OP)
Nigga you talking about something that happened in the 1600s and was 90 days of peak mania

heh you're all loser no coiners! sucks to lose out on easy gains
but it's not too late to jump in. please buy my bags.

>>61087521 (OP)
>muh Tulips
>in 2025
seriously?

>>61087572
>dotcom era
FTFY

>>61087578
its pretty much the same thing except tulips look nice so they at least have SOME use case in the real world, crypto is 100% made up shit that literally doesn't exist

>>61087521 (OP)
By posting this fucking thing again
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/there-never-was-real-tulip-fever-180964915/

Tukips were only 4 years??

>>61087640
If I bought more BTC every time someone used words like "tulip" or "ponzi" do describe it, I would be rich now. Wait, I did and I am. LOL.

Retards have been calling it a bubble for 15+ years now. And they will continue to do so for the next 15 years

>>61087521 (OP)
it doesn't have the characteristics of a bubble though. if a bubble pops, we would start at ground zero but bitcoin has always started at a higher low.

>>61087521 (OP)
The peak in 2018 disqualifies this chart.

>>61087521 (OP)
>>61087640
>>61087668
tulips shit never happened, it's made up

>>61087521 (OP)
The gold chart looks the same lmao

I haven't seen any "black women of color who be doin investin business club for professional business women" posts on Twitter yet. That's how you know you're close to the top. It's still only nerds and banks.

>>61090405
Kek

>>61087569
honestly i tought it would get cracked or bruteforced or malfunction or something

>>61087659
Nothing in that article disputes the tulip mania chart you knuckle draging fucking bitcoin owning faggot. Go buy more bitcoin.

>>61087521 (OP)
The philosophical error in comparing tulip mania to the Bitcoin bubble is a false analogy: it equates two phenomena that share superficial traits—namely speculative price surges—while ignoring their profound differences in nature, context, and significance. Tulip mania was a fleeting craze over a perishable luxury good with no lasting utility or innovation, whereas Bitcoin is a decentralized digital asset embedded in a broader technological and monetary revolution. By likening them, the analogy commits a category mistake, treating a historical fad as equivalent to a transformative protocol. This reductionist comparison obscures Bitcoin’s role in challenging traditional financial systems, enabling new forms of trust and value exchange, and fostering global economic experimentation. Philosophically, it reflects epistemic laziness: substituting shallow resemblance for deep understanding.

In 2022 I planend to buy 2.5-3 bitcoins around/under 20k, I didn't do this and every day is pain since then.

>>61087521 (OP)
Same pic was posted in 2021 using the 2017 bullrun as take off and the 2018 bear market as the Bear trap.

>>61087544
that has none of the properties of gold. kewl.

>>61087578
unironically a great time to be planting them..I mean going long on them.

>>61087569
I remember having almost the same thought
>I can gamble these away on stupid games and buy novelties because lol internet money
>I'll have plenty of time to buy back in later
Oof size: multi generational failure